T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
RE\u015e\u0130T ASLAN BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/59089)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ferhat YILDIZ<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Re\u015fit ASLAN<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u0130brahim \u00c7EL\u0130KER<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ge\u00e7me talebinin \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi sonucunda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, Batman Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda (Belediye) ta\u015feron i\u015f\u00e7isi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken 20\/11\/2017 tarihli ve 696 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (696 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) 127. maddesiyle 27\/6\/1989 tarihli ve 375 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’ye (375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) eklenen ge\u00e7ici 24. madde kapsam\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna atanmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde yer alan 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun 48. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (A) bendinin (5) numaral\u0131 alt bendinde belirtilen devlet memurlu\u011funa al\u0131nacaklarda aranan \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle, Belediye taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015f talebi reddedilmi\u015f ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi feshedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucunun, fesih i\u015fleminin iptali ve i\u015fe iade talebiyle 20\/6\/2018 tarihinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava, Batman 1. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) 18\/5\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde 696 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 127. maddesinin Ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin 12. f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan ve ayn\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 24. maddesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da uygulama alan\u0131 bulunan “\u015eartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararland\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilenlerin herhangi bir tazminat \u00f6denmeksizin istihdam\u0131na son verilir.” h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir. Kararda ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 1999 y\u0131l\u0131nda PKK Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yard\u0131m ve yatakl\u0131k su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 48. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (A) bendinin (5) numaral\u0131 alt bendinde belirtilen \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle kamu i\u015f\u00e7ili\u011fi ba\u015fvurusunun reddedildi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’ya eklenen ge\u00e7ici 24. madde kapsam\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mayan ba\u015fvurucunun 696 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK kapsam\u0131nda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fi vurgulanan kararda feshin ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi, Gaziantep B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 7. Hukuk Dairesi (Daire) taraf\u0131ndan 24\/11\/2021 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7esinde 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “Ge\u00e7ici 23 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddenin ikinci, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, yedinci, sekizinci, dokuzuncu, onuncu, onikinci ve onalt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri bu madde kapsam\u0131nda yer alanlar hakk\u0131nda da k\u0131yasen uygulan\u0131r.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fi k\u0131yasen uygulanmas\u0131 gerekli ayn\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin onikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda “\u015eartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilenlerin herhangi bir tazminat \u00f6denmeksizin istihdam\u0131na son verilir.” h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, belirtilen KHK h\u00fck\u00fcmleri gere\u011fince ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilerek istihdam\u0131na son verilmesinin hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Nihai karar 2\/12\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olup ba\u015fvurucu 13\/12\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
10. 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Genel ve \u00f6zel \u015fartlar” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 48. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir.<\/p>\n
” Devlet memurlu\u011funa al\u0131nacaklarda a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki genel ve \u00f6zel \u015fartlar aran\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A) Genel \u015fartlar:<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
5. (De\u011fi\u015fik altbent: 23\/01\/2008-5728 S.K.\/317.mad) T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun 53 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinde belirtilen s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7mi\u015f olsa bile; kasten i\u015flenen bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 bir y\u0131l veya daha fazla s\u00fcreyle hapis cezas\u0131na ya da affa u\u011fram\u0131\u015f olsa bile devletin g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar, Anayasal d\u00fczene ve bu d\u00fczenin i\u015fleyi\u015fine kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lar, zimmet, irtik\u00e2p, r\u00fc\u015fvet, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, sahtecilik, g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma, hileli iflas, ihaleye fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, edimin ifas\u0131na fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, su\u00e7tan kaynaklanan malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerini aklama veya ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbm olmamak.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
B) \u00d6zel \u015fartlar:<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
2. Kurumlar\u0131n \u00f6zel kanun veya di\u011fer mevzuat\u0131nda aranan \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mak.”<\/p>\n
11. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
