T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130.K. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/38905)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/3\/2025 – 32833<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00c7a\u011flar \u00d6NCEL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mustafa Ayhan TEK\u0130NSOY<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, polis meslek e\u011fitim merkezi \u00f6\u011frencili\u011finden \u00e7\u0131karma i\u015fleminin iptali talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131 esas al\u0131narak karar verilmesi nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 22\/11\/2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru, belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle olaylar \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Emniyet te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n polis memuru ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak amac\u0131yla 16\/10\/2015-28\/10\/2015 tarihlerinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131navlarda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olan ba\u015fvurucunun Bal\u0131kesir Polis Meslek E\u011fitim Merkezi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne (POMEM) ge\u00e7ici olarak kayd\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130ntibak e\u011fitimine al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 neticesinde ba\u015fvurucunun 25\/3\/2009 tarihinde kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na (HAGB) karar verildi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine 6\/6\/2015 tarihli ve 29378 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Polis Meslek E\u011fitim Merkezleri Giri\u015f Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin (Y\u00f6netmelik) 8. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (g) bendi uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun aday \u00f6\u011frencilik hakk\u0131 sonland\u0131r\u0131larak POMEM’den ili\u015fi\u011finin kesilmesine, \u00f6denen har\u00e7l\u0131k ve masraflar\u0131n tahsiline ili\u015fkin 26\/2\/2016 tarihli i\u015flem tesis edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, aday \u00f6\u011frencilik hakk\u0131n\u0131n sonland\u0131r\u0131larak POMEM’den ili\u015fi\u011finin kesilmesine y\u00f6nelik i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle 16\/8\/2016 tarihinde Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucu; kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan verilen HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n akabinde be\u015f y\u0131l s\u00fcresince kasti bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemedi\u011fii\u00e7in 25\/3\/2016 tarihinde d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple hakk\u0131ndaki HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmamas\u0131 gerekirken hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde ili\u015fi\u011finin kesilmesine karar verildi\u011fini belirten ba\u015fvurucu, masumiyet karinesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
8. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda 15\/6\/2017 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hakk\u0131nda HAGB karar\u0131 verildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Y\u00f6netmelik’in 8. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (g) bendinde POMEM \u00f6\u011frencili\u011fi i\u00e7in “HAGB karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f olsa d\u00e2hi kasti bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle bir y\u0131ldan uzun s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olmama” \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede mevzuatta bulunan a\u00e7\u0131k d\u00fczenleme ile g\u00f6revin \u00f6nem ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda mevzuatta belirtilen su\u00e7 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla verilen HAGB karar\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki i\u015flemin hukuka ve mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf dilek\u00e7esinde 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nda HAGB kararlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuken bir sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen bir karara y\u00f6netmelikle aksi bir sonu\u00e7 ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n normlar hiyerar\u015fisine ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc \u0130dari Dava Dairesi (B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi) 22\/12\/2017 tarihli karar ile istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, temyiz talebinde bulunarak istinaf dilek\u00e7esindeki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir. Dan\u0131\u015ftay Sekizinci Dairesi 13\/9\/2019 tarihli ilamla B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle karar\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Nihai karar 23\/10\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu 22\/11\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
12. 4\/6\/1937 tarihli ve 3201 say\u0131l\u0131 Emniyet Te\u015fkilat Kanunu’nun ek 24. maddesinin olay tarihindeki ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Emniyet Te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n polis memuru ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak \u00fczere, Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile Devlet Planlama Te\u015fkilat\u0131 M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Devlet Personel Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc al\u0131nmak suretiyle \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n teklifi ve Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131 ile polis meslek e\u011fitim merkezleri a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Polis meslek e\u011fitim merkezlerindeki e\u011fitim-\u00f6\u011fretim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde; giri\u015f \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131klar\u0131 sonradan anla\u015f\u0131lanlar, e\u011fitim ve \u00f6\u011fretimini ba\u015far\u0131 ile tamamlayamayanlar, sa\u011fl\u0131k ve disiplin y\u00f6n\u00fcnden polis olamayaca\u011f\u0131na yetkili kurullarca karar verilenlerin polis meslek e\u011fitim merkezleri ile ili\u015fikleri kesilir. Sa\u011fl\u0131k veya \u00f6l\u00fcm d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki nedenlerle ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilenlerden, \u00f6denen har\u00e7l\u0131k ve yap\u0131lan masraflar kanun\u00ee faizi ile birlikte tahsil edilir.<\/p>\n
