T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
SAL\u0130HE AYDEN\u0130Z BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/38026)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Salihe AYDEN\u0130Z<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Erhan \u00dcRK\u00dcT<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na maruz kal\u0131nmas\u0131 ve bu konuda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 ile toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Diyarbak\u0131r Valili\u011fi (Valilik) daha \u00f6nce kalabal\u0131k gruplara y\u00f6nelik olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek 5\/7\/2019 tarihli kararla Diyarbak\u0131r’da toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015flerini bir ay s\u00fcreyle yasaklam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu 8\/7\/2019 tarihinde Diyarbak\u0131r’da “sava\u015fa kar\u015f\u0131 bar\u0131\u015f” ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen a\u00e7\u0131k hava toplant\u0131s\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu toplant\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmemesi, Valilik karar\u0131na istinaden kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu ile ba\u015fvurucunun mensup oldu\u011fu siyasi parti \u00fcyelerine tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f ve bu ki\u015filerden da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 istenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Toplant\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in kolluk g\u00f6revlileri ile ba\u015fvurucu aras\u0131nda m\u00fczakereler devam etmekteyken ba\u015fvurucunun dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 \u00d6.A.n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131ndaki arac\u0131n trafi\u011fi aksatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yolun ortas\u0131na park edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7ekilmesi istenmi\u015ftir. \u00d6.A.n\u0131n arac\u0131 hareket ettirmeyece\u011fini belirtmesi \u00fczerine \u00d6.A. polis arac\u0131na bindirilerek muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvuru kapsam\u0131nda sundu\u011fu CD’de kay\u0131tl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerden ba\u015fvurucunun kollu\u011fa ait bir arac\u0131n i\u00e7inde kap\u0131da durdu\u011fu, arac\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki kolluk g\u00f6revlilerine kendisine dokunamayacaklar\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fiden bahsederek g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nma sebebini sordu\u011fu, bu ki\u015finin serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fi, bir ki\u015finin onu kolundan tutularak ara\u00e7tan indirdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Olay an\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak d\u00fczenlenen kolluk tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z \u015fekilde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek yap\u0131lan i\u015fleme itiraz etmi\u015f; polis arac\u0131na binmi\u015f ve dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131n\u0131 polis arac\u0131ndan indirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunun \u00fczerine ya\u015fanan arbedede polis amiri ba\u015fvurucuyu i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu polis arac\u0131ndan sol kolundan tutarak d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Bahse konu toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lanlar, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve oturma eylemi yapt\u0131ktan sonra yirmi dakika i\u00e7erisinde olay \u00e7\u0131karmadan da\u011f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn hastaneye ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 \u00fczerine hakk\u0131nda genel adli muayene raporlar\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu raporlarda ba\u015fvurucunun darbedildi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi, genel durumunun orta, bilincinin a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu, el ve kollar\u0131nda abrazon ile morluklar tespit edildi\u011fi, yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Bu raporlar ile birlikte ba\u015fvurucunun vekili 17\/7\/2019 tarihinde, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin ba\u015fvurucunun dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131n\u0131 ara\u00e7 i\u00e7ine almas\u0131 \u00fczerine onlarla konuyu m\u00fczakere ederken ba\u015fvurucunun darbedildi\u011fini iddia ederek g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma ve kasten yaralama su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011finden bahisle su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Diyarbak\u0131r Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k), an\u0131lan su\u00e7 duyurusu \u00fczerine ilgili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin tespit edilerek ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin temin edilerek \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ilgili birimlere m\u00fczekkere yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Toplanan deliller neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme raporlar\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nan bir ki\u015fiyi polis arac\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131karmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken ya\u015fanan arbedede polisin zor kullanma yetkisi kapsam\u0131ndaki m\u00fcdahalesi neticesinde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 6\/12\/2019 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu vekilinin bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz Diyarbak\u0131r 4. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015f ve itiraz\u0131n reddine dair karar ba\u015fvurucuya 10\/11\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 18\/11\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
13. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet eden ba\u015fvurucu, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin \u015fiddetine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6z konusu \u015fiddete y\u00f6nelik etkin bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel ilkelerin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131, polisin zor kullanma yetkisi dahilinde bulunan m\u00fcdahalenin ihlal olarak nitelendirilmemesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131 veya kitlesel bir karga\u015fay\u0131 bast\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olarak g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131 kural olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmemektedir. Bununla birlikte g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131nda a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa ya da kullan\u0131lan g\u00fc\u00e7 ile g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131 aras\u0131nda orant\u0131 yoksa k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali s\u00f6z konusu olabilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 81, 82).<\/p>\n
