T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R.E. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23711)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 30\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Batuhan Salim YE\u015e\u0130LK\u00d6Y<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R.E.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. M\u00fczeyyen \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130 YOLA\u00c7AN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve kasten yaralama eylemleri hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130ddialar\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu; internet \u00fczerinden tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan 19\/11\/2014 tarihinde ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde k\u0131yafetleri \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011fram\u0131\u015f, sonras\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k iki g\u00fcn boyunca al\u0131konulmu\u015f ve yine bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda kendisini ka\u00e7\u0131ran ki\u015finin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131na maruz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6re hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlar fiziki \u015fiddet g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ve cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, iddialar\u0131n\u0131 soru\u015fturma mercilerine ta\u015f\u0131yarak konuyla ilgili \u015fik\u00e2yetini bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 21\/11\/2014 tarihli kolluk ifadesi ile ertesi g\u00fcn Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda verdi\u011fi ifadesinde \u015fu iddialarda bulunmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n
i. Bir sosyal medya platformu \u00fczerinden E.\u00d6.yle tan\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u00fcz y\u00fcze g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcklerinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye devam etmemek istemi\u015f ve bunu E.\u00d6.ye s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine E.\u00d6. kendisini telefonla aram\u0131\u015f ve bu durumu kabul etmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ayr\u0131lmalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde hem kendisini hem de ba\u015fvurucuyu \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Korktu\u011fu i\u00e7in E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn ili\u015fkiye devam etme iste\u011fini kabul etmi\u015f ancak daha sonra yine ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. E.\u00d6. son bir defa daha bulu\u015fmak istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. E.\u00d6. ile ailesine (ba\u015fvurucunun ailesi) ait serada 19\/11\/2014 tarihinde bulu\u015fmu\u015flard\u0131r. Burada, ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini tekrar etmi\u015ftir. E.\u00d6. ise kendisini silahla tehdit etmi\u015ftir. E.\u00d6. belden yukar\u0131s\u0131ndaki k\u0131yafetleri \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f, ka\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fsa da E.\u00d6. kendisini yakalam\u0131\u015f, seran\u0131n \u00e7evresini saran dikenli tellerden sa\u00e7\u0131ndan tutarak zorla ge\u00e7irmi\u015ftir. Bu esnada kendisinin belden yukar\u0131s\u0131nda k\u0131yafet bulunmamaktad\u0131r. E.\u00d6. montunu vermi\u015f, birlikte seran\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131ndaki gri renkli arabaya binmi\u015flerdir. Arabay\u0131 s\u00fcren ki\u015fiye E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn kendisini ka\u00e7\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015f, Bu ki\u015fi onlar\u0131 k\u00f6y\u00fcn \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131na kadar g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve E.\u00d6.ye yard\u0131m etmeyece\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. Arabadan inmi\u015f ve ormanl\u0131k alanda bir s\u00fcre y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015flerdir. Beyaz renkli bir arabayla gelen ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fi kendisini ve E.\u00d6.y\u00fc alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ki\u015fi de onlar\u0131 il\u00e7e merkezine getirmi\u015ftir. E.\u00d6. elindeki silah\u0131 bu ki\u015fiye vermi\u015f ve saklamas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. E.\u00d6. kendisini \u00f6l\u00fcm ve tecav\u00fczle tehdit etti\u011fi i\u00e7in bu ki\u015fiye ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyememi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. \u0130l\u00e7e merkezine geldiklerinde E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn day\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ki\u015finin evine gitmi\u015flerdir. Evde bu ki\u015fi ile birlikte e\u015fi ve iki \u00e7ocu\u011fu vard\u0131r. Bu ki\u015filere ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyip yard\u0131m istese debu ki\u015filer yard\u0131m etmemi\u015ftir. O gece o evde kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. E.\u00d6. cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmek istemi\u015f, zaman kazanmak i\u00e7in nik\u00e2hs\u0131z cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmek istemedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine E.\u00d6. tecav\u00fcz etmeye kalkmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ertesi g\u00fcn eve bir imam gelmi\u015f, nik\u00e2hlar\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131ym\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130mama zorla ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc E.\u00d6. kendisini tecav\u00fcz etmekle tehdit etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. E.