T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ATANA\u015e MAMAS\u0130S VE CORC KASAPO\u011eLU BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/35817)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 10\/1\/2025 – 32778<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
G\u00fcls\u00fcm Gizem G\u00dcRSOY<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Atana\u015f MAMAS\u0130S<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Corc KASAPO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. H\u00fclya BENL\u0130SOY<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din adam\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle kilise vakf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmesinin \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular, \u0130stanbul’daki kiliselerde papaz olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken10\/12\/2011tarihinde Samatya Aya Analipsis Rum Ortodoks Kilisesi Vakf\u0131 Y\u00f6netim Kurulu \u00fcyeli\u011fine se\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Vakf\u0131n Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Se\u00e7im Tespit Tutana\u011f\u0131 16\/12\/2011 tarihinde Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne (Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck) bildirilmi\u015ftir. Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck 5\/3\/2012 tarihinde 20\/2\/2008 tarihli ve 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Kanunu’na dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanan ve 27\/9\/2008 tarihli ve 27010 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Vak\u0131flar Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin (Y\u00f6netmelik) 33. maddesinin (i) bendi gere\u011fi (bkz. \u00a7 18) ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din adam\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00f6netim listelerinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ve bu h\u00e2liyle Vak\u0131f Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Yetki Belgesi verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucular 12\/4\/2012 tarihinde Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn verdi\u011fi yetki belgesinin iptali talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular, dava dilek\u00e7elerinde 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da ve bu Kanun’a dayal\u0131 olarak \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan Y\u00f6netmelik’te Vak\u0131f Y\u00f6netim Kuruluna \u00fcye olma \u015fartlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda “din adam\u0131 olmamak” ibaresinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Daval\u0131 Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck; ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131ndaki i\u015flemin Lozan Antla\u015fmas\u0131 tutanaklar\u0131 gere\u011fince tesis edildi\u011fini, Lozan Antla\u015fmas\u0131 ile ruhani din adamlar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netsel ve siyasi alanlarda g\u00f6rev yapamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlendi\u011fini belirterek davalar\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130stanbul 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesince 9\/4\/2013 tarihinde dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde; Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn denetim yetkisinin cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6neticilerinin se\u00e7iminin kanun ve y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe uygun olarak yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda; Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7iminin iptali veya ge\u00e7erli say\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tasarruf ve yetkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi denetim sonucunda se\u00e7imin kanun ve y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde iptali veya ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131larak yenilenmesi i\u00e7in adli yarg\u0131 yerinde dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. An\u0131lan iptal karar\u0131 13\/4\/2013 tarihinde daval\u0131 idareye tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Karar\u0131n temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onuncu Dairesi 18\/4\/2016 tarihinde ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bozma karar\u0131nda cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere mazbut, m\u00fclhak ve esnaf vak\u0131flar\u0131 ile yeni vak\u0131flar\u0131n \u00f6zel hukuk t\u00fczel ki\u015fisi oldu\u011fu, denetim makam\u0131 olan Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn denetim yetkisinin cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6neticilerinin se\u00e7iminin kanun ve y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe uygun olarak yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar\u0131nda, denetim makam\u0131n\u0131n denetim sonucunda se\u00e7imin kanun ve y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde se\u00e7imin iptaline veya se\u00e7imin ge\u00e7erli say\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir g\u00f6rev ve yetkisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak iptal edilmesi veya ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131larak yenilenmesi i\u00e7in adli yarg\u0131 yerinde dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kararda; \u00f6zel hukuk t\u00fczel ki\u015fisi olan cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netici se\u00e7imlerinin iptaline veya se\u00e7imin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin karar verme g\u00f6rev ve yetkisinin adli yarg\u0131 yerine ait oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle davan\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n idare mahkemelerince incelenemeyece\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Bozma karar\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0130stanbul 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesi 30\/11\/2016 tarihli karar\u0131nda davan\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar verme g\u00f6rev ve yetkisinin adli yarg\u0131 yerine ait oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle g\u00f6rev y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ret karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar 20\/6\/2019 tarihinde Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Karar, ba\u015fvuruculara 25\/9\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular 