T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
H. \u00c7. BA\u015eVURUSU (2)<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/6609)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; haks\u0131z yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirlerine karar verilmesi, bu tedbirlerin yerine getirilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda azami s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, dijital materyallere hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak el konulmas\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz olarak reddedilmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 10\/1\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten soru\u015fturma makam\u0131ndan temin edilen ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, en son Kocaeli h\u00e2kimi olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Y\u00fcksek Kurulunun (HSYK) 16\/7\/2016 tarihli karar\u0131 ile g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Kocaeli Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) aralar\u0131nda Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun da bulundu\u011fu muhtelif su\u00e7lardan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine Kocaeli 2. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 17\/7\/2016 tarihinde yakalama emri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fyerindeki odas\u0131nda 17\/7\/2016 tarihinde arama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve 4 hard diske be\u015f flash belle\u011fe bir SD karta otuz alt\u0131 CD’ye ve yirmi be\u015f DVD’ye el konulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen yakalama emrine istinaden 18\/7\/2016 tarihinde i\u015fyerinde yakaland\u0131ktan sonra g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. G\u00f6zalt\u0131nda bulunan ba\u015fvurucu, yakalama emrini infaz edecek makama hitaben yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 19\/7\/2016 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde 24 saatlik g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011funu ve bu durumda h\u00fcrriyetinin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 19\/7\/2016 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuyu tutuklanmas\u0131 talebiyle Kocaeli 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sevk etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, sorgusunun ard\u0131ndan silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 20\/7\/2016 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun ikametg\u00e2h\u0131nda 22\/7\/2016 tarihinde arama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve iki diz\u00fcst\u00fc bilgisayar, \u00fc\u00e7 ta\u015f\u0131nabilir hard disk, bir ses kay\u0131t cihaz\u0131 ile muhtelif say\u0131da flash belle\u011fe, CD ve DVD’ye el konulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, koruma tedbirleri nedeniyle Kocaeli 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) nezdinde tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 23\/8\/2016 tarihli dava dilek\u00e7esiyle 15\/5\/2017 ve 22\/6\/2017 tarihli dilek\u00e7elerinde hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen yakalama emrinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu emrin yerine getirilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda kanuni tutma s\u00fcresinin a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arama i\u015flemleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda kopyalar\u0131 al\u0131narak kendisine teslim edilmesi gereken dijital materyallerine zorlay\u0131c\u0131 bir neden yokken el konuldu\u011funu belirterek bu nedenlerle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi ve manevi tazminat\u0131n giderilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Mahkeme 26\/9\/2017 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesi nedeniyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Davac\u0131 H. \u00c7. hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yakalama ve arama-elkoyman\u0131n usule ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler nedeniyle CMK 141 vd.maddelerine istinaden tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f ise de; Davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Anayasal D\u00fczeni Ortadan Kald\u0131rmaya Te\u015febb\u00fcs Etme ve Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00dcye Olma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan soru\u015fturman\u0131n tamamlanarak kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ter\u00f6r ve \u00d6rg\u00fctl\u00fc Su\u00e7lar B\u00fcrosu\u2019na yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere sonucu \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi, davan\u0131n derdest oldu\u011fu, dava sonucuna g\u00f6re tazminat talebinin hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilebilece\u011fi, bu a\u015famada dava halen derdest oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, CMK 141 maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 tazminat isteme ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n usulden reddine mahkememizce karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu s\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Ceza Dairesi (\u0130stinaf Mahkemesi), 29\/1\/2017 tarihinde istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Yasal g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde g\u00f6revli mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmama durumunda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesine gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu gerek\u00e7e ile davan\u0131n\u0131 reddinin yasaya uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lsa da, dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re sonucu itibar\u0131 ile davan\u0131n reddinin do\u011fru oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, gerek\u00e7edeki hata sonuca etkili olmamakla karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ele\u015ftirilen husus d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin karar\u0131nda usule ve esasa ili\u015fkin herhangi bir hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerde ve i\u015flemlerde herhangi bir eksiklik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ispat bak\u0131m\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirmenin yerinde oldu\u011fu, anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, … \u0130ST\u0130NAF BA\u015eVURUSUNUN ESASTAN REDD\u0130NE [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
18. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesi 5\/10\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun temyiz kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, usul ve Kanuna uygun bulunan … istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ili\u015fkin karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin isteme uygun olarak … ESASTAN REDD\u0130NE [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 24\/12\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 10\/1\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
