T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
S\u00dcLEYMAN MENG\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/20982)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6rler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Gizem Ceren DEM\u0130R KO\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
S\u00fcleyman MENG\u0130<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u00dcnal \u00c7EL\u0130K<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin yakalama i\u015flemi s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sonucu meydana gelen yaralanma, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u015f\u00fcpheliye yap\u0131lan muameleler ve bu konuda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 7\/7\/2020 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgeler do\u011frultusunda ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu 28\/6\/2017 tarihinde, Ele\u015fkirt-A\u011fr\u0131 yolu \u00fczerinde ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k faaliyetlerinin \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma esnas\u0131nda arac\u0131n kasa k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr vaziyette ka\u00e7ak oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen sigaralarla seyir h\u00e2linde oldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine zor kullan\u0131larak yakalanm\u0131\u015f, bir g\u00fcn g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulduktan sonra Ele\u015fkirt Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Olay\u0131n meydana geli\u015f \u015fekline ili\u015fkin kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta, 28\/6\/2017 tarihinde ka\u00e7ak oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen sigaralarla y\u00fckl\u00fc kamyonete dur ihtar\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine ka\u00e7an arac\u0131n tepe lambas\u0131 tak\u0131l\u0131p siren \u00e7al\u0131narak takip edilmesine ve dur ihtar\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer bir arac\u0131n kovalamacaya kat\u0131larak ters y\u00f6nde seyre ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, takibi sonland\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla ekip arac\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, havaya uyar\u0131 ate\u015fi a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde ara\u00e7lar\u0131n durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ka\u00e7an ilk arac\u0131n tekerle\u011fine ate\u015f edildi\u011fi, arac\u0131n bariyerlere \u00e7arpmak suretiyle durdu\u011fu, duran ilk ara\u00e7tan M.M. ile bir ki\u015finin indi\u011fi, ikinci ara\u00e7tan ba\u015fvurucu ve M.R.M. isimli ki\u015fi ile birlikte \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015finin indi\u011fi, ikinci ara\u00e7tan inen ki\u015filerin g\u00f6revlilere tahta ve demir sopalarla sald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6revlileri \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye y\u00f6nelik olarak kafalar\u0131n\u0131n hedef al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak gaz s\u0131k\u0131larak m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011fi, sald\u0131r\u0131ya devam eden ki\u015filerin orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmak suretiyle y\u00fcz \u00fcst\u00fc yere yat\u0131r\u0131larak etkisiz h\u00e2le getirilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Tutanakta ayr\u0131ca olay yerindeki kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131ktan faydalanan d\u00f6rt ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile ve bir ki\u015finin de olay yerinde duran ticari taksi ile kendilerine sinkafl\u0131 s\u00f6zlerle hakaret ederek ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ile M.M. isimli ki\u015finin yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ka\u00e7ak sigaralar\u0131n muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Olay sonras\u0131nda hem ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131 olay\u0131na hem de ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin olarak resen soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ele\u015fkirt Devlet Hastanesinin 28\/6\/2017 tarihli raporunda ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131rt\u0131nda 5 tane cop izi, sol \u00f6n kolda cop izi, sol dizde ve y\u00fcz\u00fcn sol k\u0131sm\u0131nda darba ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, di\u015f kesisine ba\u011fl\u0131 \u00fcst duda\u011f\u0131n orta k\u0131sm\u0131nda \u00f6dem bulundu\u011fu, yaralanman\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilece\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00fc\u00e7 polis memuru hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen muayene raporlar\u0131\u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. Sa\u011f kol \u00fcst k\u0131s\u0131mda 10×15 cm darba ba\u011fl\u0131 geni\u015f k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, sol kolda darba ba\u011fl\u0131 geni\u015f k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131klar, sol omuzda 3×3 (birim belirtilmemi\u015f) lezyon,<\/p>\n
ii. Sol el be\u015finci ve ikinci parmaklarda kanamal\u0131 kesi, sa\u011f bilekte kesi, al\u0131n ve burun \u00e7evresinde darba ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, sa\u011f birinci parmakta k\u0131r\u0131k,<\/p>\n
iii. Sa\u011f dizde k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k erozyon, sol dizde erozyon, sa\u011f bilekte kanamal\u0131 \u00e7izik.