T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
O.A. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/31114)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
O.A.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7e\u015fitli anayasal haklar\u0131n, h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda verilen yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yakalama esnas\u0131ndaki uygulamalar ve tutma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc olmas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Antalya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 18\/2\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan 3 y\u0131l 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi 24\/11\/2021 tarihinde mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu 7\/3\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fcdafii arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 22\/11\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurmak \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u00fcracaatta bulunmu\u015f, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 24\/1\/2022 tarihinde talebin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. 4\/2\/2022 tarihinde Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fen cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla yakalama emri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu 7\/2\/2022 tarihinde COVID-19 testi yapt\u0131rarak Antalya Adliyesine teslim olmak amac\u0131yla gitti\u011fini, ilgili birim taraf\u0131ndan kendisine 8\/2\/2022 tarihinde i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve COVID-19 testi yapt\u0131r\u0131p gelmesinin s\u00f6ylendi\u011fini, buna ra\u011fmen ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn gece yar\u0131s\u0131 evine gelen kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6nce polis merkezinde geceyi ge\u00e7irdi\u011fini, 8\/2\/2022 tarihinde Antalya Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna g\u00f6nderildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Kesinle\u015fen Mahk\u00fbmiyet Karar\u0131 Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Anayasal Haklar\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flemedi\u011fini, davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada dosyas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ncelikli olarak incelenerek usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde onand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eksik incelemeyle gerekli ve yeterli inceleme yap\u0131lmadan karar verildi\u011fini belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011framamas\u0131 i\u00e7in h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde incelendi\u011fini, Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n etkili bir inceleme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca emsal nitelikteki dosyalar\u0131n temyiz incelemesi \u00e7ok uzun s\u00fcrerken kendi dosyas\u0131nda temyiz incelemesinin k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
10. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 47. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 64. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvuru yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise ihlalin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda t\u00fcketilmesi gereken son ba\u015fvuru yolu temyiz olup temyiz incelemesinden ge\u00e7en kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 308. maddesi gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131na tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz yoluna gidilmesi istemi, sadece an\u0131lan mercinin takdirini harekete ge\u00e7irmeye y\u00f6neliktir. Bu kapsamda yap\u0131lan taleplerin bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi \u00fczerinde herhangi bir etkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r (Rafet \u00dcnal, B. No: 2013\/1610, 13\/6\/2013, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
12. Somut olayda ola\u011fan kanun yolu, karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131 ile tamamlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nihai karar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f tarihi dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmamakla birlikte ba\u015fvurucunun en ge\u00e7 itiraz kanun yoluna gidilmesi istemiyle ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 22\/11\/2021 tarihinde nihai karardan haberdar oldu\u011fu, bu tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcnl\u00fck ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 7\/3\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu; hakk\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, kendi iste\u011fiyle teslim olmaya haz\u0131r \u015fekilde adliyeye gitmesine ra\u011fmen hakk\u0131nda verilen yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131n hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funu, ka\u00e7ak olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen evine gelinerek teslim al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Somut olaya ili\u015fkin s\u00fcrecin aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken konuya ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihad\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerinin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 cevab\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formunda yer alan iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu b\u00f6l\u00fcmdeki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin \u00f6z\u00fc, kesinle\u015fen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn infaz\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda verilen yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6neliktir. Bu itibarla bu k\u0131s\u0131mdaki iddialar\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu etti\u011fi tutulma h\u00e2linin Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda bir su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutma niteli\u011finde de\u011fil ayn\u0131 maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutma, bir di\u011fer ifadeyle mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu nitelikteki bir tutmayla ilgili olarak yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutmaya ili\u015fkin g\u00fcvencelerin uygulanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan ba\u015fvurucu kendi iradesiyle teslim olmak \u00fczere adliyeye gitmesine ra\u011fmen buradaki g\u00f6revlilerce teslim al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra hakk\u0131nda verilen