T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
METEHAN B\u0130NBAY BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/20568)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Kemal \u00d6ZEREN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Metehan B\u0130NBAY<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, subay olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ba\u015fvurucunun istifa talebinin kabul edilmemesi nedeniyle zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 2\/7\/2020 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin birlikte yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. \u00dclkemizin 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7, Mill\u00ee G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu kararlar\u0131, darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn bast\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n akabinde Bakanlar Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde ilan edilen ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) s\u00fcreci ve bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te uygulanan tedbirler Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde yer almaktad\u0131r (Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 12-66; Sel\u00e7uk \u00d6zdemir [GK], B. No: 2016\/49158, 26\/7\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 20, 21; Alparslan Altan [GK], B. No: 2016\/15586, 11\/1\/2018, \u00a7 10; ayr\u0131ca bkz. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26\/9\/2017 tarihli ve E.2017\/16.MD-956, K.2017\/370 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n
6. T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti 21\/7\/2016 tarihinde, Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterli\u011fine Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’ne (A\u0130HS, S\u00f6zle\u015fme); Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler Genel Sekreterli\u011fine ise Medeni ve Siyasi Haklara \u0130li\u015fkin Uluslararas\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fme’ye (MSHUS) ili\u015fkin derogasyon (ask\u0131ya alma\/y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck azaltma) beyan\u0131nda bulunmu\u015ftur. OHAL’in uzat\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar da Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterli\u011fine ve Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler Genel Sekreterli\u011fine bildirilmi\u015ftir (Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n
7. OHAL d\u00f6neminde al\u0131nan tedbirlerden biri ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine veya devletin mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011funa karar verilen yap\u0131, olu\u015fum veya gruplara \u00fcyeli\u011fi, mensubiyeti veya iltisak\u0131 yahut bunlarla irtibat\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen ki\u015filerin Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda toplanan Bakanlar Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnameler ile kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu kapsamda darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn arkas\u0131ndaki yap\u0131lanma olan Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc ve\/veya Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra di\u011fer ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile ilgisi nedeniyle de \u00e7ok say\u0131da kamu g\u00f6revlisinin kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilinmektedir. Bu kapsamda T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinin general\/amiral kadrosunun yar\u0131s\u0131na yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinde g\u00f6rev yapan \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015finin kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri \u00a7 56 – 58).<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6te yandan OHAL s\u00fcrecinde genel ve soyut normlar ihdas edilerek al\u0131nan tedbirlerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda do\u011frudan etki do\u011furucu nitelikte farkl\u0131 d\u00fczenlemeler de tesis edilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda 6\/1\/2017 tarihli ve 29940 (M\u00fckerrer) say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 681 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Milli Savunma \u0130le \u0130lgili Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (681 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) 29. maddesiyle muvazzaf subay ve astsubaylar i\u00e7in on y\u0131l olan mecburi hizmet s\u00fcresi on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. 30\/8\/2005 tarihinde Kara Harp Okulundan mezun olarak Kara Kuvvetleri Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Komutanl\u0131k) b\u00fcnyesinde te\u011fmen r\u00fctbesiyle subayl\u0131k g\u00f6revine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f olan ba\u015fvurucu da y\u00fczba\u015f\u0131 r\u00fctbesiyle g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken on y\u0131ll\u0131k zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle 20\/2\/2018 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle istifa ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Komutanl\u0131k, ayn\u0131 tarihli yaz\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun 27\/7\/1967 tarihli ve 926 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Sil\u00e2hl\u0131 Kuvvetleri Personel Kanunu’nun 112. maddesi gere\u011fi istifa edebilmek i\u00e7in gerekli hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle istifa talebinin kabul edilmedi\u011fini ba\u015fvurucuya bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle Ankara 13. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucu; 2012 y\u0131l\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikle birlikte mecburi hizmet s\u00fcresinin on y\u0131l olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, bu durumun kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak do\u011furdu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. 