T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00dcLK\u00dc DALMI\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/18557)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ali Erdem \u015eAH\u0130N<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00dclk\u00fc DALMI\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin amirine kar\u015f\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerden dolay\u0131 disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuruya konu olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte Kars Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde m\u00fchendis olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Somut olay, ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fumun (anne karn\u0131nda bebek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc) hemen ard\u0131ndan ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yerle\u015fkesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc F.K. ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve kendisine hitaben “Size \u00e7ok te\u015fekk\u00fcr ederim, bana \u00e7ok yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldunuz \u00e7ocu\u011fumu sizin y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fczden kaybettim. Size hakk\u0131m\u0131 helal etmiyorum, Allah sizi bildi\u011fi gibi yaps\u0131n.” \u015feklinde bir s\u00f6ylemde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Bahse konu ifadeler nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc’n\u00fcn g\u00f6reviyle ilgili bir eylemini ele\u015ftirmedi\u011fi ancak s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin meslek eti\u011fiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nihayetinde ba\u015fvurucunun 24\/4\/1979 tarihli ve 16618 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Emniyet Te\u015fkilat\u0131 Disiplin T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn (T\u00fcz\u00fck) 5. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n A bendinin (10) numaral\u0131 alt bendinde yer alan “G\u00f6rev d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda amir veya \u00fcstlerine sayg\u0131s\u0131z davranmak” fiili kapsam\u0131nda 3 g\u00fcnl\u00fck ayl\u0131k kesimi cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle idare mahkemesi nezdinde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi, disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan T\u00fcz\u00fck maddesi ile birlikte 23\/1\/2017 tarihli ve 29957 say\u0131l\u0131 Genel Kolluk Disiplin H\u00fck\u00fcmleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (KHK) ge\u00e7ici birinci maddesinde belirtilen bu T\u00fcz\u00fck’e g\u00f6re “resen veya yetkili disiplin kurullar\u0131nca verilmi\u015f olan disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n bu KHK h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca verilmi\u015f addolunaca\u011f\u0131” h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verdi\u011fi karar\u0131nda, kullan\u0131lan ifadelerin ele\u015ftirici mahiyette ve sayg\u0131s\u0131zca oldu\u011funu, emniyet te\u015fkilat\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zellik arz eden yap\u0131s\u0131 itibar\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fini belirterek fiilin i\u015flendi\u011fi kanaatiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar istinaf kanun yolunda kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 1\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fumun ard\u0131ndan eczaneden ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 almaya giderken F.K. ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, konu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131 ancak ba\u015fvuru konusu ifadeleri kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve sayg\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k etmedi\u011fini, bunun yan\u0131nda an\u0131lan ifadeleri kullanm\u0131\u015f olsayd\u0131 dahi s\u00f6zlerin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek somut olayda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir nedeni de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. Yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcddet\u00e7e Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinin ihlalini te\u015fkil edecektir. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cTemel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, …yaln\u0131zca Anayasan\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, …demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin … gereklerine … ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.\u201d<\/p>\n
11. Bu sebeple m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ve somut ba\u015fvuruya uygun d\u00fc\u015fen, kanunlar taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclme, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n ilgili maddesinde belirtilen nedenlere dayanma ve demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir. Buna g\u00f6re somut olayda \u00f6ncelikle m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenecektir.<\/p>\n
12. Hak ya da \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere bir m\u00fcdahale s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinin emredici h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince \u00f6ncelikle tespiti gereken husus, m\u00fcdahaleye yetki veren bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r (kanunilik \u015fart\u0131na \u00e7e\u015fitli ba\u011flamlarda dikkat \u00e7eken kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Tu\u011fba Arslan [GK], B. No: 2014\/256, 25\/6\/2014, \u00a7 82; Halk Radyo ve Televizyon Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k A.\u015e. [GK], B. No: 2014\/19270, 11\/7\/2019, \u00a7 35; Sevim Akat E\u015fki, B. No: 2013\/2187, 19\/12\/2013, \u00a7 36; Hayriye \u00d6zdemir, B. No: 2013\/3434, 25\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 56-61).<\/p>\n
13. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin daha esnek uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 idari su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de kanun metninde su\u00e7 ve cezalara ili\u015fkin olarak genel bir \u015fekilde at\u0131fla yetinilmesi yeterli olmay\u0131p s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemelerin i\u00e7erik bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da belirli amac\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan kanun, bireylerin hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuksal yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine imk\u00e2n verecek nitelikte olmal\u0131d\u0131r (AYM, E.2014\/100, K.2015\/6, 14\/1\/2015). Bu nitelikleri haiz bir kanuni d\u00fczenleme ile uzmanl\u0131k gerektiren veya teknik konulara ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n belirlenmesi konusunda y\u00fcr\u00fctme organ\u0131na yetki verilmesi, kanuni d\u00fczenleme ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmaz. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle disiplin su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n\u0131n da \u00e7er\u00e7evesi kanunla belirlenmeli, kanun bireyler i\u00e7in belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Tuncer Y\u0131\u011fc\u0131, B. No: 2015\/5402, 6\/2\/2019, \u00a7 47; AYM, E.2018\/110, K.2018\/99, 17\/10\/2018; Kardelen Hasret Kaygusuz, B. No: 2017\/38607, 18\/5\/2021, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
14. Somut olayda kamu g\u00f6revlisi olan ba\u015fvurucu, eylemi nedeniyle T\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn ilgili maddesi kapsam\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 3, 4). Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130smail Karaca (B. No: 2017\/26460, 21\/4\/2021) ba\u015fvurusunda ayn\u0131 T\u00fcz\u00fck’e dayan\u0131larak yap\u0131lan disiplin cezas\u0131 \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahaleyi ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelemi\u015f; disiplin su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcz\u00fckle belirlenmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kanun maddesinin soyut ve genel bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctle T\u00fcz\u00fck’e at\u0131f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek yapt\u0131r\u0131m konusu eylemleri yasal d\u00fczeyde belirlemeyen ve ilgili ki\u015filerin (emniyet te\u015fkilat\u0131 mensuplar\u0131) hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuksal yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yeterli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131mayan s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemeye dayanan m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ayn\u0131 d\u00fczenlemeye y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda da Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer de\u011ferlendirmelerle ilgili h\u00fckm\u00fcn iptaline karar verdi\u011fini de vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (AYM, E.2015\/85, K.2016\/3, 13\/1\/2016; benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Seyit Cing\u00f6z (2), B. No: 2019\/2314, 11\/5\/2023, \u00a7 14).<\/p>\n
15. Nihayetinde somut ba\u015fvuruda \u0130smail Karaca ba\u015fvurusunda oldu\u011fu gibi T\u00fcz\u00fck kapsam\u0131nda bir m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu do\u011frultuda disiplin cezas\u0131 \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin kanunla \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fiyarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Erzurum 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2017\/1699, K.2018\/920) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/18557 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00dcLK\u00dc DALMI\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/18557) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Ali Erdem \u015eAH\u0130N Ba\u015fvurucu : \u00dclk\u00fc DALMI\u015e \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin amirine kar\u015f\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerden dolay\u0131 disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuruya konu olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte Kars Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde m\u00fchendis olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r. 3. Somut olay, ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6l\u00fc do\u011fumun (anne karn\u0131nda bebek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc) hemen ard\u0131ndan ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yerle\u015fkesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc F.K. ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve kendisine hitaben “Size \u00e7ok te\u015fekk\u00fcr ederim, bana \u00e7ok yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldunuz \u00e7ocu\u011fumu sizin y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fczden kaybettim. Size hakk\u0131m\u0131 helal etmiyorum, Allah sizi bildi\u011fi gibi yaps\u0131n.” \u015feklinde bir s\u00f6ylemde bulunmu\u015ftur. 4. Bahse konu ifadeler nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc’n\u00fcn g\u00f6reviyle ilgili bir eylemini ele\u015ftirmedi\u011fi ancak s\u00f6ylenen s\u00f6zlerin meslek eti\u011fiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nihayetinde ba\u015fvurucunun 24\/4\/1979 tarihli ve 16618 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Emniyet Te\u015fkilat\u0131 Disiplin T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn (T\u00fcz\u00fck) 5. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n A bendinin (10) …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n