{"id":28974,"date":"2025-01-31T11:18:00","date_gmt":"2025-01-31T08:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-01-31T11:18:00","modified_gmt":"2025-01-31T08:18:00","slug":"yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi<br \/>\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma-Ziynet Alaca\u011f\u0131<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, nafaka ve tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 ile reddedilen ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 erke\u011fin t\u00fcm, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n<p>2-Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmolunan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 4. maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>3-Mahkemece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n ev yap\u0131m\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda r\u0131zas\u0131 ile alt\u0131nlar\u0131 bozdurup daval\u0131ya verdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de; evlilik s\u0131ras\u0131nda kad\u0131na tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 kim taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olursa olsun ona ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve art\u0131k onun ki\u015fisel mal\u0131 niteli\u011fini kazan\u0131r. Bu durumda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmemek \u00fczere erke\u011fe verildi\u011finin, kad\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi ve onay\u0131 ile bozdurulup harcand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 halinde erkek alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 iadeden kurtulur. Kanunda aksine bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, taraflardan her biri , hakk\u0131n dayand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 olgular\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve toplanan delillerden mahkemenin de kabul\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu \u00fczere dava konusu ziynetlerin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan arsa al\u0131m\u0131 ve bu arsa \u00fczerine ev yap\u0131m\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda bozduruldu\u011fu sabittir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n daval\u0131 erkek, ziynetlerin davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi ile ve geri verilmemek \u00fczere verildi\u011fini ispat edememi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda dava konusu ziynetler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmay\u0131p, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 2. ve 3. bentlerde g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin yukar\u0131da 1. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 onama harc\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya y\u00fckletilmesine ve temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131ran davac\u0131ya geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 17.10.2018(\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n<p>\u200bT.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi<br \/>\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma-Ziynet Alaca\u011f\u0131<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, nafaka ve tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 ile reddedilen ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 erke\u011fin t\u00fcm, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n<p>2-Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmolunan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 4. maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>3-Mahkemece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n ev yap\u0131m\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda r\u0131zas\u0131 ile alt\u0131nlar\u0131 bozdurup daval\u0131ya verdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de; evlilik s\u0131ras\u0131nda kad\u0131na tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 kim taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olursa olsun ona ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve art\u0131k onun ki\u015fisel mal\u0131 niteli\u011fini kazan\u0131r. Bu durumda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmemek \u00fczere erke\u011fe verildi\u011finin, kad\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi ve onay\u0131 ile bozdurulup harcand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 halinde erkek alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 iadeden kurtulur. Kanunda aksine bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, taraflardan her biri , hakk\u0131n dayand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 olgular\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve toplanan delillerden mahkemenin de kabul\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu \u00fczere dava konusu ziynetlerin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan arsa al\u0131m\u0131 ve bu arsa \u00fczerine ev yap\u0131m\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda bozduruldu\u011fu sabittir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n daval\u0131 erkek, ziynetlerin davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi ile ve geri verilmemek \u00fczere verildi\u011fini ispat edememi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda dava konusu ziynetler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmay\u0131p, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 2. ve 3. bentlerde g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin yukar\u0131da 1. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 onama harc\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya y\u00fckletilmesine ve temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131ran davac\u0131ya geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 17.10.2018(\u00c7r\u015f.)\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma-Ziynet Alaca\u011f\u0131 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, nafaka ve tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 ile reddedilen ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 erke\u011fin t\u00fcm, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir. 2-Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmolunan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 4. maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. 3-Mahkemece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n ev yap\u0131m\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda r\u0131zas\u0131 ile alt\u0131nlar\u0131 bozdurup daval\u0131ya verdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de; evlilik s\u0131ras\u0131nda kad\u0131na tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 kim taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olursa olsun ona ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve art\u0131k onun ki\u015fisel mal\u0131 niteli\u011fini kazan\u0131r. Bu durumda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmemek \u00fczere erke\u011fe verildi\u011finin, kad\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi ve onay\u0131 &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma-Ziynet Alaca\u011f\u0131 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, nafaka ve tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 ile reddedilen ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 erke\u011fin t\u00fcm, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir. 2-Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmolunan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 4. maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. 3-Mahkemece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n ev yap\u0131m\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda r\u0131zas\u0131 ile alt\u0131nlar\u0131 bozdurup daval\u0131ya verdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de; evlilik s\u0131ras\u0131nda kad\u0131na tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 kim taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olursa olsun ona ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve art\u0131k onun ki\u015fisel mal\u0131 niteli\u011fini kazan\u0131r. Bu durumda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmemek \u00fczere erke\u011fe verildi\u011finin, kad\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi ve onay\u0131 &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-31T08:18:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-31T08:18:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1094,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-31T08:18:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma-Ziynet Alaca\u011f\u0131 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, nafaka ve tazminatlar\u0131n miktar\u0131 ile reddedilen ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 erke\u011fin t\u00fcm, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir. 2-Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmolunan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 4. maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. 3-Mahkemece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n ev yap\u0131m\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda r\u0131zas\u0131 ile alt\u0131nlar\u0131 bozdurup daval\u0131ya verdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de; evlilik s\u0131ras\u0131nda kad\u0131na tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 kim taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olursa olsun ona ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve art\u0131k onun ki\u015fisel mal\u0131 niteli\u011fini kazan\u0131r. Bu durumda ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmemek \u00fczere erke\u011fe verildi\u011finin, kad\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi ve onay\u0131 &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-01-31T08:18:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-01-31T08:18:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1094,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-01-31T08:18:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-24729-e-2018-11400-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/24729 E., 2018\/11400 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28974"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28974\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}