Polis meslek e\u011fitim merkezlerinde e\u011fitimlerini ba\u015far\u0131 ile tamamlayanlar, Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kadrolar\u0131na aday polis memuru olarak atan\u0131rlar…<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Polis meslek e\u011fitim merkezlerinin kurulu\u015f ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma us\u00fbl ve esaslar\u0131; bu merkezlerde e\u011fitime al\u0131nacak \u00f6\u011frencilerde aranacak \u015fartlar, yap\u0131lacak s\u0131navlar, disiplin ve e\u011fitim-\u00f6\u011fretimle ilgili konular, \u00f6\u011frencili\u011fin sona ermesi, tazminat ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck esaslar\u0131 ile giyecekleri k\u0131yafetler ve di\u011fer hususlar \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lacak y\u00f6netmelikle d\u00fczenlenir.”<\/p>\n
13. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “H\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 231. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201c\u2026<\/p>\n
\u00a0(5) San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda h\u00fckmolunan ceza, iki y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcreli hapis veya adl\u00ee para cezas\u0131 ise; mahkemece, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilebilir. Uzla\u015fmaya ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler sakl\u0131d\u0131r. H\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131, kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bir hukuk\u00ee sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmamas\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(6) H\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilebilmesi i\u00e7in;<\/p>\n
a) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7tan mahk\u00fbm olmam\u0131\u015f bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
b) Mahkemece, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ki\u015filik \u00f6zellikleri ile duru\u015fmadaki tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak yeniden su\u00e7 i\u015flemeyece\u011fi hususunda kanaate var\u0131lmas\u0131, <\/p>\n
c) Su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesiyle ma\u011fdurun veya kamunun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131n, aynen iade, su\u00e7tan \u00f6nceki hale getirme veya tazmin suretiyle tamamen giderilmesi, gerekir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kabul etmemesi h\u00e2linde, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmez.<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u00a0(10) Denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kasten yeni bir su\u00e7 i\u015flenmedi\u011fi ve denetimli serbestlik tedbirine ili\u015fkin y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklere uygun davran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 geri b\u0131rak\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcm ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131larak, davan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesi karar\u0131 verilir.<\/p>\n
…\u201d<\/p>\n
14. Y\u00f6netmelik’in “Ama\u00e7” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 1. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bu Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin amac\u0131, Polis Akademisi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 Polis Meslek E\u011fitim Merkezlerine al\u0131nacak \u00f6\u011frencilerde aran\u0131lacak \u015fartlar ile giri\u015f s\u0131navlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin usul ve esaslar\u0131 d\u00fczenlemektir.”<\/p>\n
15. Y\u00f6netmelik’in “Dayanak” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 3. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bu Y\u00f6netmelik, 4\/6\/1937 tarihli ve 3201 say\u0131l\u0131 Emniyet Te\u015fkilat\u0131 Kanununun ek 24 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
16. Y\u00f6netmelik’in “Adaylarda aran\u0131lacak nitelikler” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 8. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) POMEM\u2019lere ba\u015fvuru yapacak adaylarda a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fartlar aran\u0131r.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
g) 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun 53 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinde belirtilen s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7mi\u015f olsa bile;<\/p>\n
1) Kasten i\u015flenen bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olsa dahi bir y\u0131l veya daha fazla s\u00fcreyle hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olmamak,<\/p>\n
2) Affa u\u011fram\u0131\u015f veya h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olsa bile devletin g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar, Anayasal d\u00fczene ve bu d\u00fczenin i\u015fleyi\u015fine kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar, zimmet, irtik\u00e2p, r\u00fc\u015fvet, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, sahtecilik, g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma, hileli iflas, ihaleye fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, edimin ifas\u0131na fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, su\u00e7tan kaynaklanan malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerini aklama, ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k veya cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 mahk\u00fbm olmamak veya bu su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 devam etmekte olan bir soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma bulunmamak veya kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 uzla\u015fma ile neticelenmemi\u015f olmak,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
k) G\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ar\u015fiv ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 olumlu olmak.”<\/p>\n
17. Y\u00f6netmelik’in “\u0130ntibak e\u011fitimi d\u00f6neminde POMEM\u2019den \u00e7\u0131kma veya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…<\/p>\n
(2) Sa\u011fl\u0131k Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri hari\u00e7, POMEM\u2019den \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan adaylar bir daha POMEM giri\u015f s\u0131navlar\u0131na ba\u015fvuruda bulunamazlar. Bu durum, \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan adaylara yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak tebli\u011f edilir.<\/p>\n
