T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
GAN\u0130 \u015eEN BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/45282)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
H\u00fcseyin \u00d6zg\u00fcr SEV\u0130ML\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Gani \u015eEN<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ahmet VAROL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, karar sonucunu etkileyecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i T.K. 7\/11\/2016 tarihinde Buldan Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. T.K. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta al\u0131nan ifadesinde; bu tarihten yakla\u015f\u0131k iki ay \u00f6nce bir kad\u0131n\u0131n kendisini 0850…81 numaral\u0131 hattan aray\u0131p kendisine \u00f6nceden yapt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sigortas\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, sigortay\u0131 iptal etmek i\u00e7in 325 TL \u00f6demesi gerekti\u011fini, \u00f6demezse icra takibi sonucu daha y\u00fcksek bedel \u00f6demek zorunda kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini aktarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T.K. ifadesinde devamla; o an i\u00e7in dikkatsiz davran\u0131p bedelin tahsili i\u00e7in kredi kart\u0131 bilgilerini ve i\u015flem s\u0131ras\u0131nda telefonuna gelen onay kodunu arayan ki\u015fiye vermesi sonucu kart\u0131ndan 325 TL \u00e7ekildi\u011fini, ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn ayn\u0131 numaradan kendisini yeniden arayan bir ki\u015finin dosya kapatma \u00fccreti ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda tekrar para istemesi \u00fczerine herhangi bir \u00f6deme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015f ve olayla ilgili olarak \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda T.K.n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 cep telefonu hatt\u0131n\u0131n H.G. ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer yandan, 325 TL’nin T.K.ya ait kredi kart\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilmesi i\u015flemine elektronik para kurulu\u015fu olarak faaliyet g\u00f6steren W.A.\u015e. adl\u0131 firman\u0131n arac\u0131l\u0131k etti\u011fi belirlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan i\u015fleme dair dijital verilerin talep edilmesi \u00fczerine bu \u015firketten g\u00f6nderilen yaz\u0131da; s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin 8\/3\/2016 tarihinde internet \u00fczerinden ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fine, an\u0131lan tutar\u0131n \u00fcye i\u015fyeri oldu\u011fu belirtilen ve firma ismi olarak ba\u015fvurucunun ad\u0131 ve soyad\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu firmaya g\u00f6nderildi\u011fine dair bilgilere ve i\u015flemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi s\u0131rada kullan\u0131lan internet protokol (IP) numaras\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde; \u0130zmir’de faaliyet g\u00f6steren ve H.G. ile H.K.n\u0131n i\u015fletti\u011fini belirtti\u011fi \u00c7. Asistanl\u0131k ve Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k (\u00c7. \u015eirketi) adl\u0131 \u015firkete yaz\u0131l\u0131m -sanal POS hizmeti- kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi bu ki\u015filerin POS cihaz\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ald\u0131klar\u0131 \u00f6demelerin \u00f6nce kendi hesab\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ard\u0131ndan \u00f6denen bedeli o \u015firketin banka hesaplar\u0131na aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu i\u015flemlerden kaynaklanan faturalar\u0131 da \u015firkete g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini, an\u0131lan \u015firketle \u015fik\u00e2yete de konu olan benzer para tahsili i\u015flemleri nedeniyle sonradan aralar\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi noter arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla feshettiklerini, T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131ndan para \u00e7ekilmesi olay\u0131yla ilgisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. H.G. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde; T.K.y\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00c7. \u015eirketini kurdu\u011funu, T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131ndan para \u00e7ekilmesi i\u015fleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte H.K.n\u0131n da bu \u015firketin orta\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu, 1\/1\/2017 tarihinde ise bu \u015firketi tamamen kendi \u00fczerine ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015fik\u00e2yete konu i\u015flemle kendi \u015firketinin ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, para \u00e7ekme i\u015fleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte an\u0131lan telefon hatt\u0131n\u0131n kendisi ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hatt\u0131 2016 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n sonlar\u0131na do\u011fru L. Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k adl\u0131 \u015firketini kurdu\u011fu zaman ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. H.G. ayr\u0131ca; ba\u015fvurucunun yalan s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, olay \u00f6ncesinde ba\u015fvurucu ile \u00c7. \u015eirketi ad\u0131na hizmet tan\u0131t\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi ba\u015fvurucuya ait m\u00fc\u015fterilere kendi hizmetlerini tan\u0131tt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k eylemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini \u00f6\u011frenip aralar\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi sona erdirdiklerini, T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131ndan para \u00e7ekilmesi i\u015flemini de ba\u015fvurucunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Soru\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131na dayanak olarak 30\/4\/2018 tarihinde sundu\u011fu belgelerin i\u00e7erikleri \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. 15\/6\/2015 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fletti\u011fi B. adl\u0131 \u015firket ile \u00c7. \u015eirketi aras\u0131nda sanal pos s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi akdedilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmede;<\/p>\n
