T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KO\u00c7ER MUHL\u0130S BOZDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/7771)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ko\u00e7er Muhlis BOZDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Burcu G\u00dcL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn baz\u0131 \u00fcyelerinin \u0130stanbul’daki \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerine ili\u015fkin olarak \u0130stanbul \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6nderilen 20\/9\/2018 tarihli isimsiz e-posta ihbar\u0131na istinaden \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerine ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130hbar metninde isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 ki\u015filer ile bu ki\u015filerle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen 20 \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul 9. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 5\/10\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131na istinaden ileti\u015fimin tespiti, dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 tedbiri uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. S\u00f6z konusu tedbirin uygulanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda su\u00e7 unsuru niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler yapt\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilen ve aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015fi soru\u015fturmaya d\u00e2hil edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130stanbul 8. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 7\/2\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 2 ay s\u00fcreyle ileti\u015fimin tespiti, dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 tedbiri uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan tedbirin s\u00fcresi farkl\u0131 tarihlerde al\u0131nan muhtelif sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi kararlar\u0131 ile birka\u00e7 defa uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu 26\/11\/2020 tarihinde yakalanarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 tarihte ba\u015fvurucunun evinde yap\u0131lan arama neticesinde temin edilen dijital materyallere el konulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu 1\/12\/2021 tarihinde m\u00fcdafiinin de haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131yla kollukta ifade vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucuya, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn KCK\/TM (Koma Civaken K\u00fcrdistan\/T\u00fcrkiye Meclisi) yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak kuruldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen Marmara Tutuklu ve H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc Aileleri ile Yard\u0131mla\u015fma Derne\u011findeki (MATUHAY-DER\/Dernek) faaliyetleri sorulmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, sayman olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 MATUHAY-DER’in yasal olarak faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir dernek oldu\u011funu, Dernek faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ailelerinin m\u00fcracaatlar\u0131 \u00fczerine avukat y\u00f6nlendirmesi yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015filerin \u015fehir d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131n\u0131 ziyaretleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda kendilerine konaklama ve ula\u015f\u0131m konular\u0131nda yard\u0131mc\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 2\/12\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuyu silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan tutuklanmas\u0131 talebiyle \u0130stanbul 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) sevk etmi\u015ftir. H\u00e2kimlik, sorgusunun ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Dosyada mevcut 20\/09\/2020 tarihli ‘PKK hakk\u0131nda \u00f6nemli \u0130stanbul PKK hakk\u0131nda bir ihbarda bulunaca\u011f\u0131m’ konulu bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u015f\u00fcphelilerin da\u011fda \u00f6len PKK’l\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131 \u00fczerinden propaganda yap\u0131p \u00f6rg\u00fcte eleman kazand\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131, para toplamak y\u00f6n\u00fcnde etkinliklerde bulunduklar\u0131, yard\u0131mla\u015fma derne\u011fi ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda PKK’ya adam kazand\u0131r\u0131p para yard\u0131m\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131, Kandil’den gelen talimatlar\u0131 PKK’l\u0131 avukatlarla cezaevindekilere aktard\u0131klar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki e-posta ile yap\u0131lan ihbar, bu ihbar \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucu \u0130stanbul Sulh Ceza Hakimliklerince verilen kararlar, bu kararlara istinaden yap\u0131lan ve ihbarla anlat\u0131lan hususlar\u0131 teyit edici mahiyette olan \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerine ili\u015fkin (tape i\u00e7erikleri) ileti\u015fimin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131na dair tutanaklar, arama ve elkoymaya, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin yakalanmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kolluk tutanaklar\u0131, dijital materyallere ili\u015fkin inceleme tutanaklar\u0131, yap\u0131lan arama i\u015flemleri ve bu i\u015flemlerde elkonulan materyaller, a\u00e7\u0131k kaynak ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutanaklar ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerlerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flediklerine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir somut deliller bulundu\u011fu, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un CMK 100\/3-a maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 kanunen tutuklama nedeni var say\u0131lan katalog su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u00e7in T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ceza miktar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ka\u00e7ma ihtimali bulundu\u011fundan tutuklama tedbirinin yerinde ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olaca\u011f\u0131, adli kontrol tedbirlerinin yeterli olmayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheliler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden herhangi bir tutuklama engeli bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek \u015f\u00fcphelilerin CMK’n\u0131n 100 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca AYRI AYRI TUTUKLANMALARINA, [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu baz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma ve ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 talebiyle iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. 