(3) 8 inci maddede say\u0131lan nitelikleri ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan adaylar\u0131n ili\u015fikleri, POMEM M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn teklifi ve Ba\u015fkan\u0131n onay\u0131yla kesilir.<\/p>\n
…”<\/p>\n
18. Ayr\u0131ca bkz. \u015eenol T\u00fcrky\u0131lmaz, B. No: 2018\/16070 , 6\/10\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 20-26).<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
19. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu, kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan HAGB karar\u0131 verilmesine ra\u011fmen be\u015f y\u0131l i\u00e7inde kasti bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemedi\u011finin belirlenmesi nedeniyle davada d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun gere\u011fince HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten ba\u015fvurucu, g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n sonucunda ilgili kanuna ve Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde hareket edilmesi nedeniyle polis memuru olmas\u0131n\u0131n engellendi\u011fini vurgulayarak \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, masumiyet karinesinin ve kamu hizmetine girme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
B. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu, HAGB karar\u0131 nedeniyle POMEM \u00f6\u011frencili\u011finden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesinin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet etti\u011fi idari i\u015flemin \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na dair bir gerek\u00e7eye dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun da i\u015flem sonucunun \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na etkileri konusunda yeterli a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun masumiyet karinesi kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n \u201cHak arama h\u00fcrriyeti\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 36. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cHerkes, me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir.\u201d <\/p>\n
24. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cSu\u00e7lulu\u011fu h\u00fckmen sabit oluncaya kadar, kimse su\u00e7lu say\u0131lamaz.\u201d<\/p>\n
1. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucunun ihlal iddias\u0131 POMEM \u00f6\u011frencili\u011finden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na dair i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada idari yarg\u0131 yerleri taraf\u0131ndan kesin bir mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ile sonu\u00e7lanmayan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli kararda kullan\u0131lan ifadelere ili\u015fkindir. Bu ba\u011flamda somut ba\u015fvuruda masumiyet karinesinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerin ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinin uygulanabilece\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu itibarla ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) ortak koruma alan\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmleriyle konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u011fda\u015fmazl\u0131k g\u00f6stermedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u015eenol T\u00fcrky\u0131lmaz, \u00a7 31).<\/p>\n
26. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
2. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
a. Genel \u0130lkeler<\/p>\n
27. Masumiyet karinesi, Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda “Su\u00e7lulu\u011fu h\u00fckmen sabit oluncaya kadar, kimse su\u00e7lu say\u0131lamaz.” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde ise herkesin iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu belirtilmektedir. An\u0131lan maddeye “adil yarg\u0131lanma” ibaresinin eklenmesine ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7ede, T\u00fcrkiye’nin taraf oldu\u011fu uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerce de g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131n\u0131n madde metnine d\u00e2hil edildi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim S\u00f6zle\u015fme’nin 6. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda, kendisine bir su\u00e7 isnat edilen herkesin su\u00e7lulu\u011fu yasal olarak sabit oluncaya kadar su\u00e7suz say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla masumiyet karinesi, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir unsuru olmakla beraber Anayasa’n\u0131n su\u00e7lulu\u011fu h\u00fckmen sabit oluncaya kadar kimsenin su\u00e7lu say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131na dair 38. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir (Fameka \u0130n\u015f. Plastik San ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eirketi, B. No: 2014\/3905, 19\/4\/2017, \u00a7 27).<\/p>\n
28. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir unsuru olan masumiyet karinesinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvencenin iki y\u00f6n\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
29. G\u00fcvencenin ilk y\u00f6n\u00fc ki\u015fi hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonu\u00e7lan\u0131ncaya kadar ge\u00e7en, bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ki\u015finin ceza gerektiren bir su\u00e7la itham edildi\u011fi (su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131nda oldu\u011fu) s\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin olup su\u00e7lu oldu\u011funa dair h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilene kadar ki\u015finin su\u00e7lulu\u011fu ve eylemleri hakk\u0131nda erken a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131 yasaklar. G\u00fcvencenin bu y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 sadece ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemeyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fildir. G\u00fcvence ayn\u0131 zamanda di\u011fer t\u00fcm idari ve adli makamlar\u0131n da i\u015flem ve kararlar\u0131nda, su\u00e7lulu\u011fu h\u00fckmen sabit oluncaya kadar ki\u015finin su\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ima ya da a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131 gerekli k\u0131lar. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla sadece su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na konu ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 ile e\u015f zamanl\u0131 olarak y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen di\u011fer hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7 ve yarg\u0131lamalarda da (idari, hukuk, disiplin gibi) masumiyet karinesinin ihlali s\u00f6z konusu olabilir (Galip \u015eahin, B. No: 2015\/6075, 11\/6\/2018, \u00a7 39).<\/p>\n