(1) B. \u015eirketinin e-ticaret alan\u0131nda faaliyet g\u00f6steren \u00fcye i\u015fyerine, internet \u00fczerinden yapt\u0131klar\u0131 sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131n bedellerini sistem orta\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla tahsil etmeleri i\u00e7in online \u00f6deme sistemleri, altyap\u0131s\u0131 ve \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleri sundu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
(2) T\u00fcketicilerin yapacaklar\u0131 \u00f6demelerin \u00c7. \u015eirketinin internet sitesinde yer alacak olan B. \u015eirketinin sunaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvenli online \u00f6deme sistemi \u00fczerinden ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilece\u011fi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
(3) B. \u015eirketinin t\u00fcketiciler taraf\u0131ndan internet \u00fczerinden sipari\u015f edilen \u00fcr\u00fcn ve hizmetlere ait \u00f6demelerin kendi temin etti\u011fi sanal pos cihazlar\u0131 \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
(4) T\u00fcketicilerin \u00f6demeleri \u00fczerinden \u00c7. \u015eirketinin B. \u015eirketine komisyon \u00f6deyece\u011fi, bu \u00f6demeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda B. \u015eirketinin yediemin s\u0131fat\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece sanal pos hizmeti sundu\u011fu ve B. \u015eirketinin sadece t\u00fcketici ve sistem orta\u011f\u0131 ile \u00c7. \u015eirketi aras\u0131nda bir arac\u0131 oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
(5) \u00dcye i\u015fyerinin (\u00c7. \u015eirketinin) internet sitesi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sundu\u011fu \u00fcr\u00fcn ve hizmetlerin t\u00fcketiciler taraf\u0131ndan sipari\u015f edilip online \u00f6deme y\u00f6nteminin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde B. \u015eirketinin bu \u00f6demeleri kabul edece\u011fi ve sonras\u0131nda komisyon \u00fccreti ve i\u015flem \u00fccreti kesintisi yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra \u00c7. \u015eirketine \u00f6deyece\u011fi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. G\u00f6ndericinin ba\u015fvurucu, al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n \u00c7. \u015eirketi oldu\u011fu ve 8\/3\/2016 tarihinden sonra “\u00fcye i\u015f yeri \u00f6deme” a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ile farkl\u0131 tarihlerde ve bedellerle yap\u0131lan para havalelerine dair dekontlar ile farkl\u0131 ki\u015filerden benzer y\u00f6ntemlerde para tahsili yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle Kocaeli ve \u0130scehisar Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar sonucunda aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ile H.G.nin de oldu\u011fu ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararlar dosyaya sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
iii. \u0130zmir Ticaret Sicil M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 17\/11\/2014 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131nda H.G. ile H.K.n\u0131n \u00c7. \u015eirketini temsile m\u00fcnferiden yetkili olduklar\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u00c7. \u015eirketine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi ve Afyonkarahisar 2. Noterli\u011fince d\u00fczenlenen 30\/6\/2016 tarihli ihtarnamede; \u00c7. \u015eirketinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131n t\u00fcketiciler taraf\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet edildi\u011fi, bu \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin muhatab\u0131n\u0131n B. \u015eirketi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde t\u00fcketicilere para iadelerinin bu \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fcketicilerin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucunun \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla bir\u00e7ok kez ifade vermek zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek aralar\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
v. Yine ba\u015fvurucunun \u00c7. \u015eirketine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi sonraki tarihli di\u011fer ihtarnamede yer verilen hususlar ise \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
(1) \u00c7. \u015eirketi taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucuya ihtarname g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, bu ihtarnamede ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fc\u015fterilerin hesap bilgilerini kullanarak r\u0131zalar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda para tahsil etti\u011fine dair a\u00e7\u0131klamalara yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
