T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MEHMET \u00c7EL\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/22692)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00c7a\u011flar \u00d6NCEL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mehmet \u00c7EL\u0130K<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Kudret YAL\u00c7IN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, idari i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada kesin mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ile sonu\u00e7lanmayan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na dayan\u0131larak gerek\u00e7eli kararda su\u00e7lulu\u011fu \u00eema eden baz\u0131 ifadeler kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Karaman \u0130. A. Anadolu Lisesinde m\u00fcd\u00fcr yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 17 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki k\u0131z \u00f6\u011frenciye cinsel tacizde bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131 ile adli ve idari soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Adli soru\u015fturma sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fdura birden fazla kez s\u00f6zle cinsel tacizde bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. Karaman 5. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi (Ceza Mahkemesi) 22\/6\/2016 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan mahk\u00fbmiyetine ve 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 231. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na (HAGB) karar verilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7ede ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131ndan sunulan ses kayd\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun iddia edilen taciz i\u00e7erikli s\u00f6zleri s\u00f6yledi\u011finin belirlendi\u011fi, nitekim ba\u015fvurucunun da tevil yollu ikrarda bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucunun at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan karar itiraz\u0131n reddi \u00fczerine 20\/9\/2016 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Karaman \u0130l Mill\u00ee E\u011fitim M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce yap\u0131lan idari soru\u015fturma sonucunda haz\u0131rlanan raporda ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel tacizde bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131n\u0131n toplanan bilgi, belge, al\u0131nan ifadeler ve dinlenen ses kayd\u0131 ile s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Raporda an\u0131lan fiilin 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125. maddesinin (E) bendinde yer alan memurluk s\u0131fat\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak nitelik ve derecede y\u00fcz k\u0131zart\u0131c\u0131 ve utan\u00e7 verici hareket olarak nitelendirilmesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 teklif edilmi\u015ftir. Mill\u00ee E\u011fitim Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulunun (Disiplin Kurulu) 21\/6\/2016 tarihli karar\u0131 ile isnat edilen fiilin do\u011fruluk kazanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu 15\/7\/2016 tarihinde Konya 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu dava dilek\u00e7esinde ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda HAGB karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, taciz iddias\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011framas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bunun dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz bir i\u015flem tesis edildi\u011finden karar\u0131n iptalini talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 16\/12\/2016 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7ede ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki adli ve idari soru\u015fturma s\u00fcre\u00e7lerine yer verilerek dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ve mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7enin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n ve Karaman 5. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2016\/352 Esas ve 2016\/722 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n birlikte incelenmesinden; Karaman \u0130li, \u0130rfan Ataseven Anadolu Lisesinde m\u00fcd\u00fcr yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta olan davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda, 11\/B s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frencisine s\u00f6zl\u00fc taciz uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, soru\u015fturma neticesinde tanzim edilen 07.04.2016 tarih ve \/09-10 say\u0131l\u0131 disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 raporuyla, davac\u0131n\u0131n 11\/B s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frencisine s\u00f6zl\u00fc taciz uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011finden bahisle, 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125\/E-g maddesi uyar\u0131nca devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131karma cezas\u0131 ile tecziyesinin teklif edildi\u011fi, Milli E\u011fitim Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu’nun 21\/06\/2016 g\u00fcn ve 97202150\/(2016-70-02)903.08.02\/7280212 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n eyleminin 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125\/E-g maddesi uyar\u0131nca “Memurluk s\u0131fat\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak nitelik ve derecede y\u00fcz k\u0131zart\u0131c\u0131 ve utan\u00e7 verici hareketlerde bulunmak” eylemi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, davac\u0131ya isnat edilen eyleminin sabit oldu\u011fu ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125\/E-g maddesi uyar\u0131nca devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131karma cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi, bu cezan\u0131n iptali istemiyle bak\u0131lmakta olan davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n “\u00c7ocu\u011fa Kar\u015f\u0131 Cinsel Taciz” su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada, Karaman 5. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 22.06.2016 tarih ve E:2016\/352, K:2016\/722 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011finin s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011finden bahisle hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
Olayda; Karaman 5.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 22.06.2016 tarih ve E:2016\/352 K:2016\/722 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131, soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131ndaki bilgi, belge ve tan\u0131k ifade tutanaklar\u0131 birlikte incelendi\u011finde; davac\u0131n\u0131n, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi subuta erdi\u011fi sonu\u00e7 ve kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/p>\n