5\/8\/2021 tarihli iddianamede \u00f6ncelikle PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn Cezaevi D\u0131\u015f Koordinasyon Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel bilgilere yer verilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re Zindan Direni\u015f Konseyine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak olu\u015fturulan Zindan Genel Y\u00f6netimi, \u0130\u00e7 Koordinasyon ve D\u0131\u015f Koordinasyon olmak \u00fczere iki birimden olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r. \u0130ddianamede sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn Cezaevi D\u0131\u015f Koordinasyon yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda aktif olarak yer almak suretiyle silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirmesine yer verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamenin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
” … tape kay\u0131t s\u0131ra no : 5, 6, 7, 8 ve 9. s\u0131ras\u0131nda yer alan yukar\u0131da \u00f6nemli k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 yaz\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerde \u015f\u00fcphelinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc i\u00e7erisinde faaliyet g\u00f6steren veya \u00f6rg\u00fcte sempati duyan cezaevinde tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olan \u015fah\u0131slar oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen ki\u015filerin aileleri ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, buradaki amac\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fcte sempati duyan \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctten kopmamalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu maksatla avukat ayarland\u0131\u011f\u0131, maddi yard\u0131m toplama ve ziyaret gibi faaliyetler i\u00e7erisinde bulundu\u011fu, tape kay\u0131t s\u0131ra no 13’te yer alan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere \u015f\u00fcphelinin eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylem i\u00e7erisinde YA\u015eA CEZAEV\u0130 D\u0130REN\u0130\u015e\u0130 \u015feklinde slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131, tape kay\u0131t s\u0131ra no 16’da yer alan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede \u015f\u00fcphelinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcnden tutuklu\/h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak cezaevinde olan ve a\u00e7l\u0131k grevi eylemi yapan \u015fah\u0131slar ile aileleri aras\u0131nda irtibat kurup \u015fah\u0131slara destek olma amac\u0131yla faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc,tape kay\u0131t s\u0131ra no:1, 2, 3,4, 10, 11, ve 15 numara ile \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerde \u015f\u00fcphelinin internet tabanl\u0131 programlar \u00fczerinden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye dikkat etti\u011fi, 4 numaral\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan [Y.] isimli \u015fahs\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle internet tabanl\u0131 mesajla\u015fma program\u0131ndaki sohbet grubundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde telkinde bulundu\u011fu, [\u015f]\u00fcphelinin facebook isimli sosyal medya platformunda 04\/01\/2013 ve 31\/01\/2014 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu 2 ayr\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131mda le\u015fker diye tabir edilen y\u00f6resel elbiseyi giydi\u011fi, s\u00f6z konusu elbisenin sol \u00fcst k\u00f6\u015fesinde 5 k\u00f6\u015feli \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait y\u0131ld\u0131z ambleminin bulundu\u011fu, 07\/02\/2014 tarihinde payla\u015fm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu arka \u00fcst platformunda PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc simgeleyen iki adet bayra\u011f\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, kendisinin de i\u00e7erisinde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 foto\u011fraf\u0131 payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, twitter isimli sosyal medya platformunda MATUHAYDER isimli kullan\u0131c\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan payla\u015f\u0131lan #muhatap\u00f6calan \u015feklindeki g\u00f6nderiyi retweetledi\u011fi, yukar\u0131da geni\u015f [\u015fekilde] \u00f6rg\u00fctsel y\u00f6n\u00fc izah edilen MATUHAYDER isimli derne\u011fin aktif y\u00f6neticili\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunan tan\u0131k [V.D.nin] \u015f\u00fcphelinin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel eylemleri ile ilgili beyanlarda bulundu\u011fu, hakk\u0131nda farkl\u0131 bir soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden i\u015flem yap\u0131lan [\u015e.K.n\u0131n] el koyulan cep telefonunda tespiti yap\u0131lan whatsapp yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn halinde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde yukar\u0131da geni\u015f \u015fekilde izah edilen PKK\/KCK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn cezaevi d\u0131\u015f koordinasyon biriminde \u00e7e\u015fitlilik, s\u00fcreklilik ve yo\u011funluk g\u00f6steren eylemlerinin oldu\u011fu ve bu haliyle \u015f\u00fcphelinin TCK 314\/2 kapsam\u0131ndaki su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi hususunda kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphenin olu\u015ftu\u011fu,”<\/p>\n