(2) Ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi ihtarnamede bu iddialara kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak; 2016 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Haziran ay\u0131nda \u00c7. \u015eirketi yetkililerinin 4 ayr\u0131 ki\u015fiyi farkl\u0131 telefonlardan arayarak dosya masraf\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para talep ettikleri, bu ki\u015filerin g\u00f6nderdikleri paralardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n \u00c7. \u015eirketine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak faaliyet g\u00f6steren U. \u015eirketine aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemlerle ilgisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. H.G.nin ve ba\u015fvurucunun savunmalar\u0131nda ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en H.K. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde; 2014 ila 2017 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00c7. \u015eirketinin sahibi oldu\u011funu, bu \u015firketi H.G. ile birlikte y\u00f6nettiklerini, 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u015firketi H.G.ye devretti\u011fini, \u00c7. \u015eirketinin tan\u0131t\u0131m hizmeti verdi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucu ile aralar\u0131nda kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi oldu\u011funu ve tan\u0131t\u0131m hizmetlerinden al\u0131nan \u00fccretleri ba\u015fvurucudan kiralad\u0131klar\u0131 pos cihaz\u0131ndan temin ettiklerini, bu \u00fccret \u00fczerinden de ba\u015fvurucunun %30 pay ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin, H.G.nin ya da ba\u015fvurucunun kimseyi aray\u0131p para istemedi\u011fini, T.K.n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131n H.G.ye ait olup \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma sonunda haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 17\/8\/2018 tarihli iddianamede, T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131ndan para \u00e7ekilmesi i\u015fleminin ticari i\u015flem oldu\u011fu savunulmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n bu hususta herhangi bir belge ibraz edilmedi\u011fi, b\u00f6ylelikle ba\u015fvurucu ile H.G. ve H.K.n\u0131n birlikte hareket ettikleri, T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131 bilgilerini ve telefonuna gelen onay kodunu haks\u0131z olarak temin edip yarar sa\u011flayarak banka veya kredi kart\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 su\u00e7unu i\u015fledikleri belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Buldan Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanan yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 29\/11\/2018 tarihli ilk celsesinde ifade veren T.K. soru\u015fturma evresinde al\u0131nan ifadesini tekrar etmi\u015ftir. \u0130stinabe yoluyla savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu; soru\u015fturma evresinde verdi\u011fi ifadeye ve sundu\u011fu belgelere at\u0131f yaparak \u00c7. \u015eirketine s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi pos hizmeti sundu\u011funu, bu hizmet s\u0131ras\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterilere \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra otomatik olarak mesaj g\u00f6nderip i\u015flemi yapan\u0131n kendileri olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 teyit etmek i\u00e7in mesaj g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. 21\/1\/2019 tarihli ikinci celsede san\u0131klar H.G. ile H.K.n\u0131n sorgular\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. H.K. sorgusunda; \u00c7. \u015eirketinin sahibi ve yetkilisi oldu\u011funa dair savunmas\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlayarak m\u00fc\u015fterinin onay vermedi\u011fi bir \u00f6deme i\u015fleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fini ve m\u00fc\u015fteriye g\u00f6nderilen onay kodunu \u00f6\u011frenme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. H.G. ise sorgusunda; olay tarihinde \u00c7. \u015eirketinin orta\u011f\u0131 de\u011fil m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc oldu\u011funu, T.K.n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131n\u0131 kendisinin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hatt\u0131n kendisine ait oldu\u011funa dair \u00f6nceki ifadesinin tutana\u011fa hatal\u0131 olarak yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve T.K.dan temin edilen paran\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun hesab\u0131na gitti\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucuyla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131ktan sonra onun doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frenip aralar\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi fesh ettiklerini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda Denizli \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden g\u00f6nderilen 4\/2\/2019 tarihli yaz\u0131da, W. \u015eirketinin Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sundu\u011fu IP adresinin kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilemedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Mahkeme 16\/9\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu ile di\u011fer iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan mahk\u00fbmiyetlerine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda T.K.n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k H.G.ye ait oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00c7. \u015eirketinde ortak olup birlikte i\u015f yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131ndan para \u00e7ekilmesi eyleminin ticari nitelikte bir i\u015f oldu\u011funa dair delil sunamad\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelerinde bulunularak at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u birlikte i\u015fledikleri sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu ve san\u0131k H.K. Mahkeme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde; \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 yineledikten sonra Mahkeme karar\u0131ndaki de\u011ferlendirmeye kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak di\u011fer iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015fletti\u011fi \u00c7. \u015eirketi ile ortakl\u0131k ili\u015fkisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu hususun ba\u015fta ticaret sicili olmak \u00fczere muhakeme s\u00fcrecinde dosyaya sunulan t\u00fcm belgelerden de anla\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
