T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
NURCAN TA\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/7065)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Kemal \u00d6ZEREN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Nurcan TA\u015e<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Murat Ali ALKUSAL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, e\u015flerden birinin borcundan dolay\u0131 aile konutunun haczedilemeyece\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak di\u011fer e\u015f taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n aktif dava ehliyeti olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fi aleyhine Erzurum 5. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2019\/2810 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ilams\u0131z takip, Erzurum 2. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2019\/8510 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kambiyo senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc takip ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fine ait ta\u015f\u0131nmaza haciz konulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu ve ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fi, h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip ev \u015fik\u00e2yetinin kabul\u00fc ile birlikte haczin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 talebiyle Erzurum 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde s\u00f6z konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda ikamet edildi\u011fi, mevcut emlak piyasas\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bahse konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ortalama d\u00fczeyde bir ailenin ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 standartlar\u0131n alt\u0131nda bir mesken oldu\u011fu ve h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip ev niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Alacakl\u0131 taraf ise bahse konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip evi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu hususun bilirki\u015fi raporu ile tespit edilebilece\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddedilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Mahkeme 21\/1\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun meskeniyet \u015fik\u00e2yetinin aktif husumet ehliyeti bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015finin meskeniyet \u015fik\u00e2yetinin ise s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, bor\u00e7lunun h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip evinin haczedilmezlik \u015fik\u00e2yetinde bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bor\u00e7lunun \u015fahs\u0131na s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun her iki takip dosyas\u0131nda da bor\u00e7lu s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve icra takibinde taraf s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 2\/2\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 26\/2\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Komisyon ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu; aile konutunun haczedilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 bor\u00e7lunun e\u015finin ve evde ya\u015fayan di\u011fer aile \u00fcyelerinin de yarg\u0131 yoluna gitmekte hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu, aile konutu g\u00fcvencesinden kaynaklanan haklar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrebilme ve bunlar\u0131 yarg\u0131 mercilerine ta\u015f\u0131yabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu, Mahkemenin ise bu hususlar\u0131 g\u00f6zard\u0131 etti\u011fini belirterek m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda ilgili mevzuata ve Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na de\u011finilmi\u015f, yap\u0131lacak incelemede bunlarla birlikte somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvuru, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda devlet i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusu olan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck, sadece belirtilen hakka keyf\u00ee surette m\u00fcdahaleden ka\u00e7\u0131nmakla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmay\u0131p \u00f6ncelikli olan bu negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe ek olarak aile ya\u015fam\u0131na etkili bir bi\u00e7imde sayg\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri de i\u00e7ermektedir. S\u00f6z konusu pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler, bireyler aras\u0131 ili\u015fkiler alan\u0131nda olsa da aile ya\u015fam\u0131na sayg\u0131y\u0131 sa\u011flamaya y\u00f6nelik tedbirlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lar (Murat At\u0131lgan, B. No: 2013\/9047, 7\/5\/2015, \u00a7 26; Emine G\u00f6ksel [GK], B. No: 2016\/10454, 12\/12\/2019, \u00a7 34). Devletin s\u00f6z konusu pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, etkili mekanizmalar kurma, bu kapsamda gerekli usule ili\u015fkin g\u00fcvenceleri sunan yarg\u0131sal prosed\u00fcrleri sa\u011flama ve bu suretle yarg\u0131sal ve idari makamlar\u0131n bireylerin, idare ve \u00f6zel ki\u015filerle olan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131nda etkili ve adil bir karar vermelerini temin etme sorumlulu\u011funu da i\u00e7ermektedir (Marcus Frank Cerny [GK], B. No: 2013\/5126, 2\/7\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 36, 40; Semra \u00d6zel \u00dcner, B. No: 2014\/12009, 26\/10\/2016, \u00a7 36; Emine G\u00f6ksel, \u00a7 38; Muteber Bayraktar, B. No: 2019\/28943, 8\/2\/2023, \u00a7 11).<\/p>\n
11. \u00d6te yandan Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerinin aile konutuyla ilgili olarak devlete y\u00fckledi\u011fi pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmelidir (Emine G\u00f6ksel, \u00a7 43). Sadece e\u015flerden birinin m\u00fclkiyetinde olsa bile aile konutu t\u00fcm aile bireylerince kullan\u0131lmakta yani t\u00fcm aile bireylerinin aile konutu \u00fczerinde birlikte zilyetlikleri s\u00f6z konusu olmaktad\u0131r. Ailenin sosyal ve ekonomik ya\u015fam\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan son derece \u00f6nemli bir yere sahip olan aile konutu, e\u015flerin mutlulu\u011fu ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n gelece\u011fi i\u00e7in bir g\u00fcvence, evlilik kurumunun ve aile hayat\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrmesini sa\u011flayan ve aileyi bir \u00e7at\u0131 alt\u0131nda toplayan en \u00f6nemli unsurlardan biri olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir (Melahat Karkin [GK], B. No: 2014\/17751, 13\/10\/2016, \u00a7 52; Emine G\u00f6ksel, \u00a7 35; Muteber Bayraktar, \u00a7 12). Bu ba\u011flamda aile konutunun haczedilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 bor\u00e7lunun e\u015finin aile konutu g\u00fcvencesinden kaynaklanan haklar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrebilme ve bunlar\u0131 yarg\u0131 mercilerinde tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131rabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Aksi takdirde