”5018 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna ekli (I), (II), (III) ve (IV) say\u0131l\u0131 cetvellerde yer alan kamu idareleri (M\u0130T M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hari\u00e7) ile bunlara ba\u011fl\u0131 d\u00f6ner sermayeli kurulu\u015flar, bu Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnameye ekli (I) say\u0131l\u0131 listede yer alan idarelerin merkez ve ta\u015fra te\u015fkilatlar\u0131nda; \u00f6demeleri merkezi y\u00f6netim, sosyal g\u00fcvenlik kurumu, fon, kefalet sand\u0131\u011f\u0131, yat\u0131r\u0131m izleme ve koordinasyon ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, gen\u00e7lik hizmetleri ve spor il m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden veya d\u00f6ner sermaye b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden, an\u0131lan liste kapsam\u0131ndaki di\u011fer idareler i\u00e7in ise kendi b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden kar\u015f\u0131lanan 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve di\u011fer mevzuattaki h\u00fck\u00fcmler uyar\u0131nca personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fckleniciler taraf\u0131ndan 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmakta olanlar;<\/p>\n
a)657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 48 inci maddesinin (A) bendinin (1), (4), (5), (6), (7) ve (8) numaral\u0131 alt bentlerinde belirtilen \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mak,<\/p>\n
b)Herhangi bir sosyal g\u00fcvenlik kurumundan emeklilik, ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k veya malull\u00fck ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 almaya hak kazanmam\u0131\u015f olmak,<\/p>\n
c) (\u0130ptal bent: Anayasa Mahkemesinin 27\/12\/2023 tarihli ve E: 2018\/96, K: 2023\/222 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile)<\/p>\n
\u00e7) (\u0130ptal bent: Anayasa Mahkemesinin 27\/12\/2023 tarihli ve E: 2018\/96, K: 2023\/222 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile)<\/p>\n
kayd\u0131yla, bu f\u0131kran\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten itibaren on g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde idaresinin hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 birimine, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrolar\u0131nda istihdam edilmek \u00fczere yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak ba\u015fvurabilirler. …”<\/p>\n
12. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
”S\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrolar\u0131na ge\u00e7irileceklerin istihdam edilmesine esas hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri, birinci f\u0131krada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u015fleminin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla feshedilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Feshedilmi\u015f say\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerden, sadece yap\u0131lan i\u015fin tutar\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc fiyat fark\u0131 hari\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fme bedelinin %80\u2019ini a\u015fmayanlar i\u00e7in y\u00fckleniciye, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine ili\u015fkin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc zarara kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k her t\u00fcrl\u00fc fiyat fark\u0131 hari\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fme bedelinin %80\u2019i ile yap\u0131lan i\u015fin tutar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki bedel fark\u0131n\u0131n %5\u2019i fesih tarihindeki fiyatlar dikkate al\u0131narak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi y\u00fcr\u00fcten idare taraf\u0131ndan, yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu vergi, resim, har\u00e7 ve paylar dahil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm giderler ve mahrum kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00e2r kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmak \u00fczere tazminat olarak \u00f6denir ve ba\u015fkaca bir \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmaz. Y\u00fcklenici ba\u015fka bir hak talebinde bulunamaz.”<\/p>\n
13. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin on ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
”\u015eartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilenlerin herhangi bir tazminat \u00f6denmeksizin istihdam\u0131na son verilir. Yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bilgi ve belge sunmak suretiyle bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilenlere istihdam s\u00fcresince yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeler genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re tahsil edilir. \u015eartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mayanlar\u0131, bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararland\u0131ranlar\u0131n sorumluluklar\u0131 sakl\u0131d\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
14. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
”Ge\u00e7ici 23 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddenin ikinci, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, yedinci, sekizinci, dokuzuncu, onuncu, onikinci ve onalt\u0131nc\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri bu madde kapsam\u0131nda yer alanlar hakk\u0131nda da k\u0131yasen uygulan\u0131r..”<\/p>\n
15. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
”\u0130l \u00f6zel idareleri ve belediyeler ile ba\u011fl\u0131 kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda ve bunlar\u0131n \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu mahalli idare birliklerinde, birlikte veya ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 sermayesinin yar\u0131s\u0131ndan fazlas\u0131 il \u00f6zel idareleri, belediyeler ve ba\u011fl\u0131 kurulu\u015flar\u0131na ait \u015firketlerde 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve di\u011fer mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fckleniciler taraf\u0131ndan 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmakta olanlar;<\/p>\n
a) 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 48 inci maddesinin (A) bendinin (1), (4), (5), (6), (7) ve (8) numaral\u0131 alt bentlerinde belirtilen \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mak,<\/p>\n
b) Herhangi bir sosyal g\u00fcvenlik kurumundan emeklilik, ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k veya malull\u00fck ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 almaya hak kazanmam\u0131\u015f olmak,<\/p>\n
