“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
T.C.
\nD A N I \u015e T A Y
\nALTINCI DA\u0130RE
\nEsas No : 2020\/9552
\nKarar No : 2022\/9367<\/p>\n
TEMY\u0130Z EDEN (DAVALI) : \u2026 Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 – \u2026
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026
\nKAR\u015eI TARAF (DAVACI) : \u2026
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026
\n\u0130STEM\u0130N KONUSU : \u2026 B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u2026 \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n
YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130 :<\/p>\n
Dava konusu istem: \u0130stanbul \u0130li, Sar\u0131yer \u0130l\u00e7esi, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i “gerig\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm” ve “etkilenme” b\u00f6lgesinde, \u2026 ada, \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 parselde ruhsata ayk\u0131r\u0131 ilaveler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 42\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 1.833,43-TL ve 42\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 3.757,48-TL olmak \u00fczere toplam 5.590,91-TL idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 Sar\u0131yer Belediye Enc\u00fcmeni karar\u0131 ile ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131, aksi takdirde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yasal i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca, para cezas\u0131n\u0131n 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde \u00f6denmesi, aksi takdirde icra yoluyla tahsil edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin iptali istenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: \u2026 \u0130dare Mahkemesince verilen \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 kararda; yap\u0131ya ili\u015fkin yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ve para cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemlerin tesisinden \u00f6nce yap\u0131 kay\u0131t belgesi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yap\u0131 kay\u0131t belgesi al\u0131nan yap\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tesis edilmi\u015f dava konusu i\u015flemlerde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemlerin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u0130dari Dava Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: \u2026 \u0130dare Mahkemesince verilen \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n; \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 Sar\u0131yer Belediye Enc\u00fcmeni karar\u0131 ile \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin, para cezas\u0131n\u0131n 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde \u00f6denmesi, aksi takdirde icra yoluyla tahsil edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine, \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, aksi halde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131na y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun ise Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i “gerig\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm” ve “etkilenme” b\u00f6lgelerindeki ruhsats\u0131z ya da ruhsat ve eklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lar\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131m\u0131na karar verilebilmesi i\u00e7in, 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 11. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenecek tutana\u011f\u0131n esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 suretiyle \u0130l\u00e7e Belediye Enc\u00fcmenince karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekirken, Sar\u0131yer Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce tesis edilen dava konusu i\u015flemin bu k\u0131sm\u0131nda yetki y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
TEMY\u0130Z EDEN\u0130N \u0130DD\u0130ALARI : Temyiz edilen karar\u0131n, usul ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eI TARAFIN SAVUNMASI : Temyiz \u0130steminin reddi gerekti\u011fi savunulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
DANI\u015eTAY TETK\u0130K HAK\u0130M\u0130 \u2026 ‘\u00dcN D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcNCES\u0130 : Temyiz isteminin reddi ile B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u0130dari Dava Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen onanmas\u0131, k\u0131smen de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n
Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Dairesince, Tetkik Hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendikten ve dosyadaki belgeler incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
\u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E:<\/p>\n
MADD\u0130 OLAY :<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul \u0130li, Sar\u0131yer \u0130l\u00e7esi, \u2026 ada, \u2026 parsel \u00fczerinde 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun Ge\u00e7ici 16. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u2026 tarihli, \u2026 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 Yap\u0131 Kay\u0131t Belgesi verilen yap\u0131 ile kadastral yol aras\u0131na yap\u0131lan (\u2026 Mahallesi, \u2026 ) betonarme 40 m2’lik yap\u0131 i\u00e7in \u2026 d\u00fczenleme tarihli, \u2026 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131, \u2026 belge nolu Yap\u0131 Kay\u0131t Belgesinin verildi\u011fi, an\u0131lan yere ili\u015fkin ruhsats\u0131z imalat yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 s\u0131ra numaral\u0131 yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmesi \u00fczerine \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 Sar\u0131yer Belediye Enc\u00fcmeni karar\u0131 ile 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 42. maddesi uyar\u0131nca idari para cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi, ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131, aksi takdirde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yasal i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca, para cezas\u0131n\u0131n 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde \u00f6denmesi, aksi takdirde icra yoluyla tahsil edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin tesis edilmesi \u00fczerine enc\u00fcmen karar\u0131 ile bildirim i\u015fleminin iptali istemiyle bak\u0131lan davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 MEVZUAT:<\/p>\n
