T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
M. G. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/27110)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/3\/2025 – 32833<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan SARA\u00c7<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, infaz kurumunda verilen disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131nda s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ret karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Band\u0131rma 1 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) devletin egemenli\u011fi alt\u0131nda bulunan topraklardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 devlet idaresinden ay\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak su\u00e7undan 36 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131) taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck a\u00e7l\u0131k grevine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine 3\/3\/2021 tarihinde hakk\u0131nda bir ay baz\u0131 etkinliklere kat\u0131lmaktan al\u0131koyma cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 4\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Tebli\u011f edilen cezaya yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde itiraz edilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in 19\/3\/2021 tarihinde kesinle\u015fen cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na 22\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f olup bu husus ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 5\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu\u011funu, ayn\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7ten ge\u00e7en bir ba\u015fka h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn ise cezas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fleme konulmas\u0131na dair ayn\u0131 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinin bulundu\u011funu, cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair 22\/3\/2021 tarihli bildirim \u00fczerine de yap\u0131lanlar\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yeni bir dilek\u00e7e verdi\u011fini, infaz ve koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan itiraz m\u00fcddetinin ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi beyan edilerek dilek\u00e7esinin iade edildi\u011fini, dilek\u00e7elerinin i\u015fleme al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Band\u0131rma \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) ba\u015fvurucunun 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu \u015fik\u00e2yeti, s\u00f6z konusu ceza verme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n 4\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini belirterek ba\u015fvurucunun on be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck itiraz s\u00fcresinin bitiminden sonra 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde itiraz etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 31\/3\/2021 tarihinde reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 da \u00f6zetle 5\/3\/2021 tarihinde verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e ile disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunun bulundu\u011funu, buna ra\u011fmen dilek\u00e7esinin i\u015fleme al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kesinle\u015fen disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Band\u0131rma A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi)karar\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 27\/4\/2021 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Karar\u0131n 18\/5\/2021 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu 27\/5\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; kendisi hakk\u0131nda verilen disiplin cezas\u0131na s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen dilek\u00e7esinin i\u015fleme al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonradan verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7esi hakk\u0131nda ise s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan ret karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini iddia ederek itirazlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunulmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma ve etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n\u0131 soyut bir \u015fekilde ifade etti\u011fi, ba\u015fvuru konusu olaylarla ilgili olarak bu hakk\u0131n nas\u0131l ve ne \u015fekilde etkilendi\u011fi hususunda ba\u015fvurucunun yeterli a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6z konusu haklar ba\u011flam\u0131nda ne \u015fekilde bir ma\u011fduriyet ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve dezavantajl\u0131 duruma d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yeterince ortaya konulup konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, yarg\u0131sal mercilerin kararlar\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e bulundu\u011funun dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cTemel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, \u00f6zlerine dokunulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaln\u0131zca Anayasan\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, Anayasan\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fcne ve ruhuna, demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin ve l\u00e2ik Cumhuriyetin gereklerine ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.\u201d<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerden biri olan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck, hukuk devleti ilkesinden do\u011fmaktad\u0131r. Hukuk devletinde hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istisnai bir yetki oldu\u011fundan bu yetki ancak durumun gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla hakl\u0131 bir temele oturabilir. Bireylerin hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin somut ko\u015fullar\u0131n gerektirdi\u011finden daha fazla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 kamu otoritelerine tan\u0131nan yetkinin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelece\u011finden hukuk devletiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmaz (AYM, E.2013\/95, K.2014\/176, 13\/11\/2014).<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde yer alan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesi elveri\u015flilik, gereklilik ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k olmak \u00fczere \u00fc\u00e7 alt ilkeden olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Elveri\u015flilik \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen m\u00fcdahalenin amac\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131n\u0131, gereklilik ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahalenin zorunlu olmas\u0131n\u0131 yani ayn\u0131 amaca daha hafif bir m\u00fcdahale ile ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131n\u0131, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ise bireyin hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale ile ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 aras\u0131nda makul bir dengenin g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklili\u011fini ifade etmektedir (AYM, E.2011\/111, K.2012\/56, 11\/4\/2012; E.2016\/16, K.2016\/37, 5\/5\/2016; Mehmet Akdo\u011fan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/817, 19\/12\/2013, \u00a7 38; Emrah Yayla [GK], B. No: 2017\/38732, 6\/2\/2020, \u00a7 68).<\/p>\n
19. Ki\u015finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahalenin de\u011ferlendirilmesi noktas\u0131nda yarg\u0131 mercilerinin kararlar\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7enin g\u00f6sterilmemesi veya bu hususa ili\u015fkin olarak taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gereken iddialar\u0131n\u0131n cevaps\u0131z b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 hak ihlaline yol a\u00e7abilir (Zeynep Aysu Kan [GK], B. No: 2019\/11785, 14\/9\/2023, \u00a7 52).<\/p>\n
20. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu; s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 5\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu\u011funu, cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yaz\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lanlar\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yeni bir dilek\u00e7e verdi\u011fini, infaz ve koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet m\u00fcddetinin ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi beyan edilerek dilek\u00e7esinin iade edildi\u011fini, dilek\u00e7elerinin i\u015fleme al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
21. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi; ba\u015fvurucunun 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu \u015fik\u00e2yeti, s\u00f6z konusu ceza verme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n 4\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini belirterek ba\u015fvurucunun on be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck itiraz s\u00fcresinin bitiminden sonra 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde itiraz etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 5\/3\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinin \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fleme konulup \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine g\u00f6nderilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131nda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi ve dilek\u00e7ede a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yer almas\u0131na ra\u011fmen A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ve meselenin esas\u0131na etki eden en temel iddia hakk\u0131nda bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmayarak \u00f6zetle s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan ret karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 5-7)<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcresinde \u015fik\u00e2yet etmesine ra\u011fmen dilek\u00e7esinin yarg\u0131sal mercilere g\u00f6nderilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi ve A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince herhangi bir gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeyerek kategorik olarak reddedildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda ba\u015fvuruya konu m\u00fcdahalenin kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131 ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya \u015fahsi olarak orant\u0131s\u0131z bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu, yeniden yarg\u0131lama ile 7.000 TL manevi tazminata karar verilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
26. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Band\u0131rma \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2021\/973, K.2021\/1046) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/27110 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 M. G. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/27110) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/3\/2025 – 32833 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : Hasan SARA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, infaz kurumunda verilen disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131nda s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ret karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Band\u0131rma 1 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) devletin egemenli\u011fi alt\u0131nda bulunan topraklardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 devlet idaresinden ay\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak su\u00e7undan 36 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131) taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun be\u015f g\u00fcnl\u00fck a\u00e7l\u0131k grevine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine 3\/3\/2021 tarihinde hakk\u0131nda bir ay baz\u0131 etkinliklere kat\u0131lmaktan al\u0131koyma cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. 4. Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 4\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Tebli\u011f edilen cezaya yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde itiraz edilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in 19\/3\/2021 tarihinde kesinle\u015fen cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na 22\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f olup bu husus ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. 5. Ba\u015fvurucu 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 5\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu\u011funu, ayn\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n