c) (\u0130ptal bent: Anayasa Mahkemesinin 27\/12\/2023 tarihli ve E: 2018\/96, K: 2023\/222 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile)<\/p>\n
\u00e7) (\u0130ptal bent: Anayasa Mahkemesinin 27\/12\/2023 tarihli ve E: 2018\/96, K: 2023\/222 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 ile)<\/p>\n
kayd\u0131yla bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten itibaren on g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini yapan idareye veya \u015firkete, ek 20 nci madde kapsam\u0131ndaki \u015firketlerinde i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmak \u00fczere yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak ba\u015fvurabilirler…”<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 27\/12\/2023 tarihli ve E.2018\/96, K.2023\/222 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla iptal edilen 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 24. Maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) ve (\u00e7) bentleri \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
c) Bu kapsamda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalardan ve\/veya icra takiplerinden feragat edece\u011fine dair yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyanda bulunmak, <\/p>\n
\u00e7) En son \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 idare veya \u015firket ile daha \u00f6nce kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda alt i\u015fveren i\u015f\u00e7isi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden dolay\u0131 bu madde ile tan\u0131nan haklar kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda herhangi bir hak ve alacak talebinde bulunmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu haklar\u0131ndan feragat etti\u011fine dair yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir sulh s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yapmay\u0131 kabul etti\u011fini yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak beyan etmek,<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 27\/12\/2023 tarihli ve E.2018\/96, K.2023\/222 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir<\/p>\n
“…<\/p>\n
4. Ge\u00e7ici 23. Maddenin Birinci F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) ve (\u00e7) Bentleri<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
371. Dava konusu (c) bendinde yer alan kural ile s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunacak i\u015f\u00e7ilerden personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fckleniciler taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak idarelere kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalardan ve\/veya devam eden icra takiplerinden feragat edeceklerine dair yaz\u0131l\u0131 beyan istenmektedir. Di\u011fer dava konusu kural olan (\u00e7) bendi ise ileride do\u011fmas\u0131 muhtemel uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ebilmek ad\u0131na i\u015f\u00e7ilerin en son \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 idare ile daha \u00f6nce kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda alt i\u015fveren i\u015f\u00e7isi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden dolay\u0131 bu madde ile tan\u0131nan haklar kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda herhangi bir hak ve alacak talebinde bulunmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu haklar\u0131ndan feragat etti\u011fine dair yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir sulh s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yapmay\u0131 \u015fart ko\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Kurallar bu y\u00f6nleriyle hem karar hakk\u0131 ve mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na hem de m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirmektedir.<\/p>\n
372. S\u00f6z konusu kurallar\u0131n idareler aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lacak davalardan hangi davalardan ve\/veya icra takiplerinden feragat edilece\u011fini ve yine sulh s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalanacak hak ve alacaklar\u0131n hangileri oldu\u011funu teredd\u00fcde yer yermeyecek \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131k ve net olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde kuralda temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin anayasal ilkeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
373. \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilere s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrolar\u0131na ge\u00e7i\u015f kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda idare aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f davalar\u0131ndan ve\/veya icra takiplerinden vazge\u00e7ilmesinin ve ileride de ge\u00e7mi\u015f i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden kaynakl\u0131 hak ve alacak talebinde bulunulmamas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fart ko\u015fulmas\u0131 idarenin m\u00fcteselsil veya do\u011frudan sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu alacak ve haklar\u0131 \u00f6dememek suretiyle avantaj elde etmesini sa\u011flayacakt\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu avantaj\u0131n idare lehine olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 mali boyutu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131na dayal\u0131 me\u015fru bir amac\u0131 oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilecektir.<\/p>\n
374. \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilerin a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalardan ve\/veya icra takiplerinden feragat edilmesinin ve ileride do\u011fabilecek ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00f6nelik taleplerinden de feragat edildi\u011fine dair sulh s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fart ko\u015fulmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu amaca ula\u015fmak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan elveri\u015fli ve gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da s\u00f6ylenememektedir.<\/p>\n
375. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 2. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen m\u00fcteselsil sorumluluk ili\u015fkisi gere\u011fi kamu (as\u0131l) i\u015fvereni, alt i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7ilerine kar\u015f\u0131 o i\u015fyeriyle ilgili olarak Kanun\u2019dan, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden veya alt i\u015fverenin taraf oldu\u011fu toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinden alt i\u015fveren ile birlikte sorumludur.<\/p>\n
376. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 167. maddesi m\u00fcteselsil bor\u00e7lulukta i\u00e7 ili\u015fkiyi d\u00fczenlemektedir. An\u0131lan maddede, aksi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131k\u00e7a veya bor\u00e7lular aras\u0131ndaki hukuki ili\u015fkinin niteli\u011finden anla\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131k\u00e7a bor\u00e7lulardan her birinin alacakl\u0131ya yap\u0131lan ifadan, birbirlerine kar\u015f\u0131 e\u015fit paylarla sorumlu olacaklar\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Yine maddede, kendisine d\u00fc\u015fen paydan fazla ifada bulunan bor\u00e7lunun \u00f6dedi\u011fi fazla miktar\u0131 di\u011fer bor\u00e7lulardan isteyebilece\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu d\u00fczenleme \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda as\u0131l i\u015fveren, i\u015f\u00e7iye fazladan yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6deme kadar halefiyet ilkesi gere\u011fi i\u015f\u00e7inin yani alacakl\u0131n\u0131n yerine ge\u00e7ecek ve alt i\u015fverene kar\u015f\u0131 r\u00fccu hakk\u0131 elde edecektir (AYM, E.2019\/42, K.2019\/73, 19\/09\/2019, \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
377. Dava konusu kurallar\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddenin i\u015f\u00e7ilere yasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7en bir avantaj sundu\u011funa teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilerin bu imk\u00e2n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda vazge\u00e7mesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen alacak ve haklar ise alt i\u015fveren i\u015f\u00e7isi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 d\u00f6nemlere ili\u015fkindir. As\u0131l i\u015fveren olan idarenin bu hak ve alacaklardan kaynakl\u0131 r\u00fccu imk\u00e2n\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde i\u015f\u00e7ilere sunulan imk\u00e2n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu hak ve alacaklar\u0131ndan feragat etmelerinin istenmesi \u015feklinde m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na getirilen s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
378. \u00d6te yandan i\u015f\u00e7ilerden dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n davalardan feragat etmeleri ko\u015fulunun konulmas\u0131, hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kullanarak dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n davalar\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7memelerine ba\u011flanan sonu\u00e7lar nedeniyle kural\u0131n yarg\u0131 yoluna ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelik ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle kural\u0131n hak arama h\u00fcrriyetine getirdi\u011fi s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n da orant\u0131l\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
379. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kurallar, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13., 35. ve 36. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130ptalleri gerekir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
9. Ge\u00e7ici 24. Maddenin Birinci F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) ve (\u00e7) Bentleri<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
428. 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 43. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ilgisi nedeniyle kural, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. ve 35. maddeleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
429. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) ve (\u00e7) bentlerine ili\u015fkin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13., 35. ve 36. maddelerine y\u00f6nelik gerek\u00e7eler uygun oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde dava konusu kurallar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n
430. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kurallar, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13., 35. ve 36. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130ptalleri gerekir.<\/p>\n
…”<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 27\/11\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Veysi Ado ([GK] B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede Anayasa Mahkemesi 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe g\u00f6re 9\/3\/2023 tarihi (bu tarih d\u00e2hil) itibar\u0131yla derdest olan, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 neticesine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Somut ba\u015fvuruda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik nedenleri incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. \u00d6zel Hayata Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu; i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin kamu i\u015f\u00e7ili\u011fine ge\u00e7ilmemesi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek feshedildi\u011fini, hi\u00e7bir ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, istihbari bilgilerin kayna\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmadan ve fesih tarihinden sonra olu\u015fturulan belgeye dayan\u0131larak karar verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca eski h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131n\u0131n elinden al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ve e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu son olarak somut olayda \u015f\u00fcphe feshinin \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fesih tarihinden \u00f6nce \u015f\u00fcphenin olu\u015ftu\u011funa dair bir delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin haks\u0131z ve gerek\u00e7esiz olarak feshedildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti hususunda a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fine ve 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yaralama su\u00e7undan verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na dair karara de\u011finilmi\u015ftir. G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fte ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f\u00e7ilik alaca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada yarg\u0131 mercilerince su\u00e7 tarihinin, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten uzun s\u00fcre \u00f6ncesine ait oldu\u011fu ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini kan\u0131tlamaya yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edildi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fte son olarak ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ve makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fte yer verilen Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
24. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n “\u00d6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 20. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cHerkes, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na … sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesini isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir. \u00d6zel hayat\u0131n … gizlili\u011fine dokunulamaz.”<\/p>\n
25. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 16). Ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilmesine y\u00f6nelik i\u015flem, \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n otomatik olarak uygulanabilirli\u011fini sa\u011flamamakla birlikte mevcut ba\u015fvuruda mesleki hayata y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalenin ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ciddi \u015fekilde etki etti\u011fi ve bu etkinin belirli bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k d\u00fczeyine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finden ba\u015fvuru \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanabilir bulunmu\u015f ve bu kapsamda incelenmi\u015ftir (benzer \u015fekildeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in C.A. (3), [GK], B. No: 2018\/10286, 2\/7\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 97-101; Ayla Demir \u0130\u015fat, [GK], B. No: 2018\/24245, 8\/10\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 106-110).<\/p>\n
26. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
27. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ge\u00e7me talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde yer alan 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 48. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (A) bendinin (5) numaral\u0131 alt bendinde belirtilen devlet memurlu\u011funa al\u0131nacaklarda aranan \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle, Belediye taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015f talebi reddedilmi\u015f ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi feshedilmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshine dair i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 tespit ve i\u015fe iade istemli dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131 mercileri 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n emredici h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda eski tarihli bir mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, bu itibarla i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi feshinin de ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015f talebi, hakk\u0131nda devlet memurlu\u011funa engel nitelikte eski tarihli bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan bahisle reddedilmi\u015f olup ba\u015fvurucunun bu i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131 t\u00fcketip t\u00fcketmedi\u011fine dair herhangi bir bilgi veya belgeye dosya kapsam\u0131nda rastlan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu esasen i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi i\u015flemine y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131 t\u00fcketmi\u015f ve bireysel ba\u015fvuruda da bu fesih i\u015fleminin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fundan yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle somut olayda fesih i\u015flemi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen m\u00fcdahale ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 bir inceleme ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
29. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ba\u015fvuru i\u00e7in bir tak\u0131m haklardan feragat ko\u015fulu getiren(c) ve (\u00e7) bentleri Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan iptal edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 13-15). \u00d6zellikle s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015f ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmak i\u00e7in, ki\u015filerin \u00f6nceki i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine y\u00f6nelik haklar\u0131ndan feragat etmi\u015f say\u0131lma ko\u015fulunu \u00f6ng\u00f6ren 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin (\u00e7) bendinin iptal edilmesiyle birlikte, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunuldu\u011fu takdirde \u00f6nceki i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden do\u011fan hak ve alacaklar\u0131n ortadan kalkmas\u0131 gibi bir durum art\u0131k s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
30. Mahkemelerin hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131 yorumlama yetkisi, bunlar\u0131n Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yorumlanmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de beraberinde getirmektedir. Buna g\u00f6re mahkemeler, \u00f6nlerindeki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulayacaklar\u0131 mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini anayasal ilke ve g\u00fcvenceleri g\u00f6zeterek yorumlama mecburiyeti alt\u0131ndad\u0131r. Bir mevzuat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn birden farkl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan yorumun benimsenmesinden ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmas\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ilkesinin bir gere\u011fidir. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle Anayasa’ya uygun yorum ilkesi h\u00e2kimin hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131 yorumlama serbest\u00eesinin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r (Arif Huseynli ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/39033, 28\/6\/2022, \u00a7 57).<\/p>\n
31. Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin haks\u0131z olarak feshedildi\u011fi \u015fik\u00e2yetini i\u00e7eren benzer ba\u015fvurularda, derdest bir ceza davas\u0131 veya soru\u015fturman\u0131n bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n ya da ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda verilmi\u015f fesih tarihinden y\u0131llar \u00f6ncesine ait mahk\u00fbmiyet kararlar\u0131n\u0131n tek ba\u015f\u0131na yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde mahkemenin ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde hareket ederek irtibat veya iltisak\u0131 g\u00f6sterir delilleri tart\u0131\u015farak bir sonuca varmas\u0131 ve bunu da gerek\u00e7esinde g\u00f6stermesi gerekti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (S\u00fcleyman Duman ve Di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/14039, 20\/9\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 26-32).<\/p>\n