\u00d6. jandarman\u0131n bu eve gelebilece\u011fini belirterek kendisini ba\u015fka bir k\u00f6yde bulunan bir eve g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Evde E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn arkada\u015f\u0131, anne ve babas\u0131yla ya\u015famaktad\u0131r. Bu ki\u015filere zorla ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylememi\u015ftir. Gece ayn\u0131 odada kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. E.\u00d6. kendisine tecav\u00fcz etmi\u015ftir. Sabah uyand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n annesinden telefonunu istemi\u015f ve abisini arayarak abisine bulunduklar\u0131 yeri s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Daha sonra jandarma g\u00f6revlileri ayn\u0131 telefonu aram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Akabinde jandarma g\u00f6revlileri ba\u015fvurucunun ve E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu eve gelmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, E.\u00d6.den korktu\u011fu i\u00e7in o an r\u0131zas\u0131yla evden ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek zorunda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu karakola gittiklerinde olay\u0131n t\u00fcm detaylar\u0131n\u0131 jandarma g\u00f6revlilerine anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. E.\u00d6. 21\/11\/2014 tarihinde jandarma karakolunda \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifade vermi\u015ftir. \u0130fadesinde E.\u00d6. ba\u015fvurucuyla ba\u015fvurucunun evlerinin yak\u0131n\u0131nda bulunan serada bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131, burada ba\u015fvurucuya sald\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131 yerden ba\u015fvurucun r\u0131zas\u0131yla ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. E.\u00d6. ifadesinin devam\u0131nda kendilerini bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131 seradan gri bir arac\u0131n almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ormanl\u0131k alanda yakla\u015f\u0131k alt\u0131 ya da yedi kilometre y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcklerini, sonras\u0131nda bir arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n beyaz renkli bir ara\u00e7la kendilerini il\u00e7e merkezine g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. E.\u00d6. son olarak ba\u015fka bir arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n evinde iki g\u00fcn konaklad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve bu evde ba\u015fvurucunun r\u0131zas\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucuyla cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 21\/11\/2014 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen genel adli muayene raporlar\u0131nda her iki meme \u00fcst\u00fcnde ekimotik alanlar, s\u0131rtta yayg\u0131n abrazyon, pelvis sol lateralde 2×5 cm’lik ekimotik alan oldu\u011fu, vertebra muayeneside C1 seviyesinde palpasyonla hassasiyet saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, sol bacak proksimal medial y\u00fczde ekimoz tespit edildi\u011fi, hayati tehlikesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, atlantoaksiyel dislokasyon mevcut oldu\u011fu, hymen muayenesinde saat 3 ve saat 7 hizas\u0131nda hymende laserasyon ve ekimoz izlendi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi yerde 15\/12\/2014 tarihinde olay incelemesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; belirtilen alanda bir \u00e7ift ayakkab\u0131, \u00fc\u00e7 tak\u0131, bir palto ve bir uzun kollu penye bulundu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, genel adli muayene raporlar\u0131n\u0131 Adli T\u0131p Kurumuna g\u00f6ndererek ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda rapor alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Al\u0131nan 27\/2\/2015 tarihli raporda ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmalar\u0131n\u0131n hayati tehlike olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vebasit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahaleyle giderilemeyece\u011fi, atlantoaksiyel eklem \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (dislokasyon) hayat fonksiyonlar\u0131n\u0131 orta derecede (2) etkileyecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca al\u0131nan 12\/3\/2015 tarihli ek beyan\u0131nda boynundaki yaralanman\u0131n E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn sa\u00e7\u0131n\u0131 tutarak seran\u0131n \u00e7itlerinden zorla ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi esnada meydana gelmi\u015f olabilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn kendisini tehdit etti\u011fi silah\u0131n bir t\u00fcfek oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. E.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda 30\/3\/2015 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede muayene raporlar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan belirlemeler ve olay yeri incelemesi akabinde belirtilen alanda bulunan ve ba\u015fvurucuya ait olan e\u015fyadan s\u00f6z edilerek bu ki\u015finin nitelikli cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131, ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden nitelikli yoksun k\u0131lma ve neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. San\u0131k, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesindeki sorgusunda soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar ederek ba\u015fvurucunun tamamen r\u0131zas\u0131yla geldi\u011fini ve cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu da temel olarak soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki ifadesini tekrar etmi\u015f, ek olarak Posof’a kadar olan 12 kilometrelik mesafeyi \u00e7\u0131plak ayakla y\u00fcr\u00fcmek zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucu ve E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn evlerinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ki\u015filer ile beyaz arac\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla dinlemi\u015ftir. Bu ki\u015filer ba\u015fvurucu ile ayn\u0131 ortamda bulunduklar\u0131 s\u00fcre boyunca