24\/10\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular, din adam\u0131 olduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle haks\u0131z bir bi\u00e7imde Kilise Vakf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131n din ve vicdan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, \u00f6ncelikle ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilip t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi meselesinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ayr\u0131ca 2022 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 18\/6\/2022 tarihli ve 31870 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Cemaat Vak\u0131flar\u0131 Se\u00e7im Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruya konu Vak\u0131fta se\u00e7imlerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ma\u011fdur s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n devam edip etmedi\u011fi hususunun g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri hususlar\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Kilise Vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netiminden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmalar\u0131 ile bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn idari \u00e7at\u0131s\u0131 alt\u0131nda faaliyette bulunma, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn organlar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev alma haklar\u0131na son verilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla eldeki ba\u015fvurunun \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekmektedir. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucular, din adam\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle vak\u0131f y\u00f6netiminden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 24. maddesinde herkesin din\u00ee inan\u00e7 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne sahip oldu\u011fu d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. O h\u00e2lde meselenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 24. maddesinde yer alan din \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile olan ilgisi son derece a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. \u0130ncelenen olayda, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n temel \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin mensubu olduklar\u0131 Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netiminde yer alamamalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131 nedeniyle meselenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesindeki \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 24. maddesi \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir (Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis, B. No: 2019\/35842, 2\/5\/2023,\u00a7\u00a7 33,34).<\/p>\n
A. \u0130lgili Mevzuat<\/p>\n
13. 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 3. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bu Kanunun uygulanmas\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
1936 Beyannamesi: Cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n 2762 say\u0131l\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Kanunu gere\u011fince verdikleri beyannameyi,<\/p>\n
Cemaat vakf\u0131: Vakfiyeleri olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n 2762 say\u0131l\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Kanunu gere\u011fince t\u00fczel ki\u015filik kazanm\u0131\u015f, mensuplar\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131 olan T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki gayrim\u00fcslim cemaatlere ait vak\u0131flar\u0131,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
ifade eder.”<\/p>\n
14. 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 4. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Vak\u0131flar, \u00f6zel hukuk t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fine sahiptir”<\/p>\n
15. 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6neticileri mensuplar\u0131nca kendi aralar\u0131ndan se\u00e7ilir. Vak\u0131f<\/p>\n
y\u00f6neticilerinin se\u00e7im us\u00fbl ve esaslar\u0131 y\u00f6netmelikle d\u00fczenlenir.” <\/p>\n
16. 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 9. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Vak\u0131flarda; h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, nitelikli h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, ya\u011fma, nitelikli ya\u011fma, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, zimmet, r\u00fc\u015fvet, sahtecilik, hileli iflas, ihaleye fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, edimin ifas\u0131na fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma, ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131 ile Devletin g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n birinden mahk\u00fbm olanlar y\u00f6netici olamazlar.<\/p>\n
Vak\u0131f y\u00f6neticisi se\u00e7ildikten sonra yukar\u0131daki su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbm olanlar\u0131n y\u00f6neticili\u011fi<\/p>\n
sona erer.” <\/p>\n
17. 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 33. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“M\u00fclhak, cemaat, esnaf vak\u0131flar\u0131 ile yeni vak\u0131flarda i\u00e7 denetim esast\u0131r. Vak\u0131f; organlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan denetlenebilece\u011fi gibi, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z denetim kurulu\u015flar\u0131na da denetim yapt\u0131rabilir.<\/p>\n
…Vak\u0131flar\u0131n amaca ve yasalara uygunluk denetimi ile iktisad\u00ee i\u015fletmelerinin faaliyet ve<\/p>\n
mevzuata uygunluk denetimi Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7e yap\u0131l\u0131r. “<\/p>\n
18. Y\u00f6netmelik’in 19\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 28533 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Vak\u0131flar Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finde De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmelik ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lan 30. ve 32. maddeleri ile 31. ve 33. maddelerinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
30. “(1) Cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imlerinde;<\/p>\n
a) Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imine, vak\u0131f veya hayrat\u0131ndan yararlanan cemaat mensuplar\u0131 kat\u0131l\u0131r….”<\/p>\n
31. “(1) Se\u00e7menlerin;<\/p>\n