ailenin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc konutun aile konutu g\u00fcvencesinden yararlanmas\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir anlam\u0131n\u0131n kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Y\u0131ld\u0131z Eker [GK], B. No: 2015\/18872, 22\/11\/2018, \u00a7 39; Emine G\u00f6ksel, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi Emine G\u00f6ksel karar\u0131nda aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkin \u015fekilde kullan\u0131m\u0131 ve korunmas\u0131 hususundaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde haklar\u0131 do\u011frudan etkilenen aile bireylerine yarg\u0131sal yollara ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fini ortaya koymu\u015ftur. Kararda aile konutundan kaynaklanan anayasal g\u00fcvencelerin ihlalinin tespiti, durdurulmas\u0131 ve giderilmesi amac\u0131yla olu\u015fturulacak mekanizmalara ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n sadece konuta malik olan e\u015f taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil baz\u0131 durumlarda malik olmayan e\u015f taraf\u0131ndan da kullan\u0131labilmesi gerekti\u011fi, aile konutunun maliki olmayan e\u015fin koruyucu yetkileri kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesinin devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin ihlali sonucunu do\u011furabilece\u011fi, aile konutunun haczedilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 bor\u00e7lunun e\u015finin de yarg\u0131 yoluna gitmekte hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte 9\/6\/1932 ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu’nun 82. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen haciz yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n temel gayesinin bor\u00e7lunun h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip evinin haczedilmesini \u00f6nlemek suretiyle bor\u00e7lunun bar\u0131nma hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumak ise de hacze konu meskenin ayn\u0131 zamanda aile konutu niteli\u011finde olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bor\u00e7lu ile alacakl\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 menfaatlerinin dengelenmesinde art\u0131k Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik g\u00fcvencelerin de devreye girdi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda haczedilen evin aile konutu oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip ev kavram\u0131n\u0131n sadece bor\u00e7lunun de\u011fil bor\u00e7lunun ve ailesinin sosyal ve ekonomik durumuna uygun olan konut bi\u00e7iminde anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Emine G\u00f6ksel, \u00a7\u00a7 41-44; Muteber Bayraktar, \u00a7\u00a7 13, 14).<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun aile konutu oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131nmaz hakk\u0131nda alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan iki farkl\u0131 dosya kapsam\u0131nda haciz i\u015flemi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, meskeniyet iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 haczedilemezlik \u015fik\u00e2yeti ise Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan aktif husumet ehliyeti bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin an\u0131lan karar\u0131nda haczedilemezlik \u015fik\u00e2yetini ileri s\u00fcrebilme ehliyetini icra takibine taraf olanlarla s\u0131n\u0131rlayan yorumu nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun aile konutuna ili\u015fkin olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerindeki g\u00fcvencelerin g\u00f6zetilmedi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrme ve bunlara sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilip g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fini tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma imk\u00e2n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda yarg\u0131lama bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00fczerine konulan hacizden do\u011frudan etkilenecek ba\u015fvurucunun aile konutuna ili\u015fkin g\u00fcvencelerden yararlanarak meskeniyet iddias\u0131yla dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Mahkemenin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu evin aile konutu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir tart\u0131\u015fma da yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n dava ehliyetine ili\u015fkin daralt\u0131c\u0131 yorumunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddelerindeki g\u00fcvencelere uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Emine G\u00f6ksel, \u00a7 45; Muteber Bayraktar, \u00a7 15).<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler yerine getirilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuruda, tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Erzurum 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesine (E.2020\/252, K.2021\/60) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demelerin, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 19\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/7065 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 NURCAN TA\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/7065) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Kemal \u00d6ZEREN Ba\u015fvurucu : Nurcan TA\u015e Vekili : Av. Murat Ali ALKUSAL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, e\u015flerden birinin borcundan dolay\u0131 aile konutunun haczedilemeyece\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak di\u011fer e\u015f taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n aktif dava ehliyeti olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fi aleyhine Erzurum 5. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2019\/2810 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ilams\u0131z takip, Erzurum 2. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2019\/8510 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kambiyo senetlerine \u00f6zg\u00fc takip ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fine ait ta\u015f\u0131nmaza haciz konulmu\u015ftur. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu ve ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fi, h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip ev \u015fik\u00e2yetinin kabul\u00fc ile birlikte haczin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 talebiyle Erzurum 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde s\u00f6z konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda ikamet edildi\u011fi, mevcut emlak piyasas\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bahse konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ortalama d\u00fczeyde bir ailenin ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 standartlar\u0131n alt\u0131nda bir mesken oldu\u011fu ve h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip ev niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Alacakl\u0131 taraf ise bahse konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun h\u00e2line m\u00fcnasip …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n