T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
T.C. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/16404)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 5\/6\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa \u015eENOCAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na veya sorgulat\u0131lmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. K\u0131rklareli Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 2\/8\/2018 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015f; iddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname ile kapat\u0131lan kurumda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131na uygun olarak Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 Anonim \u015eirketinde (Bank Asya) hesap hareketleri olmas\u0131, tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re asker\u00ee mahrem yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev almas\u0131 ve kod ad\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 suretiyle \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, K\u0131rklareli 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lamada 4\/9\/2018 tarihinde duru\u015fma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra K\u0131rklareli \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ByLock program\u0131 kullan\u0131p kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusundaki t\u00fcm bilgi, belge, yaz\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7erikleri ve analiz raporlar\u0131 ile Bank Asya hesap hareketlerinin istenmesine, tan\u0131klar O.\u00d6., M.\u00c7., \u00dc.C., A.A. ve A.S.nin istinabe yoluyla dinlenilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Duru\u015fma be\u015f celsede bitirilmi\u015ftir. Birinci celsede K\u0131rklareli \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki ByLock tespiti ile ilgili yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkereye verdi\u011fi cevapta san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin evrak mahkemeye sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Yine ayn\u0131 celsede tan\u0131klar O.\u00d6., M.\u00c7., \u00dc.C., A.A.n\u0131n bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan talimatlara ikmalen cevap verilmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k O.\u00d6. istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ile 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yakla\u015f\u0131k bir y\u0131l boyunca ba\u015fvurucunun organize etti\u011fi, sohbet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen toplant\u0131lara kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun abilik g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucuya himmet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para verdi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k M.\u00c7. beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Tan\u0131k \u00dc.C. beyan\u0131n\u0131n da ba\u015fvurucu ile 2013-2015 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Babaeski’de g\u00f6rev yaparken kendisi ile ilgilenip abilik g\u00f6revi yapan \u015fahs\u0131n askere giderken ba\u015fvurucu ile kendisini tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun bir y\u0131l boyunca kendisi gibi asker olan O. ve A. ile birlikte abilik g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k A.A. ise beyan\u0131nda sohbet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen toplant\u0131lara k\u0131sa bir d\u00f6nem ba\u015fvurucu ile birlikte kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. \u0130kinci celsede ba\u015fvurucunun Bank Asya hesap hareketlerine ili\u015fkin 3\/5\/2019 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporu mahkemeye sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; m\u00fcdafiinin de haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu 28\/6\/2019 tarihli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc celsede al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda i\u015fyerinden dolay\u0131 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda Bank Asyada hesap a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve birikimlerini bu Bankada de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fini, tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerini kabul etmedi\u011fini, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flemedi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Be\u015finci celsede Mahkeme, san\u0131ktan ele ge\u00e7irilen dijital materyallere ili\u015fkin inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ara karar\u0131ndan yarg\u0131lamaya bir yenilik katmayaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle vazge\u00e7me y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar vermi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 celsede tan\u0131k A.S.nin istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nan beyan\u0131 okunmu\u015ftur. Tan\u0131k, beyan\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct ile ilk defa 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonras\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ger\u00e7ek y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc anlay\u0131nca \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda Babaeski’ye atand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kendisini arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini y\u00fcz\u00fcne s\u00f6ylemek i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucu ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7indeki konumunu bilmedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Daha sonra iddia makam\u0131, esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaa sunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu celsede esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015f; \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlayarak isnat edilen su\u00e7u ink\u00e2r etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii ise \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fini, \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine, olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde lehine olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmas\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Mahkeme, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015farak ba\u015fvurucunun 6 y\u0131l 10 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 (Bank Asya) hesab\u0131nda, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131 Aral\u0131k ay\u0131nda 0,00-TL oldu\u011fu, 2014 Ocak ay\u0131nda 69.000,00- TL’ye \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup hesab\u0131ndaki belli d\u00f6nemde ki art\u0131\u015f\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lideri Fetullah G\u00dcLEN’in talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn finans kaynaklar\u0131ndan olan Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flem hacmini, spek\u00fclatif olarak art\u0131rarak zarar etmesini engellemek amac\u0131 ile \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda ve \u00f6rg\u00fct lehine yap\u0131lan \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc bir eylem olarak san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fine kanaat getirilmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn gizlili\u011fe \u00f6nem veren, hassas yap\u0131lara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 se\u00e7ici ve dikkatli davranan bir \u00f6rg\u00fct oldu\u011fu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct ile irtibat\u0131 veya iltisak\u0131 bulunan \u015firketlerinde ortak olacak kimsenin de \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan dikkat ve \u00f6zenle se\u00e7ilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct ile irtibatl\u0131 veya iltisakl\u0131 olmas\u0131 sebebiyle FET\u00d6\/PDY Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile irtibatl\u0131 veya iltisakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit edilen \u0130stanbul \u0130linde [A.] Dershanelerinde 2008 y\u0131l\u0131 ile 2014 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda tayin atama sistemine tabii bir \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, 2014 ve 2015 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda L\u00fcleburgaz \u0130l\u00e7esinde bulunan[G.] A.