T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
N. \u0130. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/35865)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan SARA\u00c7<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ali AYDIN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumu disiplin kurulu karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen \u015fik\u00e2yete ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7te, ilgili Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden kabul edilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, devletin egemenli\u011fi alt\u0131nda bulunan topraklardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 devlet idaresinden ay\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak \u0130zmir Kad\u0131n Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. 6\/6\/2020 tarihinde 03.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda B-5 ko\u011fu\u015funda kalmakta olan mahpuslar\u0131n ko\u011fu\u015f mazgal\u0131na gidildi\u011finde, baz\u0131 mahpuslar\u0131n, ba\u015fvurucunun psikolojik sorunlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu, kendilerini s\u00fcrekli tehdit etti\u011fini, kap\u0131lara vurup kendilerini ve ko\u011fu\u015fta bulunan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 uyutmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendilerini d\u00f6vmekle tehdit etti\u011fini ifade etmeleri \u00fczerine Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu) taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Disiplin Kurulu, 19\/6\/2020 tarihinde 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 43. maddesinin (d) bendi gere\u011fi “kurumda korku, kayg\u0131 veya panik yaratabilecek bi\u00e7imde s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemek veya davran\u0131\u015fta bulunmak” eylemi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun 5 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“….al\u0131nan tan\u0131k ko\u011fu\u015f ifadelerinde h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Nay\u015fe \u0130REZ’in ko\u011fu\u015fta kalan di\u011fer mahkumlar\u0131 korkuttu\u011fu, onlar\u0131 tehdit etti\u011fi, ortak ya\u015fan\u0131lan alanlarda uyulmas\u0131 gereken kurallara uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ko\u011fu\u015fta kalan mahkumlar\u0131 ‘sizleri \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fim diyerek tehdit ederek konu\u015ftu\u011fu, tan\u0131k ko\u011fu\u015f ifadelerinin birbiriyle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Nay\u015fe \u0130REZ hakk\u0131nda 5275 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanunun 43. Maddesinin (2.) F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendi gere\u011fi ‘kurumda korku, kayg\u0131 veya panik yaratabilecek bi\u00e7imde s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemek veya davran\u0131\u015fta bulunmak’ h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi ‘1 AYDAN 3 AYA KADAR Z\u0130YARET\u00c7\u0130 KABUL\u00dcNDEN YOKSUN BIRAKMA’ h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekse de;<\/p>\n
H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Nay\u015fe \u0130REZ\u2019in sicil \u00f6zetinden kald\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f disiplin cezas\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanunun 48. Maddesinin 2 . F\u0131kras\u0131 ‘Bir eylemden dolay\u0131 verilen disiplin cezas\u0131 kesinle\u015ftikten sonra bu cezan\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yeniden disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren bir eylemde bulunan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc hakk\u0131nda, her defas\u0131nda bir \u00fcst ceza uygulan\u0131r.’ h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi bir \u00fcst ceza olan ‘5 G\u00dcN H\u00dcCREYE KOYMA’ disiplin cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na; …”<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, 10\/7\/2020 tarihinde s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) nezdinde \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, 19\/8\/2020 tarihinde Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sistemi (SEGB\u0130S) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi huzurunda ifade vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu ifadesinde 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda babas\u0131n\u0131n vefat\u0131ndan sonra psikolojik rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fini, bu nedenle ila\u00e7 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir \u00f6nceki sene kurum doktorunun g\u00f6zetiminde ilac\u0131 b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ilk iki ay hi\u00e7 bir problem olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ay ataklar ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu bu beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda, arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n odalar\u0131n\u0131 tekmeledi\u011fini, hal\u00fcsinasyonlar g\u00f6r\u00fcp kontrol d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bilin\u00e7siz s\u00f6zler s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylediklerinin do\u011fru oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, ilaveten, arkada\u015flar\u0131ndan \u00f6z\u00fcr diledi\u011fini ancak bunlar\u0131n ilac\u0131 b\u0131rakmas\u0131ndan ve hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla meydana geldi\u011fini bu olaydan sonra ilac\u0131na tekrar ba\u015flayarak tedavi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ba\u015fka insanlara rahats\u0131zl\u0131k vermemek i\u00e7in tekli bir ko\u011fu\u015fta kalmay\u0131 istedi\u011fini, \u015fu anda kimseye rahats\u0131zl\u0131k vermedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, 15\/9\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetini kabul etmi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir:<\/p>\n
“Hakimli\u011fimizce yap\u0131lan incelemede; Dinlenen itiraz eden h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin beyanlar\u0131, bizatihi olay\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 taraf olarak nitelendirilecek ki\u015fi olan Nay\u015fe \u0130rez’in a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131, Nay\u015fe \u0130rez hakk\u0131nda dosyada mevcut olan ‘ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ve Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Ruh ve Sinir Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Hastanesinde yatarak tedavi g\u00f6rmesi gerekti\u011fi’ belirtilen Ankara Numune E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesi Sa\u011fl\u0131k Kurulu Raporu ve di\u011fer raporlar ve tedavi evraklar\u0131 ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131yla Nay\u015fe \u0130rez’in s\u00fcregelen bir ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak s\u00fcregelen ve devaml\u0131l\u0131k arzeden davran\u0131\u015f bozukluklar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funa \u015f\u00fcphe olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, son denemede ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 da kullanmayan Nay\u015fe’nin di\u011fer ko\u011fu\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131nda ge\u00e7ti\u011fi \u015fekilde sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlar ve s\u00f6ylemler g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, ko\u011fu\u015fta bulunan di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin bu s\u00fcregelen olumsuz durum nedeniyle endi\u015fe ve korkuya kap\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131n normal oldu\u011fu, uzun s\u00fcre devam eden bu durum sonucu olay g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7inde bulunduklar\u0131 olumsuz psikolojik hal nedeniyle sarfettikleri s\u00f6zlerin hakaret ve tehdit olarak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmemesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131, buna g\u00f6re hem ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 y\u00f6nlendirme yetisini kaybetti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan Nay\u015fe \u0130rez hem de a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle di\u011fer ko\u011fu\u015f arkada\u015f\u0131 olan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclere at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n unsurlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itirazlar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir. …” <\/p>\n
