Uygulamada, esas hakk\u0131nda konu\u015fmalar yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra mahkeme, h\u00fckm\u00fc m\u00fczakere etmek i\u00e7in ara vermektedir. Bu ara esnas\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011fu zaman Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n da duru\u015fma salonunda bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclebilmektedir. Bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda, konunun hukuksal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ele alaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131lama yasam\u0131z\u0131n 227. maddesi \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r: \u201cM\u00fczakerede ancak karara ve h\u00fckme kat\u0131lacak h\u00e2kimler bulunur\u201d.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi gibi bu norm, yoruma muhta\u00e7 de\u011fildir. H\u00fck\u00fcm m\u00fczakere edilirken, yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimse ortamda bulunamaz. Yaln\u0131zca, maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca; mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131, yarg\u0131\u00e7 ve savc\u0131 yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131 ile mahkemede staj yapan avukat adaylar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fczakere s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmalar\u0131na izin verebilir. Bunlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda birisinin m\u00fczakerede bulunmas\u0131, yasaya uygun \u015fekilde verilen bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir ve bozma nedenidir[1].<\/p>\n
Yasa tasar\u0131s\u0131 gerek\u00e7esinde de dan\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in olsa dahi m\u00fczakerede yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimsenin bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131 belertilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Buna g\u00f6re, m\u00fczakerede ne Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ne de k\u00e2tip bulunabilir. \u00d6zellikle Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fczakerede bulunmas\u0131, uygulamada kan\u0131ksanan ciddi bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
M\u00fczakerenin nerede yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. Heyet, m\u00fczakere odas\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi gibi duru\u015fma salonunu bo\u015faltarak da bunu yapabilir. Ancak, duru\u015fma salonunda yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimsenin kalmamas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131, iddia ve savunma diyalekti\u011fine dayan\u0131r. Mahkeme, iddia ve savunman\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fmesinden kanaat edinen ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fi konumundad\u0131r. M\u00fczakerede iddia makam\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, iddia makam\u0131 ile tarafs\u0131z olan\/olmas\u0131 gereken karar verici makam\u0131n beraber karar vermesi anlam\u0131na gelir. B\u00f6yle bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilebilir mi?<\/p>\n
\u0130ddia ve savunma s\u00f6zlerini s\u00f6yledikten sonra savunman\u0131n d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak iddiayla beraber karar verilmesi, b\u00fct\u00fcn bir yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 sakatlar.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan belirtelim ki, m\u00fczakerenin s\u0131rf formalite icab\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bir izlenim de verilmemelidir. H\u00fck\u00fcm, duru\u015fmada edinilen vicdani kanaate dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Duru\u015fma bitmeden, son celse \u00f6ncesinde h\u00fckm\u00fcn haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, kanaatin duru\u015fmada edinilmedi\u011fini, yasan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k s\u00f6z\u00fcne muhalefet edildi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak; uygulamam\u0131zda s\u0131kl\u0131kla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, duru\u015fma \u00f6ncesi kararlar\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kopyala-yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r yap\u0131lmas\u0131, m\u00fczakere a\u015famas\u0131nda Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ve k\u00e2tibin de yer almas\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n do\u011fru d\u00fczg\u00fcn yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve yasan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k s\u00f6z\u00fcne ve t\u00fcm mant\u0131\u011f\u0131na muhalefet edildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir. B\u00f6yle bir yarg\u0131lama sonucu verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, hukuksal de\u011feri yoktur. <\/p>\n
————<\/p>\n
[1] Koray Do\u011fan, \u201cCeza Muhakemesinde H\u00fck\u00fcm\u201d, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 3, Say\u0131: 7, 2008, s. 194-195.<\/p>\n
\u200bUygulamada, esas hakk\u0131nda konu\u015fmalar yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra mahkeme, h\u00fckm\u00fc m\u00fczakere etmek i\u00e7in ara vermektedir. Bu ara esnas\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011fu zaman Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n da duru\u015fma salonunda bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclebilmektedir. Bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda, konunun hukuksal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ele alaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131lama yasam\u0131z\u0131n 227. maddesi \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r: \u201cM\u00fczakerede ancak karara ve h\u00fckme kat\u0131lacak h\u00e2kimler bulunur\u201d.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi gibi bu norm, yoruma muhta\u00e7 de\u011fildir. H\u00fck\u00fcm m\u00fczakere edilirken, yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimse ortamda bulunamaz. Yaln\u0131zca, maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca; mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131, yarg\u0131\u00e7 ve savc\u0131 yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131 ile mahkemede staj yapan avukat adaylar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fczakere s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmalar\u0131na izin verebilir. Bunlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda birisinin m\u00fczakerede bulunmas\u0131, yasaya uygun \u015fekilde verilen bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir ve bozma nedenidir[1].<\/p>\n
