T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
AHMET NEJDET BAYRAM BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/51504)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ahmet Nejdet BAYRAM<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Zeynep TUT\u011eA\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011franmas\u0131 ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 21\/10\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden ula\u015f\u0131lan bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
A. Uyu\u015fturucu veya Uyar\u0131c\u0131 Madde \u0130mal ve Ticareti Su\u00e7undan Ba\u015flat\u0131lan Ceza Soru\u015fturmas\u0131yla \u0130lgili S\u00fcre\u00e7 <\/p>\n
5. Karab\u00fck \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne 20\/3\/2021 g\u00fcn\u00fc ak\u015fam saatlerinde Ahmet diye bilinen ve \u00fczerinde sahte kimlik ta\u015f\u0131yan bir \u015fahs\u0131n ilgili adreste uyu\u015fturucu madde sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihbar\u0131 \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imal ve ticareti su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince tutulan 20\/3\/2021 tarihli tutana\u011f\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir :<\/p>\n
“… Bahse konu [p]ansiyon civar\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fumuz esnada bizce daha \u00f6nceden de i\u015flem yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 bilinen [S.P.], [D.\u00d6.] isimli \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n oldu\u011fu ve yanlar\u0131nda esmer tenli, \u00fczerinde gri renkli h\u0131rka ve mavi renkli pantolonlu bir erkek \u015fahs\u0131n da oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n yanlar\u0131na ivedi bir \u015fekilde gidilmi\u015f, \u015fah\u0131slara polis tan\u0131tma kimlik karnelerimiz g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi esnada esmer tenli \u015fah\u0131s ekomini market isimli i\u015fyeri istikametine do\u011fru ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 esnada \u015fah\u0131s taraf\u0131m\u0131zca yakalanm\u0131\u015f ve biz g\u00f6revlilere yumruk ve tekme atmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak suretiyle sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunmu\u015f ve \u015fahsa sakin olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi s\u00f6ylenildi\u011fi h[\u00e2]lde \u015fah\u0131s sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlar sergilemesi, sinkafl\u0131 kelimeler kullanmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 biz g\u00f6revlilere ve kendisine zarar vermemesi i\u00e7in \u015fahsa artan nispette ve kademeli olarak g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131larak kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmak suretiyle \u015fah\u0131s g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckle etkisiz h[\u00e2]le getirilmi\u015f, \u015fah\u0131slara daha sonradan yap\u0131lan kimlik kontrollerinde \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n[D.\u00d6.],[S.P.] ve biz g\u00f6revlilerden ka\u00e7an Ey\u00fcp Demir isimli \u015fah\u0131s oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f…[t\u0131r]”<\/p>\n
7. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri, yakalanan \u015fahs\u0131n \u00fczerinden \u00e7\u0131kan Ey\u00fcp Demir kimlik bilgileriyle olu\u015fturulan n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdan\u0131n\u0131n sahte oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirerek yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rmada n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdan\u0131ndaki foto\u011fraf\u0131n Ey\u00fcp Demir’e, kimlik bilgilerinin ba\u015fka birine ait oldu\u011funu, \u015fahs\u0131n ger\u00e7ek kimlik bilgilerinin Ahmet Nejdet Bayram oldu\u011funu, yap\u0131lan sistem ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131nda alt\u0131 su\u00e7 kayd\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu ve hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde ticareti yapma veya sa\u011flama su\u00e7undan yakalama emri oldu\u011funu tespit etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ifadelerine ba\u015fvurulan S.P. ve D.\u00d6. ba\u015fvurucunun polisten ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ile polisler aras\u0131nda arbede ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun polislere direndi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurundaki ifadesinde ve Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011findeki sorgusunda sivil polislerden kimliklerini g\u00f6stermelerini istedi\u011fini, bunun \u00fczerine polislerin kendisine k\u0131zd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve gerginlik ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra ellerini arkadan kelep\u00e7elediklerini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu 21\/3\/2021 tarihinde saat 01.40’ta uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imal ve ticareti su\u00e7undan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 13.30’da Cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na sevk edilmesi nedeniyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011findeki sorgusunun ard\u0131ndan da tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Karab\u00fck E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesinde d\u00fczenlenen21\/3\/2021 tarihli ve 02.34 muayene saatli nezarethane giri\u015f muayene raporunda “Genel durum iyi, bilin\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131k, gks 15 olan hasta. Frontal kemik lateralinde ciltalt\u0131 hematom, ekimoz mevcut. Sol kulak arkas\u0131 abrazyon mevcut. Acil durum bildirir ge\u00e7ici rapordur. Kati rapor beyin cerrahi taraf\u0131ndan verilmesi uygundur. Nezarethane giri\u015finde sak\u0131nca yoktur.” \u015feklinde tespit yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Karab\u00fck Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imal ve ticareti, resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlar sergilemesi \u00fczerine kademeli g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmak suretiyle etkisiz h\u00e2le getirildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imal ve ticareti, resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmi\u015f olup h\u00fck\u00fcmler inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda derdesttir.<\/p>\n
