T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MUHAMMET EM\u0130N RUH\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/4127)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Kamber Ozan TUTAL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammet Emin RUH\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Kilis’in Merkez il\u00e7esi B\u00fcy\u00fckk\u00fctah Mahallesi’nde bulunan avlulu k\u00e2rgir ev ve mahsere (zeytinya\u011f\u0131 \u00fcretim imalathanesi) niteli\u011findeki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n yar\u0131 payda\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Di\u011fer paylar ise ba\u015fvurucunun iki karde\u015fine aittir. Kilis Belediyesi (Belediye) 1989 y\u0131l\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 yol yapmak amac\u0131yla y\u0131karak kamula\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Adana K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu 8\/5\/2005 tarihinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bulunan Osmanl\u0131 d\u00f6nemine ait yap\u0131y\u0131 korunmas\u0131 gereken ta\u015f\u0131nmaz k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil etmi\u015ftir. Koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 imar plan\u0131na g\u00f6re ta\u015f\u0131nmaz kentsel sit alan\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde kalmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucunun ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ba\u015fka bir arsayla takas edilmesi talebine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kentsel sit alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer almas\u0131 nedeniyle takasa konu edilemeyece\u011fini ve kamula\u015ft\u0131rma \u00f6dene\u011finin yetersiz olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu konuya ili\u015fkin olarak Belediyeye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurulardan da bir sonu\u00e7 alamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Gaziantep K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu; ba\u015fvurucunun ve Belediyenin \u00e7e\u015fitli tarihlerdeki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tescilden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi taleplerini, yap\u0131n\u0131n korunmaya de\u011fer \u00f6zelliklerini kaybetmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetmi\u015f ve tescil kayd\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n can ve mal kayb\u0131na neden olmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in Belediyenin g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerini almas\u0131; r\u00f6l\u00f6ve, restit\u00fcsyon ve restorasyon projelerinin de\u011ferlendirilmek \u00fczere Kurula sunulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini karara ba\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer hissedarlar 2\/8\/2013 tarihinde K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile Belediyeye kar\u015f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davada; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilmesi sonucunda kullan\u0131lmaz h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi, ta\u015f\u0131nmaza kamu makamlar\u0131nca hukuken el at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131nmazla ilgili kamula\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemi yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n takasa konu edilmedi\u011fi belirtilerek m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
7. Yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Gaziantep 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) ke\u015fif yaparak bilirki\u015fi raporu alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bilirki\u015fi raporunda ta\u015f\u0131nmaza kesin in\u015faat yasa\u011f\u0131 getirildi\u011fi ve bak\u0131ms\u0131z b\u0131rak\u0131lan yap\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lamaz h\u00e2lde oldu\u011fu kaydedilmi\u015ftir. Raporda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Hazineye ait ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar ile trampaya konu edilebilece\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n de\u011ferinin 250.000 TL oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde Belediyeyi has\u0131m mevkiinden \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Mahkeme 12\/1\/2018 tarihinde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle 250.000 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n davac\u0131lara \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda; \u00f6denek yetersizli\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kamula\u015ft\u0131rma talebinin reddedilmesi ve k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaza koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 imar plan\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda in\u015faat yasa\u011f\u0131 getirilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz \u015fekilde k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n de\u011ferinin \u00f6denmesi ve idare ad\u0131na tapuda tescil edilmesi gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Taraflar karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Gaziantep B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 2. \u0130dari Dava Dairesi 18\/3\/2019 tarihinde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi, k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131 baz\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara tabi olmakla birlikte belli ko\u015fullar d\u00e2hilinde kullan\u0131m\u0131na izin verildi\u011finden m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131ran bir s\u0131n\u0131rlamadan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca 21\/7\/1983 tarihli ve 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma Kanunu’nun 15. maddesine g\u00f6re kamula\u015ft\u0131rma yetkisinin bir program d\u00e2hilinde ve b\u00fct\u00e7e olanaklar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kullan\u0131labilece\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6dene\u011fi yetersiz olan idarenin kamula\u015ft\u0131rma yapmaya zorlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi sonu\u00e7 olarak maddi tazminat verilmesini gerektiren ko\u015fullar\u0131n davada olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Kar\u015f\u0131oy g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ise hasar g\u00f6ren yap\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve restorasyonun davac\u0131lar i\u00e7in ciddi k\u00fclfet olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan maddi zarar\u0131n tazmin edilmesi gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer davac\u0131lar m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, t\u00fcm