14. An\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131 Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 9. Ceza Dairesince (Daire) 9\/9\/2021 tarihinde kesin olmak \u00fczere esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 10\/9\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 29\/9\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Komisyon, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki iddialar\u0131n kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; Mahkeme karar\u0131ndaki tespitlerin aksine T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen para \u00e7ekme i\u015flemi s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00c7. \u015eirketi ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi sadece bu \u015firkete g\u00fcvenli online \u00f6deme hizmeti sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bu hizmet gere\u011fi para kendi hesab\u0131na ge\u00e7tikten ve komisyon ald\u0131ktan sonra paray\u0131 \u00c7. \u015eirketine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fine, bu hususun dosyaya sundu\u011fu dekontlarla sabit oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan \u015firketin ki\u015filerden r\u0131za d\u0131\u015f\u0131 para \u00e7ekme i\u015flemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesi sonucu aralar\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi feshetti\u011fine dair ihtarnameyi dosyaya sunmas\u0131na ve ticaret sicil kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re bu \u015firkete ortak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair savunmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n bu itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n Mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilmemesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
18. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihatlara de\u011finildikten sonra, an\u0131lan hakk\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine dair iddian\u0131n incelenmesinde ilgili mevzuat\u0131n, yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvuru, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa Mahkemesi, \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen bir\u00e7ok ba\u015fvuruda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini belirlemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6zellikle a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut bir bi\u00e7imde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili olmas\u0131, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davayla do\u011frudan ilgili olan bu hususlara mahkemelerce makul bir gerek\u00e7e ile yan\u0131t verilmesi gerekti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir (Muhittin Kaya ve Muhittin Kaya \u0130n\u015faat Taahh\u00fct Madencilik G\u0131da Turizm Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. \u015eti., B. No: 2013\/1213, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 25, 26; Vesim Parlak, B. No: 2012\/1034, 20\/3\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 33, 34; Yasemin Ek\u015fi, B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 56, 57; Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31-39; M\u00fcn\u00fcr Ata, B. No: 2014\/4958, 22\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 37-43; Hikmet \u00c7elik ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/4894, 15\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 54-59; \u015eah Tar\u0131m \u0130n\u015f. Tur. Ltd. \u015eti., B. No: 2013\/7847, 9\/3\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 36-48).<\/p>\n
22. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu; B. adl\u0131 \u015firketi i\u015fletti\u011fini, bu \u015firketin di\u011fer firmalar\u0131n online \u00f6deme i\u015flemlerini kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in sanal pos hizmeti sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n i\u015flettikleri \u00c7. \u015eirketine de aralar\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi bu hizmeti verip \u00c7. \u015eirketinin t\u00fcketicilere arz etti\u011fi \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin internet \u00fczerinden sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00f6denen \u00fcr\u00fcn bedellerinin kendi yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 sayesinde \u00f6denmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu bedel \u00fczerinden s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi komisyon ald\u0131ktan sonra bedeli \u00c7. \u015eirketine aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin bu yaz\u0131l\u0131m sayesinde sadece t\u00fcketici ile \u00c7. \u015eirketi aras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sat\u0131\u015f sonucu yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme i\u015flemlerine arac\u0131l\u0131k etti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 4, 9).<\/p>\n