a) T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131 olmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
b) On sekiz ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
c) Se\u00e7im \u00e7evresinde ikamet etmesi,<\/p>\n
\u015fartt\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
32. “(1) Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netim kuruluna se\u00e7ilecek ki\u015filerin 31 inci maddede belirtilen \u015fartlara ek olarak a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fartlar\u0131 da ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 gerekir:<\/p>\n
a) En az ilkokul mezunu olmak,<\/p>\n
b) Kanunun 9 uncu maddesinde belirtilen su\u00e7lar\u0131n birinden mahk\u00fbm edilmemi\u015f olmak.<\/p>\n
\u015fartt\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
33. (i) “Se\u00e7im i\u015flemleri ile sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ve se\u00e7ilen ki\u015filerin bu Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uygun olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131 hususunda b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, yeni se\u00e7ilen vak\u0131f y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyelerine yetki belgesi verilir.”<\/p>\n
B. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
19. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, idare mahkemelerince adli yarg\u0131 mercilerinin yetkili oldu\u011fu belirtilerek g\u00f6rev bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ret karar\u0131 verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilip t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi hususunun netle\u015ftirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa Mahkemesi Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis karar\u0131nda Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n sekiz y\u0131l boyunca \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanamamalar\u0131n\u0131n devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirip getirmedi\u011finin incelenmesi ile ilgili olan ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 33. maddesi ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin \u00f6z\u00fcne s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 sorunlar ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi meselesi esasla birlikte incelenmi\u015ftir. Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda da i\u015faret edilen karardaki de\u011ferlendirmelerden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
22. Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hakk\u0131n etkin bir \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda devlete birtak\u0131m pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler y\u00fcklemektedir. Devlete y\u00fcklenen pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler, bu haklara ili\u015fkin davalarda kamusal makamlarca verilecek kararlar\u0131n etkinli\u011fi ve yeterlili\u011fi; ilgili kararlar\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan en k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede verilmesiyle yak\u0131ndan alakal\u0131d\u0131r (Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis, \u00a7 43).<\/p>\n
23. Bu konuda yarg\u0131sal makamlardan ivedilikle hareket etmeleri, di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k hakk\u0131nda h\u0131zl\u0131 bir yarg\u0131lama yaparak davay\u0131 s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rakmamalar\u0131, ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7elerle bir karar vermeleri beklenir. Bu beklentinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi, \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ba\u011flam\u0131nda devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerindendir. Bu konudaki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yerine getirilmemesi durumunda, haktan yararlanamayanlar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan telafisi imk\u00e2ns\u0131z zararlar\u0131n do\u011fmas\u0131 muhtemeldir (Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
24. Mevcut ba\u015fvuru ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6nemli olan husus, \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik hukuki bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi amac\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rak\u0131lmadan h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesidir. Bu t\u00fcrden bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 telafisi imk\u00e2ns\u0131z zararlara yol a\u00e7abilece\u011finden tek ba\u015f\u0131na devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali anlam\u0131na gelebilecektir.<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din\u00ee az\u0131nl\u0131ktan ki\u015filer oldu\u011funun hat\u0131rlat\u0131lmas\u0131nda da fayda vard\u0131r. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc her bir vatanda\u015f\u0131n etkin bir \u015fekilde kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n demokratik bir toplum i\u00e7in \u00f6nemi ku\u015fkusuz olmakla birlikte az\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa mensup bireyler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bu hususun daha hassas oldu\u011funun belirtilmesi gerekir. Zira bu kimseler \u00e7o\u011funluk i\u00e7inde sahip olduklar\u0131 kimlikleri korumak ve kimliklerine \u00f6zg\u00fc tarihsel, din\u00ee, sosyal, ekonomik, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel durumlar\u0131, haklar\u0131 daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir bi\u00e7imde ifade etmek i\u00e7in bir araya gelir ve bu kimselerin az\u0131nl\u0131k konumunda olmalar\u0131ndan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc daha fazla korunmalar\u0131 gerekir. Bu nedenle devletin toplumsal b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc temin etmek ad\u0131na az\u0131nl\u0131k haklar\u0131n\u0131 korumas\u0131 ve bu haklar\u0131n en etkin \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamas\u0131 yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
26. Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucular, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda Kilise Vakf\u0131 Y\u00f6netim Kuruluna se\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir. Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Y\u00f6netim Kurulundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermesi ile 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130dare Mahkemesi Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn i\u015fleminin iptaline karar vermi\u015f ve bu karar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck iptal karar\u0131n\u0131 esas alarak ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netiminde yer almas\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir i\u015flem tesis etmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015flayan ve 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131yla sonu\u00e7lanan yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcresi boyunca ba\u015fvurucular vak\u0131f y\u00f6netiminde yer alamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonunda davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir karar da verilmemi\u015ftir. Yani ba\u015fvurucular, din adam\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle Y\u00f6netim Kurulunda yer al\u0131p alamayacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak mahkemeler taraf\u0131ndan hi\u00e7bir tespit yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle bitmeyen bu nizal\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fma kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden yararlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. Bu kapsamda olduk\u00e7a uzun s\u00fcren bir yarg\u0131lama sonucunda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin esas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulamam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra davan\u0131n sonunda adli yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015faret edilerek g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verildi\u011finin alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmelidir. 6\/1\/1982 tarihli ve 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun 2. ve devam\u0131 maddelerinde idare mahkemelerinin hangi davalara bakmakla g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130dari yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcn\u00fcn temel dayana\u011f\u0131 olan s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ancak sekiz y\u0131l\u0131n sonunda g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n gerekli olan makul ivedilik ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir.<\/p>\n
28. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yukar\u0131da anlat\u0131lanlar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde olaylar bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde -sadece usule ili\u015fkin bir sonuca var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olundu\u011fu da g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken bir davan\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din adam\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netim kurulunda yer al\u0131p alamayacaklar\u0131 ile ilgili ihtilaf uzunca bir s\u00fcre \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcms\u00fcz b\u0131rak\u0131larak \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn getirdi\u011fi haklara eri\u015fimleri yarg\u0131lama boyunca imk\u00e2ns\u0131z k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Netice olarak mahkemelerin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen Vak\u0131flarda kendileri ve vak\u0131f \u00fcyeleri ad\u0131na \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc bir bi\u00e7imde hareket etme hakk\u0131ndan etkin bir \u015fekilde yararlanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak konusundaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
29. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 24. maddesi \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
30. Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n idari yarg\u0131 s\u00fcrecinin sonunda verilen g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunduklar\u0131 tekrar hat\u0131rlat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din adam\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netiminde yer al\u0131p alamayacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak yarg\u0131 mercilerince hen\u00fcz bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucular Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n i\u015faret etti\u011fi adli yarg\u0131 yolunun \u015fik\u00e2yetleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden etkisiz oldu\u011funu da ileri s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir. Mevcut ba\u015fvurunun ko\u015fullar\u0131nda yetkili yarg\u0131 kolunu belirlemek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir. Eldeki davada yetkili yarg\u0131 yolunun belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin olarak hukuk sistemimizde bulunan mekanizmalar t\u00fcketilmi\u015f de de\u011fildir. \u015eik\u00e2yetlerinin esas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak ise ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yarg\u0131 mahkemelerinin esasa ili\u015fkin verece\u011fi bir karar sonras\u0131nda ve ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fu takdirde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmalar\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu nedenlerle bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunun ikincilli\u011fi ilkesi gere\u011fi ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bu y\u00f6ndeki \u015fik\u00e2yetleri hakk\u0131nda bir inceleme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM bu sonuca farkl\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvurucular, ihlalin tespit edilmesi ve tazminata karar verilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
32. Niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
33. \u00d6te yandan somut olay ba\u011flam\u0131nda ihlalin tespit edilmesinin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zararlar\u0131n giderilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali nedeniyle manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara takdiren net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvuruculara net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n AYRI AYRI \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 364,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.164,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
