T.C.<\/p>\n
YARGITAY<\/p>\n
9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/p>\n
Esas Numaras\u0131: 2024\/15165<\/p>\n
Karar Numaras\u0131: 2025\/2237<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 03.03.2025<\/p>\n
\u0130HT\u0130YAR\u0130 ARABULUCULUK ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130<\/p>\n
GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 B\u0130R ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/p>\n
TARAFLARIN \u00dcZER\u0130NDE SERBEST\u00c7E TASARRUF EDEMEYECEKLER\u0130 B\u0130R ZAMANDA UYU\u015eMAZLIK KONUSU OLMADAN ARABULUCULUK TUTANA\u011eI D\u00dcZENLEND\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130HT\u0130YAR\u0130 ARABULUCULUK ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130N\u0130N ARABULUCULU\u011eUN AMACINA UYGUN OLMADI\u011eI<\/p>\n
\u00d6ZET\u0130: Somut olayda davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 03.10.2015-31.10.2022 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ihtiyari arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci ba\u015flat\u0131larak d\u00fczenlenen anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131nda davac\u0131ya \u00fccret (maa\u015f) alaca\u011f\u0131, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin, yol ve yemek \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denece\u011finin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131na 01.11.2022 tarihinde i\u015f\u00e7ilik alaca\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda 36.653,30 TL \u00f6dendi\u011fi, tutana\u011f\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 29.06.2022 tarihi itibar\u0131yla i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi devam eden davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ile y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti gibi i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona ermesine ba\u011fl\u0131 tazminat ve alacaklar\u0131n \u00f6denece\u011finden s\u00f6z edilmesinin \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n 31.10.2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekte bir fesih i\u015flemi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde avans niteli\u011finde \u00f6demelerin k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi, ayr\u0131ca i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi sona ermedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n parasal alaca\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin kanuna uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi ve ger\u00e7ekte bir fesih s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde i\u015f\u00e7iye ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda bir \u00f6demenin arabulucu \u00f6n\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan anla\u015fma ile kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6demenin avans niteli\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi sona ermedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n arabulucu anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131 ile paraya tahvil edilmesinin de kabul edilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : Van B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
SAYISI : 2023\/2077 E., 2024\/1121 K.<\/p>\n
\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Van 2. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
SAYISI : 2022\/1525 E., 2023\/642 K.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. DAVA<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 03.10.2015 tarihinde i\u015fe ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 31.10.2022 tarihine kadar benzin istasyonunda pompac\u0131 olarak bilfiil \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi devam ederken daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin 29.06.2022 tarihinde kendisinin belirlemi\u015f oldu\u011fu arabulucuya m\u00fcvekkili ile di\u011fer i\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 r\u0131zalar\u0131 ve iradeleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda g\u00f6t\u00fcrerek, m\u00fcvekkili ve di\u011fer i\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131ndan ibra almak amac\u0131yla s\u00f6zde anla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arabuluculuk tutana\u011f\u0131nda belirtilen \u00fccret (maa\u015f) alaca\u011f\u0131, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131, asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alaca\u011f\u0131, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131, yol ve yemek \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131 konular\u0131nda ihtiyari arabuluculuk suretiyle 29.06.2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ihtiyari arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek arabuluculuk anla\u015fma belgesinin iptaline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. CEVAP<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131 taraf arabuluculuk tutanaklar\u0131 ile daval\u0131n\u0131n kendi arabulucusuna zorlanarak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fini iddia etse de davac\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015f\u0131, k\u0131dem s\u00fcresi, e\u011fitim durumu ve i\u015f tecr\u00fcbesi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda arabuluculuk faaliyetinin anlam\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00f6nemini anlayacak durumda oldu\u011funun a\u015fikar olup davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n iradesinin sakatland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan 2022\/222306 No.lu arabuluculuk tutana\u011f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi baz\u0131 i\u015fverenlerin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi feshetmeden belli aral\u0131klarla i\u015f\u00e7i alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6dediklerini, m\u00fcvekkili Firma taraf\u0131ndan da bu ama\u00e7 do\u011frultusunda hareket edilip arabuluculu\u011fa gidilip anla\u015fma sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin amac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7ilerinin \u00f6demelerini d\u00f6nem d\u00f6nem almalar\u0131 oldu\u011funu, Firman\u0131n davac\u0131ya ekte sunulan dekontlardan anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere 56.707,00 TL \u00f6deme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 ve \u00f6denen miktar aras\u0131nda bir orant\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu sebeple objektif ve subjektif unsurlar\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015eirkette pompac\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131 ile beraber arabuluculuk tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 imzalam\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, fesih bildiriminin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 31.10.2022 tarihinden \u00f6nce davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan se\u00e7ilen arabuluculu\u011fa y\u00f6nlendirildi\u011fi, i\u015fveren ve i\u015f\u00e7i aras\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 konusundaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa ili\u015fkin arabuluculuk tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tarih dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda taraflar\u0131n \u00fczerinde serbest\u00e7e tasarruf edemeyecekleri bir zamanda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu olmadan arabuluculuk tutana\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, ihtiyari arabuluculuk anla\u015fma belgesinin arabuluculu\u011fun amac\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve iptalinin gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 2022\/222306 numaral\u0131 29.06.2022 tarihli ihtiyari arabuluculuk tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; somut olayda davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 03.10.2015-31.10.2022 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ihtiyari arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci ba\u015flat\u0131larak d\u00fczenlenen anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131nda davac\u0131ya \u00fccret (maa\u015f) alaca\u011f\u0131, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin, yol ve yemek \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denece\u011finin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131na 01.11.2022 tarihinde i\u015f\u00e7ilik alaca\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda 36.653,30 TL \u00f6dendi\u011fi, tutana\u011f\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 29.06.2022 tarihi itibar\u0131yla i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi devam eden davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ile y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti gibi i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona ermesine ba\u011fl\u0131 tazminat ve alacaklar\u0131n \u00f6denece\u011finden s\u00f6z edilmesinin \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n 31.10.2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekte bir fesih i\u015flemi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde avans niteli\u011finde \u00f6demelerin k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi, ayr\u0131ca i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi sona ermedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n parasal alaca\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin kanuna uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi ve ger\u00e7ekte bir fesih s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde i\u015f\u00e7iye ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda bir \u00f6demenin arabulucu \u00f6n\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan anla\u015fma ile kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6demenin avans niteli\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi sona ermedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n arabulucu anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131 ile paraya tahvil edilmesinin de kabul edilemeyece\u011fi, Mahkemenin vak\u0131a ve hukuki de\u011ferlendirmesinde usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle daval\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n
A. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n
1. Daval\u0131 vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde;<\/p>\n
a. Davac\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015f\u0131, k\u0131dem s\u00fcresi, e\u011fitim durumu ve i\u015f tecr\u00fcbesi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, arabuluculuk faaliyetinin anlam\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00f6nemini anlayacak durumda oldu\u011funu, bu sebepten davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n iradesinin sakatland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu,<\/p>\n
b. Menfaat birli\u011fi i\u00e7indeki tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
c. Gerek\u00e7e belirtilmeden tamamen soyut beyanlara dayanarak karar verildi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
d. Taraflar\u0131n anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fccretin \u00f6denmesinden aylar sonra tutana\u011f\u0131n iptalinin istenmesinin ayr\u0131 bir \u00e7eli\u015fki i\u00e7erdi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
B. De\u011ferlendirme ve Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, ihtiyari arabuluculuk anla\u015fma belgelerinin 6325 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131nda Arabuluculuk Kanunu’nun 18\/5 h\u00fckm\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli bir anla\u015fma belgesi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve buna g\u00f6re iptalinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin nihai kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 371. maddesinde yer alan sebeplerden birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Temyizen incelenen karar, taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131na, dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131 ile hukuki ili\u015fkinin nitelendirilmesine, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lama ve ispat kurallar\u0131 ile kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re usul ve kanuna uygun olup daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen nedenler karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
VI. KARAR<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple;<\/p>\n
Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 370\/1 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n
A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz giderinin temyiz edene y\u00fckletilmesine,<\/p>\n
Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n
03.03.2025 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi<\/p>\n
legalbank.net<\/p>\n
\u200b\u0130HT\u0130YAR\u0130 ARABULUCULUK ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130 – GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 B\u0130R ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130\u011e\u0130 – TARAFLARIN \u00dcZER\u0130NDE SERBEST\u00c7E TASARRUF EDEMEYECEKLER\u0130 B\u0130R ZAMANDA UYU\u015eMAZLIK KONUSU OLMADAN ARABULUCULUK TUTANA\u011eI D\u00dcZENLEND\u0130\u011e\u0130 – \u0130HT\u0130YAR\u0130 ARABULUCULUK ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130N\u0130N ARABULUCULU\u011eUN AMACINA UYGUN OLMADI\u011eI\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. YARGITAY 9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 Esas Numaras\u0131: 2024\/15165 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2025\/2237 Karar Tarihi: 03.03.2025 \u0130HT\u0130YAR\u0130 ARABULUCULUK ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130 GE\u00c7ERL\u0130 B\u0130R ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130\u011e\u0130 TARAFLARIN \u00dcZER\u0130NDE SERBEST\u00c7E TASARRUF EDEMEYECEKLER\u0130 B\u0130R ZAMANDA UYU\u015eMAZLIK KONUSU OLMADAN ARABULUCULUK TUTANA\u011eI D\u00dcZENLEND\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u0130HT\u0130YAR\u0130 ARABULUCULUK ANLA\u015eMA BELGES\u0130N\u0130N ARABULUCULU\u011eUN AMACINA UYGUN OLMADI\u011eI \u00d6ZET\u0130: Somut olayda davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 03.10.2015-31.10.2022 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ihtiyari arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci ba\u015flat\u0131larak d\u00fczenlenen anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131nda davac\u0131ya \u00fccret (maa\u015f) alaca\u011f\u0131, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin, yol ve yemek \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denece\u011finin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131na 01.11.2022 tarihinde i\u015f\u00e7ilik alaca\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda 36.653,30 TL \u00f6dendi\u011fi, tutana\u011f\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 29.06.2022 tarihi itibar\u0131yla i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi devam eden davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ile y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti gibi i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona ermesine ba\u011fl\u0131 tazminat ve alacaklar\u0131n \u00f6denece\u011finden s\u00f6z edilmesinin \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n 31.10.2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekte bir fesih i\u015flemi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde avans niteli\u011finde \u00f6demelerin k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi, ayr\u0131ca i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi sona ermedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n parasal alaca\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin kanuna uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi ve ger\u00e7ekte bir fesih s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde i\u015f\u00e7iye ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda bir \u00f6demenin arabulucu \u00f6n\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n