Bu durumda, davac\u0131n\u0131n subuta eren eyleminin 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125\/E-g maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi sonucunda ‘devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131karma’ cezas\u0131 ile tecziyesine ili\u015fkin dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ve mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onikinci Dairesi (Dan\u0131\u015ftay), 28\/1\/2020 tarihinde temyize konu karar\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle karar\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu nihai karar\u0131 17\/6\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 6\/7\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Komisyon ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hi\u00e7bir h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, buna ra\u011fmen an\u0131lan karar nedeniyle devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, daha \u00f6nce hi\u00e7bir disiplin cezas\u0131 bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun gere\u011fince bir alt kademedeki cezan\u0131n verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz \u015fekilde uygulanan cezan\u0131n sonucu olarak manevi zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca taciz iddialar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayan ba\u015fvurucu, \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
10. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; Mahkeme karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun ceza hukuku anlam\u0131nda su\u00e7lu oldu\u011funu ifade veya \u00eema eden bir anlat\u0131ma yer verilmedi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca somut olaya dair t\u00fcm maddi olay ve olgular\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilerek takdir yetkisinin sebeplerinin gerek\u00e7elendirildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Mahkemece y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen muhakemede salt HAGB karar\u0131na dayan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na g\u00f6re disiplin mevzuat\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan eylemin s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanarak ba\u015fvurunun kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fte son olarak, masumiyet karinesi ilkesinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir ederBa\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc HAGB karar\u0131n\u0131n, Mahkeme ve Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmesine y\u00f6neliktir. Her ne kadar ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda do\u011frudan masumiyet karinesi ibaresini kullanmam\u0131\u015fsa da \u015fik\u00e2yet konusu olarak dile getirdi\u011fi olgular\u0131n masumiyet karinesiyle ilgili oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun masumiyet karinesi kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. Masumiyet karinesi, ki\u015finin su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 olmadan su\u00e7lu olarak kabul edilmemesini g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca hi\u00e7 kimse, su\u00e7lulu\u011fu h\u00fckmen sabit oluncaya kadar yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131 ve kamu otoriteleri taraf\u0131ndan su\u00e7lu olarak nitelendirilemez ve su\u00e7lu muamelesine tabi tutulamaz (K\u00fcr\u015fat Eyol, B. No: 2012\/665, 13\/6\/2013, \u00a7 26). Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bir unsuru olan masumiyet karinesinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvencenin iki y\u00f6n\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. G\u00fcvencenin ilk y\u00f6n\u00fc; ki\u015fi hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonu\u00e7lan\u0131ncaya kadar ge\u00e7en, bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ki\u015finin ceza gerektiren bir su\u00e7la itham edildi\u011fi (su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131nda oldu\u011fu) s\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin olup su\u00e7lu oldu\u011funa dair h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilene kadar ki\u015finin su\u00e7lulu\u011fu ve eylemleri hakk\u0131nda erken a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131 yasaklar. G\u00fcvencenin ikinci y\u00f6n\u00fc ise ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda mahk\u00fbmiyet d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011funda devreye girer ve daha sonraki yarg\u0131lamalarda ceza gerektiren su\u00e7la ilgili olarak ki\u015finin masumiyetinden \u015f\u00fcphe duyulmamas\u0131n\u0131, kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n toplum nezdinde ki\u015finin su\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu izlenimini uyand\u0131racak i\u015flem ve uygulamalardan ka\u00e7\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir (Galip \u015eahin, B. No: 2015\/6075, 11\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 39-40).<\/p>\n
14. HAGB, erteleme ve k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na se\u00e7enek yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar gibi h\u00fckm\u00fcn ve cezan\u0131n bireyselle\u015ftirilmesi kurumlar\u0131ndan biridir. H\u00e2kim, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurmakla beraber h\u00fckm\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamamakta ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirli bir s\u00fcre denetim alt\u0131nda tutmaktad\u0131r. San\u0131k, denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemedi\u011fi ve mahkemece \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen denetimli serbestlik tedbirine uygun davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 geri b\u0131rak\u0131lan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (Enez Ers\u00f6z, B. No: 2018\/19673, 31\/3\/2022, \u00a7 35). H\u00fck\u00fcm, a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde kanun yolu denetimine tabi olaca\u011f\u0131ndan mahkemenin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7lu oldu\u011funa dair s\u00f6z konusu kanaatinin kanun yolu mercilerinde bozulmas\u0131 ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ki\u015finin isnat edilen su\u00e7tan beraat etmesinin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle denetim s\u00fcrecinde ki\u015finin su\u00e7lulu\u011funun sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla su\u00e7lu say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, masum oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (Enez Ers\u00f6z, \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n
15. Di\u011fer taraftan idari uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne esas te\u015fkil etmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan salt ki\u015finin yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan ve HAGB’ye dair karardan s\u00f6z edilmesi masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011finden bahsedebilmek i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. Bu kapsamdaki de\u011ferlendirmede karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve nihai karar\u0131n m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran HAGB’ye karar verilen fiillere dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi gerekir (H\u00fcseyin \u015eahin [GK], B. No: 2013\/1728, 12\/11\/2014, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n
16. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131ndadevlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda ise ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen eylemin s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011fi, an\u0131lan eylemin memurluk s\u0131fat\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak nitelik ve derecede y\u00fcz k\u0131zart\u0131c\u0131 ve utan\u00e7 verici hareket oldu\u011fu belirtilerek davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan karar Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. HAGB karar\u0131 neticesinde ba\u015fvurucunun masumiyeti devam etti\u011finden an\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131ndan sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun masumiyetine halel veren bir yakla\u015f\u0131m sergileyip sergilemediklerinin incelenmesi gerekir. Bu ba\u011flamda yukar\u0131da yer verilen ilkeler uyar\u0131nca masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi incelenirken yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan makam\u0131n ilgili ki\u015fiye su\u00e7 isnat edip etmedi\u011fi, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 sorgulay\u0131p sorgulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda verilen HAGB karar\u0131na dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Mustafa Demirkol, B.No: 2019\/24253, 8\/2\/2024, \u00a719).<\/p>\n
18. Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, Ceza Mahkemesi karar\u0131na at\u0131fla, ba\u015fvurucunun “…\u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011finin s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011finden bahisle hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi…” belirtilmi\u015f ve disiplin cezas\u0131na konu olan fiilin irdelenmesi yerine HAGB karar\u0131na at\u0131f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle ret sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; bir yandan kesin bir mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ile sonu\u00e7lanmayan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda verilen karara dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir yandan da kullan\u0131lan ifadelerde ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi izleniminin olu\u015fmas\u0131na sebebiyet verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu durumda verilen HAGB karar\u0131 anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le gelmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun masumiyetine g\u00f6lge d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvuruya konu adli yarg\u0131lamada yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmenin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a g\u00f6re HAGB ile kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bir hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik d\u00fczenlemeyle ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 da s\u00f6ylenemez (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Kader Uzun Madenkuyu, B. No: 2019\/19294, 19\/1\/2023, \u00a7 38).<\/p>\n
19. Sonu\u00e7 olarak Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde kullan\u0131lan ifadeler ve Ceza Mahkemesinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ertelenen h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na konu eylemi i\u015fledi\u011fi ve su\u00e7lu oldu\u011fu inanc\u0131n\u0131n yans\u0131t\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. ve 38. maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu; devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verildi\u011finden ba\u015fvurucunun di\u011fer \u015fik\u00e2yetleri hakk\u0131nda kabul edilebilirlik ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespitine, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile maddi ve manevi tazminata karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
23. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. \u0130\u015fbu ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n esas\u0131yla ilgili herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtti\u011fi ihlal gerek\u00e7elerini g\u00f6zeterek ve s\u00f6z konusu devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131karma i\u015flemiyle ilgili olarak disiplin hukuku \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yeniden bir de\u011ferlendirme yaparak gereken karar\u0131 vermek mahkemelerin takdirindedir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesi ile 38. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan masumiyet karinesinin \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK BULUNMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
D. Tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin masumiyet karinesinin ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Konya 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2016\/811, K.2016\/1433) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 446,90 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.446,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onikinci Dairesi (E.2017\/2584, K.2020\/678) ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/22692 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MEHMET \u00c7EL\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/22692) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : \u00c7a\u011flar \u00d6NCEL Ba\u015fvurucu : Mehmet \u00c7EL\u0130K Vekili : Av. Kudret YAL\u00c7IN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, idari i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada kesin mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ile sonu\u00e7lanmayan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na dayan\u0131larak gerek\u00e7eli kararda su\u00e7lulu\u011fu \u00eema eden baz\u0131 ifadeler kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Karaman \u0130. A. Anadolu Lisesinde m\u00fcd\u00fcr yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 17 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki k\u0131z \u00f6\u011frenciye cinsel tacizde bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131 ile adli ve idari soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Adli soru\u015fturma sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fdura birden fazla kez s\u00f6zle cinsel tacizde bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. Karaman 5. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi (Ceza Mahkemesi) 22\/6\/2016 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan mahk\u00fbmiyetine ve 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 231. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na (HAGB) karar verilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7ede ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131ndan sunulan ses kayd\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun iddia edilen taciz i\u00e7erikli s\u00f6zleri s\u00f6yledi\u011finin belirlendi\u011fi, nitekim ba\u015fvurucunun da tevil yollu ikrarda bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n