ba\u015fvurucunun zorla al\u0131konuldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fcrecek herhangi bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun ayaklar\u0131nda bir yaralanma g\u00f6rmediklerini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. A\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7\u0131plak ayakla uzun s\u00fcre y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair iddias\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan muayene belgeleri ve iddianame ile birlikte ba\u015fvurucuyu Adli T\u0131p Kurumuna sevk etmi\u015ftir. Haz\u0131rlanan 17\/6\/2015 tarihli raporda, ba\u015fvurucunun ayaklar\u0131nda uzun s\u00fcre y\u00fcr\u00fcmeye ba\u011fl\u0131 bir yaralanma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n muayene tarihi itibar\u0131yla belirlenmesinin t\u0131bben m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 14\/10\/2015 tarihinde isnat edilen t\u00fcm su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden E.\u00d6.n\u00fcn beraatine karar vermi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, \u00f6zellikle de ba\u015fvurucunun E.\u00d6. ile birlikte kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 evlerde ya\u015fayan ki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131na dayanarak ba\u015fvurucunun E.\u00d6. ile r\u0131zas\u0131yla ka\u00e7\u0131p cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pi\u015fmanl\u0131k duydu\u011fu ve ailesinden korktu\u011fu i\u00e7in E.\u00d6.den \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funa, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerine en ba\u015fta r\u0131zas\u0131yla ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen sonradan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmas\u0131 nedeniyle iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ciddi \u00e7eli\u015fki bar\u0131nd\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131na kanaat getirmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun uzun s\u00fcre \u00e7\u0131plak ayak y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair iddias\u0131n\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zel olarak belirtmi\u015f; olay\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi g\u00fcn ve saat itibar\u0131yla k\u0131\u015f mevsimi ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan havan\u0131n \u00e7ok so\u011fuk oldu\u011funu, dolayas\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu uzun s\u00fcre \u00e7\u0131plak ayakla y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f olsayd\u0131 olay sonras\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k kontrol\u00fcnde bu duruma dair mutlaka bir saptama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201c…<\/p>\n
Her ne kadar san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda nitelikli yaralama ve cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de, ma\u011fdurenin olay tarihi itibariyle 20 ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu, kapal\u0131 bir toplum olan k\u00f6y i\u00e7erisinde ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerin sosyo k\u00fclt\u00fcrel yap\u0131s\u0131 itibariyle ailevi ili\u015fkilerin kuvvetli oldu\u011fu ve buna dayal\u0131 olarak ailevi bask\u0131n\u0131n yo\u011fun oldu\u011fu, san\u0131k ile ma\u011fdurenin olay tarihinden \u00e7ok \u00f6ncesinde internet ortam\u0131nda tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 ve bu tan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n k\u0131sa s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde arkada\u015fl\u0131k boyutunu a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve olay tarihi \u00f6ncesinde bir kez y\u00fcz y\u00fcze g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131k ile ma\u011fdurenin olay an\u0131na kadar sevgili olduklar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesinin gerekti\u011fi, <\/p>\n
Her ne kadar ma\u011fdure mahkememizde kolluk a\u015famas\u0131nda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadelerinden farkl\u0131 olarak olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ve saatinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini zorla silah\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartarak \u00fczerine sald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u0131yafetlerini \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sa\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 tutarak tel \u00f6rg\u00fcden a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ekti\u011fini ve kilometrelerce y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve bu y\u00fcr\u00fcmelerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak ayakla oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015f ise de, olay\u0131n oldu\u011fu tarihte Ardahan ilinde k\u0131\u015f \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve olay\u0131n oldu\u011fu saatin ak\u015fam 21:00 olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda s\u0131cakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck derecede oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ve ma\u011fdurenin 1 saate yak\u0131n zorla \u00e7\u0131plak ayak ile y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin beyan\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, ma\u011fdurenin ayaklar\u0131nda Adli T\u0131p Kurumunda yapt\u0131r\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde, her ne kadar olay tarihi itibariyle olu\u015fmu\u015f bir lezyonun tespit edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamakla birlikte inceleme tarihi itibariyle ayaklar\u0131nda herhangi bir doku kayb\u0131, \u00e7atlak, nekros, nas\u0131r, donuk yada yan\u0131\u011fa ait bir durumun saptanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, ma\u011fdurenin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 gere\u011fi gece vaktinde a\u011f\u0131r k\u0131\u015f ko\u015fullar\u0131nda toprak bir zeminde bu kadar s\u00fcre zorla y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olsa idi, olay sonras\u0131nda ma\u011fdurenin hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc esnada mutlaka bu durumun ma\u011fdure taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6ylenece\u011fi ve buna ili\u015fkin rapor haz\u0131rlanaca\u011f\u0131 ancak bu zorla y\u00fcr\u00fctme hadisesinin dahi soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00fcndeme hi\u00e7 gelmedi\u011fi, ma\u011fdure ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131 yakalayan jandarma g\u00f6revlilerinin yakalama esnas\u0131nda ma\u011fdurenin y\u00fcz\u00fcnde veya g\u00f6r\u00fcnen herhangi bir yerinde darp cebir izi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fcmesinin normal oldu\u011fu ve herhangi bir topallama olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik beyanlar\u0131,<\/p>\n