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun, olay\u0131n ertesini g\u00fcn\u00fc al\u0131nan g\u00f6zalt\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporunda, sol kulak ve kulak arkas\u0131nda morluk, sol kol dirsek b\u00f6lgesinde darp izi, s\u0131rttaki izlerin kayboldu\u011fu, sol dizde 2×3 (birim belirtilmemi\u015f) ekimotik alan, y\u00fczde al\u0131n b\u00f6lgesinde hafif, daha \u00f6nce kanad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belli olan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ekimotik alan, sol g\u00f6zde morarma, \u00fcst dudak orta k\u0131s\u0131mda kesi tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu, olay nedeniyle Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta 29\/6\/2017 tarihinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde, \u0130ran’dan getirdi\u011fi ka\u00e7ak sigaralar\u0131 Erzurum’da satmak \u00fczere yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yolda karde\u015fi M.M.yi arac\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sivil iki arac\u0131n durmas\u0131n\u0131 istemesi \u00fczerine husumetli oldu\u011fu Y.D.nin adamlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sivil ara\u00e7larda polis oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterecek bir i\u015faretin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arac\u0131n lasti\u011fine ate\u015f edilince durdu\u011funu, sivil giyimli ki\u015filerin direnmedikleri h\u00e2lde kendilerini g\u00f6z ya\u015fart\u0131c\u0131 gaz s\u0131karak kelep\u00e7eledi\u011fini, tekme, tokat ve cop ile d\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bir polisin arac\u0131n cam\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olayda birlikte hareket eden ikinci bir ara\u00e7 ve sorulan 5 ki\u015finin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. \u015e\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla beyan\u0131 al\u0131nan M.M. de ba\u015fvurucuyla ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde ifade vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun avukat\u0131 ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda \u015fiddetin devam etti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde iddiada bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan nezarethane kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri \u00fczerinde Ele\u015fkirt \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6revlilerine inceleme yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup d\u00fczenlenen bilirki\u015fi raporunda nezarethanede tutulma s\u00fcresi zarf\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun darbedildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin kay\u0131t tespit edilmedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ilgili polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n anlat\u0131m\u0131na g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n
i. \u0130ki polis memuru kontrol s\u0131ras\u0131nda ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k faaliyetlerinde kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildikleri arac\u0131n kasas\u0131nda sigaralar\u0131 g\u00f6rmeleri \u00fczerine arac\u0131 durdurmak istemi\u015fler, ba\u015fka bir polis memurunu telsizden anonsla durumdan haberdar etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
ii. Dur ikazlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n ara\u00e7 durmam\u0131\u015f, ikinci bir ara\u00e7 ters y\u00f6nden gelerek polis arac\u0131n\u0131n takibi b\u0131rakmas\u0131 ve kaza yapmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla arac\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p tampondan vurmu\u015flar, polis memurlar\u0131 lastiklerine ate\u015f etmek suretiyle \u015f\u00fcphelileri durdurmu\u015flar, ara\u00e7lardan inen yedi ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan levye ve sopalarla sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011fram\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iii. Daha \u00f6nce telsizden haberdar edilen polis memuru olay yerine varm\u0131\u015f, sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 bertaraf etme \u00e7abas\u0131yla olaya m\u00fcdahil olmu\u015f, iki ki\u015fi kontrol at\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, di\u011fer sald\u0131rganlar ka\u00e7m\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Olaydan sonra da \u015f\u00fcpheliler taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7e\u015fitli suretlerle polis memurlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tehdit eylemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun olaydan bir hafta kadar sonra ba\u015f a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesi nedeniyle hastaneye gitti\u011fi ve kendisine beyin cerrahi poliklinik kontrol\u00fc \u00f6nerildi\u011fi, kontroller sonras\u0131 ameliyat ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, olay nedeniyle 4\/1\/2018 tarihinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa bir \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi sunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu \u00f6zetle olay g\u00fcn\u00fc iki sivil arac\u0131n durdurmak istemesi \u00fczerine husumetli oldu\u011fu ki\u015finin adamlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arac\u0131n tekerle\u011fine ate\u015f edilince durdu\u011funu, polis oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmayan ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan direnmedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde gaz s\u0131k\u0131larak kelep\u00e7elendi\u011fini, elleri arkadan kelep\u00e7eli h\u00e2ldeyken cop ve tekmeyle d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ismini verdi\u011fi bir polisin kafas\u0131na silah dip\u00e7i\u011fi ile vurdu\u011funu, fiziksel \u015fiddetin karakolda da devam etti\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca ilk muayenesinin yan\u0131nda polisler olmas\u0131 nedeniyle gerekti\u011fi gibi yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, serbest b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131ktan \u00fc\u00e7 d\u00f6rt g\u00fcn sonra ba\u015f a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel bir sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015funda MR (manyetik rezonans) tetkiki yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve darbe nedeniyle hasar olu\u015ftu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fini, olay sebebiyle fel\u00e7 oldu\u011funu ve bir dizi operasyon ge\u00e7irdi\u011fini belirterek polis memurlar\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucunun 4\/1\/2018 tarihinde verdi\u011fi \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esine ayr\u0131 bir soru\u015fturma numaras\u0131 verilmi\u015f, daha sonra ilk soru\u015fturma evrak\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. 