16. Yakalama i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 direnmenin s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin bedensel g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphesiz ki anayasal y\u00f6nden sorun olu\u015fturmamaktad\u0131r. Yakalama i\u015fleminin gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sonradan anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, sonucu de\u011fi\u015ftirmemektedir (Nergiz \u015een ve di\u011ferleri (2) [2. B.], B. No: 2017\/17702, 4\/7\/2022, \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcc\u00fcn gerekli ve ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gereken husus, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun davran\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, gerekli ise g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131nda a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p ka\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yahut kullan\u0131lan g\u00fc\u00e7 ile g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131 aras\u0131nda orant\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiyi kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin etki alan\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131karmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun bir karga\u015fan\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla al\u0131konan birini kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin elinden almaya, etki alanlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131karmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcc\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla ili\u015fkili oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir. Bu nedenle kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereksiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. M\u00fcdahalenin amac\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucuda meydana gelen yaralanma dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fc\u00e7 ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir.<\/p>\n
19. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesi, -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesindeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bir kimsenin devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin 17. maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddiada bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci, gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131; ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli; soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S.D. [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
20. Olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespitine ve varsa sorumlular\u0131n belirlenerek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturmalarda soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n olay\u0131n geli\u015fimine ve delillerin elde edilmesine ili\u015fkin olarak ma\u011fdurun her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve taleplerini kar\u015f\u0131lama zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmamaktad\u0131r (Mehmet Bayram [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/5963, 13\/4\/2016, \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucunun vekilinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7 duyurusu \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k olaya ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri temin etmi\u015f ve s\u00f6z konusu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerden tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fkaca bir i\u015fleme gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermesinin soru\u015fturmada eksiklik bulundu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun da ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutunun ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Toplant\u0131 ve G\u00f6steri Y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc D\u00fczenleme Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu; toplant\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda kendisine kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiili m\u00fcdahalede bulunup kendisini toplant\u0131 alan\u0131ndan uzakla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, toplant\u0131ya orant\u0131s\u0131z g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131larak m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011funu, bu konuda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7 duyurusu \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; toplant\u0131n\u0131n me\u015fru bir amaca istinaden ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinin engellendi\u011fi, toplant\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda daha sonra bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131na izin verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu, hem yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7 duyurusunda hem de bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir olguyu ortaya koyamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu ve dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemler, toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahale olarak kabul edilemez. Zira ba\u015fvurucunun dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131n\u0131 trafi\u011fi aksatacak \u015fekilde bekletmesi sebebiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen m\u00fcdahalenin toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131na bir m\u00fcdahale olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, toplant\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 faaliyetinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z m\u00fcnferit bir olaya ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131ndan sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ilk bak\u0131\u015fta anla\u015f\u0131labilmektedir. Nitekim ba\u015fvurucu ve ba\u015fvurucunun mensup oldu\u011fu partinin yetkililerinin kolluk g\u00f6revlileriyle m\u00fczakereleri sonucunda bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131, olays\u0131z bir \u015fekilde da\u011f\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 ve bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te toplant\u0131ya herhangi bir m\u00fcdahalenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak bir m\u00fcdahalenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 34. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/38026 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR SAL\u0130HE AYDEN\u0130Z BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/38026) Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucu : Salihe AYDEN\u0130Z Vekili : Av. Erhan \u00dcRK\u00dcT I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na maruz kal\u0131nmas\u0131 ve bu konuda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 ile toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Diyarbak\u0131r Valili\u011fi (Valilik) daha \u00f6nce kalabal\u0131k gruplara y\u00f6nelik olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek 5\/7\/2019 tarihli kararla Diyarbak\u0131r’da toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015flerini bir ay s\u00fcreyle yasaklam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu 8\/7\/2019 tarihinde Diyarbak\u0131r’da “sava\u015fa kar\u015f\u0131 bar\u0131\u015f” ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen a\u00e7\u0131k hava toplant\u0131s\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu toplant\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmemesi, Valilik karar\u0131na istinaden kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu ile ba\u015fvurucunun mensup oldu\u011fu siyasi parti \u00fcyelerine tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f ve bu ki\u015filerden da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 istenmi\u015ftir. 4. Toplant\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in kolluk g\u00f6revlileri ile ba\u015fvurucu aras\u0131nda m\u00fczakereler devam etmekteyken ba\u015fvurucunun dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 \u00d6.A.n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131ndaki arac\u0131n trafi\u011fi aksatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yolun ortas\u0131na park edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7ekilmesi istenmi\u015ftir. \u00d6.A.n\u0131n arac\u0131 hareket ettirmeyece\u011fini belirtmesi \u00fczerine \u00d6.A. polis arac\u0131na bindirilerek muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvuru kapsam\u0131nda sundu\u011fu CD’de kay\u0131tl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerden ba\u015fvurucunun …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n