{"id":57399,"date":"2025-04-16T11:47:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-16T08:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-04-16T11:47:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-16T08:47:00","slug":"yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

11. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n

2017\/16572 E., 2018\/7615 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi
\nSU\u00c7 : Resmi belgede sahtecilik, Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, G\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : D\u00fc\u015fme<\/p>\n

A) San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Adana 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2008\/288 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131na verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi:<\/p>\n

Re\u00e7etelere yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcrleri, su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 345. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde olup, eczac\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, iddia olunan re\u00e7etelere “sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc ilave ederek” bunlara uygun ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 fatura d\u00fczenleyip Emekli Sand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haks\u0131z ila\u00e7 bedeli almas\u0131 \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eyleminde, sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc resmi belge olmay\u0131p \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu ve \u00f6zel belgenin de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun hile unsurunu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 79. maddesi delaletiyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 504\/3. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen “nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve san\u0131k lehine olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihlerden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden, kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan vekili ve san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafilerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

B)San\u0131klar …, …, …, … ve … hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak su\u00e7undan verilen d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi:
\nSan\u0131klar\u0131n akne tedavisinde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun olmayan majistral i\u00e7erikli ila\u00e7lar\u0131 ihtiva eden re\u00e7ete d\u00fczenlemeleri nedeniyle haklar\u0131n g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131klara y\u00fcklenen 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 240. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda kalan g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve san\u0131klar lehine olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihlerden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden, kamu davalar\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan vekili ve san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafilerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

C)Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 27.12.2006 tarihli iddianamesiyle ve san\u0131klar …, …, …, …, … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan dava nedeniyle verilen d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi:<\/p>\n

5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihlerinde \u00f6zel polikliniklerde ba\u015fka doktorun ka\u015fesini kullan\u0131p bu isim ad\u0131na imzalamak suretiyle ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 re\u00e7ete d\u00fczenlemek, t\u0131p merkezinde hi\u00e7 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmayan doktor ad\u0131na ve yapt\u0131r\u0131lmayan tahlil istem belgelerini d\u00fczenlemek ve faturaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p kuruma ibraz etmek suretiyle kurum zarar\u0131na sebebiyet vermek \u015feklindeki iddialara konu olan belgeler resmi belge olmay\u0131p \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu ve \u00f6zel belgenin de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun hile unsurunu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 79. maddesi delaletiyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 504\/7. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, su\u00e7 niteli\u011finde yan\u0131lg\u0131 ile eylemlerin g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahisle d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 ise de; nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve lehe olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7 tarihlerinden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden kamu davalar\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafileri ve kat\u0131lan vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle sonucu itibar\u0131yla do\u011fru olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

D) Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 16.07.2008 tarihli iddianamesiyle san\u0131klar …, … ve … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan dava nedeniyle verilen d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi:<\/p>\n

San\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fka doktorlara ait ka\u015fe ile re\u00e7ete d\u00fczenlediklerinden bahisle kamu g\u00f6revlisinin resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7unu i\u015fledikleri iddia edilmi\u015f ise de; eylemleri nedeniyle somut bir belirleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve fiillerinin sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, eylemlerinin 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 354. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda bulunan \u201c\u00f6zel sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015funda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan doktorun ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 re\u00e7ete ve belge d\u00fczenlemesi\u201d su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup; ayr\u0131ca Co\u015fkun Eczanesi taraf\u0131ndan kuruma fatura edilen 33 adet re\u00e7etede sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcrleri oldu\u011fu ve bu re\u00e7etelerin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fka doktor ka\u015feleri d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015f ise de, san\u0131klar\u0131n sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemine i\u015ftiraklerinin tespit edilememi\u015f olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n

5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihlerinde \u00f6zel polikliniklerde ba\u015fka doktorun ka\u015fesini kullan\u0131p bu isim ad\u0131na imzalamak suretiyle ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 re\u00e7ete d\u00fczenlemek ve faturaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p kuruma ibraz etmek suretiyle kurum zarar\u0131na sebebiyet vermek iddias\u0131na konu olan belgeler resmi belge olmay\u0131p \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu ve \u00f6zel belgenin de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun hile unsurunu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 79. maddesi delaletiyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 504\/7. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, su\u00e7 niteli\u011finde yan\u0131lg\u0131 ile eylemlerin g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahisle d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 ise de; nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve lehe olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7 tarihlerinden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden kamu davalar\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafileri ve kat\u0131lan vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle sonucu itibar\u0131yla do\u011fru olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

E) Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 03.04.2007 tarihli iddianamesi ile san\u0131k … ve 14.05.2007 tarihli iddianamesiyle san\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan davada eylemlerin nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahisle verilen g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 \u00fczerine kurulan d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n incelenmesi:<\/p>\n

5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihlerinde \u00f6zel polikliniklerde ba\u015fka doktorun ka\u015fesini kullan\u0131p bu isim ad\u0131na imzalamak suretiyle ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 re\u00e7ete d\u00fczenlemek ve faturaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p kuruma ibraz etmek suretiyle kurum zarar\u0131na sebebiyet vermek iddialar\u0131na konu olan fiillerinin, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 504\/7. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, su\u00e7 niteli\u011finde yan\u0131lg\u0131 ile eylemlerin g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahisle d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kurulmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 ise de, nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re, su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve lehe olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7 tarihlerinden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden, kamu davalar\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafileri ve kat\u0131lan vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle sonucu itibar\u0131yla do\u011fru olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

F) Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 24.12.2010 tarihli iddianamesi ile san\u0131klar …, …, …, Ceyda Asayo\u011flu ve … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan verilen d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde:<\/p>\n

Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kimlikleri yaz\u0131lmayan san\u0131klar …, … ve …’in kimliklerinin gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihlerinde \u00f6zel polikliniklerde ba\u015fka doktorun ka\u015fesini kullan\u0131p bu isim ad\u0131na imzalamak suretiyle ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 re\u00e7ete d\u00fczenlemek ve faturaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p kuruma ibraz etmek suretiyle kurum zarar\u0131na sebebiyet vermek iddias\u0131na konu olan belgeler resmi belge olmay\u0131p \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu ve \u00f6zel belgenin de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun hile unsurunu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 79. maddesi delaletiyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 504\/7. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, su\u00e7 niteli\u011finde yan\u0131lg\u0131 ile eylemlerin g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahisle d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 ise de, nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re, su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve lehe olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7 tarihlerinden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden kamu davalar\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle sonucu itibar\u0131yla do\u011fru olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

G)Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 24.12.2010 tarihli iddianamesiyle san\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan dava nedeniyle verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi:<\/p>\n

San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda 24.12.2010 tarihli iddianame ile a\u00e7\u0131lan ve birle\u015fen 2010\/552 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyada bulunan 15.03.2010 tarihli SGK Tefti\u015f Kurulu Soru\u015fturma Raporu’na g\u00f6re; san\u0131k … taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6zel \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 T\u0131p Merkezi’nde ba\u015fka doktorlara ait ka\u015feler ile d\u00fczenlenerek onaylanan Fatma Tarc\u0131 ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 27.06.2005 ve G\u00fcler Or\u00e7an ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 04.08.2005 tarihli re\u00e7eteler oldu\u011fu; ayr\u0131ca Mehmet Akta\u015f ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 05.05.2005 tarihli re\u00e7etenin 10.06.2005, Nuri Din\u00e7er ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 06.05.2005 tarihli re\u00e7etenin 09.06.2005, Mehmet Yorulmaz ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 13.05.2005 tarihli re\u00e7etenin 11.06.2005, Fatma Tarc\u0131 ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 20.05.2005 tarihli re\u00e7etenin 15.06.2005 ve G\u00fcler Or\u00e7an ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 24.05.2005 tarihli re\u00e7etenin de 17.06.2005 tarihinde \u00f6dendi\u011finin ayr\u0131ca 14 adet re\u00e7etenin daha 01.06.2005 tarihinden sonra \u00f6dendi\u011finin tespit edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; her ne kadar san\u0131k sa\u011fl\u0131k oca\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan doktor ise de, su\u00e7a konu re\u00e7etelerin \u00f6zel sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmeti sunan t\u0131p merkezi veya polikliniklerde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, bu nedenle eylemlerinin 210\/2. madde delaletiyle TCK’nin 204\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen resmi belgede sahtecilik ve ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 158\/1-e maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6zel sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumundaki eylemlerinin g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden, su\u00e7 niteli\u011finde yan\u0131lg\u0131 ile t\u00fcm eylemlerinin g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahisle d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmu\u015f ise de;<\/p>\n