17\/6\/2019 tarihinde ise ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131 olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin olan dosya tefrik edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucunun sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu ve al\u0131nan di\u011fer raporlar \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. A\u011fr\u0131 Devlet Hastanesinin ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 4\/7\/2017 tarihli giri\u015f evrak\u0131nda \u201cdaha \u00f6nce kafa travmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda yo\u011fun bak\u0131mda yatan hastaya beyin zedelenmesi oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenmi\u015f 4 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce yine ba\u015f\u0131na darbe alan hastan\u0131n bu b\u00f6lgede sa\u00e7l\u0131 deride morluklar\u0131 ve ba\u015f a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 olmu\u015f, 4 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr ba\u015f a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde devam etmesi \u00fczerine d\u0131\u015f merkezde beyin MR \u00e7ekilmi\u015f, acil servise y\u00f6nlendirilmi\u015f bilin\u00e7 kayb\u0131, bay\u0131lma yok, genel durum orta, kas g\u00fcc\u00fc tam, d\u0131\u015f merkez kranial MR raporunda sa\u011f frontal b\u00f6lgede ensefalomalezik alan, sol oksipital b\u00f6lgede kortikal alanda en b\u00fcy\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 7 mm, birka\u00e7 alanda akut iskemi ile ilgili olabilecek diff\u00fczyonda parlakla\u015fma alanlar\u0131, her iki tarafta meningeal hafif kontrastlanma izlendi\u011fi, \u00f6n planda posttravmatik ba\u015f a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 ve sol oksipital b\u00f6lgede travmaya sekonder aksonal injury olabilece\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, beyin cerrahi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00f6nerildi\u011fi, beyin cerrahi notunda akut patoloji d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmedi\u011fi\u201d belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. 6\/9\/2017 tarihinde ba\u015f a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 \u015fikayetiyle ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu Atat\u00fcrk \u00dcniversitesi Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesinde ba\u015fvurucunun daha \u00f6nce 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda kafas\u0131na darbe ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi daha sonra 2017 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n 6. ay\u0131nda kafas\u0131na darbe alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu, tetkikler i\u00e7in hastaneye yat\u0131\u015f yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 4\/10\/2017 tarihinde anevrizma nedeniyle ameliyat edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iii. 25\/3\/2019 tarihli Kocaeli Devlet Hastanesi Fiziksel T\u0131p ve Rehabilitasyon Uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporda ba\u015fvurucunun sol taraf\u0131nda fel\u00e7 bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 hastanede g\u00f6rev yapan beyin ve sinir cerrahisi uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tarihi belirsiz \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenen raporda da ba\u015fvurucunun hayati tehlike ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi, sol taraftaki kuvvet kayb\u0131n\u0131n sekel olarak kabul edilebilece\u011fi kanaati belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ayr\u0131ca 16\/9\/2019 tarihinde Adli T\u0131p Kurumuna yaz\u0131 yazarak ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n nezarethane \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporunda belirtilen darp cebir izlerine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi hususunda rapor d\u00fczenlenmesini istemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan rapor talebi hen\u00fcz sonu\u00e7lanmadan 16\/3\/2020 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zet olarak ba\u015fvurucunun olaydan be\u015f ay sonra ba\u015f a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetiyle doktora gitti\u011fi, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015f raporunda basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir \u015fekilde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131, herhangi bir darp eyleminin incelenen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun olaydan yedi ay sonra \u015fik\u00e2yette bulundu\u011fu, iddialar\u0131n\u0131 destekler delilin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara fel\u00e7 olmas\u0131na neden olan olay\u0131n nezarete konulma de\u011fil yakalama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini, olaydan sonra \u00e7ekilen foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131 sundu\u011funu, karde\u015finin tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmedi\u011fini, adli t\u0131p raporu beklenmeden karar verildi\u011fini belirterek yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz A\u011fr\u0131 Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 9\/6\/2020 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“28. 06.2017 tarihinde m\u00fc\u015ftekinin polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n dur ihtar\u0131na ra\u011fmen durmayarak … plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7la ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan anons ve siren seslerine ra\u011fmen m\u00fc\u015ftekinin ka\u00e7maya devam etti\u011fi, yakalanmamak i\u00e7in trafik ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n tersi y\u00f6nde hareket etti\u011fi ve polis arac\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131rarak ka\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fcm uyar\u0131 ve ikazlara ra\u011fmen durmayan arac\u0131n tekerle\u011fine ate\u015f edildi\u011fi ve bu s\u0131rada m\u00fc\u015ftekinin de i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu arac\u0131n bariyerlere \u00e7arpmak suretiyle durduruldu\u011fu, ara\u00e7tan \u00e7\u0131kan ve m\u00fc\u015ftekinin de i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131na sald\u0131rmaya devam ederek tehditlerde bulunmalar\u0131 \u00fczerine g\u00f6revliler taraf\u0131ndan orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131larak etkisiz hale getirildikleri, ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinden toplamda 1100 karton ka\u00e7ak sigara ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin nezarethaneye girerken ve \u00e7\u0131karken ald\u0131r\u0131lan adli muayene raporlar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde m\u00fc\u015ftekinin iddia etti\u011fi gibi silah kabzas\u0131 ile kafas\u0131ndan yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir bulguya rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, adli rapordaki bulgular\u0131n da m\u00fc\u015ftekinin ve yan\u0131ndaki \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n