30. G\u00fcvencenin ikinci y\u00f6n\u00fc ise ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda mahk\u00fbmiyet d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011funda devreye girer ve daha sonraki yarg\u0131lamalarda ceza gerektiren su\u00e7la ilgili olarak ki\u015finin masumiyetinden \u015f\u00fcphe duyulmamas\u0131n\u0131, kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n toplum nezdinde ki\u015finin su\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu izlenimini uyand\u0131racak i\u015flem ve uygulamalardan ka\u00e7\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir (Galip \u015eahin, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n
31. HAGB, erteleme ve k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na se\u00e7enek yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar gibi h\u00fckm\u00fcn ve cezan\u0131n bireyselle\u015ftirilmesi kurumlar\u0131ndan biridir. H\u00e2kim, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurmakla beraber h\u00fckm\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamamakta ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirli bir s\u00fcre denetim alt\u0131nda tutmaktad\u0131r. San\u0131k, denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemedi\u011fi ve mahkemece \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen denetimli serbestlik tedbirine uygun davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 geri b\u0131rak\u0131lan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (\u015eevki Ozan B\u00fcy\u00fckkaya, B. No: 2018\/24012, 31\/3\/2022, \u00a7 34).<\/p>\n
32. H\u00fck\u00fcm, a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde kanun yolu denetimine tabi olaca\u011f\u0131ndan mahkemenin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7lu oldu\u011funa dair s\u00f6z konusu kanaatinin kanun yolu mercilerinde bozulmas\u0131 ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ki\u015finin isnat edilen su\u00e7tan beraat etmesinin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle denetim s\u00fcrecinde ki\u015finin su\u00e7lulu\u011funun sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla su\u00e7lu say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve masum oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (\u015eevki Ozan B\u00fcy\u00fckkaya, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
33. Anayasa Mahkemesi bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda (\u00f6rnek i\u00e7in bkz. Ali G\u00fcrsoy, B. No: 2012\/833, 26\/3\/2013) HAGB’nin -san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lama sonunda cezaya h\u00fckmedilmesi h\u00e2linde- h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n belirli ko\u015fullar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ertelenmesi anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 231. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda h\u00fckmolunan ceza iki y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcreli hapis ya da adli para cezas\u0131 ise HAGB karar\u0131 verilebilece\u011fini, an\u0131lan maddenin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda HAGB’nin kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bir hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmamas\u0131n\u0131 ifade etti\u011fini, \u00f6te yandan ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 223. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011findeki kararlar aras\u0131nda HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n say\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. HAGB’nin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131 karara ba\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmle sonu\u00e7land\u0131ran bir karar niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu kapsamda nihai bir sonu\u00e7 da do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa Mahkemesi HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7lulu\u011fu tespit eden bir karar olarak kabul edilmesinin ba\u015fta masumiyet karinesi olmak \u00fczere temel haklar\u0131 ihlal edebilece\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir (\u00dcmm\u00fcg\u00fcls\u00fcm Salgar [GK], B. No: 2016\/12847, 21\/10\/2021, \u00a7 85).<\/p>\n
34. Di\u011fer taraftan idari uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne esas te\u015fkil etmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan salt ki\u015finin yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan ve HAGB’ye dair karardan s\u00f6z edilmesi, masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011finden bahsedilebilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. Bunun i\u00e7in karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve nihai karar\u0131n m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran HAGB’ye karar verilen fiillere dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi gerekir (H\u00fcseyin \u015eahin [GK], B. No: 2013\/1728, 12\/11\/2014, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n
b. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
35. POMEM taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 neticesinde Y\u00f6netmelik’in 8. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (g) bendi uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki HAGB karar\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun aday \u00f6\u011frencilik hakk\u0131 sonland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve POMEM’den ili\u015fi\u011finin kesilmesi ile yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin ba\u015fvurucudan tahsiline karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme de ili\u015fik kesme i\u015flemine konu eylemin (kasten yaralama su\u00e7u) i\u015flendi\u011finin ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda tespit edildi\u011fini belirterek i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
