T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2018\/1166 E., 2018\/2175 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :SULH HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kiralanan\u0131n tahliyesi davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n 15.02.2010 ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli ve 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcreli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile \u00e7at\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kirac\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n konut ihtiyac\u0131 nedeniyle taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi ile daval\u0131n\u0131n kiralanandan tahliyesine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131, davan\u0131n reddini dilemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi ile daval\u0131n\u0131n tahliyesine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
\n6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.\u2019nun 350\/1. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re ihtiya\u00e7 iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lacak tahliye davalar\u0131n\u0131n belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde s\u00fcrenin sonunda, belirsiz s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde bu kanunun 328. maddesinde fesih bildirimi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrelere uyularak belirlenecek tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir ay i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. TBK.\u2019nun 353. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kiraya veren, daha \u00f6nce veya en ge\u00e7 davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrede dava a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kirac\u0131ya yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirmi\u015fse dava, bildirimi takip eden uzayan bir kira y\u0131l\u0131 sonuna kadar a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, daval\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmese bile mahkemece kendili\u011finden g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Davan\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihinin ve s\u00fcresinin bilinmesi zorunludur. Davac\u0131n\u0131n bildirdi\u011fi bu tarihlere daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karsa uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n taraflar\u0131n g\u00f6sterecekleri tan\u0131k dahil b\u00fct\u00fcn deliller toplanarak bir hadise olarak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Olay\u0131m\u0131za gelince; davaya dayanak olup h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan ve taraflar aras\u0131nda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmayan 15.02.2010 ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcreli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin \u00f6zel \u015fartlar 8. maddesinde ”kirac\u0131 veya mal sahibi kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona erdirilmesi hususundaki irade beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 kontrat s\u00fcresinin bitiminden 2 ay \u00f6nce kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa bildirmek zorundad\u0131r. Aksi takdirde kira s\u00fcresi 1 y\u0131l daha uzam\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.” d\u00fczenlemesi mevcuttur. An\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fme bitim tarihinden 2 ay \u00f6nce daval\u0131ya g\u00f6nderilen bir ihtar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ayn\u0131 ko\u015fullarla bir y\u0131l uzam\u0131\u015f olup 11.09.2015 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan dava s\u00fcresinde de\u011fildir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan bu olgu kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lmayan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kiralanan\u0131n tahliyesine karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.
\nH\u00fck\u00fcm bu nedenle bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan esaslar g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsiz, temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde oldu\u011fundan kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn HUMK.nun 428.maddesi gere\u011fince daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun ge\u00e7ici madde 3 atf\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK.nun 440.maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011fden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 08.03.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
3. Hukuk Dairesi <\/p>\n
2017\/16499 E., 2017\/17280 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :SULH HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kiralanan\u0131n tahliyesi davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131lar, sahip olduklar\u0131 iki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu binan\u0131n riskli yap\u0131 oldu\u011fundan kentsel d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm yasas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda y\u0131k\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ,bu nedenle dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda beraber oturacaklar\u0131n\u0131 ve oturacaklar\u0131 ba\u015fka bir daire olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanla davac\u0131n\u0131n kirac\u0131 olarak bulundu\u011fu kiralanan\u0131n ihtiya\u00e7 nedeniyle tahliyesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, ihtiyac\u0131n samimi oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile daval\u0131n\u0131n kiralanandan tahliyesine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
1-6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.\u2019nun 350\/1. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re ihtiya\u00e7 iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lacak tahliye davalar\u0131n\u0131n belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde s\u00fcrenin sonunda, belirsiz s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde bu kanunun 328. maddesinde fesih bildirimi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrelere uyularak belirlenecek tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir ay i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. TBK.\u2019nun 353. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kiraya veren, daha \u00f6nce veya en ge\u00e7 davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrede dava a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kirac\u0131ya yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirmi\u015fse dava, bildirimi takip eden uzayan bir kira y\u0131l\u0131 sonuna kadar a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, daval\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmese bile mahkemece kendili\u011finden g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Olay\u0131m\u0131za gelince; h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan ve taraflar aras\u0131nda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmayan 15\/03\/2014 ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcreli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 12. maddesinde; ”…Ayr\u0131ca kirac\u0131, kendi iste\u011fi ile kira d\u00f6nemi sonunda gayrimenkulu tahliye etmeye karar verirse, tahliyeden en az 2 ay \u00f6nce mal sahibine yaz\u0131l\u0131 bildirimde bulunacakt\u0131r. Aksi taktirde kira d\u00f6nemi sonuna kadar olan kiray\u0131 \u00f6der. Mal sahibi de kirac\u0131n\u0131n gayrimenkul\u00fc tahliye etmesini istedi\u011finde ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde 2 ay \u00f6ncesinden bildirimde bulunacakt\u0131r.” d\u00fczenlemesi h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince davac\u0131 yan taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fme bitim tarihinden 2 ay \u00f6nce daval\u0131ya g\u00f6nderilen bir ihtar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ayn\u0131 ko\u015fullarla bir y\u0131l uzam\u0131\u015f olup 30\/04\/2015 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan dava s\u00fcresinde de\u011fildir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan bu olgu kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131lmayan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kiralanan\u0131n tahliyesine karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
H\u00fck\u00fcm bu nedenle bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2- Bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine \u015fimdilik gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da birinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle h\u00fckm\u00fcn HUMK.nun 428. maddesi gere\u011fince daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, ikinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine \u015fimdilik yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun ge\u00e7ici madde 3 atf\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK.nun 440.maddesi gere\u011fince karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 07.12.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bKira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde ”kirac\u0131 veya mal sahibi kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona erdirilmesi hususundaki irade beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 kontrat s\u00fcresinin bitiminden 2 ay \u00f6nce kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa bildirmek zorundad\u0131r. Aksi takdirde kira s\u00fcresi 1 y\u0131l daha uzam\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.” d\u00fczenlemesi mevcuttur. An\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fme bitim tarihinden 2 ay \u00f6nce daval\u0131ya g\u00f6nderilen bir ihtar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ayn\u0131 ko\u015fullarla bir y\u0131l uzam\u0131\u015f olup a\u00e7\u0131lan dava s\u00fcresinde de\u011fildir.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/1166 E., 2018\/2175 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :SULH HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kiralanan\u0131n tahliyesi davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I Davac\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n 15.02.2010 ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli ve 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcreli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile \u00e7at\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kirac\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n konut ihtiyac\u0131 nedeniyle taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi ile daval\u0131n\u0131n kiralanandan tahliyesine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131, davan\u0131n reddini dilemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi ile daval\u0131n\u0131n tahliyesine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.\u2019nun 350\/1. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re ihtiya\u00e7 iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lacak tahliye davalar\u0131n\u0131n belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde s\u00fcrenin sonunda, belirsiz s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde bu kanunun 328. maddesinde fesih bildirimi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrelere uyularak belirlenecek tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir ay i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. TBK.\u2019nun 353. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kiraya veren, daha \u00f6nce veya en ge\u00e7 davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrede dava a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kirac\u0131ya yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirmi\u015fse dava, bildirimi takip eden uzayan bir kira y\u0131l\u0131 sonuna kadar a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, daval\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmese bile …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97802","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n