22\/11\/1983 tarihli Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 11. maddesinde; Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i alan\u0131ndaki yap\u0131lar\u0131n, kaz\u0131 izni verildi\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131na ve eklerine ve bu Kanunla belirlenen esaslara g\u00f6re denetlenece\u011fi, denetleme s\u0131ras\u0131nda in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131 ve eklerine ve bu Kanunla belirlenen imar mevzuat\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n bir tutanakla tespit edilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup, 13. maddesinde; ”A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen yap\u0131lar Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar \u0130dare Heyetinin karar\u0131 ve Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn yaz\u0131l\u0131 emri ile y\u0131k\u0131l\u0131r veya y\u0131kt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
a) \u0130n\u015faat ruhsat\u0131 olmayan yap\u0131lar, b) Yap\u0131n\u0131n, in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131 ve eklerine ve imar mevzuat\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri, c) Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce m\u00fch\u00fcrlenerek yap\u0131m\u0131 durdurulmu\u015f yap\u0131lar\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlendikten sonra yap\u0131lan ilaveleri, d) Yap\u0131larda kullanma izni verildikten sonra imar mevzuat\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikler ve eklentileri.<\/p>\n
Bu Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken yap\u0131lar tespit edildi\u011finde Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce derhal Valili\u011fe bildirilir. Vali Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar \u0130dare Heyetini en ge\u00e7 yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde toplayarak konunun karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar ve karar\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6nderir. Y\u0131k\u0131m emri 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik kuvvetleri veya belediye zab\u0131ta kuvvetleri taraf\u0131ndan mal sahibine veya m\u00fcteahhide tebli\u011f edilir. Bu tebligat onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde tamamlan\u0131r. Tebligat\u0131n bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 taktirde, y\u0131k\u0131m emri yap\u0131 mahallinde g\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek bir yere onbe\u015f g\u00fcn m\u00fcddetle as\u0131l\u0131r ve bu i\u015flem bir tutanakla belirlenir. Bu suretle durum mal sahibi veya m\u00fcteahhide tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Tebligat\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131ndan itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131, mal sahibi veya m\u00fcteahhit taraf\u0131ndan y\u0131k\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, y\u0131k\u0131m i\u015flemi Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u0130mar M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce yerine getirilir ve y\u0131k\u0131m masraflar\u0131 %20 fazlas\u0131 ile mal sahibi veya m\u00fcteahitten tahsil edilir” h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 46. maddesinde ise ”Bu Kanunla 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 6’nc\u0131 maddesine g\u00f6re kurulan organlar kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kurulu\u015flar\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve sorumluluklar\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen \u00e7er\u00e7eve dahilinde \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck \u015eehir ve ilgili \u0130l\u00e7e Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131klar\u0131nca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcr. \u015e\u00f6yle ki: 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 2 nci maddesinde belirlenen ve 22\/7\/1983 onay tarihli plana g\u00f6re Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i alan\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen “Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Sahil \u015eeridi” ve “\u00d6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm” b\u00f6lgelerindeki uygulamalar \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck \u015eehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca, “gerig\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm” ve “etkilenme” b\u00f6lgelerindeki uygulamalar da ilgili \u0130l\u00e7e Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131klar\u0131nca yap\u0131l\u0131r. ” h\u00fckm\u00fc d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
HUKUK\u0130 DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME:<\/p>\n
1-Temyize konu \u0130dari Dava Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, para cezas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik enc\u00fcmen karar\u0131 ile \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemin para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131nda, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanununun 49. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda say\u0131lan bozma nedenlerinden hi\u00e7birisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2- \u0130\u015flemin, ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131, aksi takdirde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yasal i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131na gelince;<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da yer verilen mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesinden, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i gerig\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm” ve “etkilenme” b\u00f6lgesinde yer alan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlardaki imar mevzuat\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n \u0130l\u00e7e Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca tutanakla tespit edilebilece\u011fi ve ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fine uygun olarak 13. maddede yer alan sebeplerden birine dayanarak y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 al\u0131nabilece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i “gerig\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm” ve “etkilenme” b\u00f6lgesinde, \u0130stanbul \u0130li, Sar\u0131yer \u0130l\u00e7esi, \u2026 ada, \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 parsel \u00fczerindeki yap\u0131ya ili\u015fkin 28\/08\/2018 tarihli yap\u0131 kay\u0131t belgesinin bulundu\u011fu, 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 11. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 s\u0131ra numaral\u0131 yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmesi \u00fczerine, ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131, aksi takdirde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yasal i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin, yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011finin yerine getirilmesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, an\u0131lan i\u015flemde yetki y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bununla birlikte, niteli\u011fi belirtilen dava konusu i\u015flem tarihinde ta\u015f\u0131nmazla ilgili yap\u0131 kay\u0131t belgesi mevcut oldu\u011fundan, i\u015flemden \u00f6nce yap\u0131 kay\u0131t belgesi bulunan yap\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u0131k\u0131m ve para cezas\u0131 kararlar\u0131 verilemeyece\u011finden, i\u015flemin ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131, aksi takdirde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yasal i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n iptali yolundaki \u0130dari Dava Dairesi karar\u0131nda sonucu itibar\u0131yla isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan, daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda, \u0130stanbul \u0130li, Sar\u0131yer \u0130l\u00e7esi, \u2026 ada, \u2026 parsel \u00fczerindeki yap\u0131da 40 m2’lik ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olan 28\/08\/2018 d\u00fczenleme tarihli, \u2026 belge nolu Yap\u0131 Kay\u0131t Belgesinin iptaline ili\u015fkin \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u2026 tarih ve E.\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin \u2026 \u0130dare Mahkemesinin \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine dair \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 \u2026 \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n sunuldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de, yap\u0131n\u0131n mevcut durumuna g\u00f6re yeniden tespit yap\u0131lmak suretiyle i\u015flem tesis edilebilece\u011fi tabiidir.<\/p>\n
KARAR SONUCU:<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n
1. Daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin reddine,<\/p>\n
2. Dava konusu i\u015flemin yukar\u0131da \u00f6zetlenen gerek\u00e7eyle iptaline ili\u015fkin Mahkeme karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen reddi, k\u0131smen de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle reddi yolundaki temyize konu \u2026 \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n; para cezas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik enc\u00fcmen karar\u0131 ile i\u015flemin para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA, i\u015flemin, ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131, aksi takdirde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yasal i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da belirtilen gerek\u00e7e ile ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n
3. 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanununun 50. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, bu onama karar\u0131n\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011fini ve bir \u00f6rne\u011finin de an\u0131lan B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u0130dari Dava Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesini teminen dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren ilk derece Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 09\/11\/2022 tarihinde, kesin olarak, oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Daire : ALTINCI DA\u0130RE
\nKarar Y\u0131l\u0131 : 1991
\nKarar No : 3229
\nEsas Y\u0131l\u0131 : 1991
\nEsas No : 482
\nKarar Tarihi : 24\/12\/1991<\/p>\n
\u0130DARECE \u0130PTAL ED\u0130LEN RUHSATIN D\u00dcZENLEN\u0130\u015e TAR\u0130H\u0130 \u0130T\u0130BAR\u0130YLE ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130N\u0130N \u0130PTAL KARARINA KADAR Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dcKTE OLDU\u011eU TARTI\u015eMASIZ \u0130SE DE DAHA SONRA S\u00d6Z\u00dc ED\u0130LEN RUHSATIN DAYANA\u011eI OLAN YASA H\u00dcKM\u00dcN\u00dcN ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130NCE \u0130PTAL ED\u0130LMES\u0130 SONUCU \u0130DARECE GER\u0130 ALINMASINDA \u0130SABETS\u0130ZL\u0130K BULUNMADI\u011eI, KAZANILMI\u015e HAK \u0130DD\u0130ASININ \u0130SE, RUHSATIN Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dcKTE OLDU\u011eU D\u00d6NEMDE \u0130N\u015eAATA BA\u015eLANMI\u015e OLMASI VE ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130N\u0130N \u0130PTAL KARARINA KADAR TARAFLARCA ULA\u015eILAN SEV\u0130YEN\u0130N KANITLANMASI HAL\u0130NDE BU KISIMLARIN KAZANILMI\u015e HAK OLARAK DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130N\u0130N YAPININ YIKIMINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N DAVADA \u0130NCELENMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130 BU NEDENLE, \u0130DARE MAHKEMES\u0130NCE 3194 SAYILI YASANIN 29.MADDES\u0130NE DAYANILARAK KAZANILMI\u015e HAKTAN BAH\u0130SLE \u0130PTAL KARARI VER\u0130LMES\u0130NDE \u0130SABET BULUNMADI\u011eI HK.<\/p>\n
Dava, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki blok i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenen in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131n\u0131n, hava foto\u011fraflar\u0131nda ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en blo\u011fun in\u015faat\u0131na 18.4.1987 tarihinden sonra ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tesbit edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle iptaline ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, \u0130dare Mahkemesince uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu yap\u0131 izin belgesinin 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 47.maddesinin Anayasa Mahkemesince iptalinden \u00f6nceki bir tarihte verildi\u011fi, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en Yasan\u0131n 29.maddesi uyar\u0131nca, ruhsat tarihinden itibaren iki y\u0131l i\u00e7inde yap\u0131ya ba\u015flayabilme durumu bulundu\u011fu, ba\u015flama m\u00fcddetiyle birlikte be\u015f y\u0131l i\u00e7inde yap\u0131 bitirilmedi\u011fi takdirde verilmi\u015f ruhsat h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ve ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f in\u015faatlarda m\u00fcktesep haklar sakl\u0131 tutuldu\u011funa g\u00f6re i\u015flem tesisi s\u0131ras\u0131nda bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilemeyece\u011fi, imar hukuku y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n belirlenmesinde bu h\u00fckm\u00fcnde esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcr \u015fekilde uygulamak suretiyle kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131n ihlali sonucunu do\u011frudan ve idari istikrar prensibiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan yolda i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuken kabul edilemeyece\u011fi, bu durumda tesisi i\u00e7in ba\u015fkaca sebep de g\u00f6sterilmeyen dava konusu ruhsat iptaline ili\u015fkin i\u015flemde hukuka uygunluk bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmi\u015f ve bu karar daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 3.maddesinin (g) bendinde, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i k\u0131y\u0131 ve sahil \u015feridinde ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesinde konut yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, tevhit ve ifraz i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lmas\u0131na izin verilemeyece\u011fi kural\u0131 getirilmi\u015f, ancak s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcm 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 47.maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm b\u00f6lgesinde muhtelif ko\u015fullarla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmak \u00fczere yap\u0131la\u015fma imkan\u0131 getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