Ma\u011fdurenin olay\u0131n s\u0131ca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131ca\u011f\u0131na 21\/11\/2014 tarihinde kollukta al\u0131nan ifadesinde, herhangi bir \u015fekilde seradaki olaylardan bahsetmemesine ra\u011fmen olaydan yakla\u015f\u0131k 4,5 ay sonras\u0131nda savc\u0131l\u0131kta al\u0131nan ifadesinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n seraya silahla geldi\u011fini beyan etmesi ve burada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine tecav\u00fcz etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak sa\u00e7lar\u0131ndan tuttu\u011funu, boynundaki yaralanman\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini dikenli tellerden atmas\u0131 neticesinde oldu\u011funu iddia etmesi,<\/p>\n
Ma\u011fdurenin 21\/11\/2014 tarihli kolluk ifadesinde ‘imam nikah\u0131m\u0131z k\u0131y\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra geldi\u011fimiz A. k\u00f6y\u00fcnde E… isimli \u015fah\u0131s benimle zorla cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131… Jandarma ekipleri A. k\u00f6y\u00fcne gelerek bizi yakalad\u0131 bana ilk anda kendi iste\u011fimle ka\u00e7\u0131p ka\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131m soruldu\u011funda kendi iste\u011fimle ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftim.’ beyan\u0131 ile mahkememizde vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadesinde ise ma\u011fdurenin \u00e7ok ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde Hanak il\u00e7e merkezinde ki evde ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 arkas\u0131ndan ili\u015fkinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011fu A. k\u00f6y\u00fcnde ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin beyanlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ma\u011fdurenin a\u015famalarda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ifadeler aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7ok ciddi \u00e7eli\u015fkiler bulundu\u011fu, <\/p>\n
Ma\u011fdurenin cinsel ili\u015fkinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi evdebulunan ev sakinlerinin san\u0131k [E.]\u0131n zorla cinsel ili\u015fki eylemine yard\u0131m etti\u011fine dair a\u015famalarda hi\u00e7 bir beyan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, jandarma g\u00f6revlilerinin eve ili\u015fkin haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu tutanakta ma\u011fdurenin kalm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu odada kilit sisteminde oldu\u011fu ve bu kilit sisteminin odan\u0131n i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funun tespiti kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ma\u011fdurenin bu kilidi kilitleyerek cinsel ili\u015fki olmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyebilece\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, <\/p>\n
Ma\u011fdure ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131 yakalayan jandarma g\u00f6revlilerinin olay esnas\u0131nda d\u00fczenlemi\u015f olduklar\u0131 yakalama tutana\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 tutanakta jandarma g\u00f6revlilerinin ma\u011fdureye r\u0131zas\u0131 dahilinde ka\u00e7\u0131p ka\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sorduklar\u0131nda, ma\u011fdurenin r\u0131zas\u0131 ile ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi ve nitekim yarg\u0131lama esnas\u0131nda yakalama tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlayan Jandarma g\u00f6revlileri tan\u0131k olarak dinlendi\u011finde tan\u0131klar\u0131n ortak bir bi\u00e7imde ma\u011fdureye zorla ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lma hadisesinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sorduklar\u0131 esnada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdurenin yan\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve hatta evde oldu\u011funu beyan etmeleri, ma\u011fdurenin karakola girdikten sonra a\u011flamaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve olay\u0131n zorla oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fini beyan etmeleri,<\/p>\n
San\u0131k ve ma\u011fdurenin belediye kum oca\u011f\u0131ndan arac\u0131na bindikleri tan\u0131k [S] dahil olmak \u00fczere daha sonra evlerinde kald\u0131klar\u0131 ev sahiplerinin hi\u00e7birinin zor hadisesinden bahsetmedikleri gibi r\u0131za ile ka\u00e7ma hadisesinin oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 birbirleri ile uyumlu beyanlar\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 a\u015famas\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde dile gelmedi\u011fi halde sonradan olay yerinde bir tak\u0131m ma\u011fdura ait k\u0131yafetler bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin beyanlar ve k\u0131yafetlerin bulundu\u011fu yerler ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdureyi zorla ka\u00e7\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve tehdit ile cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fine ili\u015fkin ma\u011fdurenin a\u015famalarda birbiri ile tutars\u0131z \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka herhangi bir beyan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131… [anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.]\u201d<\/p>\n