polise g\u00f6stermi\u015f oldu\u011fu mukavemetten kaynakl\u0131 diren\u00e7lerini k\u0131rmaya y\u00f6nelik eylemler dolay\u0131s\u0131yla olu\u015ftu\u011funun de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, v\u00fccudundaki yaralanmalar\u0131n\u0131n BTM ile giderilebilecek nitelikte oldu\u011funun bildirildi\u011finin g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, dosya aras\u0131ndaki kamera \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm tutanaklar\u0131nda da m\u00fc\u015ftekinin darp edildi\u011fine dair herhangi bir g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcye rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki taraf\u0131ndan dosya aras\u0131na sunulan Atat\u00fcrk \u00dcniversitesi Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesi’ne ait tedavi evraklar\u0131n\u0131n olaydan yakla\u015f\u0131k 7 ay sonras\u0131na ait oldu\u011fu ve olayla ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 tespit edilemedi\u011finden itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131… [anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r].”<\/p>\n
20. Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmesinden sonra dosyaya girdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 2. \u0130htisas Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 29\/7\/2020 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen raporda, \u201cki\u015fide tan\u0131mlanan subdural hemtomun k\u00fcnt nitelikte bir travma (uygun zemine d\u00fc\u015fme, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclme, sert ve k\u00fcnt bir cisimle vaya kesici ezici bir cismin k\u00fcnt taraf\u0131 ile vurulmak suretiyle) ile olu\u015fabilece\u011finin t\u0131bben bilindi\u011fi, kafa ve sa\u00e7l\u0131 deri b\u00f6lgesine y\u00f6nelik k\u00fcnt travmalarda ilk bak\u0131\u015fta herhangi bir harici lezyon olu\u015fmadan da kafa i\u00e7i de\u011fi\u015fimlerin geli\u015febilece\u011fi, ki\u015finin A\u011fr\u0131 Devlet Hastanesinin 4\/7\/2017 giri\u015f tarihli evrak\u0131nda belirtilen kafa travmas\u0131na ne zaman maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve niteli\u011finin bilinmedi\u011fi hususlar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ki\u015fide subdural kanama ve akabinde geli\u015fen mevcut klinik tablosunun iddia edilen g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda darp edilme olay\u0131na m\u0131 yoksa buna yak\u0131n tarihlerde maruz kal\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ba\u015fkaca bir travmaya m\u0131 ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak geli\u015fti\u011finin mevcut verilerle t\u0131bben ay\u0131rt edilemedi\u011fi\u201d bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturman\u0131n tefrik edilmesinden sonra, ba\u015fvurucunun da i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu alt\u0131 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda silahla kasten yaralama (polis memurlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik), g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin isimlerini kullanarak birden fazla ki\u015fi ile tehdit, kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6revinden dolay\u0131 alenen hakaret, 21\/3\/2007 tarihli ve 5607 say\u0131l\u0131 Ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131kla M\u00fccadele Kanunu’nun 3. maddesinin(18) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na muhalefet su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Olaya kar\u0131\u015fan bir \u015f\u00fcphelinin kimli\u011fi tespit edilememi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n derdest oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
22. Bunlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ba\u015fvurucu; olay g\u00fcn\u00fc polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu kendisine ait arac\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 ak\u00e2binde ellerinin arkas\u0131ndan kelep\u00e7elendi\u011fi ve darbedilmeye ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay mah\u00e2llinde ismini verdi\u011fi bir polis memuru taraf\u0131ndan silah dip\u00e7i\u011fiyle kafas\u0131na vuruldu\u011fu, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alma i\u015flemleri esnas\u0131nda v\u00fccudunun de\u011fi\u015fik yerlerinde yaralanmalar olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen basit t\u0131bb\u00ee m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek yaralanma oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde rapor verildi\u011fi, konuldu\u011fu nezarethanede k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131, nezarethanede ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131n a\u011fr\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmesine ra\u011fmen sevk i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmayarak a\u011fr\u0131 kesici almas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin s\u00f6ylendi\u011fi, olay g\u00fcn\u00fcnden birka\u00e7 g\u00fcn sonra m\u00fcracaat etti\u011fi hastanede ba\u015f\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 dip\u00e7ik darbesi nedeniyle sorun olu\u015ftu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi ve sonras\u0131nda v\u00fccudunun sol yan\u0131n\u0131n fel\u00e7 kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, fel\u00e7 kalmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 silah\u0131n dip\u00e7i\u011fiyle yaralanmas\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, meydana gelen zararlar\u0131n giderilmesinin idarenin sorumlulu\u011funda bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla meydana geldi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini amac\u0131yla Erzurum 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan dava 14\/1\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ret gerek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Davac\u0131 S\u00fcleyman Mengi’nin yaralanmas\u0131na ve neticesinde fel\u00e7li kalmas\u0131na dayanak te\u015fkil etti\u011fi iddia edilen olay\u0131n, S\u00fcleyman Mengi ile g\u00fcvenli\u011fi sa\u011flamakla g\u00f6revli emniyet birimi mensuplar\u0131 aras\u0131nda meydana geldi\u011fi, olaya ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen adl\u00ee soru\u015fturma sonucu verilen karar esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n yaralanmas\u0131na te\u015fkil eden olay an\u0131ndaki yaralama olay\u0131n\u0131n ilk olarak