{"id":93525,"date":"2025-05-21T09:38:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-21T06:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-21T09:38:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-21T06:38:00","slug":"aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n

ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

MUSTAFA BORA ACAR BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/87302)<\/p>\n

Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n

\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n

Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n

Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n

Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Mustafa Bora ACAR<\/p>\n

Vekili<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Av. Alev ACAR<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebiyle Ankara Barosuna (Baro) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Baro, ba\u015fvurucunun talebini kabul etmi\u015ftir. Baronun karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, itiraz etmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek \u00fczere g\u00f6nderilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

4. Mahkeme 4\/11\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015f; kararda; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda zimmet su\u00e7undan ve kamu g\u00f6revlisinin resm\u00ee belgede sahtecili\u011fi su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kovu\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011funu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 12. \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin 18\/3\/2022 tarihli karar\u0131 ile temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

6. Temyiz ba\u015fvurusu, Dan\u0131\u015ftay Sekizinci Dairesinin 13\/6\/2022 tarihli karar\u0131 ile incelenmeksizin reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

7. Ba\u015fvurucu 19\/7\/2022 tarihinde nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 17\/8\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

8. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n

A. \u00d6zel Hayata Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n

9. Ba\u015fvurucu, avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yarg\u0131 mercileri taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun somut durumu ile mevzuat de\u011ferlendirilerek karar verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

10. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesine, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla serbest avukatl\u0131k yapmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mesleki hayata y\u00f6nelik bu t\u00fcr tedbirlerin ya da m\u00fcdahalelerin hangi durumlarda \u00f6zel hayat ba\u011flam\u0131nda uygulanabilir oldu\u011fu hususunda belirlenen \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler Tamer Mahmuto\u011flu ([GK], B. No: 2017\/38953, 23\/7\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 84-96) karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

11. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet \u00c7etinkaya ve D.K. [GK], B. No: 2018\/27392, 15\/4\/2021; B.A.Y. [GK], B. No: 2019\/19788, 5\/7\/2022). Ancak ba\u015fvurucunun staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddinin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu ve an\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesini ihlal edece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (\u00d6mer \u00d6zcan [GK], B. No: 2019\/24047, 23\/3\/2023).<\/p>\n

12. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00d6mer \u00d6zcan karar\u0131nda an\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu tespit ederek kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck kriteriyle birlikte incelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

13. Bu kapsamda Anayasa Mahkemesi; 19\/3\/1969 tarihli ve 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu’nun 5. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda baz\u0131 su\u00e7lardan kovu\u015fturma alt\u0131nda bulunulmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde avukatl\u0131\u011fa al\u0131nma iste\u011fi hakk\u0131ndaki karar\u0131n kovu\u015fturma sonuna kadar ertelenebilece\u011fi ancak ilgili mevzuatta staj\u0131n \u00f6telenmesine dair a\u00e7\u0131k bir kanuni d\u00fczenlemenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmi\u015ftir. Buradan hareketle staj\u0131n avukatl\u0131\u011fa kabul talebinde bulunman\u0131n \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu kural\u0131n staja ba\u015fvuruda i\u015flerlik kazand\u0131r\u0131lacak \u015fekilde geni\u015f yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri daraltan bir yorum oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (\u00d6mer \u00d6zcan, \u00a7\u00a7 61, 63).<\/p>\n

14. Bununla birlikte an\u0131lan kararda kovu\u015fturman\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetle sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde aday\u0131n staj listesinden ve avukat\u0131n baro levhas\u0131ndan kesin olarak silinece\u011finin mevzuatta a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlendi\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar ba\u011flam\u0131nda hakk\u0131nda devam eden kovu\u015fturma bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle ba\u015fvurucunun baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n hangi zorlay\u0131c\u0131 toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u00d6mer \u00d6zcan, \u00a7\u00a7 64, 65). Somut ba\u015fvuruda da an\u0131lan ilke ve tespitlerden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n

15. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Veysi Ado ([GK] B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede Anayasa Mahkemesi 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe g\u00f6re 9\/3\/2023 tarihi (bu tarih d\u00e2hil) itibar\u0131yla derdest olan, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 neticesine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut ba\u015fvuruda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n

16. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

17. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n

18. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n

A. 1.\u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

2. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2021\/992, K.2021\/1892) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

E. 664,10 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.664,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n

G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR MUSTAFA BORA ACAR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/87302) Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Mustafa Bora ACAR Vekili : Av. Alev ACAR I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebiyle Ankara Barosuna (Baro) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Baro, ba\u015fvurucunun talebini kabul etmi\u015ftir. Baronun karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, itiraz etmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek \u00fczere g\u00f6nderilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir. 3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 4\/11\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015f; kararda; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda zimmet su\u00e7undan ve kamu g\u00f6revlisinin resm\u00ee belgede sahtecili\u011fi su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kovu\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011funu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. 5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAYM'nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM'nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR MUSTAFA BORA ACAR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/87302) Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Mustafa Bora ACAR Vekili : Av. Alev ACAR I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebiyle Ankara Barosuna (Baro) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Baro, ba\u015fvurucunun talebini kabul etmi\u015ftir. Baronun karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, itiraz etmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek \u00fczere g\u00f6nderilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir. 3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 4\/11\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015f; kararda; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda zimmet su\u00e7undan ve kamu g\u00f6revlisinin resm\u00ee belgede sahtecili\u011fi su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kovu\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011funu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. 5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-21T06:38:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"AYM’nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-21T06:38:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1506,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-21T06:38:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM’nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR MUSTAFA BORA ACAR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/87302) Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Mustafa Bora ACAR Vekili : Av. Alev ACAR I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebiyle Ankara Barosuna (Baro) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Baro, ba\u015fvurucunun talebini kabul etmi\u015ftir. Baronun karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, itiraz etmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek \u00fczere g\u00f6nderilmesi \u00fczerine TBB ilk karar\u0131nda \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir. 3. Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBB karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 4\/11\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015f; kararda; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda zimmet su\u00e7undan ve kamu g\u00f6revlisinin resm\u00ee belgede sahtecili\u011fi su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kovu\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011finin kamu hizmeti oldu\u011funu, mesle\u011fin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sona erene kadar beklenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. 5. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-21T06:38:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"AYM’nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-21T06:38:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1506,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-21T06:38:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2022-87302-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM’nin 2022\/87302 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}