1- Sahtecilik su\u00e7u bak\u0131m\u0131ndan; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca; san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen TCK’nin 210\/2. maddesi delaletiyle 204\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u201cresmi belgede sahtecilik\u201d su\u00e7unun, su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 204\/1. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezas\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 66\/1-e ve 67\/4. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi 04.08.2005 tarihinden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, su\u00e7 tarihinde yan\u0131lg\u0131 ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olmayan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 102\/4, 104\/2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

Yasaya ay\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafileri ve kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, sair y\u00f6nleri incelenmeyen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK\u2019nin 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA; ancak san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen TCK’nin 210\/2. maddesi delaletiyle 204\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u201cresmi belgede sahtecilik\u201d su\u00e7unun, su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 204\/1. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezas\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 66\/1-e ve 67\/4. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi 04.08.2005 tarihinden temyiz inceleme tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmeyen bu hususta ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 322. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yetkiye dayan\u0131larak karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 66\/1-e, 67\/4 ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019nin 223\/8. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca D\u00dc\u015eMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

2- Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise; \u00d6zel \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 Poliklini\u011fi’nde san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan sahte olarak d\u00fczenlenip onaylanan re\u00e7eteler nedeniyle kurumun 17.06.2005 tarihinde \u00f6deme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, su\u00e7un 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK d\u00f6neminde i\u015flendi\u011fi ve su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fckte olan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 66, 67. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrelerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, su\u00e7 tarihinden \u00f6nce y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkm\u0131\u015f olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 102\/4, 104\/2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca d\u00fc\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafileri ve kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, sair y\u00f6nleri incelenmeyen h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebepten dolay\u0131 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’nin 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 03.10.2018 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 03.10.2018 tarihli, 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi 2017\/16572 E., 2018\/7615 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SU\u00c7 : Resmi belgede sahtecilik, Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, G\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma H\u00dcK\u00dcM : D\u00fc\u015fme A) San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Adana 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2008\/288 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131na verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi: Re\u00e7etelere yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcrleri, su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 345. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde olup, eczac\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, iddia olunan re\u00e7etelere “sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc ilave ederek” bunlara uygun ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 fatura d\u00fczenleyip Emekli Sand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haks\u0131z ila\u00e7 bedeli almas\u0131 \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eyleminde, sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc resmi belge olmay\u0131p \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu ve \u00f6zel belgenin de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun hile unsurunu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 79. maddesi delaletiyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 504\/3. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen “nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve san\u0131k lehine olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihlerden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden, kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi 2017\/16572 E., 2018\/7615 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SU\u00c7 : Resmi belgede sahtecilik, Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, G\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma H\u00dcK\u00dcM : D\u00fc\u015fme A) San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Adana 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2008\/288 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131na verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi: Re\u00e7etelere yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcrleri, su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 345. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde olup, eczac\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, iddia olunan re\u00e7etelere “sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc ilave ederek” bunlara uygun ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 fatura d\u00fczenleyip Emekli Sand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haks\u0131z ila\u00e7 bedeli almas\u0131 \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eyleminde, sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc resmi belge olmay\u0131p \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu ve \u00f6zel belgenin de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun hile unsurunu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 79. maddesi delaletiyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 504\/3. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen “nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve san\u0131k lehine olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihlerden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden, kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-16T08:47:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-16T08:47:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":2781,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-16T08:47:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi 2017\/16572 E., 2018\/7615 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SU\u00c7 : Resmi belgede sahtecilik, Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, G\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma H\u00dcK\u00dcM : D\u00fc\u015fme A) San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda sahtecilik ve nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Adana 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2008\/288 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131na verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi: Re\u00e7etelere yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcrleri, su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 345. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde olup, eczac\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, iddia olunan re\u00e7etelere “sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc ilave ederek” bunlara uygun ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 fatura d\u00fczenleyip Emekli Sand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haks\u0131z ila\u00e7 bedeli almas\u0131 \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eyleminde, sahte ila\u00e7 kup\u00fcr\u00fc resmi belge olmay\u0131p \u00f6zel belge niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu ve \u00f6zel belgenin de doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun hile unsurunu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 79. maddesi delaletiyle ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 504\/3. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen “nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7 ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 9. maddeleri h\u00fckm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun yasada gerektirdi\u011fi cezas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihlerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan ve san\u0131k lehine olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nin 102\/4 ve 104\/2. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihlerden h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden, kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n vaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-04-16T08:47:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-04-16T08:47:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":2781,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-04-16T08:47:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-11-ceza-dairesinin-2017-16572-e-ve-2018-7615-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2017\/16572 E. ve 2018\/7615 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57399"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57399\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}