B. G\u00f6revi K\u00f6t\u00fcye Kullanma Su\u00e7undan Ba\u015flat\u0131lan Ceza Soru\u015fturmas\u0131yla \u0130lgili S\u00fcre\u00e7 <\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu22\/4\/2021tarihli \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esiyle,20\/3\/2021 tarihinde Karab\u00fck Narkotik Su\u00e7larla M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ekiplerince ifade vermeye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n darp ve cebirine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak \u015fiddetin tutanaklara ge\u00e7irilmedi\u011fini, s\u00f6z konusu fiziksel \u015fiddet nedeniyle r\u00f6ntgen filmi \u00e7ekilmemesinin g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fiddetin en \u00f6nemli delili oldu\u011funu, darp ve cebirin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair doktor raporunun ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; 20\/3\/2021 tarihinde, polis olduklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyensivil giyimli iki ki\u015finin kendisine kimli\u011fini sordu\u011funu, kendisinin de bu ki\u015filerden kimliklerini g\u00f6stermelerini istedi\u011finde \u00fczerine \u00e7ulland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, karakolda da be\u015f ki\u015finin kendisini d\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, daha sonra hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, kafas\u0131nda \u015fi\u015flik oldu\u011funu, doktorun \u00f6ncelikle tomografi sonucunu g\u00f6rmesi gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek kendisini beyin tomografisine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini, bir saat kadar sonra da “Darp yoktur.” \u015feklinde rapor verdi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, Karab\u00fck Adliyesi binas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik noktas\u0131 ve giri\u015f k\u0131sm\u0131 ile hastaneye giri\u015f ve \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f an\u0131 ile hastanenin i\u00e7ini g\u00f6steren kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n temin edilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma neticesinde;<\/p>\n
i. Karab\u00fck Adliyesi kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n 28 g\u00fcn tutulmas\u0131 sebebiyle g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131na ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
ii. Hastane kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi neticesinde d\u00fczenlenen CD Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda sivil polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyu kelep\u00e7eli olarak hastaneye getirdikleri, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerde herhangi bir zor kullanma, darp izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, hastaneden ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen raporlar, radyoloji kay\u0131tlar\u0131 vb. t\u00fcm evrak\u0131n temin edilerek g\u00f6nderilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Hastane taraf\u0131ndan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilen t\u0131bbi belgeler \u015f\u00f6yledir :<\/p>\n
i. 21\/3\/2021 tarihli ve saat 02.37 istemli radyoloji sonu\u00e7 raporunda ba\u015fvuruya acil beyin tomografisi \u00e7ekildi\u011fi, tetkik sonucu bulgular\u0131n “Asimetriteden dolay\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme suboptimaldir. De\u011ferlendirilebildi\u011fi kadar\u0131yla; D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc ventrik\u00fcl orta hatta ve normal geni\u015fliktedir. Serebellum, pons ve mezensefalon dansiteleri BT \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc dahilinde do\u011fald\u0131r. Bazal ganglionlar ve talamuslar normaldir. Serebral parankim normal olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Kanama veya infarkt alan\u0131 izlenmemi\u015ftir. Serebral sulkus derinlikleri ve ventrik\u00fcler sistem geni\u015fli\u011fi ya\u015f ile uyumludur. Orta hat yap\u0131larda shift izlenmemi\u015ftir. Kranial kemik yap\u0131lar do\u011fald\u0131r.” \u015feklinde oldu\u011fu kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. 21\/3\/2021 tarihli, saat 02.33 giri\u015f ve saat 04.10 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015fl\u0131 hasta vizit detay raporunda tan\u0131 ad\u0131 “\u0130dari ama\u00e7lar i\u00e7in muayene, tan\u0131mlanmam\u0131\u015f.”, yak\u0131nma “nezaret giri\u015f +kan idrar numune al\u0131m\u0131” \u015feklinde belirtilmi\u015f; raporda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fturucu testine dair laboratuvar sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na ve acil beyin BT tetkiki nedeniyle radyoloji rapor a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na(bkz. \u00a7 17, i) yer verilmi\u015f,u ygulanan tedavilerde ilac\u0131n ad\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131na “Dikloron 75 mg\/3 ml im 10 ampul” yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, uygulanan hizmetlerin “acil poliklinik muayenesi, idrarda keratinin (uyu\u015fturucu i\u00e7in), uyu\u015fturucu paneli, BT, beyin” oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. 