davac\u0131 S\u00fcleyman Mengi ve yan\u0131ndaki ki\u015filerin emniyet g\u00fc\u00e7lerine y\u00f6nelik mukavemeti oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu manada davac\u0131 S\u00fcleyman Mengi’nin ya\u015fanan olay neticesinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 esnas\u0131nda ald\u0131r\u0131lan sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunda v\u00fccudunda basit t\u0131bb\u00ee m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek yaralanmaya dayal\u0131 izler bulundu\u011fu sabit ise de, eldeki mevcut verilere g\u00f6re davac\u0131 S\u00fcleyman Mengi’nin bu \u015fekilde yaralanmas\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden olay\u0131n ba\u015flamas\u0131n\u0131n nedeninin davac\u0131 S\u00fcleyman Mengi’nin fiilinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, emniyet g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin fiillerinin orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 mahiyetinde oldu\u011fu, olay \u00fczerine d\u00fczenlenen adli muayene raporunda davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi gibi silah kabzas\u0131yla kafas\u0131ndan yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir bulgunun yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n olay an\u0131nda darp edildi\u011fine dair delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle iddia olunan fel\u00e7 ge\u00e7irme olay\u0131 ile idar\u00ee eylem aras\u0131nda ill\u00eeyet ba\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bunun yan\u0131nda davac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan, S\u00fcleyman Mengi’nin olay\u0131n ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulmak i\u00e7in konuldu\u011fu nezarethanede k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011fu ve yaralama fiilinin burada da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015fse de, davac\u0131 S\u00fcleyman Mengi’nin \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda nezarethane kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelendi\u011fi ve bu kapsamda tanzim edilen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc inceleme tutanaklar\u0131nda bu iddialar\u0131 ortaya koyan bir su\u00e7 unsuruna rastlan\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle \u015fik\u00e2yete y\u00f6nelik adl\u00ee soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011finden, bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n ba\u015fkaca bir delille davac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek, olay\u0131n bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle daval\u0131 idareye atf-\u0131 k\u00e2bil bir kusur bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmektedir.”<\/p>\n
24. Davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu inceleyen Dava dairesince Adli T\u0131p Kurumundan m\u00fctalaa al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 22\/4\/2024 tarihli bu m\u00fctalaan\u0131n sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131na g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n
i. Ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 28\/6\/2017 tarihli g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015f muayenesi bulgular\u0131 ile 29\/6\/2017 tarihli g\u00f6zalt\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f muayenesi bulgular\u0131 uyumludur.<\/p>\n
ii. Ki\u015fide tan\u0131mlanan subdural hemtomun k\u00fcnt nitelikte bir travma (uygun zemine d\u00fc\u015fme, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclme, sert ve k\u00fcnt bir cisimle veya kesici ezici bir cismin k\u00fcnt taraf\u0131 ile vurulmak suretiyle) ile olu\u015fabilece\u011fi t\u0131bben bilinmektedir. Kafa ve sa\u00e7l\u0131 deri b\u00f6lgesine y\u00f6nelik k\u00fcnt travmalarda ilk bak\u0131\u015fta herhangi bir harici lezyon olu\u015fmadan da kafa i\u00e7i de\u011fi\u015fimler geli\u015febilir.<\/p>\n
iii. Ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten yakla\u015f\u0131k 70 g\u00fcn sonra tan\u0131s\u0131 konulan subdural kanama ve akabinde geli\u015fen mevcut klinik tablo, dava konusu yakalama ve g\u00f6z alt\u0131 tarihleri ile uyumludur ancak mevcut verilerle yakalama esnas\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen zor kullanma m\u0131 yoksa g\u00f6z alt\u0131 s\u00fcresi boyunca maruz kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia olunan travma (\u015fiddet\/k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele) sonucu mu geli\u015fti\u011fi konusunda t\u0131bbi ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
A. Adli Yard\u0131m Talebi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
25. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. G\u00f6zalt\u0131nda K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele \u0130ddias\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda \u015fiddet g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, kendisine \u00e7\u00f6k kalk yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca doktora g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclme talebinin yerine getirilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
27. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n, “g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda \u015fiddetin devam etti\u011fi” \u015feklinde bir beyanda bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan iddiay\u0131 yine detay i\u00e7ermeksizin ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde dile getirmi\u015f, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun tutuldu\u011fu polis merkezinin kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri temin edilmi\u015f, herhangi bir k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olay\u0131na rastlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Her ne kadar ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporunda ilk rapordan farkl\u0131 olarak sol g\u00f6zde morluk belirtilmi\u015fse de, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015f raporunda ba\u015fvurucunun y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fcn sol taraf\u0131na darbe alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun sabit oldu\u011fu, olay an\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmayan morluk bulgusunun ertesi g\u00fcn \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n yaralanmalarla uyumlu oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. 