\u015e’ye ba\u011fl\u0131 [F.] Dershanesinde dershane \u00f6\u011fretmeni olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 di\u011fer delillerle birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kabul a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli bir kanaate vard\u0131racak bir olgu olarak de\u011ferlendirmek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ‘K\u00fcr\u015fat’ kod ad\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, sohbet verdi\u011fi ve himmet toplad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin yukar\u0131da belirtilen aleyhine bulunan tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu kanaati hakimler kurulumuzca kabul g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
… su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bi\u00e7imi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kasta dayal\u0131 kusurunun a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ama\u00e7 ve saiki ve meydana gelen tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK.nun 314\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015farak takdiren ve te\u015fdiden 5 (be\u015f) y\u0131l 6 (alt\u0131) ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7un 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanununun 3. maddesinde belirtilen ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan olmas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131\u011fa verilen cezan\u0131n, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunun 5’inci maddesi uyar\u0131nca yar\u0131s\u0131 (1\/2’si) oran\u0131nda art\u0131r\u0131larak, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 7 (yedi) y\u0131l 15 (on be\u015f) ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n
TCK madde 62 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme;<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 ve fiilden sonraki tutumu de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olumsuz bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda [TCK’n\u0131n] 62. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckmolunan cezadan 1\/6 oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi vicdani kanaati ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda neticeten 6 (alt\u0131) y\u0131l 10 (on) ay 15 (onbe\u015f) g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131 vicdani kanaat ve inanc\u0131na var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu, istinaf ve temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinde di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenilmedi\u011fini, Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sistemi (SEGB\u0130S) ile ba\u011flant\u0131 kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soru sorma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. H\u00fck\u00fcm, kanun yolu denetiminden ge\u00e7erek 12\/11\/2020 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu 8\/6\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
14. Komisyon; ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki bir k\u0131s\u0131m g\u00fcvencelere, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131na ve ya\u015fam hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu; gerek\u00e7eli kararda ifadelerine yer verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n huzurda dinlenilmesi i\u00e7in Mahkemenin giri\u015fimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine tan\u0131klara soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu suretle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; tan\u0131klar\u0131n istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fmada okundu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun bunlara kar\u015f\u0131 iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 dile getirdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin beyan\u0131nda genel olarak bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda tan\u0131k kavram\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen fiil hakk\u0131nda bilgi veren herhangi bir ki\u015fi \u015feklinde \u00f6zerk olarak yorumlam\u0131\u015f ve tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 ile ilgili ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir (Atila O\u011fuz Boyal\u0131, B. No: 2013\/99, 20\/3\/2014; Sel\u00e7uk Demir, B. No: 2014\/9783, 22\/1\/2015; AZ. M., B. No: 2013\/560, 16\/4\/2015; Baran Karada\u011f, B. No: 2014\/12906, 7\/5\/2015; Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, B. No: 2019\/30221, 28\/12\/2021). Buna g\u00f6re bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama ve sorgulatma hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131klara soru y\u00f6neltebilmesi, onlarla y\u00fczle\u015febilmesi ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu s\u0131nama imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gereklidir (AZ. M., \u00a7 55). Di\u011fer yandan bir mahk\u00fbmiyet -tek veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde- san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir kimse taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadelere dayand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesindeki g\u00fcvencelerle ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f olur (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
19. Anayasa Mahkemesi, tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131yla ilgili olarak verdi\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda somut bir yarg\u0131lama \u00f6ncesinde veya haricinde elde edilen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n delil olarak kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adilli\u011fine zarar verip vermedi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmek i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 a\u015famal\u0131 bir test uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade eder. Buna g\u00f6re ilk olarak tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemede haz\u0131r edilmemesi ge\u00e7erli bir nedenin mevcudiyetine dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130kinci olarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilen beyan\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek veya belirleyici delil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n tek veya belirleyici delil oldu\u011funun tespit edilmesi durumunda ise \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u015fama olarak savunma taraf\u0131n\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu olumsuzlu\u011fun telafi edilmesi amac\u0131yla yeterli d\u00fczeyde kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi ortaya konulmal\u0131d\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Abdurrahim Balur, B. No: 2013\/5467, 7\/1\/2016, \u00a7 80; Onur Urbay, B. No: 2014\/6222, 6\/3\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 36, 40; Zekeriya Sevim, B. No: 2018\/18989, 16\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 44, 51). Bu kapsamda h\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen ba\u015fka do\u011frulay\u0131c\u0131 delillere dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 telafi edici g\u00fcvencelerden biri olarak kabul edilebilir (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 39). Mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131klar\u0131n -san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da onlara soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak ve sorulan sorulara verdikleri cevaplar hakk\u0131nda ki\u015fisel izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edecek \u015fekilde- SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla dinlenmesi telafi edici bir g\u00fcvence olabilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte U\u011fur \u00d6zcan, B. No: 2021\/12137, 26\/7\/2022, \u00a7 40). Sorgulanmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin ve do\u011frulu\u011funun saptanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla savunma taraf\u0131na sa\u011flanabilecek bir di\u011fer telafi edici g\u00fcvence ise san\u0131\u011fa olay\u0131 kendi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda incelenmesi gereken ilk sorun, beyan\u0131 delil olarak kabul edilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenmemesinin ge\u00e7erli bir nedene dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Somut olayda Mahkeme, tan\u0131klar\u0131 huzurda dinlemeye ili\u015fkin herhangi bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6stermemi\u015ftir. Duru\u015fma Tutana\u011f\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli kararda da tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilememesinin veya ayn\u0131 anda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc ve sesli ileti\u015fim tekni\u011finin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle dinlenilmemesinin hangi ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermemi\u015ftir. Ancak buna ili\u015fkin ge\u00e7erli bir nedenin ortaya konulmamas\u0131 tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
21. \u0130kinci olarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn tek veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ba\u015fvurucunun sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadeye dayal\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Somut olayda Mahkeme; tan\u0131k O.\u00d6.n\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucu ile 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na, yakla\u015f\u0131k bir y\u0131l boyunca ba\u015fvurucunun organize etti\u011fi, sohbet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenledi\u011fi toplant\u0131lara kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucunun abilik g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na, kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucuya himmet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para verdi\u011fine, tan\u0131k \u00dc.C.nin ba\u015fvurucu ile 2013-2015 Babaeski’de g\u00f6rev yaparken kendisi ile ilgilenip abilik g\u00f6revi yapan \u015fahs\u0131n askere giderken ba\u015fvurucu ile kendisini tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucunun bir y\u0131l boyunca kendisi gibi asker olan O. ve A. ile birlikte abilik g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na, tan\u0131k A.A.n\u0131n sohbet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen toplant\u0131lara k\u0131sa bir d\u00f6nem ba\u015fvurucu ile birlikte kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucunun kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na, tan\u0131k A.S.nin \u00f6rg\u00fctle ilk defa 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na, daha sonras\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ger\u00e7ek y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc anlay\u0131nca \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda Babaeski’ye atand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kendisini arad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini y\u00fcz\u00fcne s\u00f6ylemek i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucu ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7indeki konumunu bilmedi\u011fine dair beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyete esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun Bank Asyadaki mutat olmayan hesap hareketlerine (2013 y\u0131l\u0131 Aral\u0131k ay\u0131nda hesab\u0131nda para yokken 2014 Ocak ay\u0131nda 69.000 TL oldu\u011fu) ve \u00f6rg\u00fct ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 kurumda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma kayd\u0131na dair hususlar\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirmek suretiyle isnat edilen su\u00e7un olu\u015ftu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. Gerek\u00e7eli karar i\u00e7eri\u011finden Mahkemenin – tan\u0131klar O.\u00d6., \u00dc.C., A.A. ve A.S.nin beyanlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda- Bank Asyadaki mutat olmayan hesap hareketleri ve FET\u00d6\/PDY ile iltisakl\u0131 dershanelerde tayin atama sistemine tabi \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin delillere dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda duru\u015fmada sorgulanamayan tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcren tek veya belirleyici nitelikte delil oldu\u011funu kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131klar O.\u00d6., \u00dc.C., A.A. ve A.S.nin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tek veya belirleyici delil olarak mahk\u00fbmiyette kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131yla ilgili uygulanan testin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u015famas\u0131yla ilgili bir inceleme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Kenan YA\u015eAR’\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
D. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 5\/6\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na veya sorgulat\u0131lmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015fyerinden dolay\u0131 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda Bank Asya\u2019da hesap a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve birikimlerini o bankada de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fi tespiti yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve tan\u0131klar O.\u00d6., M.\u00c7., \u00dc.C., A.A. ve A.S.\u2019nin istinabe yoluyla dinlenilmi\u015f ve yarg\u0131lama sonunda Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130stinaf ve temyiz a\u015famalar\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erek karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu; gerek\u00e7eli kararda ifadelerine yer verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n huzurda dinlenilmesi i\u00e7in Mahkemenin herhangi bir giri\u015fimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine tan\u0131klara soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu suretle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Mahkememiz ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirli\u011fine oybirli\u011fi ile, ihlal edilmedi\u011fine oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar vermi\u015ftir. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen sebeplerle ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine dair mahkeme \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun karar\u0131na i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda ceza yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama veya sorgulatma hakk\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131klara soru y\u00f6neltebilmesi, onlarla y\u00fczle\u015febilmesi ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu s\u0131nama imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gereklidir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma evresinde sorgulama ya da sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k ifadelerinin tek veya belirleyici oldu\u011fu bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda \u015fayet dengeleyici g\u00fcvencelerden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 durumunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesindeki g\u00fcvencelerle ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f olur.<\/p>\n
6. Mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131klar\u0131n -san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da onlara soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak ve sorulan sorulara verdikleri cevaplar hakk\u0131nda izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edecek \u015fekilde- SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla dinlenmesi telafi edici bir g\u00fcvence olabilir (Metin Akdemir (2), B. No: 2020\/3964, 21\/9\/2022 \u00a7 36). Sorgulanmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin ve do\u011frulu\u011funun saptanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla savunma taraf\u0131na sa\u011flanabilecek bir di\u011fer telafi edici g\u00fcvence ise san\u0131\u011fa olay\u0131 kendi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun aleyhinde beyanda bulunan tan\u0131klar\u0131n istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nan ifadeleri duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015f ancak tan\u0131klar\u0131n huzurda dinlenilmesine ili\u015fkin olarak Mahkemece herhangi bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. \u0130lgili duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli kararda tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilememesinin veya ayn\u0131 anda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc ve sesli ileti\u015fim tekni\u011finin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle dinlenilmemesinin hangi ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Mahkeme, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Bank Asya\u2019daki mutat olmayan hesap hareketlerine (2013 y\u0131l\u0131 aral\u0131k ay\u0131nda 0,00-TL oldu\u011fu, 2014 Ocak ay\u0131nda 69.000,00- TL’ye \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131), \u00f6rg\u00fct ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 kurumda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma kayd\u0131na ve tan\u0131klar O.\u00d6., \u00dc.C., A.A. ve A.S.\u2019nin beyanlar\u0131na istinaden mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Yarg\u0131tay uygulamas\u0131na g\u00f6re ki\u015filerin Bank Asya nezdindeki mutat bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemleri \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet veya \u00f6rg\u00fcte yard\u0131m olarak kabul edilmemektedir [(Kapat\u0131lan)16. Ceza Dairesinin 5\/3\/2019 tarihli ve E.2018\/6408, K.2019\/1447; 2\/3\/2021 tarihli ve E.2019\/5505, K.2021\/1793 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131].<\/p>\n
10. Gerek\u00e7eli karar i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucunun Bank Asya nezdindeki mutat olmayan bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemlerinin tek ba\u015f\u0131na ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin Yarg\u0131tay uygulamas\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda istinabe yoluyla dinlenen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kanaatin olu\u015fmas\u0131nda ve temel cezan\u0131n alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131larak tayin edilmesinde tek olmasa da belirleyici nitelikte delil olarak kabul edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucuya olaylar\u0131 bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dosyada tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen ba\u015fka deliller de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ancak Mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun da onlara soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla neden dinlemedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir bilgi ve belgeye ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tan\u0131klar\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyanlar\u0131 duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015f ise de ba\u015fvurucu, tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc nakli yoluyla da olsa onlar\u0131 sorgulayamam\u0131\u015f; sorulara verdikleri cevaplar hakk\u0131nda izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edememi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00fczden tan\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi tepkiler konusunda Mahkemenin dikkati \u00e7ekilememi\u015f, tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi test edilememi\u015ftir. Mahkeme tan\u0131klar beyanda bulunurken g\u00f6sterdikleri tepkilerle ilgili olarak izlenim edinememi\u015ftir. \u00d6te yandan h\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka delillere de dayan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde mahk\u00fbmiyete temel al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle savunma makam\u0131n\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamay\u0131 telafi etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir.<\/p>\n
12. Sonu\u00e7 olarak g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi ve do\u011frulu\u011fu test edilmemi\u015f tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde savunman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklar\u0131 telafi edecek kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvencelerin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda tan\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmada veya SEGB\u0130S yoluyla dinlenmemesi bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetini zedelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi kanaatine vard\u0131\u011f\u0131mdan, \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun aksi y\u00f6ndeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00a0Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 5\/6\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/16404 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 T.C. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/16404) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 5\/6\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa \u015eENOCAK Ba\u015fvurucu : T.C. \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na veya sorgulat\u0131lmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. K\u0131rklareli Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 2\/8\/2018 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015f; iddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname ile kapat\u0131lan kurumda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131na uygun olarak Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 Anonim \u015eirketinde (Bank Asya) hesap hareketleri olmas\u0131, tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re asker\u00ee mahrem yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev almas\u0131 ve kod ad\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 suretiyle \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. 4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, K\u0131rklareli 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lamada 4\/9\/2018 tarihinde duru\u015fma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra K\u0131rklareli \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ByLock …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1877","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n