36. Gerek POMEM gerekse Mahkeme, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda verilen karara dayanm\u0131\u015f ise de bu karar kesinle\u015fmi\u015f de\u011fildir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucunun su\u00e7lulu\u011fu h\u00fckmen sabit olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n sonucunda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 231. maddesinin ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen su\u00e7a uygulanabilece\u011finin tespiti ile HAGB’ye karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k denetim s\u00fcresinin su\u00e7 i\u015flenmeden ge\u00e7irilmesi h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesi imk\u00e2n\u0131 vard\u0131r. HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 231. maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun masumiyet karinesinin devam etti\u011fi ku\u015fkusuzdur.<\/p>\n
37. Ba\u015fvurucunun masumiyeti devam etti\u011finden an\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131ndan sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun masumiyetine halel veren yakla\u015f\u0131m sergileyip sergilemedikleri, bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle masumiyet karinesinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvencenin ikinci y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011finin incelenmesi gerekir. Bu ba\u011flamda yukar\u0131da yer verilen ilkeler uyar\u0131nca masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi incelenirken yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan makam\u0131n ilgili ki\u015fiye su\u00e7 isnat edip etmedi\u011fi, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 sorgulay\u0131p sorgulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda verilen ancak a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ertelenen h\u00fckme dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir (\u015eenol T\u00fcrky\u0131lmaz, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
38. \u0130dari yarg\u0131 mercilerinin gerek\u00e7elerinde, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda verilen karara at\u0131fla ba\u015fvurucunun kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan bir y\u0131l \u00fc\u00e7 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Y\u00f6netmelik’in 8. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (g) bendinde POMEM \u00f6\u011frencili\u011fi i\u00e7in “HAGB karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f olsa d\u00e2hi kasti bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle bir y\u0131ldan uzun s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olmama” \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7elerinde bir yandan kesin bir mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ile sonu\u00e7lanmayan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda verilen karara dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir yandan da kullan\u0131lan ifadelerde ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi izleniminin olu\u015fmas\u0131na sebebiyet verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu durumda verilen HAGB karar\u0131 anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le gelmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun masumiyetine g\u00f6lge d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayn\u0131 zamanda ba\u015fvuruya konu idari yarg\u0131lamada yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmenin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a g\u00f6re HAGB ile kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bir hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik d\u00fczenlemeyle ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemez (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u015eenol T\u00fcrky\u0131lmaz, \u00a7 47).<\/p>\n
39. Sonu\u00e7 olarak yarg\u0131 mercilerinin gerek\u00e7elerinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadeler ve ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ertelenen h\u00fckme dayanmalar\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun ceza yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131na konu eylemi i\u015fledi\u011fi ve su\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu inanc\u0131n\u0131 yans\u0131tt\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. ve 38. maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
40. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi ile 40.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
41. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
42. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
VII. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. ve 38. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan masumiyet karinesinin \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin masumiyet karinesinin ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2016\/3424, K.2017\/1970) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 364,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.164,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2019\/38905 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130.K. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/38905) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/3\/2025 – 32833 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : \u00c7a\u011flar \u00d6NCEL Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Mustafa Ayhan TEK\u0130NSOY \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, polis meslek e\u011fitim merkezi \u00f6\u011frencili\u011finden \u00e7\u0131karma i\u015fleminin iptali talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131 esas al\u0131narak karar verilmesi nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 22\/11\/2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru, belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle olaylar \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Emniyet te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n polis memuru ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak amac\u0131yla 16\/10\/2015-28\/10\/2015 tarihlerinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131navlarda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olan ba\u015fvurucunun Bal\u0131kesir Polis Meslek E\u011fitim Merkezi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne (POMEM) ge\u00e7ici olarak kayd\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 6. \u0130ntibak e\u011fitimine al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmas\u0131 neticesinde ba\u015fvurucunun 25\/3\/2009 tarihinde kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na (HAGB) karar verildi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n