2005 y\u0131l\u0131nda g\u00f6reve ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla mecburi hizmetini tamamlam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu vurgulayan ba\u015fvurucu istifas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmemesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. \u0130dare Mahkemesi 11\/4\/2019 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde 926 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 112. maddesindeki “Muvazzaf subay ve astsubaylar subay ve astsubay nasbedildikleri tarihten itibaren fiilen onbe\u015f y\u0131l hizmet etmedik\u00e7e istifa edemezler.” h\u00fckm\u00fc hat\u0131rlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hizmet y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin s\u00fcrenin tespitinde mill\u00ee savunma hizmetlerinin devaml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131nda yeterli ve nitelikli personel mevcuduna duyulan ihtiyac\u0131n \u00f6nem arz etti\u011fi belirtilerek mecburi hizmet s\u00fcresini doldurmam\u0131\u015f olan ba\u015fvurucunun istifa ba\u015fvurusunun reddine y\u00f6nelik dava konusu i\u015flemde mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucu 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda mecburi hizmet s\u00fcresinin on y\u0131l olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini, bu kapsamda hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlayan bir\u00e7ok arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n istifa taleplerinin kabul edildi\u011fini vurgulayarak istifa talebinin kabul edilmemesinin e\u015fitlik, hukuki \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirlik ve kanunlar\u0131n geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmezli\u011fi ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu istifa edip pilot olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda pilotaj e\u011fitimine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 fakat istifas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmemesi nedeniyle bu hedefini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiremedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 3. \u0130dari Dava Dairesi (Daire) 20\/2\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n usule ve hukuka uygun oldu\u011funu ve kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Nihai karar 2\/7\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenilmi\u015ftir. 25\/3\/2020 tarihli ve 7226 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile COVID-19 pandemisi nedeniyle yarg\u0131 alan\u0131ndaki s\u00fcreler 13\/3\/2020 tarihinden 15\/6\/2020 tarihine kadar durdu\u011fundan 2\/7\/2020 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
15. 926 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Subaylar\u0131n ve astsubaylar\u0131n y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 112. maddesinin 26\/3\/1982 tarihli ve 2642 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 15. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik h\u00e2linin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Muvazzaf subay ve astsubaylar subay ve astsubay nasbedildikleri tarihten itibaren fiilen 15 y\u0131l hizmet etmedik\u00e7e istifa edemezler.”<\/p>\n
16. 22\/5\/2012 tarihli ve 6318 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 47. maddesiyle 926 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 112. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “15 y\u0131l” ibaresi “10 y\u0131l” \u015feklinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmek suretiyle muvazzaf subay ve astsubaylar\u0131n zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcreleri on y\u0131la d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
17. 681 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 29. maddesiyle 926 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 112. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “10” ibaresi “onbe\u015f” \u015feklinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmek suretiyle muvazzaf subay ve astsubaylar\u0131n zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcreleri tekrar on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 681 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 29. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7073 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 29. maddesiyle aynen kabul edilerek kanunla\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. 926 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Subaylar\u0131n ve astsubaylar\u0131n y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 112. maddesinin yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Durumlar\u0131 yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kralara uyanlar ile T\u00fcrk Sil\u00e2hl\u0131 Kuvvetleri\u2019nden her ne \u015fekilde olursa olsun mecbur\u00ee hizmet y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tamamlamadan ayr\u0131lan veya ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilen subay ve astsubaylar (T\u00fcrk Sil\u00e2hl\u0131 Kuvvetleri\u2019nde g\u00f6rev yapamaz \u015feklinde sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu alanlar ile vazife mal\u00fbl\u00fc olarak T\u00fcrk Sil\u00e2hl\u0131 Kuvvetleri\u2019nden ayr\u0131lanlar hari\u00e7), her y\u0131l kuvvet komutanl\u0131klar\u0131, Jandarma Genel Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Sahil G\u00fcvenlik Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan belirlenen; asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci, subay ve astsubay nasbedildikten sonra kendilerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6\u011frenim, e\u011fitim ve yeti\u015ftirme masraflar\u0131n\u0131, y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00fcrelerinin eksik kalan k\u0131sm\u0131 ile orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak kanun\u00ee faizi ile birlikte tazminat olarak \u00f6derler. \u00d6\u011frenim, e\u011fitim ve yeti\u015ftirme masraflar\u0131n\u0131n hangi unsurlardan olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131 ve tahsiline ili\u015fkin usul ve esaslar; Mill\u00ee Savunma, \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131klar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fc\u015ftereken y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulacak y\u00f6netmelikte belirlenir.”<\/p>\n