FARKLI GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucular, \u0130stanbul’daki kiliselerde papaz olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken10\/12\/2011 tarihinde Samatya Aya Analipsis Rum Ortodoks Kilisesi Vakf\u0131 Y\u00f6netim Kurulu \u00fcyeli\u011fine se\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. \u00c7o\u011funluk, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n temel \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin mensubu olduklar\u0131 Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netiminde yer alamamalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvuruyu Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesindeki \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 24. maddesi \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 24. maddesinde herkesin din ve vicdan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne sahip oldu\u011fu d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Din adam\u0131 olan ba\u015fvurucular dini bir vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netim kuruluna se\u00e7ilmi\u015flerdir. \u0130lgili mevzuat\u0131n buna izin vermedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucular vak\u0131f y\u00f6netiminden kamu makamlar\u0131nca \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi (A\u0130HM), Komisyon d\u00f6neminde verdi\u011fi bir karar\u0131nda \u201cdini bir toplulu\u011fun \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmesinin dini ya\u015fam\u0131n \u00f6nemli bir par\u00e7as\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve buraya kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n ki\u015finin dininin bir tezah\u00fcr\u00fc oldu\u011funu\u201d vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Hasan ve \u00c7avu\u015f\/Bulgaristan, B. No. 30985\/96, 26 Ekim 2000, \u00a7 59). Mahkeme, \u00f6n\u00fcndeki ba\u015fvuruyu Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nin (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, vicdan ve din \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc koruyan 9. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda ele alm\u0131\u015f, daval\u0131 \u00fclkenin savunmas\u0131nda \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ba\u015fvurunun S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alan 11. maddesi alt\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne itibar etmemi\u015ftir (Hasan ve \u00c7avu\u015f\/Bulgaristan, \u00a7 57).<\/p>\n
5. Dini liderlerin atanmas\u0131 ve se\u00e7ilmesini i\u00e7eren ba\u015fka bir ba\u015fvuruda A\u0130HM din \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6ncelikle bireysel bir vicdan meselesi olmakla birlikte, di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, ki\u015finin dinini tek ba\u015f\u0131na ve \u00f6zel olarak veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131yla birlikte, kamusal alanda ve inanc\u0131n\u0131 payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ki\u015filerin \u00e7evresinde a\u00e7\u0131klama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmi\u015ftir (M\u00fcsl\u00fcman Cemaati Y\u00fcksek \u015euras\u0131\/Bulgaristan, B. No. 39023\/97, 16 Aral\u0131k 2004, \u00a7 73). Burada da Mahkeme ba\u015fvuruyu dernekleri haks\u0131z Devlet m\u00fcdahalelerine kar\u015f\u0131 koruyan S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 11. maddesi \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 9. maddesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ele alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. \u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki ba\u015fvurunun temelini az\u0131nl\u0131k konumundaki dini bir toplulu\u011fun kendi i\u00e7 i\u015flerini d\u00fczenlemesi olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Bu konuda idarece yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din ve vicdan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6neliktir, zira ilgili dini vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netimine kat\u0131lma ki\u015finin dini inanc\u0131n\u0131n kamusal alana yans\u0131mas\u0131n\u0131n, d\u0131\u015fa vurumunun bir sonucudur.<\/p>\n
7. Belirtilen gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 24. maddesinde korunan din ve vicdan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenip, bu maddeden ihlal sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kanaatindeyim.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2019\/35817 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ATANA\u015e MAMAS\u0130S VE CORC KASAPO\u011eLU BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/35817) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/9\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 10\/1\/2025 – 32778 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : G\u00fcls\u00fcm Gizem G\u00dcRSOY Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Atana\u015f MAMAS\u0130S \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Corc KASAPO\u011eLU Vekili : Av. H\u00fclya BENL\u0130SOY \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din adam\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle kilise vakf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmesinin \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular, \u0130stanbul’daki kiliselerde papaz olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken10\/12\/2011tarihinde Samatya Aya Analipsis Rum Ortodoks Kilisesi Vakf\u0131 Y\u00f6netim Kurulu \u00fcyeli\u011fine se\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir. 3. Vakf\u0131n Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Se\u00e7im Tespit Tutana\u011f\u0131 16\/12\/2011 tarihinde Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne (Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck) bildirilmi\u015ftir. Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck 5\/3\/2012 tarihinde 20\/2\/2008 tarihli ve 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Kanunu’na dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanan ve 27\/9\/2008 tarihli ve 27010 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Vak\u0131flar Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin (Y\u00f6netmelik) 33. maddesinin (i) bendi gere\u011fi (bkz. \u00a7 18) ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din adam\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00f6netim listelerinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ve bu h\u00e2liyle Vak\u0131f Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Yetki Belgesi verilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucular 12\/4\/2012 tarihinde Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn verdi\u011fi yetki belgesinin iptali talebiyle dava …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n