21\/3\/2021 tarihli, saat 13.51 giri\u015f ve saat 13.57 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015fl\u0131 hasta vizit detay raporunda ba\u015fvurucuya acil poliklinik muayenesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. 21\/3\/2021 tarihli, saat 19.37 giri\u015f ve saat 19.42 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015fl\u0131 hasta vizit detay raporunda acil poliklinik muayenesi ve COVID-19 testi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, test sonucunun negatif \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcpheli Karab\u00fck \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermi\u015f; kararda at\u0131l\u0131 iddialar\u0131 duyan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kamera kayd\u0131n\u0131n, doktor raporu veya ba\u015fkaca delilin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soyut iddia d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7may\u0131 gerektirir her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e olarak a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun karara itiraz\u0131 Karab\u00fck Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 20\/9\/2021 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 7\/1\/2025 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu; Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imal ve ticareti su\u00e7undan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 20\/3\/2021 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay hakk\u0131nda etkili ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini belirterek anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
22. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fikayet etti\u011fi olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fanmas\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k bir ay sonra Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun darp veya cebire maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair delil elde edilemedi\u011fi, ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve i\u00e7tihatlar ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
23. \u0130hlal iddias\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
a. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
24. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
b. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
i. Genel \u0130lkeler <\/p>\n
25. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi, yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75).<\/p>\n
26. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131 -ki\u015fi \u00fczerindeki etkisi ne olursa olsun- ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde de g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7 81).<\/p>\n
27. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla yasaklanan muamelelerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddialar uygun delillerle desteklenmelidir. Bu delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde ise s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen delillerin iddiay\u0131 makul \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6tesinde ispat edip etmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir. Bununla birlikte yeterince ciddi, a\u00e7\u0131k ve tutarl\u0131 emareler ya da aksi ispat edilemeyen birtak\u0131m karineler de iddian\u0131n ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli kan\u0131t te\u015fkil edebilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 95; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 83).<\/p>\n
28. Ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada yaralanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde yetkili makamlar, bu olaya ili\u015fkin tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95) zira bu t\u00fcr olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgiler \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fimindedir (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
29. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi \u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddedeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bireyin bir devlet g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten ki\u015filer olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmal\u0131, soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli ve soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 111, 112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103). Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma sonunda verilen karar, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereklili\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermelidir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fiklikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cebrail Bekta\u015f ve Y\u00fcksel \u015eahin, B. No: 2015\/4787, 25\/9\/2019, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