An\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fc de kapsar nitelikte bir ba\u015fvuru ile 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n baz\u0131 maddelerinin iptali talebinin Anayasa Mahkemesine iletilmesi sonucunda Anayasa Mahkemesince 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 47.maddesi Anayasan\u0131n 2. ve 56.maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunarak 11.12.1986 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, … say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile iptal edilmi\u015f, karar ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn Anayasa gere\u011fi devlet eliyle kurulan ve tarafs\u0131z bir kamu t\u00fczel ki\u015fisi olan \u2026 Kurumu ve takip eden g\u00fcnde yaz\u0131l\u0131 bas\u0131n arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla t\u00fcm kamuoyuna duyurulmu\u015f, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Yasa maddesinin Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunarak iptal edildi\u011fi hususu t\u00fcm kamuoyunun \u00f6zellikle konu ile ilgili bulunan idareler ve \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n bilgisi dahiline girmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu olayda, idarece iptal edilen ruhsat\u0131n d\u00fczenleni\u015f tarihi itibariyle Anaya Mahkemesinin iptal karar\u0131na kadar y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z ise de daha sonra s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ruhsat\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan yasa h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Anaya Mahkemesince iptal edilmesi sonucu idarece geri al\u0131nmas\u0131nda isabetsizlik bulunmamaktad\u0131r.
\nDavac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak iddias\u0131na gelince, Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n s\u00fcregelen i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda, kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n tesbitinde yap\u0131 izin belgesinin d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunmas\u0131 yeterli olmay\u0131p, bu izin belgesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak in\u015fa edilen yap\u0131n\u0131n ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 seviye \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc olarak al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Olayda da, yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ruhsat\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde in\u015faata ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin iptal karar\u0131na kadar taraflarca ula\u015f\u0131lan seviyenin kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 halinde bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesinin yap\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin davada incelenmesi gerekmektedir.
\nBu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, \u0130dare Mahkemesince 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 29.maddesine dayan\u0131larak kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haktan bahisle iptal karar\u0131 verilmesinde isabet bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, temyize konu ….\u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bDan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi\u2019nin 09\/11\/2022 tarihli, 2020\/9552 E., 2022\/9367 K. ve 24\/12\/1991 tarihli, 1991\/482 E., 1991\/3229 K. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” T.C. D A N I \u015e T A Y ALTINCI DA\u0130RE Esas No : 2020\/9552 Karar No : 2022\/9367 TEMY\u0130Z EDEN (DAVALI) : \u2026 Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 – \u2026 VEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026 KAR\u015eI TARAF (DAVACI) : \u2026 VEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026 \u0130STEM\u0130N KONUSU : \u2026 B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u2026 \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130 : Dava konusu istem: \u0130stanbul \u0130li, Sar\u0131yer \u0130l\u00e7esi, Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i “gerig\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm” ve “etkilenme” b\u00f6lgesinde, \u2026 ada, \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 parselde ruhsata ayk\u0131r\u0131 ilaveler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun 42\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 1.833,43-TL ve 42\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 3.757,48-TL olmak \u00fczere toplam 5.590,91-TL idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 Sar\u0131yer Belediye Enc\u00fcmeni karar\u0131 ile ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ay i\u00e7inde y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ruhsata ba\u011flanmas\u0131, aksi takdirde 2960 say\u0131l\u0131 Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i Kanununun 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yasal i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca, para cezas\u0131n\u0131n 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde \u00f6denmesi, aksi takdirde icra yoluyla tahsil edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u2026 tarih ve \u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fleminin iptali istenilmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: \u2026 \u0130dare Mahkemesince verilen \u2026 tarih ve E:\u2026 , K:\u2026 say\u0131l\u0131 kararda; yap\u0131ya ili\u015fkin yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ve para cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemlerin tesisinden \u00f6nce …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-95378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n