T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
T. D. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/439)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Melek \u015eAHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ercan G\u00dcLL\u00dc<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza infaz kurumunda ba\u015fta kalabal\u0131k odada tutulma olmak \u00fczere uygun olmayan \u015fartlarda bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lma ve bu konudaki ba\u015fvurunun infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fince incelenmeden reddedilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hasta olunmas\u0131 durumunda \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm bulunamamas\u0131, bedelinin \u00f6denece\u011fi beyan edilmesine ra\u011fmen kitap ve dergilerin al\u0131nmamas\u0131, di\u011fer su\u00e7lardan kalanlara verilen mahrem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) mahpuslar\u0131na verilmemesi nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve ifade h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131ndaki su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 nedeniyle 18\/7\/2016 tarihinde tutuklanarak getirildi\u011fi (kapat\u0131lan) Ad\u0131yaman E Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) 25\/1\/2020 tarihine kadar 3 y\u0131l 6 ay 7 g\u00fcn bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130nfaz Kurumu \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kuruluna (\u0130nfaz Kurulu) bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015flar\u0131n \u00e7ok kalabal\u0131k oldu\u011funu, kalabal\u0131k nedeniyle asgari ki\u015fisel alan\u0131n sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 bir\u00e7ok s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131n\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fini, C-12 No.lu ko\u011fu\u015fta yeterli ranza olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan banyo ve tuvaletin \u00f6n\u00fcnde, yerde, \u0131\u015f\u0131k alt\u0131nda yatmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ranzan\u0131n \u00fcst kat\u0131nda yatt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda da tavandan ge\u00e7en kanalizasyon borular\u0131ndan \u00fczerine pis su akt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, taleplere ra\u011fmen ar\u0131zan\u0131n giderilmedi\u011fini, banyonun kap\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer su\u00e7lardan kalanlara verilen mahrem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY mahpuslar\u0131na verilmedi\u011fini, D-15 No.lu ko\u011fu\u015fta sadece \u00f6nceden belirlenen g\u00fcnde Kurum doktoruna muayene olabildi\u011fini, resm\u00ee tatillerde iki kez hastaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde ambulans \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bandroll\u00fc ve yasaklanmam\u0131\u015f kitap ve dergileri alma konusunda k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bilgisayar ve internet kullanma, \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 alma hakk\u0131n\u0131n engellendi\u011fini, ceza infaz kurumu kantininden \u00fccreti kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r\u0131 almak i\u00e7in sipari\u015f fi\u015fi yazmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen iki \u00fc\u00e7 ay alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ailesinin i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r\u0131 getirmesinin engellendi\u011fini, kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odalar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz oldu\u011funu, birer tuvalet ve banyo oldu\u011fundan uzun s\u00fcre s\u0131ra bekledi\u011fini, s\u0131cak suyun az verildi\u011fini, yemeklerin da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131nda hijyen \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu konuda hem yaz\u0131l\u0131 hem s\u00f6zl\u00fc talepte bulundu\u011fu h\u00e2lde taleplerine cevap verilmedi\u011fini belirterek 23\/9\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130nfaz Kurulu 28\/10\/2019 tarihinde, bahsedilen konular\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve yetki alan\u0131na girmedi\u011finden karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, karara kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, \u015fartlar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi talebinin g\u00f6rev ve yetkisinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara itiraz\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen Ad\u0131yaman 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131nda yasal isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 26\/11\/2019 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmesinin ard\u0131ndan 26\/12\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu 25\/1\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fka bir ceza infaz kurumuna, 27\/5\/2023 tarihinde ise denetimli serbestli\u011fe nakledilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131yla Ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Olarak Etkili Ba\u015fvuru Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; tutuldu\u011fu ko\u011fu\u015fta olmas\u0131 gerekenin iki kat\u0131 kadar mahpus bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tuvalet ve banyo \u00f6n\u00fcnde yerde yatmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ranzan\u0131n \u00fcst kat\u0131nda yatt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00fczerine pis sular damlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, birer tuvalet ve banyonun yetersiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bazen bir iki saat tuvalet s\u0131ras\u0131 bekledi\u011fini, banyonun kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, banyonun i\u00e7inin mutfa\u011f\u0131 kullananlarca net bir \u015fekilde g\u00f6r\u00fclebildi\u011fini, g\u00fcnl\u00fck be\u015f alt\u0131 dakikal\u0131k s\u0131cak su verildi\u011fini, \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131kanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f alan\u0131n\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc oldu\u011funu, Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun cevaps\u0131z b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
10. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun tutulma \u015fartlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden farkl\u0131 bir ceza infaz kurumuna nakledilmesi nedeniyle tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilece\u011finden bahisle ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun t\u00fcketmedi\u011fi, etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet ve itirazlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir k\u0131s\u0131tlamaya maruz kalmadan \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi nezdinde \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu yapabildi\u011fi, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itirazla karar\u0131n hukuki denetimini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lacak tespit ve de\u011ferlendirmelerde dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvuru, tutulma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n uluslararas\u0131 standartlara uygun h\u00e2le getirilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli kararlar\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 talebiyle \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde esasa girilmeden reddedilmesi nedeniyle ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n dile getirebilece\u011fi etkili bir ba\u015fvuru yolunun bulunmamas\u0131na, bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle mevcut yarg\u0131sal sistemin etkili \u015fekilde i\u015fletilmemesine ili\u015fkindir. 16\/5\/2001 tarihli ve 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun 4. maddesine g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131 ve tutukevlerine kabul edilmeleri, yerle\u015ftirilmeleri, bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131, \u0131s\u0131t\u0131lmalar\u0131 ve giydirilmeleri, beslenmeleri, temizliklerinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, bedensel ve ruhsal sa\u011fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla muayene ve tedavilerinin yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, d\u0131\u015far\u0131yla ili\u015fkileri, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 gibi i\u015flem veya faaliyetlere ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri incelemek ve karara ba\u011flamak infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011finin g\u00f6revlerindendir. Buna ra\u011fmen \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin b\u00fcsb\u00fct\u00fcn temelsiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen iddialar\u0131n savunulabilir (tart\u0131\u015fmaya, de\u011ferlendirmeye de\u011fer) nitelikte oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan belirtilen iddialar k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir (etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131ndan inceleme i\u00e7in ba\u011flant\u0131 kurulan hak, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ya da yasa\u011f\u0131n savunulabilir olmas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fart oldu\u011funa dair kararlar i\u00e7in bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 73).<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 40. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131; anayasal bir hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcren herkese hakk\u0131n niteli\u011fine uygun olarak iddialar\u0131n\u0131 inceletebilece\u011fi makul, eri\u015filebilir, ihlalin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini veya s\u00fcrmesini engellemeye ya da sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmaya (yeterli giderim sa\u011flamaya) elveri\u015fli idari ve yarg\u0131sal yollara ba\u015fvuruda bulunabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131 sa\u011flar. Bunun i\u00e7in s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n sadece hukuken mevcut bulunmas\u0131 yeterli olmay\u0131p uygulamada da etkili olmas\u0131, bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ba\u015far\u0131 \u015fans\u0131 sunmas\u0131 gerekir. Bununla birlikte bir ba\u015fvuru yolunun gerek hukuken gerekse uygulamada genel anlamda etkili olmas\u0131, somut olay bak\u0131m\u0131ndan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir ihlalin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine engel de\u011fildir (Yusuf Ahmed Abdelaz\u0131m Elsayad, B. No: 2016\/5604, 24\/5\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 60, 61). Ayr\u0131ca etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan inceleme yap\u0131labilmesi kural olarak bu hakla aras\u0131nda ba\u011flant\u0131 kurulan hakk\u0131n, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ya da yasa\u011f\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine \u00f6nceden karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fildir (Abdullah Ya\u015fa [GK], B. No: 2015\/12486, 5\/11\/2020, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
14. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun odalar\u0131n kalabal\u0131k olmas\u0131na ve kalabal\u0131kl\u0131ktan kaynaklanan di\u011fer \u015fartlara y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetleri, \u015fik\u00e2yet konusunun \u0130nfaz Kurulunun g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedildikten sonra 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da d\u00fczenlenen infaz h\u00e2kimliklerinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle derece mahkemelerince esasa girilmeden reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla derece mahkemelerince ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetleri konusunda bir inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u015eik\u00e2yet konusunun 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 4. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan ve infaz h\u00e2kimliklerine mahpuslar\u0131n hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerinin korunmas\u0131 ad\u0131na geni\u015f bir g\u00f6rev alan\u0131 tan\u0131yan d\u00fczenlemenin kapsam\u0131na hangi nedenlerle girmedi\u011fi hususunda derece mahkemelerince ikna edici a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011finin g\u00f6revli ve yetkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde verilen karar\u0131n bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7eler i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ve uygun bir telafi \u015fans\u0131 sunulmas\u0131na elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Derece mahkemelerince verilen kararlar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilen ilgili mevzuat\u0131n ba\u015fvuruya konu i\u015flemin hukuka ve Anayasa’ya uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n denetlemesini yasaklamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda derece mahkemelerince ortaya konulan bu yakla\u015f\u0131m, temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetin etkili bir \u015fekilde incelenmesine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130tiraz\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi de bu eksikli\u011fi gidermeye y\u00f6nelik bir karar vermemi\u015ftir. Neticede ba\u015fvurucuya, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc m\u00fcdahalenin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle ba\u015fvurabilece\u011fi ve asgari g\u00fcvenceleri i\u00e7eren, pratikte de i\u015fleyen etkili bir hukuk yolunun sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 40. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ceza infaz kurumunda tutulma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n M.\u00c7. [GK] (B. No: 2017\/34600, 6\/2\/2020) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak e\u015fitlik ilkesinin, e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve ifade h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Cemal G\u00fcnsel [GK] (B. No: 2016\/12900, 21\/1\/2021) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve 3.000.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucunun tahliye edilmesi nedeniyle tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. \u00d6te yandan ihlalin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurucuya net 115.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik kriterlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA, <\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 40. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 115.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 30.000 TL vekalet \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Ad\u0131yaman \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2019\/1370, K.2019\/1378) ve Ad\u0131yaman 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (2019\/1905 D. \u0130\u015f) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 15\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/439 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 T. D. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/439) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 15\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Melek \u015eAHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Ercan G\u00dcLL\u00dc \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza infaz kurumunda ba\u015fta kalabal\u0131k odada tutulma olmak \u00fczere uygun olmayan \u015fartlarda bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lma ve bu konudaki ba\u015fvurunun infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fince incelenmeden reddedilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hasta olunmas\u0131 durumunda \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm bulunamamas\u0131, bedelinin \u00f6denece\u011fi beyan edilmesine ra\u011fmen kitap ve dergilerin al\u0131nmamas\u0131, di\u011fer su\u00e7lardan kalanlara verilen mahrem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) mahpuslar\u0131na verilmemesi nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve ifade h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131ndaki su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 nedeniyle 18\/7\/2016 tarihinde tutuklanarak getirildi\u011fi (kapat\u0131lan) Ad\u0131yaman E Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) 25\/1\/2020 tarihine kadar 3 y\u0131l 6 ay 7 g\u00fcn bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130nfaz Kurumu \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kuruluna (\u0130nfaz Kurulu) bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015flar\u0131n \u00e7ok kalabal\u0131k oldu\u011funu, kalabal\u0131k nedeniyle asgari ki\u015fisel alan\u0131n sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve buna …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n