13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu ve vekili ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, temyiz formunu 5\/11\/2015 tarihinde d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu 7\/5\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesi devam ederken temyiz incelemesi 24\/4\/2024 tarihinde sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Dairesi nitelikli cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden nitelikli yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden verilen beraat kararlar\u0131n\u0131 onam\u0131\u015f, dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi doldu\u011fu i\u00e7in nitelikli kasten yaralama su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden E.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, toplanan deliller san\u0131\u011f\u0131n isnat edilen su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fini kan\u0131tlamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin beraat karar\u0131 vermesinden ve aradan ge\u00e7en uzun s\u00fcreye ra\u011fmen temyiz incelemesinin sonu\u00e7lanmamas\u0131ndan yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahale ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015f; bu m\u00fcdahale iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda devam eden ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n etkili y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
17. Nitelikli cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve nitelikli kasten yaralama gibi eylemler, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda inceleme yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli olan asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k e\u015fi\u011fine do\u011fas\u0131 gere\u011fi ula\u015f\u0131r. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
19. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi, yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75).<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi, devletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revlerini d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 5. maddesiyle birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde devlete birtak\u0131m negatif ve pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler y\u00fckler (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2012\/752, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 50; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 82). Pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda devlet; bireyleri, di\u011fer bireyler taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lanlar da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye kar\u015f\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in hukuki ve fiil\u00ee tedbirler almakla \u00f6devlidir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 82; R.K., B. No: 2013\/6950, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 74, 75). \u00d6zellikle \u00e7ocuklar ve savunmas\u0131z bireyler etkili \u015fekilde korunmal\u0131d\u0131r (Z.C. [GK], B. No: 2013\/3262, 11\/5\/2016, \u00a7 84). Koruma \u00f6devi en ciddi durumlarda ceza hukuku h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmas\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n uygulamada da etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131 yoluyla bireyleri, maddi ve manevi b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fcklerinin ihlallerinden yeterli \u015fekilde korumak i\u00e7in yasal bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Z.C. \u00a7 56; ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan k\u0131smen benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u0130pek Deniz ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/1595, 21\/4\/2016, \u00a7 149; T.A. [GK], B. No: 2017\/32972, 29\/9\/2021, \u00a7 135). Koruma \u00f6devi ayr\u0131ca yetkililerin bir ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ek ve yak\u0131n bir k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele tehlikesini bildikleri veya bilmelerinin gerekti\u011fi durumlarda bu tehlikenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini engellemek i\u00e7in makul tedbirler almalar\u0131n\u0131 da gerektirir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 82; R.K., \u00a7 74). Bununla birlikte \u00f6zellikle insan davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemezli\u011fi, \u00f6ncelikler ve kaynaklar de\u011ferlendirilerek yap\u0131lacak i\u015flem veya y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek faaliyet tercihi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kamu makamlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 y\u00fck olu\u015fturacak \u015fekilde yorumlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 53; R.K., \u00a7 76).<\/p>\n
21. Devletin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin usuli bir y\u00f6n\u00fc de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, savunulabilir nitelikteki her k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi gerektirir. Bu soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131, insan onurunu koruyan hukukun etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin veya di\u011fer bireylerin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele niteli\u011findeki filleri nedeniyle hesap vermelerini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli vesoru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 110-112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103).<\/p>\n