19. 926 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “\u0130stifalar\u0131n kabul s\u00fcresi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 116. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini bitirerek istifa etme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kazananlar, istifalar\u0131n\u0131 Ocak ve \u015eubat aylar\u0131 i\u00e7inde isteyebilirler. \u0130stifalar\u0131n kabul\u00fc, m\u00fcracaat tarihinden itibaren bir aydan fazla geciktirilemez. Bu aylar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki istifa istemleri, ancak ilgili kuvvet komutan\u0131n\u0131n hizmet gerekleri itibar\u0131yla uygun g\u00f6rmesi halinde kabul edilebilir.”<\/p>\n
20. Ayr\u0131ca ilgili hukuk i\u00e7in bkz. (Ali \u015eanl\u0131, B. No: 2019\/18003, 31\/3\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 18-35)<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 20\/11\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu; Komutanl\u0131k b\u00fcnyesinde 2005 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 subayl\u0131k g\u00f6revine ili\u015fkin mecburi hizmetinin 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131lan d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fince on y\u0131l oldu\u011funu ve bunun da 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla bitti\u011fini, bu ba\u011flamda 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda istifa dilek\u00e7esini sundu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte istifa edece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek pilotaj e\u011fitimine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu e\u011fitimi ba\u015far\u0131yla tamamlay\u0131p pilot olmaya hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 fakat istifas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmemesi nedeniyle pilotluk mesle\u011fini icra edemedi\u011fini vurgulayan ba\u015fvurucu; mecburi hizmet s\u00fcresinin on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemenin kendisine uygulanmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucu e\u015fitlik, kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak ve hukuki \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirlik ilkelerinin, ayn\u0131 zamanda zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131 ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
23. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; OHAL \u015fartlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenlik hizmetinin lay\u0131k\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi ve \u00fclke savunmas\u0131n\u0131n zaafiyete u\u011framamas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinin personel ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131n ivedi olarak kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n mutlak bir zorunluluk oldu\u011fu hat\u0131rlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri b\u00fcnyesinde kritik \u00f6neme sahip subay ve astsubay ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131n mevcut personel ile kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, h\u00e2li haz\u0131rda istihdam edilmekte olan personelin belirli bir s\u00fcre daha istihdam edilmelerini \u015fart ko\u015fan d\u00fczenlemenin, \u00fcst hukuk normlar\u0131na ve hukuka uygun olarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konuldu\u011fu, s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemenin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirlik ve belirlilik ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda mevzuata yer verilmi\u015f ve incelemenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesinde yer alan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda \u00f6nceki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmekle birlikte ba\u015fvuruya konu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k hakk\u0131nda karar verildi\u011fi tarihte OHAL’in sona ermi\u015f oldu\u011funu ve OHAL \u015fartlar\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
25. Anayasa’n\u0131n iddian\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde dayanak al\u0131nacak 18. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Hi\u00e7 kimse zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lamaz. Angarya yasakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u015eekil ve \u015fartlar\u0131 kanunla d\u00fczenlenmek \u00fczere h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck veya tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri i\u00e7indeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmalar; ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hallerde vatanda\u015flardan istenecek hizmetler; \u00fclke ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 alanlarda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen vatanda\u015fl\u0131k \u00f6devi niteli\u011findeki beden ve fikir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131, zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma say\u0131lmaz.”<\/p>\n
26. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 16). Ba\u015fvurucu, istifa talebinin kabul edilmemesi nedeniyle e\u011fitimini ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 pilotluk mesle\u011fini icra edemedi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015f ve bu ba\u011flamda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Anayasa Mahkemesi, Anayasa ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin ortak koruma alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 ile yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n belli ko\u015fullar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilece\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir. (bu hususta gerekli olan ko\u015fullar\u0131n neler oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin detayl\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Tamer Mahmuto\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 84-90; C.A. (3) [GK], B. No: 2018\/10286, 2\/7\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 97-101; Ayla Demir \u0130\u015fat [GK], B. No: 2018\/24245, 8\/10\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 106-110).<\/p>\n
27. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, her ne kadar istifa talebinin kabul edilmemesi nedeniyle pilotluk mesle\u011fini icra edemedi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015fse de somut bir i\u015f ba\u015fvurusu yahut de\u011ferlendiremedi\u011fi bir i\u015f teklifinden bahsetmemi\u015ftir. H\u00e2lihaz\u0131rda subay olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ve mesleki hayat\u0131na devam eden ba\u015fvurucunun pilotluk mesle\u011fini icra edememesi nedeniyle sosyal \u00e7evresinde belirli bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k d\u00fczeyine ula\u015fm\u0131\u015f olan herhangi bir etkiyi ortaya koyamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu nedenle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n somut ba\u015fvuru y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanabilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvuru formu bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun istifas\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmemesinden kaynaklanan t\u00fcm \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
1. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
29. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
2. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
a. Genel \u0130lkeler<\/p>\n
30. Zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 ve bu husustaki genel ilkeler i\u00e7in bkz. Ali \u015eanl\u0131, B. No: 2019\/18003, 31\/3\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 43-52.<\/p>\n
b. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
31. Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nce Ali \u015eanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda jandarma astsubay olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ba\u015fvurucunun zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinden \u00f6nce istifa etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle e\u011fitim giderlerinin yasal faiziyle birlikte iadesinin istenmesinin zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fine y\u00f6nelik iddias\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda ilk olarak ba\u015fvurucunun zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinin yasal bir de\u011fi\u015fiklikle on be\u015f y\u0131la uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya makul olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6remedi\u011fi bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi tespiti ile birlikte zorunlu hizmeti kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tam \u00fccret ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu g\u00f6zetilerek uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (Ali \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a7 69, 70). Akabinde zorunlu hizmetin on be\u015f y\u0131la uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n OHAL ko\u015fullar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek ba\u015fvurucunun durumunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 18. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde vatanda\u015flardan istenecek hizmetler istisnas\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girip girmedi\u011fi irdelenmi\u015ftir. Netice itibar\u0131yla zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde vatanda\u015flardan istenecek hizmetler kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurulabilecek bir tedbir oldu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun zorunlu hizmeti kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yasal t\u00fcm parasal haklar\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 da belirtilerek zorunlu hizmetinin be\u015f y\u0131l uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 k\u00fclfet y\u00fcklemedi\u011fi ve zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Ali \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a7 75 – 78).<\/p>\n
32. Bu kapsamda Ali \u015eanl\u0131 ba\u015fvurusuna konu olan zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinden \u00f6nce istifa edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle e\u011fitim giderlerinin yasal faiziyle iadesinin istenmesi durumuna kar\u015f\u0131n mevcut ba\u015fvuruda istifa talebinin kabul edilmemesi s\u00f6z konusudur. Nitekim somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu Komutanl\u0131k b\u00fcnyesinde y\u00fczba\u015f\u0131 r\u00fctbesiyle g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 20\/2\/2018 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle istifa talebini sunmu\u015f, Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayn\u0131 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131yla zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucunun istifa talebinin kabul edilmemesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
33. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu, on y\u0131ll\u0131k zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlad\u0131ktan sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren kanuni d\u00fczenlemeyle hizmet s\u00fcresinin on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet etmektedir. Bununla birlikte bak\u0131lmakta olan ba\u015fvuruda oldu\u011fu gibi Ali \u015eanl\u0131 ba\u015fvurusunda da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde temelde hizmet s\u00fcresinin on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131ndan yak\u0131n\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. Ali \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7 56). Bu ba\u011flamda her iki bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na neden olan idari i\u015flemler farkl\u0131 ise de ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet konusu edilen husus ayn\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
34. Somut olayda Komutanl\u0131k b\u00fcnyesinde 30\/8\/2005 tarihinde te\u011fmen r\u00fctbesiyle subayl\u0131k g\u00f6revine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f olan ba\u015fvurucunun bu tarih itibar\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan mevzuata g\u00f6re zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresi on be\u015f y\u0131ld\u0131r. 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikle bu s\u00fcre on y\u0131la indirilmi\u015f, akabinde 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda 681 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ile bu s\u00fcre tekrar on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 15-17). Bu d\u00fczenlemenin OHAL ko\u015fullar\u0131nda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu vurgulamak gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
