T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
MUSTAFA GENCER BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/4693)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 12\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130smail \u015eAH\u0130N<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa GENCER<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun telefon hakk\u0131n\u0131 hafta sonu kullanamamas\u0131na dair \u015fik\u00e2yetinin ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e olmaks\u0131z\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan Elaz\u0131\u011f Y\u00fcksek G\u00fcvenlikli Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucu; telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme saatlerinin e\u015finin \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor olmas\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da e\u011fitim durumu nedeniyle mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131na veya hafta sonuna aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Kurul) m\u00fcracaat etmi\u015ftir. Kurul, ba\u015fvurucunun talebinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kurul gerek\u00e7esinde, COVID-19 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f s\u00fcrelerinin 20 dakika olmas\u0131 ve personelin izole \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re g\u00f6revlendirilmesi nedeni ile g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6nceli\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Elaz\u0131\u011f \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) itirazda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde, \u0130nfaz Kurumuna ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esine at\u0131fta bulunarak Kurul karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin mesai d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda veya hafta sonu yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 27\/11\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. H\u00e2kimlik gerek\u00e7esinde; \u0130nfaz Kurumu kapasitesi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak haftal\u0131k telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcnlerinin ve saatlerinin belirlendi\u011fini, kurum faaliyetlerinin idarenin belirlemi\u015f oldu\u011fu sistem \u00fczerinden d\u00fczenli bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu oldu\u011funu ve mahpuslar\u0131n kendi istedikleri g\u00fcn ve saatlerde haftal\u0131k telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapmaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131nda \u0130nfaz Kurumunun asayi\u015f ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fini zaafiyete u\u011frataca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla hafta sonu veya mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme taleplerinin h\u0131zla art\u0131\u015f g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yapan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\/tutuklu say\u0131s\u0131 ile mesai saati d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda g\u00f6revli personel say\u0131s\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130nfaz Kurumunda hafta sonu meydana gelebilecek bir olay\u0131 bast\u0131rmada ciddi s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n olu\u015fabilece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. An\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun Elaz\u0131\u011f 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n da reddine kesin olarak karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 18\/12\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 13\/1\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
6. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu; ailesine uzak bir ceza infaz kurumunda olmas\u0131 ve ekonomik ko\u015fullar nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe gelemedi\u011fini, e\u015finin hafta i\u00e7i mesai saatleri i\u00e7inde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n da \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in e\u015finin telefonu vas\u0131tas\u0131yla \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015femedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Bu durumu belirterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilmek i\u00e7in telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hakk\u0131n\u0131n mesai d\u0131\u015f\u0131 saatlerde veya hafta sonu kulland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki talebinin haks\u0131z \u015fekilde reddedildi\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca \u00e7ocuklarla ziyaret g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn hafta sonuna al\u0131nmas\u0131 talebinin kabul edildi\u011fini ancak ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ziyarete gelemedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocuklarla ileti\u015fimi sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmesinin reddedilmesinin aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve e\u015fitlik ilkesini ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, s\u00fcre\u00e7te verilen kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7elerine ve ilgili mevzuat ile i\u00e7tihada yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvuru, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n haftal\u0131k telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme g\u00fcn ve saatlerinin \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerini sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde tespit edilmesi gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin genel ilkeler Anayasa Mahkemesinin Yeliz Erten ([2. B.], B. No: 2020\/99, 11\/3\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 34-38) karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddeleri ebeveynin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla b\u00fct\u00fcnle\u015fmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve kamusal makamlar\u0131n bu t\u00fcr tedbirleri alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir. Mahkemeler, idari makamlar ve yasama organ\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerde \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi ile aile ili\u015fkilerinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde hareket edilmesi devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin gere\u011fidir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n baz\u0131 haklar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz sonucu olsa da ceza infaz kurumu idaresi h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ailesiyle temas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak tedbirler almak zorundad\u0131r. Bu tedbirler al\u0131n\u0131rken \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek kamu d\u00fczeni ve su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi ile aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir denge sa\u011flanmal\u0131 ve bu konuda ikna edici gerek\u00e7eler ortaya konmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde bkz. Kenan G\u00fclbay [2. B.], B. No: 2020\/9239, 8\/6\/2023, \u00a7 10; Enes Akelma ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2020\/37466, 8\/2\/2024, \u00a7 10; \u015eaban Cino\u011flu [2. B.], B. No: 2020\/8674, 8\/6\/2023, \u00a7 9).<\/p>\n
11. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015finin hafta i\u00e7i mesai saatlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6rd\u00fckleri bir arada de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun telefon yoluyla \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla hafta i\u00e7i mesai saatlerinde ileti\u015fim kurmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fi ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ile hafta sonu veya mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 verilmemesinin aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali anlam\u0131na gelece\u011fini yarg\u0131sal makamlara sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7elerinde belirtti\u011fi, buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k yarg\u0131sal makamlar taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu talepleri hakk\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun haftal\u0131k telefon hakk\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla ileti\u015fimi sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmesi talebi reddedilmi\u015f ise de; ilgili kararlarda ba\u015fvurucunun ko\u015fullar\u0131 ile devletin aile birlikteli\u011finin devam\u0131na ve ili\u015fkilerinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesine ili\u015fkin tedbir alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 ilkesi de g\u00f6zetilmek suretiyle talebin kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n idareye nas\u0131l bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckleyece\u011fi yeterli gerek\u00e7eyle ortaya konuldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla idarenin uygulamas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek aile ili\u015fkilerinin devaml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde hareket edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla olayda aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan devletten beklenen pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yerine getirilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 20.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
16. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda talebine ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 20.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 20.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Elaz\u0131\u011f \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/3070, K.2020\/3277) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 12\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 12\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/4693 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR MUSTAFA GENCER BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/4693) Karar Tarihi: 12\/3\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u0130smail \u015eAH\u0130N Ba\u015fvurucu : Mustafa GENCER I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun telefon hakk\u0131n\u0131 hafta sonu kullanamamas\u0131na dair \u015fik\u00e2yetinin ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e olmaks\u0131z\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan Elaz\u0131\u011f Y\u00fcksek G\u00fcvenlikli Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucu; telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme saatlerinin e\u015finin \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor olmas\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da e\u011fitim durumu nedeniyle mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131na veya hafta sonuna aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Kurul) m\u00fcracaat etmi\u015ftir. Kurul, ba\u015fvurucunun talebinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kurul gerek\u00e7esinde, COVID-19 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f s\u00fcrelerinin 20 dakika olmas\u0131 ve personelin izole \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re g\u00f6revlendirilmesi nedeni ile g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6nceli\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Elaz\u0131\u011f \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) itirazda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde, \u0130nfaz Kurumuna ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esine at\u0131fta bulunarak Kurul karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin mesai d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda veya hafta sonu yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 27\/11\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. H\u00e2kimlik gerek\u00e7esinde; \u0130nfaz …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n