22. Olas\u0131 cezai sorumlulu\u011fun tespiti ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonras\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f ise bu a\u015fama da Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gereklerine cevap verebilecek nitelikte olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Filiz Aka, B. No: 2013\/8365, 10\/6\/2015, \u00a7 30; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 100).<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu, ma\u011fduru oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve kasten yaralama eylemleri nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 etkisiz oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011finden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle inceleme k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetini bildirmesinin akabinde derh\u00e2l bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131larak gerekli delillerin topland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu eylemlerin faili oldu\u011fu iddia edilen ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin de yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 makul bir s\u00fcrat ve \u00f6zenle y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n isnat edilen t\u00fcm su\u00e7lardan beraatine karar verse de davadaki \u00e7eli\u015fkili unsurlar\u0131 g\u00f6zetti\u011fi ve vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucun temelden yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ne var ki Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n temyiz incelemesini 8 y\u0131l 5 ay\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n bir s\u00fcrede tamamlam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kasten yaralama su\u00e7u dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011fram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Oysa soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalar\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi; hukuk devletine ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlere ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc ve te\u015fvik g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc verilmesinin engellenmesi, herhangi bir hile ya da kanunsuz eyleme izin verilmemesi ve kamuoyunun g\u00fcveninin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in \u015fartt\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 119). Bu gereklilik ya\u015fanan gecikmelerin yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n etkilili\u011fi \u00fczerinde bir etki yarat\u0131p yaratmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesinden tamamen ayr\u0131d\u0131r (Aysel Gezer ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2021\/9961, 2\/11\/2023, \u00a7 142). Bu nedenle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve 40.000 TL maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvuruda kamu g\u00f6revlisi olmayan ki\u015finin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve kasten yaralama eylemleriyle ilgili yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinin makul bir s\u00fcrat ve \u00f6zenle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ya\u015fanan a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 gecikme nedeniyle kasten yaralama su\u00e7unun dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011framas\u0131 sebebiyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
28. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda talebiyle ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 40.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130 TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 40.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesine (E.2021\/9292,K.2024\/3566) ve Ardahan A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2015\/28, K.2015\/131) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 30\/10\/2024tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 30\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/23711 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 R.E. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23711) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 30\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Batuhan Salim YE\u015e\u0130LK\u00d6Y Ba\u015fvurucu : R.E. Vekili : Av. M\u00fczeyyen \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130 YOLA\u00c7AN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve kasten yaralama eylemleri hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u0130ddialar\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu; internet \u00fczerinden tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan 19\/11\/2014 tarihinde ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde k\u0131yafetleri \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011fram\u0131\u015f, sonras\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k iki g\u00fcn boyunca al\u0131konulmu\u015f ve yine bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda kendisini ka\u00e7\u0131ran ki\u015finin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131na maruz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6re hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlar fiziki \u015fiddet g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ve cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulamaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, iddialar\u0131n\u0131 soru\u015fturma mercilerine ta\u015f\u0131yarak konuyla ilgili \u015fik\u00e2yetini bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 21\/11\/2014 tarihli kolluk ifadesi ile ertesi g\u00fcn Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda verdi\u011fi ifadesinde \u015fu iddialarda bulunmu\u015ftur: i. Bir sosyal medya platformu \u00fczerinden E.\u00d6.yle tan\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u00fcz y\u00fcze g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcklerinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye devam etmemek istemi\u015f ve bunu E.\u00d6.ye s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine E.\u00d6. kendisini telefonla aram\u0131\u015f …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n