35. \u00d6ncelikle ba\u015fvurucunun subayl\u0131k g\u00f6revine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresi on be\u015f y\u0131l ise de bu durum ba\u015fvurucunun kanun koyucunun lehe yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlemelerden yararlanmas\u0131na engel te\u015fkil etmemektedir. Daha a\u00e7\u0131k ifadeyle ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6reve devam etti\u011fi 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik sonucunda makul olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6rebildi\u011fi s\u00fcrenin art\u0131k on y\u0131l oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda bu s\u00fcrenin tekrar on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ise ba\u015fvurucuya makul olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6remedi\u011fi bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi fakat ayn\u0131 zamanda ba\u015fvurucunun zorunlu hizmeti kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tam \u00fccret ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinin on be\u015f y\u0131l olarak kabul edilmesi Anayasa’n\u0131n 18. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (benzer de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Ali \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a7 69, 70).<\/p>\n
36. \u00d6te yandan zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinin on be\u015f y\u0131la uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n OHAL ko\u015fullar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun durumunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 18. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen “ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde vatanda\u015flardan istenecek hizmetler” istisnas\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girip girmedi\u011finin ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
37. OHAL d\u00f6nemine T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131karma tedbiri ile birlikte ciddi say\u0131da personel a\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda mill\u00ee savunma ve g\u00fcvenlik gibi baz\u0131 kamu hizmetlerinde zafiyet olu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek amac\u0131yla hususi baz\u0131 tedbirlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131 da ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazd\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda ihtiyac\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in on y\u0131l olan zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinin on be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 yolunda d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc d\u00f6nemde \u00fclkenin i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu ihtiya\u00e7lar g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde g\u00f6revdeki subaylar\u0131n zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde vatanda\u015flardan istenecek hizmetler kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurulabilecek bir tedbir oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. Bununla birlikte bu tedbirin Anayasa’n\u0131n 18. maddesini ihlal etmemesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fcklememesi gerekir. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun zorunlu hizmeti kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yasal t\u00fcm parasal haklar\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca eklenen be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcreyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresinin daha \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nemlerde T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinde uygulanan s\u00fcreyle de uyumlu oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu durumda -ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc ko\u015fullar da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde- ba\u015fvurucunun zorunlu hizmetinin be\u015f y\u0131l uzat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 k\u00fclfet y\u00fcklemedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (benzer de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Ali \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a7 75, 76).<\/p>\n
38. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 18. maddesinde g\u00fcvenceye ba\u011flanan zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 18. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 20\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 20\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/20568 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 METEHAN B\u0130NBAY BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/20568) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Kemal \u00d6ZEREN Ba\u015fvurucu : Metehan B\u0130NBAY \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, subay olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ba\u015fvurucunun istifa talebinin kabul edilmemesi nedeniyle zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve angarya yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 2\/7\/2020 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin birlikte yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. \u00dclkemizin 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7, Mill\u00ee G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu kararlar\u0131, darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn bast\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n akabinde Bakanlar Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde ilan edilen ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) s\u00fcreci ve bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te uygulanan tedbirler Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde yer almaktad\u0131r (Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 12-66; Sel\u00e7uk \u00d6zdemir [GK], B. No: 2016\/49158, 26\/7\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 20, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n