32. Somut ba\u015fvuruda yarg\u0131 mercilerince, 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin 12. F\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “\u015eartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilenlerin herhangi bir tazminat \u00f6denmeksizin istihdam\u0131na son verilir.” h\u00fckm\u00fcne ve bu d\u00fczenlemenin k\u0131yasen uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ayn\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren mahkemeler belirtilen kural\u0131n emredici nitelikte oldu\u011funu ve bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f akdinin feshinin zorunlu oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
33. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesi birtak\u0131m kamu kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda, ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesi ise belediyeler ve birtak\u0131m kamu kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan personelin s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015flerine y\u00f6nelik d\u00fczenlemeler i\u00e7ermektedir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 11-16).An\u0131lan maddelerin 1. f\u0131kralar\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ba\u015fvuru ve atanma \u015fartlar\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Her iki d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fince de s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne kabul\u00fc yap\u0131lan ki\u015filerin ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u015flemi tarihi itibar\u0131yla daha \u00f6nceki i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin feshedilmi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte, Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da bahsedilen iptal karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 16-17) s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7ilik ba\u015fvurusu yapma durumunda her hangi bir hak kayb\u0131 meydana gelece\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir yasal d\u00fczenleme mevcut de\u011fildir. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin 12. f\u0131kras\u0131nda bu d\u00fczenlemeden yararlananlar\u0131n, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7ili\u011fe \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde bir \u015fekilde kabul\u00fc yap\u0131lan ki\u015filerin durumu d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ve bu ki\u015filerin \u015fartlar\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i olarak istihdamlar\u0131na son verilece\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen yarg\u0131 mercilerince an\u0131lan d\u00fczenleme anayasal ilke ve g\u00fcvenceler g\u00f6zetilmeyerek, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler aleyhine \u00e7ok geni\u015f yorumlanmak suretiyle, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ba\u015fvuru yapan ki\u015filerin daha \u00f6nceki i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin kendili\u011finden feshedilmi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
34. \u00d6te yandan yarg\u0131 mercilerince ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda \u00e7ok eski tarihli bir mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan bahsedilmekle yetinilmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren mahkemelerce 1999 y\u0131l\u0131nda verildi\u011fi belirtilen bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n, ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f akdinin feshedilmesine ne \u015fekilde delil te\u015fkil edebilece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f\u00e7ilik alaca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada yarg\u0131 mercilerince su\u00e7 tarihinin, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten uzun s\u00fcre \u00f6ncesine ait oldu\u011fu ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini kan\u0131tlamaya yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
35. Sonu\u00e7 olarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren mahkemelerce, mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri anayasal ilke ve g\u00fcvenceler g\u00f6zetilmeyerek yorumlanm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ifade edilmekle yetinilmi\u015f, an\u0131lan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne konu olay ve olgular\u0131n neler oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan karar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f akdinin feshine nas\u0131l etki etti\u011fine dair bir gerek\u00e7eye yer verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
36. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
37. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespitine, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve 100.000 TL maddi,100.000 TL manevi tazminata karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
38. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
39. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
VII. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Batman 1. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesine (E.2018\/393, K.2021\/308) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 27\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 27\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/59089 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 RE\u015e\u0130T ASLAN BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/59089) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Ferhat YILDIZ Ba\u015fvurucu : Re\u015fit ASLAN Vekili : Av. \u0130brahim \u00c7EL\u0130KER \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ge\u00e7me talebinin \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi sonucunda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu, Batman Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda (Belediye) ta\u015feron i\u015f\u00e7isi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken 20\/11\/2017 tarihli ve 696 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (696 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) 127. maddesiyle 27\/6\/1989 tarihli ve 375 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’ye (375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) eklenen ge\u00e7ici 24. madde kapsam\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna atanmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. 6. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 24. maddesinin 1. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n