23. Di\u011fer yandan san\u0131klar H.K. ile H.G.; ba\u015fvurucunun \u00c7. \u015eirketinin orta\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funa dair bir beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015flar, aksine ba\u015fvurucunun savunmalar\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi \u00c7. \u015eirketinin kendileri taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fletildi\u011fini, bu \u015eirket ile ba\u015fvurucu aras\u0131nda akdedilen s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile ba\u015fvurucunun kendilerine online \u00f6deme hizmeti sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte, olay tarihinde T.K.n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131klardan H.G. ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015f (bkz. \u00a7 3), san\u0131k H.K. da bu hatt\u0131n kendi \u015firketleri taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 5, 7).<\/p>\n
24. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu, kendi \u015firketi ile \u00c7. \u015eirketi aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan sanal pos hizmeti s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini, T.K. adl\u0131 ki\u015finin kredi kart\u0131ndan harcama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten sonraki farkl\u0131 tarihlerde kendisinin banka arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u00c7. \u015eirketine “\u00fcye i\u015f yeri \u00f6demesi” ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131 paralara dair dekontlar\u0131, \u00c7. \u015eirketinin ortak ve temsilcilerinin di\u011fer iki san\u0131k oldu\u011funa dair ticaret sicil kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131, ceza davas\u0131na konu eylemle benzer \u015fekilde farkl\u0131 ki\u015filerden de para istenmesi sonucu \u00f6denen bu bedellerin iadesinin kendisinden istenmesi nedeniyle \u00c7. \u015eirketi ile aralar\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi feshetti\u011fine dair ihtarnameleri ve yine ki\u015filerden dosya masraf\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para istenmesi sonucu kendisi hakk\u0131nda farkl\u0131 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar sonucu verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararlar\u0131n\u0131 da Mahkemenin bilgisine sunmu\u015ftur (bkz. \u00a7 6).<\/p>\n
25. T.K.n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131n H.G. ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olup \u00c7. \u015eirketi taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi ve Mahkemenin kabul\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun \u00c7. \u015eirketinin orta\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair itirazlar\u0131 ile bu itirazlara dayanak olarak sundu\u011fu belgelerin i\u00e7eri\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda an\u0131lan olgu ve itirazlar\u0131n sonuca etkili, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
26. Buna ra\u011fmen Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun davan\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131 ile birlikte \u00c7. \u015eirketini i\u015fletti\u011fi, san\u0131klarla ortak i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131 bilgileri ile \u00f6deme i\u015flemi i\u00e7in gerekli olan onay kodunu di\u011fer san\u0131klarla birlikte hareket ederek ele ge\u00e7irip haks\u0131z menfaat sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucunun di\u011fer san\u0131klarla ortak i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair birtak\u0131m soyut de\u011ferlendirmeler bulunmaktaysa da Mahkeme ve Daire kararlar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k ve ayr\u0131 yan\u0131t verilmesini gerektiren, T.K.n\u0131n arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131n davan\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131ndan H.G.ye ait olup \u00c7. \u015eirketi taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, kendisinin B. adl\u0131 ayr\u0131 bir \u015firket i\u015fletti\u011fine, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00c7. \u015eirketi ve di\u011fer san\u0131klarla ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, hem \u00c7. \u015eirketine di\u011fer m\u00fc\u015fteriler taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin, hem de T.K.n\u0131n kredi kart\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilen paran\u0131n \u00c7. \u015eirketi ile aralar\u0131ndaki sanal pos hizmeti s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fi \u00f6nce kendi hesab\u0131na geldi\u011fine ve kendisi taraf\u0131ndan komisyon al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra \u00c7. \u015eirketine aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair iddialar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI ve Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
