{"id":20542,"date":"2024-12-13T09:19:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-13T06:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2024-12-13T09:19:00","modified_gmt":"2024-12-13T06:19:00","slug":"aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   TOLGA G\u00dcNER BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n<p>   (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/15546)<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Karar Tarihi: 24\/10\/2024<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n<p>   \u00dcyeler<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n<p>   Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   \u015eahap KAYMAK<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Tolga G\u00dcNER<\/p>\n<p>   Vekili<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Av. Ali Hikmet YA\u011eCI<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/p>\n<p>1. Ba\u015fvuru, temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde karar\u0131n kesin olarak verilmesinden dolay\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Soma Devlet Hastanesi acil servisinde 18\/6\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6revli sa\u011fl\u0131k memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan enjeksiyon sonras\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck ayak olarak tan\u0131mlanan engellilik h\u00e2li meydana geldi\u011finden bahisle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 2.000 TL maddi ve 800.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren i\u015fletilecek yasal faiziyle tazminine karar verilmesi talebiyle Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>3. Mahkeme davan\u0131n k\u0131smen reddine, k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re 50.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n dava tarihi olan 10\/5\/2018 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile ba\u015fvurucuya \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Olayda kusuru oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ilgili kamu g\u00f6revlisi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131nda yapt\u0131r\u0131lan bilirki\u015fi incelemesi neticesinde d\u00fczenlenen Adli T\u0131p Kurumu (ATK) raporunu h\u00fckme esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. ATK raporunda \u00f6zetle tedaviyi d\u00fczenleyen hekimin ve enjeksiyonu uygulayan sa\u011fl\u0131k personelinin fiillerinin t\u0131p biliminin genel kabul g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f ilke ve kurallar\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun Ege \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Hastanesinde muayenesinin yapt\u0131r\u0131larak d\u00fczenlenen sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu raporunun da de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla idarenin sundu\u011fu sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmetinde t\u0131bbi tedavi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kusurlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, idarenin eylemi ile meydana gelen zarar aras\u0131nda nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle maddi tazminat talebi reddedilmi\u015ftir. Manevi tazminat talebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise enjeksiyon uygulamas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce risklerin anlat\u0131l\u0131p ba\u015fvurucudan yaz\u0131l\u0131 onam\u0131n al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bu durumun ba\u015fvurucunun ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lma ve onay verme hakk\u0131n\u0131n elinden al\u0131nmas\u0131na ve sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmetinin gere\u011fi gibi i\u015fletilmedi\u011fi konusunda ba\u015fvurucuda endi\u015fe ve \u00fcz\u00fcnt\u00fcye yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>4. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 taraflarca istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 6. \u0130dari Dava Dairesi (B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi) istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 24\/2\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 19\/3\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>6. Komisyon ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilemez oldu\u011fu hususunda oybirli\u011fi sa\u011flanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>7. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n<p>8. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>9. Ba\u015fvurucu; B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesinin kesin nitelikte karar vermesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131n\u0131n elinden al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>10. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda 6\/1\/1982 tarihli ve 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nda idare ve vergi mahkemeleri taraf\u0131ndan verilen ne t\u00fcrdeki kararlar\u0131n hangi kanun yollar\u0131na tabi oldu\u011funun d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davada verilen karar\u0131n temyize tabi kararlar aras\u0131nda say\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u0130dari yarg\u0131 mercilerinin her somut olaya \u00f6zg\u00fc olarak idarenin hizmet kusurunun tazminat\u0131 gerektirip gerektirmedi\u011fini takdir etti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temin edilen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve ilgili belgelerin ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetine ili\u015fkin olarak yap\u0131lacak incelemede dikkate al\u0131nmak \u00fczere g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fte de\u011finilen Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dile getirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>11. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fcn B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kesin olarak verilmesine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvuru, mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>12. Anayasa Mahkemesi, istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde karar\u0131n kesin olarak verilmesinden dolay\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131 Umut \u00d6zt\u00fcrk ([GK], B. No: 2017\/37079, 29\/9\/2021) karar\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Kararda, ilk derece mahkemesi veya istinaf mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011fu hususunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitin yarg\u0131 denetimi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve bu tespite kar\u015f\u0131 bir \u00fcst kanun yoluna m\u00fcracaat edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 kararda, ilk derece veya b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince kesin oldu\u011fu belirtilerek verilen kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yolunun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funa dair \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin \u00f6ncelikli olarak kanun yolunda (istinaf\/temyiz) dile getirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir (Umut \u00d6zt\u00fcrk, \u00a7\u00a7 34-36).<\/p>\n<p>13. Anayasa Mahkemesi an\u0131lan karar\u0131nda, mahkemece kesin olarak verildi\u011fi belirtilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yolunun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131 olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu yola ba\u015fvurulmadan ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda dile getirildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilemez oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Umut \u00d6zt\u00fcrk, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38).<\/p>\n<p>14. Ba\u015fvurucu; 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 46. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda Dan\u0131\u015ftay dava dairelerinin nihai kararlar\u0131 ile b\u00f6lge idare mahkemelerinin an\u0131lan f\u0131krada say\u0131lan davalar hakk\u0131nda verdikleri kararlar\u0131n ba\u015fka kanunlarda aksine h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunsa dahi Dan\u0131\u015ftayda karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde temyiz edilebilece\u011finin kurala ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayn\u0131 f\u0131kran\u0131n (b) bendinde konusu y\u00fcz bin T\u00fcrk liras\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan vergi davalar\u0131, tam yarg\u0131 davalar\u0131 ve idari i\u015flemler hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n temyize tabi oldu\u011funun d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu kapsamda B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kesin nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131n\u0131n engellendi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ancak ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Mahkeme karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine dair B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kesin \u015fekilde verilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131 temyiz kanun yoluna ta\u015f\u0131maks\u0131z\u0131n do\u011frudan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda ifade etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>15. Bu de\u011ferlendirmeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ba\u015fvurucunun B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesince kesin olarak verildi\u011fi belirtilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz kanun yolunun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131 olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu yola ba\u015fvurmadan ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frudan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda dile getirdi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hukuk sisteminde mevcut ve etkili yarg\u0131 yolunu t\u00fcketmeksizin bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n<p>A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n<p>B. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n<p>C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 24\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi<\/p>\n<p>\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 24\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 TOLGA G\u00dcNER BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/15546) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 24\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eahap KAYMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Tolga G\u00dcNER Vekili : Av. Ali Hikmet YA\u011eCI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde karar\u0131n kesin olarak verilmesinden dolay\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Soma Devlet Hastanesi acil servisinde 18\/6\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6revli sa\u011fl\u0131k memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan enjeksiyon sonras\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck ayak olarak tan\u0131mlanan engellilik h\u00e2li meydana geldi\u011finden bahisle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 2.000 TL maddi ve 800.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren i\u015fletilecek yasal faiziyle tazminine karar verilmesi talebiyle Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Mahkeme davan\u0131n k\u0131smen reddine, k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re 50.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n dava tarihi olan 10\/5\/2018 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile ba\u015fvurucuya \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Olayda kusuru oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ilgili kamu g\u00f6revlisi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131nda yapt\u0131r\u0131lan bilirki\u015fi incelemesi neticesinde d\u00fczenlenen Adli T\u0131p Kurumu (ATK) raporunu h\u00fckme esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AYM&#039;nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM&#039;nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 TOLGA G\u00dcNER BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/15546) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 24\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eahap KAYMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Tolga G\u00dcNER Vekili : Av. Ali Hikmet YA\u011eCI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde karar\u0131n kesin olarak verilmesinden dolay\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Soma Devlet Hastanesi acil servisinde 18\/6\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6revli sa\u011fl\u0131k memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan enjeksiyon sonras\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck ayak olarak tan\u0131mlanan engellilik h\u00e2li meydana geldi\u011finden bahisle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 2.000 TL maddi ve 800.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren i\u015fletilecek yasal faiziyle tazminine karar verilmesi talebiyle Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Mahkeme davan\u0131n k\u0131smen reddine, k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re 50.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n dava tarihi olan 10\/5\/2018 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile ba\u015fvurucuya \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Olayda kusuru oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ilgili kamu g\u00f6revlisi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131nda yapt\u0131r\u0131lan bilirki\u015fi incelemesi neticesinde d\u00fczenlenen Adli T\u0131p Kurumu (ATK) raporunu h\u00fckme esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-13T06:19:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-13T06:19:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1425,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\",\"Uncategorized\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-13T06:19:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 TOLGA G\u00dcNER BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/15546) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 24\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eahap KAYMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Tolga G\u00dcNER Vekili : Av. Ali Hikmet YA\u011eCI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde karar\u0131n kesin olarak verilmesinden dolay\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Soma Devlet Hastanesi acil servisinde 18\/6\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6revli sa\u011fl\u0131k memuru taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan enjeksiyon sonras\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck ayak olarak tan\u0131mlanan engellilik h\u00e2li meydana geldi\u011finden bahisle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 2.000 TL maddi ve 800.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n olay tarihinden itibaren i\u015fletilecek yasal faiziyle tazminine karar verilmesi talebiyle Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Mahkeme davan\u0131n k\u0131smen reddine, k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re 50.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n dava tarihi olan 10\/5\/2018 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile ba\u015fvurucuya \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Olayda kusuru oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ilgili kamu g\u00f6revlisi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131nda yapt\u0131r\u0131lan bilirki\u015fi incelemesi neticesinde d\u00fczenlenen Adli T\u0131p Kurumu (ATK) raporunu h\u00fckme esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2024-12-13T06:19:00+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2024-12-13T06:19:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1425,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler","Uncategorized"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-13T06:19:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2021-15546-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM&#8217;nin 2021\/15546 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20542\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}