20. 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun “G\u00f6zalt\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 91. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Yukar\u0131daki maddeye g\u00f6re yakalanan ki\u015fi, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca b\u0131rak\u0131lmazsa, soru\u015fturman\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilebilir. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresi, yakalama yerine en yak\u0131n h\u00e2kim veya mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in zorunlu s\u00fcre hari\u00e7, yakalama an\u0131ndan itibaren yirmid\u00f6rt saati ge\u00e7emez. Yakalama yerine en yak\u0131n h\u00e2kim veya mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilme i\u00e7in zorunlu s\u00fcre oniki saatten fazla olamaz.”<\/p>\n
21. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Bilgisayarlarda, bilgisayar programlar\u0131nda ve k\u00fct\u00fcklerinde arama, kopyalama ve elkoyma” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 134. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) Bir su\u00e7 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada, somut delillere dayanan kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe sebeplerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fka surette delil elde etme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 halinde, h\u00e2kim veya gecikmesinde sak\u0131nca bulunan h\u00e2llerde Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelinin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisayar ve bilgisayar programlar\u0131 ile bilgisayar k\u00fct\u00fcklerinde arama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, bilgisayar kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan kopya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na, bu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclerek metin h\u00e2line getirilmesine karar verilir. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen kararlar yirmi d\u00f6rt saat i\u00e7inde h\u00e2kim onay\u0131na sunulur. H\u00e2kim karar\u0131n\u0131 en ge\u00e7 yirmi d\u00f6rt saat i\u00e7inde verir. S\u00fcrenin dolmas\u0131 veya h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan aksine karar verilmesi h\u00e2linde \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan kopyalar ve \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yap\u0131lan metinler derh\u00e2l imha edilir.<\/p>\n
(2) Bilgisayar, bilgisayar programlar\u0131 ve bilgisayar k\u00fct\u00fcklerine \u015fifrenin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclememesinden dolay\u0131 girilememesi veya gizlenmi\u015f bilgilere ula\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 ya da i\u015flemin uzun s\u00fcrecek olmas\u0131 halinde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn yap\u0131labilmesi ve gerekli kopyalar\u0131n al\u0131nabilmesi i\u00e7in, bu ara\u00e7 ve gere\u00e7lere elkonulabilir. \u015eifrenin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve gerekli kopyalar\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 halinde, elkonulan cihazlar gecikme olmaks\u0131z\u0131n iade edilir.<\/p>\n
(3) Bilgisayar veya bilgisayar k\u00fct\u00fcklerine elkoyma i\u015flemi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, sistemdeki b\u00fct\u00fcn verilerin yedeklemesi yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
(4) \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kraya g\u00f6re al\u0131nan yedekten bir kopya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak \u015f\u00fcpheliye veya vekiline verilir ve bu husus tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilerek imza alt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n
(5) Bilgisayar veya bilgisayar k\u00fct\u00fcklerine elkoymaks\u0131z\u0131n da, sistemdeki verilerin tamam\u0131n\u0131n veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kopyas\u0131 al\u0131nabilir. Kopyas\u0131 al\u0131nan veriler k\u00e2\u011f\u0131da yazd\u0131r\u0131larak, bu husus tutana\u011fa kaydedilir ve ilgililer taraf\u0131ndan imza alt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
22. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Tazminat istemi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 veya kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
a) Kanunlarda belirtilen ko\u015fullar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yakalanan, tutuklanan veya tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na karar verilen,<\/p>\n
b)Kanun\u00ee g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde h\u00e2kim \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmayan,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
j) E\u015fyas\u0131na veya di\u011fer malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerine, ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde elkonulan veya korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli tedbirler al\u0131nmayan ya da e\u015fyas\u0131 veya di\u011fer malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferleri ama\u00e7 d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan veya zaman\u0131nda geri verilmeyen,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Ki\u015filer, madd\u00ee ve manev\u00ee her t\u00fcrl\u00fc zararlar\u0131n\u0131, Devletten isteyebilirler.”<\/p>\n
23. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Tazminat isteminin ko\u015fullar\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 142. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kesinle\u015fti\u011finin ilgilisine tebli\u011finden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay ve her h\u00e2lde karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kesinle\u015fme tarihini izleyen bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde tazminat isteminde bulunulabilir.”<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
24. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu, su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde mesle\u011finden kaynaklanan g\u00fcvencelere riayet edilmeksizin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlenen yakalama emrine istinaden yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yakaland\u0131ktan sonra 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da belirtilen azami s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen yetkili merci \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n keyf\u00ee ve gerek\u00e7esiz \u015fekilde reddedildi\u011fini beyan ederek ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
26. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