yakalama karar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda evine gelinerek teslim al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucunun kendi iste\u011fiyle teslim olmak istemesi ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren bir olgu olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. Ancak ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutman\u0131n hukukili\u011fi \u00fczerinde bir etkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu husus su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuklama a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen “mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi” ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 bir ihlal iddias\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu ise Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi ki\u015finin h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen ya da tamamen bu ko\u015fullarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fini tespit etmekle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r (Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu, B. No: 2017\/27793, 18\/7\/2018, \u00a7 55). Bu kapsamda yap\u0131lan incelemede ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc ve mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulma karar\u0131n\u0131 veren mercinin bir mahkeme olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, karar\u0131n h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 bir niteli\u011finin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lman\u0131n mahkemece verilen h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya tedbirin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n hukukili\u011fini etkileyen yeni bir durum bulundu\u011fu \u015feklinde bir iddias\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesince bu y\u00f6nde herhangi bir tespit de yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi benzer nitelikteki \u00e7ok say\u0131da ba\u015fvuruda, h\u00fck\u00fcmle birlikte verilen tutuklama veya tutuklamaya y\u00f6nelik yakalama karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lan ki\u015filerin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131, tutulman\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n yerine getirilmesi niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funu belirterek a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun bulmu\u015f ve kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir (Nail \u0130lbey, B. No: 2012\/958, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 21, 22; Turgut Ketken, B. No: 2012\/1006, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 21, 22; \u00d6kke\u015f Alp K\u0131r\u0131kkanat, B. No: 2012\/1011, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 21, 22; G\u00fcrkan Y\u0131ld\u0131z, B. No: 2012\/1100, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 21, 22). Anayasa Mahkemesi ayr\u0131ca h\u00fck\u00fcmle birlikte tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na karar verilen ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm sonras\u0131ndaki tutulmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin benzer y\u00f6ndeki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 da ayn\u0131 nedenle kabul edilemez bulmu\u015ftur (Murat Da\u011f, B. No: 2014\/125, 4\/2\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 45-48; G\u00fcven Ersoy, B. No: 2014\/126, 4\/2\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 45-48).<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun kesinle\u015fen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda tutulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir ihlalin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu; gece yar\u0131s\u0131 evine bask\u0131n yap\u0131larak e\u015fi ve \u00e7ocu\u011fu \u00f6n\u00fcnde, \u015feref ve haysiyeti rencide edilmek suretiyle yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yakalama karar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda polis merkezinde ve ceza infaz kurumunda k\u00f6t\u00fc ko\u015fullarda ya\u015famak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ceza infaz kurumunda koronavir\u00fcse yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucunun polis merkezindeki tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Nebahat Baysal G\u00fcl (B. No: 2016\/14634, 28\/5\/2019) karar\u0131ndaki gibi, ceza infaz kurumundaki tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Didem T\u00fctenk (B. No: 2013\/7525, 10\/6\/2015) karar\u0131ndaki gibi, ailesinin g\u00f6z\u00fc \u00f6n\u00fcnde, \u015feref ve itibar\u0131 rencide edilerek yakalanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n ise \u00d6mer Akta\u015f (B. No: 2014\/14915, 21\/9\/2016) karar\u0131ndaki gibi ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Kesinle\u015fen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin di\u011fer iddialar\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 10\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/31114 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 O.A. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/31114) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : O.A. \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7e\u015fitli anayasal haklar\u0131n, h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda verilen yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yakalama esnas\u0131ndaki uygulamalar ve tutma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc olmas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Antalya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 18\/2\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan 3 y\u0131l 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi 24\/11\/2021 tarihinde mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu 7\/3\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. 5. Ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fcdafii arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 22\/11\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurmak \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u00fcracaatta bulunmu\u015f, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 24\/1\/2022 tarihinde talebin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. 6. 4\/2\/2022 tarihinde Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fen cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla yakalama emri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. 7. Ba\u015fvurucu 7\/2\/2022 tarihinde COVID-19 testi …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n