Yasa tasar\u0131s\u0131 gerek\u00e7esinde de dan\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in olsa dahi m\u00fczakerede yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimsenin bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131 belertilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Buna g\u00f6re, m\u00fczakerede ne Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ne de k\u00e2tip bulunabilir. \u00d6zellikle Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fczakerede bulunmas\u0131, uygulamada kan\u0131ksanan ciddi bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
M\u00fczakerenin nerede yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. Heyet, m\u00fczakere odas\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi gibi duru\u015fma salonunu bo\u015faltarak da bunu yapabilir. Ancak, duru\u015fma salonunda yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimsenin kalmamas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131, iddia ve savunma diyalekti\u011fine dayan\u0131r. Mahkeme, iddia ve savunman\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fmesinden kanaat edinen ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fi konumundad\u0131r. M\u00fczakerede iddia makam\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, iddia makam\u0131 ile tarafs\u0131z olan\/olmas\u0131 gereken karar verici makam\u0131n beraber karar vermesi anlam\u0131na gelir. B\u00f6yle bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilebilir mi?<\/p>\n
\u0130ddia ve savunma s\u00f6zlerini s\u00f6yledikten sonra savunman\u0131n d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak iddiayla beraber karar verilmesi, b\u00fct\u00fcn bir yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 sakatlar.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan belirtelim ki, m\u00fczakerenin s\u0131rf formalite icab\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bir izlenim de verilmemelidir. H\u00fck\u00fcm, duru\u015fmada edinilen vicdani kanaate dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Duru\u015fma bitmeden, son celse \u00f6ncesinde h\u00fckm\u00fcn haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, kanaatin duru\u015fmada edinilmedi\u011fini, yasan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k s\u00f6z\u00fcne muhalefet edildi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak; uygulamam\u0131zda s\u0131kl\u0131kla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, duru\u015fma \u00f6ncesi kararlar\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kopyala-yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r yap\u0131lmas\u0131, m\u00fczakere a\u015famas\u0131nda Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ve k\u00e2tibin de yer almas\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n do\u011fru d\u00fczg\u00fcn yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve yasan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k s\u00f6z\u00fcne ve t\u00fcm mant\u0131\u011f\u0131na muhalefet edildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir. B\u00f6yle bir yarg\u0131lama sonucu verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, hukuksal de\u011feri yoktur. <\/p>\n
————<\/p>\n
[1] Koray Do\u011fan, \u201cCeza Muhakemesinde H\u00fck\u00fcm\u201d, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 3, Say\u0131: 7, 2008, s. 194-195.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Uygulamada, esas hakk\u0131nda konu\u015fmalar yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra mahkeme, h\u00fckm\u00fc m\u00fczakere etmek i\u00e7in ara vermektedir. Bu ara esnas\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011fu zaman Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n da duru\u015fma salonunda bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclebilmektedir. Bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda, konunun hukuksal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ele alaca\u011f\u0131z. Yarg\u0131lama yasam\u0131z\u0131n 227. maddesi \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r: \u201cM\u00fczakerede ancak karara ve h\u00fckme kat\u0131lacak h\u00e2kimler bulunur\u201d. G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi gibi bu norm, yoruma muhta\u00e7 de\u011fildir. H\u00fck\u00fcm m\u00fczakere edilirken, yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimse ortamda bulunamaz. Yaln\u0131zca, maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca; mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131, yarg\u0131\u00e7 ve savc\u0131 yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131 ile mahkemede staj yapan avukat adaylar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fczakere s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmalar\u0131na izin verebilir. Bunlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda birisinin m\u00fczakerede bulunmas\u0131, yasaya uygun \u015fekilde verilen bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir ve bozma nedenidir[1]. Yasa tasar\u0131s\u0131 gerek\u00e7esinde de dan\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in olsa dahi m\u00fczakerede yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimsenin bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131 belertilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, m\u00fczakerede ne Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ne de k\u00e2tip bulunabilir. \u00d6zellikle Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fczakerede bulunmas\u0131, uygulamada kan\u0131ksanan ciddi bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kt\u0131r. M\u00fczakerenin nerede yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. Heyet, m\u00fczakere odas\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi gibi duru\u015fma salonunu bo\u015faltarak da bunu yapabilir. Ancak, duru\u015fma salonunda yarg\u0131\u00e7lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimsenin kalmamas\u0131 gerekir. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131, iddia ve savunma diyalekti\u011fine dayan\u0131r. Mahkeme, iddia ve savunman\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fmesinden kanaat edinen ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fi konumundad\u0131r. M\u00fczakerede iddia makam\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, iddia makam\u0131 ile tarafs\u0131z olan\/olmas\u0131 gereken karar verici makam\u0131n beraber karar vermesi anlam\u0131na gelir. B\u00f6yle bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n