10. Tan\u0131k V.D., iddianamede yer verilen ifadesinde \u00f6zetle e\u015fi ile aralar\u0131nda zaman zaman sorunlar oldu\u011funu, e\u015finin day\u0131s\u0131 olan ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine 20\/6\/2017 tarihinde ”Sen e\u015finle neden s\u00fcrekli tart\u0131\u015f\u0131yosun bu b\u00f6yle y\u00fcr\u00fcmeyecek yar\u0131n ben HDP partisinden arkada\u015flar\u0131 sana g\u00f6nderece\u011fim derdini onlara anlatacaks\u0131n.” dedi\u011fini, ertesi g\u00fcn HDP kad\u0131n kollar\u0131 ve KCK sorumlusu olduklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen ki\u015filerin evine geldi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k anlat\u0131m\u0131na g\u00f6re bu ki\u015filerden birisi kendisine ”sen e\u015finle anla\u015fam\u0131yorsun siz bir daha birbirinizi g\u00f6remeyeceksiniz. Biz ne zaman istersek sen o zaman e\u015fini g\u00f6rebilirsin sizin sorununuzu devlet \u00e7\u00f6zemez. Bizim mahkememizde yarg\u0131lanacaks\u0131n\u0131z biz \u00e7\u00f6zeriz sen bizden haber bekleyeceksin. Bizim karar\u0131m\u0131za g\u00f6re ya bo\u015fanacaks\u0131n\u0131z ya da evlili\u011finiz devam edecek. Haber gelene kadar e\u015fin [M.B.nin] evinde kalacak. Bizi dinlemezsen seni kandile kadar g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcr\u00fcz derdini orda anlat\u0131rs\u0131n” \u015feklinde ifadeler kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tan\u0131k V.D. ayr\u0131ca e\u015fine sordu\u011funda bu ki\u015fileri ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun bir g\u00fcn sonra kendisini arayarak “D\u00fcn sana g\u00f6nderdi\u011fim yolda\u015flar\u0131 \u015fikayet etmi\u015fsin neden onlar\u0131 bu i\u015fe kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131n.” dedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkeme, duru\u015fman\u0131n 8\/12\/2021 tarihli ilk oturumunda ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz \u0130stanbul 14. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 22\/12\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu ret karar\u0131n\u0131 29\/12\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 24\/1\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
14. Mahkeme duru\u015fman\u0131n 2\/3\/2022 tarihli oturumunda ba\u015fvurucunun serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na, 2\/10\/2024 tarihli oturumunda ise silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n istinaf kanun yolu a\u015famas\u0131nda derdest oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Komisyonca adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Tutuklaman\u0131n Hukuki Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu; yasal olarak faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir derne\u011fin i\u015flerine ili\u015fkin tape kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7 delili olarak kabul edildi\u011fini, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi ve bunu hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan deliller olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen hakk\u0131nda tutuklama karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini, tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131n ve bu karara itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine verilen tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermedi\u011fini belirterek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmayan tedbir nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
17. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; an\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetle ilgili olarak 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen kanun yolu t\u00fcketilmeden bireysel ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. An\u0131lan iddian\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede ise ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, tutuklama karar\u0131nda at\u0131f yap\u0131lan delillerin kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131 i\u00e7erdi\u011fi ve tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, tutuklulu\u011fun hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
19. Yakalama suretiyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahale -temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin belirlendi\u011fi Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcddet\u00e7e- Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ihlalini te\u015fkil edecektir. Bu sebeple s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yakalama tedbirinin niteli\u011fine uygun d\u00fc\u015fen kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclme, Anayasa’n\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen hakl\u0131 sebeplerden bir veya daha fazlas\u0131na dayanma ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmama ko\u015fullar\u0131na uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir (Hasan Akbo\u011fa [GK], B. No: 2016\/10380, 27\/3\/2019, \u00a7 50; tutuklama tedbirine ili\u015fkin olarak benzer de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Halas Aslan, B. No: 2014\/4994, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 53, 54).<\/p>\n
20. Bu nedenle somut olayda \u00f6ncelikle ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcyesi olma su\u00e7undan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 100. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc incelenmeden \u00f6nce tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu olan su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirti bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re tutuklama ancak su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hakk\u0131nda kuvvetli belirti bulunan ki\u015filer bak\u0131m\u0131ndan m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bir ba\u015fka anlat\u0131mla tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu, ki\u015finin su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hakk\u0131nda kuvvetli belirtinin bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu, tutuklama tedbiri i\u00e7in aranan olmazsa olmaz unsurdur (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Mustafa Ali Balbay, B. No: 2012\/1272, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 72; Hanefi Avc\u0131, B. No: 2013\/2814, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