8. \u0130zmir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bukarara itiraz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi), 23\/9\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar vererek ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin bahsedilen karar\u0131n\u0131n iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir:<\/p>\n
“…Mahkememizce yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucu; tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda [Y.T.] ve [N.\u00d6.y\u00fc]’u kurum g\u00f6revlilerine y\u00f6nelik tehditleri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden itiraz\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler [S.D.], [F.A.], [S.Y.], [S.K.], Nay\u015fe \u0130rez, [Z.G.nin] eylemlerinin sabit oldu\u011fu, pandemi nedeniyle ko\u011fu\u015f de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin ve nakillerinin k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle sorunun ikna yoluyla konu\u015farak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011finden itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u0130nfaz Hakimli\u011finin 15\/09\/2020 Tarih, 2020\/2299 Esas 2020\/2820 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler [S.D.], [F.A.], [S.Y.], [S.K.], Nay\u015fe \u0130rez, [Z.G.] y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130PTAL\u0130NE,”<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 1\/10\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesi \u00fczerine 2\/11\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ayn\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun vekili taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 mahkeme kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131 nedeniyle 2020\/35347 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyan\u0131n mevcut ba\u015fvuru ile birle\u015ftirilmesine ve s\u00f6z konusu dosyan\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesince 23\/12\/2021 tarihinde Komisyon taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilmi\u015f; k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar hakk\u0131nda kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f; ba\u015fvuru, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kabul edilebilirlik hususunun karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in B\u00f6l\u00fcme g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; ceza verme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yete ili\u015fkin \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu iptal karar\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan itiraz \u00fczerine A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin karar\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, idarenin tek yanl\u0131 tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, lehlerine olan hususlar\u0131n ise de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini b\u00f6ylece adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k), Anayasa Mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddialar\u0131 \u00fczerine verdi\u011fi kabul edilemezlik kararlar\u0131na atfen A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesi, benzer iddialarla yap\u0131lan bir ba\u015fvuruyu \u0130nan G\u00f6k karar\u0131nda (B. No: 2018\/1936, 28\/1\/2021) de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu kararda, h\u00fccre cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen itiraz merciinin, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 kabul ederek ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetini kesin olarak reddederken gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden muaf olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanarak merci karar\u0131nda \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilmesine ili\u015fkin infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131nda yer alan gerek\u00e7elerin neden hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bunun yan\u0131nda, bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131nda h\u00fckme ula\u015fmay\u0131 sa\u011flayan sebepler ve sonuca g\u00f6t\u00fcren nedensellik kurgusu de\u011ferlendirmelerinin yeterli a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kta yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle gerek h\u00fckm\u00fcn dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n gerekse dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinde an\u0131lan kabul gerek\u00e7esinin adalet gereksinimini giderecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc ve nitelikte, yeterli ve ilgili oldu\u011funun s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi belirtilerek gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (an\u0131lan kararda bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 64-66). Somut ba\u015fvuruda da \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 (bkz. \u00a7 6) de\u011ferlendirilerek karar verildi\u011fi h\u00e2lde Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n karara itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurucunun bu iddialar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeden karar verdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan an\u0131lan kararda yer alan ilkelerden ay\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirecek bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Di\u011fer taraftan bu ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Zira gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, taraflara yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kurallara uygun bi\u00e7imde incelenip incelenmedi\u011fini bilmelerine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayan bir hak olup yarg\u0131lama sonucuna y\u00f6nelik bir teminat sa\u011flamaz. Bu itibarla Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtti\u011fi ihlal gerek\u00e7elerini g\u00f6zeterek ve s\u00f6z konusu iddiayla ilgili olarak yeniden bir de\u011ferlendirme yaparak gereken karar\u0131 vermek yine yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin takdirindedir.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ile yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131, 10.000 TL maddi ve 20.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
21. \u00d6te yandan ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (D. \u0130\u015f 2020\/2321) iletilmek \u00fczere Kar\u015f\u0131yaka\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/2299, K.2020\/2820) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 19\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/35865 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 N. \u0130. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/35865) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Hasan SARA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Ali AYDIN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumu disiplin kurulu karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen \u015fik\u00e2yete ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7te, ilgili Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden kabul edilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, devletin egemenli\u011fi alt\u0131nda bulunan topraklardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 devlet idaresinden ay\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak \u0130zmir Kad\u0131n Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. 6\/6\/2020 tarihinde 03.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda B-5 ko\u011fu\u015funda kalmakta olan mahpuslar\u0131n ko\u011fu\u015f mazgal\u0131na gidildi\u011finde, baz\u0131 mahpuslar\u0131n, ba\u015fvurucunun psikolojik sorunlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu, kendilerini s\u00fcrekli tehdit etti\u011fini, kap\u0131lara vurup kendilerini ve ko\u011fu\u015fta bulunan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 uyutmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendilerini d\u00f6vmekle tehdit etti\u011fini ifade etmeleri \u00fczerine Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu) taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Disiplin Kurulu, 19\/6\/2020 tarihinde 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 43. maddesinin (d) bendi gere\u011fi “kurumda korku, kayg\u0131 veya panik …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n