30. Belirli bir davaya ili\u015fkin olarak delilleri de\u011ferlendirme ve g\u00f6sterilen delilin davayla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verme yetkisi kural olarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten yarg\u0131 mercilerine aittir (Orhan K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2014\/4704, 1\/2\/2018, \u00a7 44). Bu ba\u011flamda somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun banka veya kredi kart\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 su\u00e7unu i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar vermek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen ihlal karar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi gibi ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n gereklerinin yerine getirilmesi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lacak yeniden yarg\u0131lama neticesinde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mutlaka beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na da gelmemektedir. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere gereken i\u015flemler yerine getirildikten sonra yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede mahkemenin delillerin takdir bi\u00e7imine g\u00f6re benzer veya farkl\u0131 bir sonuca varmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Basri BA\u011eCI ve Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU’ nun kar\u015f\u0131oylar\u0131 ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Buldan Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2018\/244, K.2019\/370) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.287,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY<\/p>\n
1. Anayasan\u0131n 148\/3. maddesinde bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemelerinde, kanun yolunda g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken hususlarda inceleme yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmektedir. Bu d\u00fczenlemeye paralel olarak 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 49. maddesinin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n son c\u00fcmlesinde benzer bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. Kanun yolu denetiminin muhtevas\u0131 somut dosya baz\u0131nda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza muhakemesi Kanununun 280\/1. a. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda \u201cispat bak\u0131m\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirmenin yerinde\u201d olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda yap\u0131larak ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmek suretiyle istinaf isteminin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi konuya dair de\u011ferlendirmesinde olay\u0131n ma\u011fdurunun arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefonun sorunlu i\u015flemleri yapan \u201c\u00c7\u201d \u015eirketinin orta\u011f\u0131 olan H.G.ye ait olmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda \u00c7. \u015eirketine paralar\u0131n tahsili noktas\u0131nda pos cihaz\u0131 hizmeti sunmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun faaliyetleri ile ma\u011fdurla irtibat kurulmas\u0131, ki\u015fisel bilgilerine ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, ikna edilmesi ve paras\u0131n\u0131n tahsil edilmesi hususlar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zeterek mahk\u00fbmiyet sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Konu tamamen delilerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131yla ilgili olup Anayasal anlamda sorun te\u015fkil edecek bir husus da bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Di\u011fer taraftan yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde deliler ve olay\u0131n taraflar\u0131 ile do\u011frudan temas edan ve onlar\u0131 ilk elden g\u00f6zlemleme f\u0131rsat\u0131 bulan yarg\u0131lama mercileri delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde Anayasa Mahkemesine nazaran daha avantajl\u0131 konumdad\u0131rlar.<\/p>\n
6. Mevcut dosyada delillerin takdirinden hareketle ihlal sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ni kanun yolu denetimi yapar konuma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrecek olup bu durum ise yukar\u0131da aktar\u0131lan Anayasa ve Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
7. Bu de\u011ferlendirmeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun ihlal y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki karar\u0131na i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00a0Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/45282 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 GAN\u0130 \u015eEN BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/45282) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : H\u00fcseyin \u00d6zg\u00fcr SEV\u0130ML\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Gani \u015eEN Vekili : Av. Ahmet VAROL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, karar sonucunu etkileyecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i T.K. 7\/11\/2016 tarihinde Buldan Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. T.K. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta al\u0131nan ifadesinde; bu tarihten yakla\u015f\u0131k iki ay \u00f6nce bir kad\u0131n\u0131n kendisini 0850…81 numaral\u0131 hattan aray\u0131p kendisine \u00f6nceden yapt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 sigortas\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, sigortay\u0131 iptal etmek i\u00e7in 325 TL \u00f6demesi gerekti\u011fini, \u00f6demezse icra takibi sonucu daha y\u00fcksek bedel \u00f6demek zorunda kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini aktarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T.K. ifadesinde devamla; o an i\u00e7in dikkatsiz davran\u0131p bedelin tahsili i\u00e7in kredi kart\u0131 bilgilerini ve i\u015flem s\u0131ras\u0131nda telefonuna gelen onay kodunu arayan ki\u015fiye vermesi sonucu kart\u0131ndan 325 TL \u00e7ekildi\u011fini, ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn ayn\u0131 numaradan kendisini yeniden arayan bir ki\u015finin dosya kapatma \u00fccreti ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda tekrar para istemesi \u00fczerine herhangi bir \u00f6deme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015f ve olayla ilgili olarak \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. 3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n