27. Anayasa’n\u0131n iddian\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde dayanak al\u0131nacak 19. maddesinin birinci, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, be\u015finci ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Herkes, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fine sahiptir. <\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hakk\u0131nda kuvvetli belirti bulunan ki\u015filer, ancak ka\u00e7malar\u0131n\u0131, delillerin yokedilmesini veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini \u00f6nlemek maksad\u0131yla veya bunlar gibi tutuklamay\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lan ve kanunda g\u00f6sterilen di\u011fer hallerde h\u00e2kim karar\u0131yla tutuklanabilir. H\u00e2kim karar\u0131 olmadan yakalama, ancak su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinde veya gecikmesinde sak\u0131nca bulunan hallerde yap\u0131labilir; bunun \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 kanun g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Yakalanan veya tutuklanan ki\u015fi, tutulma yerine en yak\u0131n mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli s\u00fcre hari\u00e7 en ge\u00e7 k\u0131rksekiz saat ve toplu olarak i\u015flenen su\u00e7larda en \u00e7ok d\u00f6rt g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde h\u00e2kim \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131r. Kimse, bu s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7tikten sonra hakim karar\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lamaz. Bu s\u00fcreler ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hal ve sava\u015f hallerinde uzat\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Bu esaslar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fleme t\u00e2bi tutulan ki\u015filerin u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131 zarar, tazminat hukukunun genel prensiplerine g\u00f6re, Devlet\u00e7e \u00f6denir.”<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin -\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve be\u015finci f\u0131kralar\u0131nda yer alan g\u00fcvenceler de dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle- dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
a. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
29. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
b. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
i. Genel \u0130lkeler<\/p>\n
30. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda, herkesin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu ilke olarak konulduktan sonra ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131nda \u015fekil ve \u015fartlar\u0131 kanunda g\u00f6sterilmek kayd\u0131yla ki\u015filerin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131labilece\u011fi durumlar s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Maddenin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc, be\u015finci, alt\u0131nc\u0131, yedinci ve sekizinci f\u0131kralar\u0131nda ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahalede bulunan ki\u015filere tan\u0131nan g\u00fcvencelere ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelere yer verilmi\u015ftir (Safkan Aydo\u011fdu, B. No: 2014\/7498, 5\/4\/2017, \u00a7 43).<\/p>\n
31. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise bu esaslar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fleme tabi tutulan ki\u015filerin u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131 zararlar\u0131n tazminat hukukunun genel prensiplerine g\u00f6re devlet taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan f\u0131krada yer alan “bu esaslar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fleme t\u00e2bi tutulan ki\u015filer” ifadesiyle maddenin di\u011fer t\u00fcm f\u0131kralar\u0131nda belirtilen kurallara ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir i\u015fleme tabi k\u0131l\u0131nman\u0131n ki\u015fiye tazminat hakk\u0131 do\u011furdu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re maddenin ikinci veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131nda belirtilen durumlara ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahalede bulunulmas\u0131 ya da ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale edilen kimsenin maddenin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc, be\u015finci, alt\u0131nc\u0131, yedinci ve sekizinci f\u0131kralar\u0131ndaki g\u00fcvencelerden yararland\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde u\u011fran\u0131lan zararlar devlet taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denecektir (Safkan Aydo\u011fdu, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
32. Anayasa Mahkemesi, kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresinin a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya yakalaman\u0131n ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Hikmet Kopar ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/14061, 8\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 64-72; Hidayet Karaca [GK], B. No: 2015\/144, 14\/7\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 53-64; G\u00fcnay Da\u011f ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/1631, 17\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 141-150; \u0130brahim S\u00f6nmez ve Nazmiye Kaya, B. No: 2013\/3193, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 34-47).<\/p>\n
ii. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
33. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu; hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yakaland\u0131ktan sonra azami s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen yetkili merci \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (a) ve (b) f\u0131kralar\u0131na istinaden tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu kararda, ba\u015fvurucunun yakalaman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve azami s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddialar\u0131yla ilgili olarak herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmeye yer verilmemi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 14).<\/p>\n
34. \u00d6te yandan \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi, yasal g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde g\u00f6revli mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmama durumunda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in davac\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmedi\u011fini belirterek ilk derece mahkemesinin ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n yasaya uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirlemi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi, s\u00f6z konusu yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011fa ra\u011fmen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re sonucu itibar\u0131yla davan\u0131n reddinin do\u011fru oldu\u011fu ve gerek\u00e7edeki hatan\u0131n sonuca etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle istinaf talebinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
35. \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda ilk derece mahkemesince verilen davan\u0131n reddi karar\u0131n\u0131n sonucu itibar\u0131yla do\u011fru oldu\u011fu kanaatine ne \u015fekilde ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer verilmemi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 16). \u0130stinaf Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak gerek\u00e7elerini a\u00e7\u0131klamadan verdi\u011fi bu karar Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n genel ve soyut nitelikteki karar\u0131yla onanarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 18).<\/p>\n
36. Ba\u015fvuruya konu tazminat yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen esaslara ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir i\u015fleme tabi tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak bu sonuca ne \u015fekilde ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun ko\u015fullar\u0131nda etkili bir ba\u015fvuru yolu oldu\u011fu Yarg\u0131tay ve Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131yla ortaya konulan s\u00f6z konusu tazminat davas\u0131, somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zenli bir bi\u00e7imde incelenmedi\u011fi ku\u015fkusunu do\u011furacak \u015fekilde ve gerek\u00e7esiz olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu, Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen tazminat talep etme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 etkili bir bi\u00e7imde kullanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
37. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin -\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak- dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131yla Ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Olarak Etkili Ba\u015fvuru Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
38. Ba\u015fvurucu; soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda verilen arama kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda dijital materyallerine 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 134. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak el konuldu\u011funu, Kanun’a g\u00f6re kopya al\u0131nmas\u0131yla yetinilmesi gerekirken elkoyma karar\u0131 verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n keyf\u00ee ve gerek\u00e7esiz olarak reddedildi\u011fini belirterek m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
39. Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
40. Ba\u015fvurucunun elkoyma i\u015fleminden kaynaklanan, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmesi suretiyle olu\u015fan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmin edilmesi talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n etkili bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm imk\u00e2n\u0131 sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetleri, Anayasa’n\u0131n 35. maddesiyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 40. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
a. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden <\/p>\n
41. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
b. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden <\/p>\n
42. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (j) bendinde, e\u015fyas\u0131na veya di\u011fer mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerine \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde el konulan veya bunlar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli tedbirler al\u0131nmayan ya da e\u015fyas\u0131 veya di\u011fer mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferleri ama\u00e7 d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan ya da zaman\u0131nda geri verilmeyen ki\u015filere tazminat talebinde bulunabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
43. Anayasa Mahkemesi ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 veya kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca \u015f\u00fcphelilerin e\u015fyas\u0131na ya da mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerine ili\u015fkin olarak elkoyma tedbirinin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda bunun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Nuray I\u015f\u0131k, B. No: 2014\/7561, 28\/9\/2016,\u00a7\u00a7 60-67; Sinan Ayd\u0131n Ayg\u00fcn (2), B. No: 2014\/922, 16\/6\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 61-69).<\/p>\n
44. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen bu yol, bir yandan ba\u015fvurucunun maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 elkoyma i\u015fleminin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitini, di\u011fer yandan da u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131n tazmini imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 141. maddesiyle \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hukuk yolu ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan eri\u015filebilir ve elveri\u015fli bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm ve makul \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde bir ba\u015far\u0131 imk\u00e2n\u0131 sunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
45. Ba\u015fvurucu da bu kapsamda elkoyma tedbirinin kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fartlara uyulmadan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak yarg\u0131sal makamlar\u0131n s\u00fcre\u00e7te verdi\u011fi kararlara bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun bu talebine ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 14, 16, 18). Ba\u015fvurucunun elkoyma tedbirinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n ve bunun bir sonucu olarak s\u00f6z konusu talep y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmamas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ve uygun bir telafi \u015fans\u0131 sunmaya elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetin etkili bir \u015fekilde incelenmesine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Neticede somut olay\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131nda m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda olu\u015fan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini konusunda ba\u015fvurucuya asgari g\u00fcvenceleri i\u00e7erecek \u015fekilde etkili bir hukuk yolu sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
46. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesiyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak 40. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
47. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile maddi ve manevitazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
48. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
49. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VII. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 1.Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. Anayasa’n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak 40. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ile m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Kocaeli 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2017\/140, K.2017\/302) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 19\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/6609 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR H. \u00c7. BA\u015eVURUSU (2) (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/6609) Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN Ba\u015fvurucu : I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; haks\u0131z yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirlerine karar verilmesi, bu tedbirlerin yerine getirilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda azami s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, dijital materyallere hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak el konulmas\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz olarak reddedilmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 10\/1\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten soru\u015fturma makam\u0131ndan temin edilen ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu, en son Kocaeli h\u00e2kimi olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Y\u00fcksek Kurulunun (HSYK) 16\/7\/2016 tarihli karar\u0131 ile g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 6. Kocaeli Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n