k\u00fclfetin \u00fczerilerinde b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayarak karar\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir. Dan\u0131\u015ftay Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Dairesi 13\/10\/2020 tarihinde karar\u0131 hukuka ve usul\u00fcne uygun buldu\u011funu belirterek onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 18\/12\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 13\/1\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilmesi neticesinde uzun s\u00fcredir ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan fiilen yararlanma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bug\u00fcne kadar restore edilmedi\u011fi gibi ne takasa konu edildi\u011fini ne de kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00f6nemli bir k\u0131sm\u0131 yol olarak kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yap\u0131n\u0131n restore edilmesine izin verilmesine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k bunun fiilen m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan orant\u0131s\u0131z bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, kanun yolu a\u015famalar\u0131nda verilen kararlarda ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7eye yer verilmedi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ile kamusal menfaatin gerekleri aras\u0131nda sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gereken dengenin bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu sokaktaki di\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lar in\u015fa edilebilirken kendi ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131ndan fiilen yararlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik gerekli tedbirlerin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f ve \u00f6nceki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvuru, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesince ayn\u0131 konu ile ilgili \u015fik\u00e2yetler Ahmet B\u00f6lge (B. No: 2014\/13133, 28\/9\/2016) ba\u015fvurusunda incelenmi\u015f ve uygulanacak ilkeler ortaya konmu\u015ftur. An\u0131lan kararda, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilmesinin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil etti\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilmesi sebebiyle ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131ndan yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi fakat ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131ndan do\u011fan bir k\u0131s\u0131m hak ve yetkilerinin k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda m\u00fcdahalenin m\u00fclkiyetin kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kontrol veya d\u00fczenleme yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (Ahmet B\u00f6lge, \u00a7 48).<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesince 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6. ve 7. maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine dayal\u0131 olan m\u00fcdahalenin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 niteli\u011fi bulundu\u011fu tespit edilen bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tescili suretiyle korunarak asl\u0131na uygun olarak muhafazas\u0131nda me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n bulundu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Ahmet B\u00f6lge, \u00a7\u00a7 50-56). \u00d6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede ise malikin ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi, ilgili mevzuata uygun hareket edildi\u011fi s\u00fcrece 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un maliklere tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 hak, muafiyet ve kolayl\u0131klardan yararlan\u0131labilece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer taraftan yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleye kar\u015f\u0131 yetkili makamlar \u00f6n\u00fcnde etkin bir bi\u00e7imde itiraz edebilme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n malike tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na de\u011finilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re m\u00fcdahalenin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumun malikin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ile kamusal menfaatin gerekleri aras\u0131nda sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gereken dengeyi bozmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve malik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan me\u015fru say\u0131lamayacak ferd\u00ee ve a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 nitelikte bir y\u00fck olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Ahmet B\u00f6lge, \u00a7\u00a7 57-65).<\/p>\n
17. Leyla Berker ve di\u011ferleri (B. No: 2016\/13669, 6\/3\/2019) ba\u015fvurusunda da k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n imar plan\u0131nda m\u00fcze alan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle meydana gelen maddi zarar\u0131n tazmin edilmemesi \u015fik\u00e2yeti incelenmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un maliklere tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 hak, muafiyet ve kolayl\u0131klardan yararlanabilmelerinin ve yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleye kar\u015f\u0131 idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlar \u00f6n\u00fcnde etkin bir bi\u00e7imde itiraz edebilmelerinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu kaydedilmi\u015ftir. Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz yoluna gitmeyen ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ayr\u0131ca kendilerine sa\u011flanan hak ve kolayl\u0131klardan yararlanamad\u0131klar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde somut bir \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00e2liyle Ahmet B\u00f6lge karar\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirecek bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek kamu yarar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda olmas\u0131 gereken adil dengenin bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Leyla Berker ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 24).<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda da ba\u015fvurucunun maliklerinden biri oldu\u011fu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00fczerinde bulunan yap\u0131, korunmas\u0131 gereken k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tespit ve tescil edilmi\u015ftir. Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bulunan yap\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilmesi yoluyla m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin m\u00fclk\u00fcn kullan\u0131m\u0131n kontrol\u00fc veya denetlenmesine ili\u015fkin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc kural kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale, 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleriyle \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel varl\u0131klar\u0131n korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olan me\u015fru bir amaca dayanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. M\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise \u00f6ncelikle 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un maliklere tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 hak, muafiyet ve kolayl\u0131klardan yararlanabilmeleri ve yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleye kar\u015f\u0131 idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlar \u00f6n\u00fcnde etkin bir bi\u00e7imde itiraz edebilmelerinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu belirtilmelidir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k ba\u015fvurucunun Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu yola ba\u015fvurdu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir beyan\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u00d6te yandan 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, bak\u0131m ve onar\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca ayni, nakdi ve teknik yard\u0131m yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruya konu yap\u0131n\u0131n restorasyonuna ili\u015fkin olarak ba\u015fvurucu kendisine sa\u011flanan s\u00f6z konusu hak ve kolayl\u0131klardan yararlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair somut bir olgu ortaya koymam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca kamula\u015ft\u0131rmayla bir k\u0131sm\u0131ndan yol ge\u00e7irilmesinden dolay\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n fiilen kullan\u0131m\u0131 imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n mevcut durumunun bak\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131k sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi tespitine yer verilmi\u015f, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kamula\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda yol ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahserenin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir tespitte bulunulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yine ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n yola kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 niteli\u011fini yitirmesine neden oldu\u011funa veya yap\u0131n\u0131n ihyas\u0131n\u0131 imk\u00e2ns\u0131z k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir tespite yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde yer verilmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00fczerinde bulunan tescilli bir k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 b\u00f6lgede bulunan di\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131nmazlardan farkl\u0131 olarak s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara tabi olan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz gerekli bak\u0131m ve asl\u0131na uygun restorasyon yap\u0131larak kullanabilecektir. Ayr\u0131ca ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ili\u015fkin bir sat\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemektedir. Bu durumda somut ba\u015fvuruda Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan i\u00e7tihad\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirecek bir neden bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Sonu\u00e7 olarak m\u00fcdahalenin ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131 ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin ba\u015fvurucuya \u015fahsi olarak a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 ve ola\u011fan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fcklemedi\u011fi, kamu yarar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda olmas\u0131 gereken adil dengenin bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrede tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, formdaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
24. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvurular ile benzer nitelikte olan Veysi Ado ([GK], B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda an\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetle ilgili olarak uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede Anayasa Mahkemesi 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe g\u00f6re 9\/3\/2023 tarihi (bu tarih d\u00e2hil) itibar\u0131yla derdest olan, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 neticesine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. Somut ba\u015fvuruda an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik kriterleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 19\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/4127 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MUHAMMET EM\u0130N RUH\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/4127) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Kamber Ozan TUTAL Ba\u015fvurucu : Muhammet Emin RUH\u0130 \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil edilmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Kilis’in Merkez il\u00e7esi B\u00fcy\u00fckk\u00fctah Mahallesi’nde bulunan avlulu k\u00e2rgir ev ve mahsere (zeytinya\u011f\u0131 \u00fcretim imalathanesi) niteli\u011findeki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n yar\u0131 payda\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Di\u011fer paylar ise ba\u015fvurucunun iki karde\u015fine aittir. Kilis Belediyesi (Belediye) 1989 y\u0131l\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 yol yapmak amac\u0131yla y\u0131karak kamula\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Adana K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu 8\/5\/2005 tarihinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bulunan Osmanl\u0131 d\u00f6nemine ait yap\u0131y\u0131 korunmas\u0131 gereken ta\u015f\u0131nmaz k\u00fclt\u00fcr varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak tescil etmi\u015ftir. Koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 imar plan\u0131na g\u00f6re ta\u015f\u0131nmaz kentsel sit alan\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde kalmaktad\u0131r. 4. Ba\u015fvurucunun ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ba\u015fka bir arsayla takas edilmesi talebine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kentsel sit alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer almas\u0131 nedeniyle takasa konu edilemeyece\u011fini ve kamula\u015ft\u0131rma \u00f6dene\u011finin yetersiz olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n