ii. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imal ve ticareti su\u00e7undan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ifade vermeye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcrken g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. \u015eik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ifadesi al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu; polislerin \u00fczerine \u00e7ulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, karakolda be\u015f ki\u015finin kendisini d\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, kafas\u0131nda \u015fi\u015flik meydana geldi\u011fini ancak doktorun darp olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair rapor d\u00fczenledi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 15).<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k at\u0131l\u0131 iddialar\u0131 duyan tan\u0131k, kamera kayd\u0131, doktor raporu veya ba\u015fka delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermi\u015fse de\u00a0 ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n temelini olu\u015fturan bilgi ve belgeleri soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na getirtmemi\u015ftir. Bu eksiklik nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun yakalama esnas\u0131nda sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlarla direnmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucuya kademeli olarak g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutanak (bkz. \u00a7 6),S.P. ve D.\u00d6.n\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun polislere direndi\u011fine ili\u015fkin anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 (bkz. \u00a7 8), ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren rapor (bkz. \u00a7 11) de\u011ferlendirilememi\u015ftir. Yine bu eksiklik, ba\u015fvurucunun kesin adli raporunun al\u0131namamas\u0131na da sebep olmu\u015ftur. Bu durumda s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen evraklar soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na getirtilmi\u015f olsayd\u0131 olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in te\u015fhis i\u015flemi yap\u0131lmas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 d\u00e2hil bir\u00e7ok soru\u015fturma i\u015flemi yap\u0131labilirdi.<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imal ve ticareti su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta (bkz. \u00a7 6)ba\u015fvurucunun sald\u0131rgan tavr\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilmi\u015ftir. Bilgi sahibi s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadelerine ba\u015fvurulan S.P. ve D.\u00d6. de ba\u015fvurucunun polise kar\u015f\u0131 direndi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 8). Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenen iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun tutumu nedeniyle orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 12). Ancak Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u015fvuru konusu soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131ndaki eksiklikler nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereklili\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n iddian\u0131n soyut oldu\u011funun belirtilmesiyle yetinilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
33. An\u0131lan hususlar k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterlidir.<\/p>\n
34. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
35. Ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda, \u015fik\u00e2yet konusu olan olay nedeniyle hastanedeki t\u00fcm t\u0131bbi evraklar istenmi\u015ftir. Hastane taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki t\u0131bbi evrak Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f ise de g\u00f6nderilen t\u0131bbi evrak i\u00e7inde uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde imali ve ticareti su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin nezarethane giri\u015f adli muayene raporu (bkz. \u00a7 11) yoktur. An\u0131lan raporu ba\u015fvurucu da sunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay\u0131 ilk elden incelemekle g\u00f6revli ve yetkili olan soru\u015fturma makam\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun adli muayene raporunda tespit edilen yaralanmas\u0131yla ilgili de\u011ferlendirme yapma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 somut olayda Anayasa Mahkemesinin soru\u015fturma makam\u0131n\u0131n yerine ge\u00e7erek bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmas\u0131 ikincillik prensibi gere\u011fi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu ba\u011flamda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
V. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
36. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 100.000 TL maddi, 100.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
37. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi soru\u015fturma makam\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yenidensoru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
38. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Karab\u00fck Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2021\/2788) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 7\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 7\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/51504 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 AHMET NEJDET BAYRAM BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/51504) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucu : Ahmet Nejdet BAYRAM Vekili : Av. Zeynep TUT\u011eA\u00c7 \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011franmas\u0131 ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 21\/10\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden ula\u015f\u0131lan bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: A. Uyu\u015fturucu veya Uyar\u0131c\u0131 Madde \u0130mal ve Ticareti Su\u00e7undan Ba\u015flat\u0131lan Ceza Soru\u015fturmas\u0131yla \u0130lgili S\u00fcre\u00e7 5. Karab\u00fck \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne 20\/3\/2021 g\u00fcn\u00fc ak\u015fam saatlerinde Ahmet diye bilinen ve \u00fczerinde sahte kimlik ta\u015f\u0131yan bir \u015fahs\u0131n ilgili adreste uyu\u015fturucu madde sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihbar\u0131 \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n