2024 tarihli Adli T\u0131p Kurumu m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda da ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015f ve \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporlar\u0131n\u0131n uyumlu oldu\u011fu kanaati bildirilmi\u015ftir. Hi\u00e7bir a\u015famada detayland\u0131r\u0131lmayan ve Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde de soyut \u015fekilde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda darp iddias\u0131n\u0131n savunulabilir \u015fekilde ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucu Anayasa Mahkemesine ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6z alt\u0131nda kendisine \u00e7\u00f6k kalk yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucunun Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sundu\u011fu \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde an\u0131lan husus yer almamakta olup ilk defa kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu iddias\u0131n\u0131, kamera kayd\u0131 incelemesinde ba\u015fvurucunun duvar dibinde \u00e7\u00f6ker vaziyette oturdu\u011funu g\u00f6steren foto\u011frafa dayand\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. Kamera \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme tutanaklar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcpheli M.M.nin koridorda ayakta bir s\u00fcre bekledikleri tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun ayakta bekledikleri koridorda \u00e7\u00f6melerek oturdu\u011fu bir foto\u011fraf karesi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun kollar\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde \u00e7\u00f6melerek oturur vaziyette g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu foto\u011fraf karesinin ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Nitekim kamera kayd\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlemeleri dosyaya girdikten sonraki bir a\u015famada an\u0131lan iddian\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi de bu tespiti do\u011frular niteliktedir.<\/p>\n
29. Son olarak ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131n a\u011fr\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesine kar\u015f\u0131n doktora g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fini, kendisine a\u011fr\u0131 kesici almas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylendi\u011fini beyan etmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bir g\u00fcnl\u00fck g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresi ile giri\u015f ve \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015fta olmak \u00fczere iki kez doktor kontrol\u00fcnden ge\u00e7ti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmetlerine eri\u015fiminin engellendi\u011fine dair bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lamamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
30. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Yakalama S\u0131ras\u0131nda K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele \u0130ddias\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvurucu; polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u015fiddete maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kafas\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 dip\u00e7ik darbesi nedeniyle v\u00fccudunda kal\u0131c\u0131 hasar meydana geldi\u011fini, soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini, \u00f6zellikle olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda yan\u0131nda bulunan karde\u015fi M.M.nin dinlenmedi\u011fini ve yakalama sonras\u0131nda avukat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilen ve yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren foto\u011fraf\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucu, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n, hak arama h\u00fcrriyetinin ve etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
32. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan uzun bir s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu, ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ilgili mevzuat ve i\u00e7tihat ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvuruya konu olaya ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin bilgi ve belgeler sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
33. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder.<\/p>\n
34. \u00d6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi baz\u0131 h\u00e2llerde de ba\u015fvuru; ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn derecesi ile t\u00fcr\u00fc, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131nda yatan niyet ve ama\u00e7 ile maruz kal\u0131nan eylemin ma\u011fdurun fiziki b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczerindeki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 gibi hususlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilir (Mehmet Karada\u011f, B. No: 2013\/2030, 26\/6\/2014, \u00a7 20; Mustafa \u00c7elik ve Siyahmet \u015eeran, B. No: 2014\/7227, 12\/1\/2017, \u00a7 69; Yasin A\u011fca, B. No: 2014\/13163, 11\/5\/2017, \u00a7 110).<\/p>\n
35. Ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn t\u00fcr\u00fc ve derecesi, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015f ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n hemen ard\u0131ndan yeni bir adli rapor almak i\u00e7in herhangi bir sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015funa ba\u015fvurmamas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun 2004 y\u0131l\u0131ndaba\u015f\u0131na darbe alm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 2. \u0130htisas Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 29\/7\/2020 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen raporun kapsam\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenemeyece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
a. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
36. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
b. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
i. Genel \u0130lkeler<\/p>\n
37. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi, yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75; K.K. [GK], B. No: 2020\/34532, 29\/5\/2024, \u00a7 26).<\/p>\n
38. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131, ki\u015fi \u00fczerindeki etkisi ne olursa olsun ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde de g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 81; K.K. \u00a7 27).<\/p>\n
39. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin bu ilkeler, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin hukuka uygun olarak verdikleri emre kar\u015f\u0131 etkin (aktif) veya edilgin (pasif) direni\u015f g\u00f6sterilmesi h\u00e2linde de ge\u00e7erlidir (Arif Haldun Soyg\u00fcr, B. No: 2013\/2659, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 51, 52; K.K., \u00a7 27).<\/p>\n
40. Yakalama gerektiren durumlarda, \u00f6zellikle yakalamaya kar\u015f\u0131 direnmenin oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde \u015f\u00fcphesiz ki kolluk makamlar\u0131n\u0131n bedensel g\u00fc\u00e7 uygulamas\u0131 anayasal y\u00f6nden sorun olu\u015fturmamaktad\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonradan anla\u015f\u0131lan h\u00e2llerde yap\u0131lan yakalamalarda dahi yakalanmas\u0131na \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan ki\u015finin direnmesi kolluk makamlar\u0131n\u0131n zor kullanma yetkisini kullanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirebilir [Nergiz \u015een ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2017\/17702, 4\/7\/2022, \u00a7 50].<\/p>\n
41. Devletin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin bir de usule ili\u015fkin y\u00f6n\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, savunulabilir nitelikteki her k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi gerektirir. Bu soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131, insan onurunu koruyan hukukun etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin veya di\u011fer bireylerin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele niteli\u011findeki filleri nedeniyle hesap vermelerini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli vesoru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 110-112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103).<\/p>\n
42. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkilili\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan her olayda ge\u00e7erli olmak \u00fczere bir asgari soru\u015fturma i\u015flemler listesi veya benzeri bir asgari \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct belirlemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Fahriye Erkek ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/4668, 16\/9\/2015, \u00a7 68). Olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve varsa sorumlular\u0131n tespitine engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturmalarda soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n olay\u0131n geli\u015fimine ve delillerin elde edilmesine ili\u015fkin olarak \u00f6len ki\u015finin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve taleplerini kar\u015f\u0131lama zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmamaktad\u0131r (Yavuz Durmu\u015f ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/6574, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7 62; Mahpulah \u00d6zarslan, B. No: 2016\/12544, 15\/9\/2020, \u00a7 62).<\/p>\n
43. Etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir sonu\u00e7 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de\u011fil uygun ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi ba\u015fvuruculara \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle yarg\u0131latma ya da cezaland\u0131rma hakk\u0131 vermedi\u011fi gibi devlete t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyetle sonu\u00e7land\u0131rma \u00f6devi de y\u00fcklemez (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 113).<\/p>\n
ii. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
44. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda kolluk tutanaklar\u0131na g\u00f6re, ba\u015fvurucunun da i\u00e7lerinde bulundu\u011fu yedi ki\u015finin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iki ara\u00e7, polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan durdurulmak istenmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer ki\u015filer dur ihtar\u0131na uymam\u0131\u015f, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu arac\u0131 takibi b\u0131rakmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n lasti\u011fine ate\u015f etmesi sonucu ara\u00e7lar bariyerlere \u00e7arparak durmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve takipten kurtulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulamakta ancak takiptekilerin polis oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik takip ve durdurma a\u015famas\u0131nda ya\u015fananlara ili\u015fkin bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, ara\u00e7lar durduktan sonra direnmedi\u011fini, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kendisini kelep\u00e7eli haldeyken darp ettiklerini, olayda kendisi ve birlikte yakalanan karde\u015fi M.M. d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimsenin ve ikinci bir arac\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmektedir.<\/p>\n
45. Olay nedeniyle durdurulan yedi ki\u015fiden be\u015finin olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda ka\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 hususu tutanaklardan ve sonraki soru\u015fturma evraklar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131rapolis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda ciddi \u015fekilde yaraland\u0131klar\u0131 doktor raporlar\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir (bkz. \u00a7 9). Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun polis memurlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131na itibar edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemektedir. Durdurulan ki\u015filerce polis memurlar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, kendilerini savunmak ve ki\u015fileri kontrol alt\u0131na almak amac\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun da i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu gruba kuvvet kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
46. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n hem kendilerine y\u00f6nelen sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 bertaraf etmek amac\u0131yla me\u015fru savunma kapsam\u0131nda hem de \u015f\u00fcphelilerin yakalanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla maddi ve bedeni kuvvet kulland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n sabit oldu\u011fu, olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun kafas\u0131na darbe alm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fme, \u00e7arpma, arac\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7arpma ya da polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan maddi g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f olabilece\u011fi, sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun olay nedeniyle meydana gelen yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun tutumunun kendisine g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kesin olarak gerekmesi nedeniyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde kuvvet kullan\u0131m\u0131n orant\u0131s\u0131z oldu\u011fu sonucuna da ula\u015f\u0131lamamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
47. Ba\u015fvurucu, kafas\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 darbe sonucunda sonradan geli\u015fen rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle v\u00fccudunun sol taraf\u0131n\u0131n fel\u00e7 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucu, 4\/1\/2018 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde kafas\u0131na tabancan\u0131n dip\u00e7i\u011fi ile vuruldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015fse de 29\/6\/2017 tarihinde al\u0131nan ifadesinde kendisine tekme tokat ve jop ile vuruldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tabancan\u0131n dip\u00e7i\u011fi ile kafas\u0131na vuruldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir beyanda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda al\u0131nan sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131nda ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131n sol taraf\u0131na darbe ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmi\u015f olmakla birlikte bu yaralanman\u0131n nas\u0131l meydana geldi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir bulgu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu esnada ba\u015fvurucuda n\u00f6rolojik olarak bir sorun geli\u015fmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucu da serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n olaydan alt\u0131 g\u00fcn sonra hastaneye ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. ATK 2. \u0130htisas Kurulunca haz\u0131rlanan rapor uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun mevcut sa\u011fl\u0131k sorununun olay nedeniyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finin kesin olarak s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi kanaati bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucuda meydana geldi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen sekelin, al\u0131nan bu darbe sonucu olu\u015ftu\u011fu kabul edilse dahi ba\u015fvurucunun takip ve durdurma s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki sabit olan tutumu nedeniyle kendisine ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olarak kuvvet kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde kuvvet kullan\u0131m\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lamamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
48. Ba\u015fvurucu \u015fik\u00e2yeti hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015fse de ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131 \u00fczerine derhal ve resen soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun t\u00fcm iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelendi\u011fi, kamera kayd\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri, sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131 ve beyanlar ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere delillerin topland\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n orant\u0131l\u0131 kuvvet kullan\u0131m\u0131 sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc deliller, ba\u015fvurucunun yakalama sonras\u0131 \u00e7ekilen foto\u011fraf\u0131 ile ATK raporunun beklenmemi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmalar\u0131 doktor raporlar\u0131yla sabit olup s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen foto\u011fraf da ba\u015fvurucunun yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yeni bir delil niteli\u011finde de\u011fildir. ATK raporunun i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde de bu raporun beklenmeden karar verilmesinin de yine sonuca etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Sonuca etkili olmayan delillerin toplanmamas\u0131 etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etmeyecektir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanma olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
49. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
V. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. G\u00f6zalt\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Yakalama s\u0131ras\u0131nda kuvvet kullan\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
D. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fc ile ge\u00e7ici olarak muaf tutulan 446,90 TL har\u00e7tan ibaret yarg\u0131lama giderinin, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 339. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucudan TAHS\u0130L\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/20982 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 S\u00dcLEYMAN MENG\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/20982) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6rler : 1. Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Gizem Ceren DEM\u0130R KO\u015eAR Ba\u015fvurucu : S\u00fcleyman MENG\u0130 Vekili : Av. \u00dcnal \u00c7EL\u0130K \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin yakalama i\u015flemi s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sonucu meydana gelen yaralanma, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u015f\u00fcpheliye yap\u0131lan muameleler ve bu konuda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 7\/7\/2020 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgeler do\u011frultusunda ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu 28\/6\/2017 tarihinde, Ele\u015fkirt-A\u011fr\u0131 yolu \u00fczerinde ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k faaliyetlerinin \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma esnas\u0131nda arac\u0131n kasa k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr vaziyette ka\u00e7ak oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen sigaralarla seyir h\u00e2linde oldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n