22. Soru\u015fturma mercileri; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki tutuklama karar\u0131 ve iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun KCK\/TM’nin Zindan Direni\u015f Konseyine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak olu\u015fturulan Cezaevi D\u0131\u015f Koordinasyon Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda aktif olarak yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tape kay\u0131tlar\u0131na, \u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen sosyal medya payla\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131na ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerde bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin tan\u0131k V.D.nin beyan\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 7-10). Ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131nca kullan\u0131lan ve \u00fczerinde \u00f6rg\u00fct amblemi olan bir k\u0131yafet ile \u00e7ektirdi\u011fi foto\u011fraf, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc temsil eden s\u00f6zde bayraklar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde \u00e7ektirdi\u011fi foto\u011fraf ve vatanda\u015flar aras\u0131ndaki adli nitelikteki sorunlar\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131nca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne arac\u0131l\u0131k etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 (bkz. \u00a7 10) g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tutuklama karar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen delillerin isnat edilen su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirti olarak kabul edilmesinin temelsiz ve keyf\u00ee olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Bu de\u011ferlendirmede tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi andaki genel ko\u015fullar g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilmemelidir.<\/p>\n
24. Somut olayda H\u00e2kimlik\u00e7e ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na karar verilirken i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia olunan silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin olarak kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezan\u0131n miktar\u0131na atfen ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmas\u0131na ve isnat edilen su\u00e7un 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 100. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen katalog su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda yer almas\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut olay\u0131n yukar\u0131da belirtilen \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131 ile H\u00e2kimlik taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6zellikle -su\u00e7un a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na atfen- ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesine y\u00f6nelen tutuklama nedeninin olgusal temellerinin oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m Ata\u015f, B. No: 2014\/4459, 26\/10\/2016, \u00a7 61; Devran Duran [GK], B. No: 2014\/10405, 25\/5\/2017, \u00a7 66).<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da belirlenmesi gerekir. Bir tutuklama tedbirinin Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. ve 19. maddeleri kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn belirlenmesinde somut olay\u0131n t\u00fcm \u00f6zellikleri dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6rle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle tutuklanmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda H\u00e2kimli\u011fin isnat edilen su\u00e7 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fin niteli\u011fini ve \u00f6nemini de g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutarak ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu ve adli kontrol uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varmas\u0131n\u0131n keyf\u00ee ve temelsiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. S\u00fcleyman Ba\u011fr\u0131yan\u0131k ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/9756, 16\/11\/2016, \u00a7 214).<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Tutuklulu\u011fun Makul S\u00fcreyi A\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucu, tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
31. Anayasa Mahkemesi, tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi veya makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu tahliye edilmi\u015f veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc h\u00e2le gelmi\u015f ise as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Erkam Abdurrahman Ak, B. No: 2014\/8515, 28\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 48-62; \u0130rfan Ger\u00e7ek, B. No: 2014\/6500, 29\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 33-45; Ahmet Kubilay Tezcan, B. No: 2014\/3473, 25\/1\/2018, \u00a7 26). Somut olayda 2\/3\/2022 tarihinde serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilen (bkz. \u00a7 14) ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden an\u0131lan kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
32. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik nedenleri incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 20\/11\/2024tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 20\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/7771 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 KO\u00c7ER MUHL\u0130S BOZDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/7771) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Ko\u00e7er Muhlis BOZDEM\u0130R Vekili : Av. Burcu G\u00dcL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn baz\u0131 \u00fcyelerinin \u0130stanbul’daki \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerine ili\u015fkin olarak \u0130stanbul \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6nderilen 20\/9\/2018 tarihli isimsiz e-posta ihbar\u0131na istinaden \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerine ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. \u0130hbar metninde isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 ki\u015filer ile bu ki\u015filerle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen 20 \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul 9. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 5\/10\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131na istinaden ileti\u015fimin tespiti, dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 tedbiri uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. S\u00f6z konusu tedbirin uygulanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda su\u00e7 unsuru niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler yapt\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilen ve aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015fi soru\u015fturmaya d\u00e2hil edilmi\u015ftir. 5. \u0130stanbul 8. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 7\/2\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 2 ay s\u00fcreyle ileti\u015fimin tespiti, dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131 tedbiri uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan tedbirin s\u00fcresi farkl\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n