T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
ABDULAZ\u0130Z ENCU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/15347)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Volkan \u00c7AKMAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1.Abdulaziz ENCU<\/p>\n
2. Abdullah ENCU<\/p>\n
3. Abdurrahman ENCU<\/p>\n
4. Aysel \u00c7ET\u0130N<\/p>\n
5. Azime \u00dcREK<\/p>\n
6. Ceylan ENCU<\/p>\n
7. Dervi\u015f ENCU<\/p>\n
8. Fadile TOSUN<\/p>\n
9. Fatma ENCU<\/p>\n
10. Felek ENCU<\/p>\n
11. Halime ENCU<\/p>\n
12. Halime ENCU<\/p>\n
13. Halime ENCU<\/p>\n
14. Hamdiye ENCU<\/p>\n
15. Heybet ENCU<\/p>\n
16. Hikmet ENCU<\/p>\n
17. \u0130rfan ENCU<\/p>\n
18. \u0130slam ENCU<\/p>\n
19. Kadriye ENCU<\/p>\n
20. Leyla ENCU<\/p>\n
21. Mehmet ENCU<\/p>\n
22. Mehmet KAPLAN<\/p>\n
23. Mes\u00fct ENCU<\/p>\n
24. Nahide ENCU<\/p>\n
25. Pakize KAPLAN<\/p>\n
26. Rihan ENCU<\/p>\n
27. Sad\u0131k ALMA<\/p>\n
28. Servet ENCU<\/p>\n
29. \u015eahra ENCU<\/p>\n
30. \u015eemsettin ENCU<\/p>\n
31. Tahir ENCU<\/p>\n
32. T\u00fcrkan UYSAL<\/p>\n
33. \u00dcbeydullah ENCU<\/p>\n
34. Yahya ENCU<\/p>\n
35. Zeki TOSUN<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Kerem ALTIPARMAK<\/p>\n
36. \u011eazal ENCU<\/p>\n
37. S\u00fcleyman ENCU<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Habibe DANI\u015eMAN, Av. Sedat BENEK<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, asker\u00ee operasyon sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen can kay\u0131plar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik sona ermi\u015f bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinin reddi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri, \u015e\u0131rnak ili Uludere il\u00e7esine yak\u0131n ve \u00fclke s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan b\u00f6lgede -Irak \u00fclkesi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 d\u00e2hilinde- hava harek\u00e2t\u0131 d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. 28\/12\/2011 tarihli harekat s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131 hayatlar\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. S\u00f6z konusu harek\u00e2t sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen can kay\u0131plar\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonucunda Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Asker\u00ee Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 6\/1\/2014 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7esinde, ter\u00f6rist oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen grubun b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, Irak’\u0131n kuzeyinde bulunmas\u0131 ve 1150 metre derinli\u011finde gruplar halinde yay\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi ve Bakanlar Kurulu kararlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca verilen g\u00f6revi icra eden T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri personelinin g\u00f6rev gereklerini yerine getirirken, daha sonra ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan grubu, ter\u00f6rist grup olarak alg\u0131lay\u0131p ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lamayacak bir hataya d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Kararda devamla, ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz hataya d\u00fc\u015fen ki\u015filerin ceza hukukuna ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemeler gere\u011fi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131larak verilen g\u00f6revi icra ederken ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz hataya d\u00fc\u015fen askeri personel hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmek suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015ftir. Karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz Hava Kuvvetleri Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Asker\u00ee Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 11\/6\/2014 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucular, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinin ard\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesi nezdinde ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015f ise de ba\u015fvuru evrak\u0131na ili\u015fkin eksiklik bildiriminin s\u00fcresinde yerine getirilmemesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvuru reddedilmi\u015ftir (bkz. Mehmet Enc\u00fc ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/11864, 24\/2\/2016). Ba\u015fvurucular, s\u00fcreci takiben Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine (A\u0130HM) bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015f ancak A\u0130HM i\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun t\u00fcketilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir (bkz. Selahattin Enc\u00fc ve di\u011ferleri\/T\u00fcrkiye, B. No: 49976\/16, 17\/5\/2018).<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular 11\/6\/2019 tarihinde, olayla ilgili y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde g\u00f6rev alan yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) mensubu olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle kamu g\u00f6revinden ihra\u00e7 edildi\u011fini belirterek ba\u015fkaca herhangi bir iddia (yeni delil, ihra\u00e7 edilen h\u00e2kimlerin somut soru\u015fturmada usuls\u00fczl\u00fck yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 vs.) ileri s\u00fcrmeden soru\u015fturman\u0131n yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. \u015e\u0131rnak Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131; ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n konuya ili\u015fkin yeni delil ileri s\u00fcrmedi\u011fini, taraflar\u0131 konusu ayn\u0131 olan olaya ili\u015fkin olarak yeni delil, bulgu olmadan tekrar soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekiler taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen hususlar\u0131n yeniden soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek mahiyette yeni delil te\u015fkil etmedi\u011fini belirterek talebin m\u00fckerrer kay\u0131t niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 28\/1\/2021 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131 12\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u015e\u0131rnak Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucular, nihai karar\u0131 15\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmelerinin ard\u0131ndan 9\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvuruculardan Kadriye Encu’nun 22\/10\/2021 tarihinde vefat etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Komisyonca aralar\u0131nda konu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden irtibat bulunan 2021\/19066 ile 2021\/15347 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvurular\u0131n birle\u015ftirilerek, incelemenin 2021\/15347 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerinden ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesine ve ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
A. Kadriye Encu Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu Kadriye Encu bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinden sonra vefat etmi\u015ftir. Vefat eden ve di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n akrabas\u0131 olan Kadriye Encu taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n iddias\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Kadriye Encu ba\u015fvurusunun devam\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 ve yorumlanmas\u0131 veya temel haklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ya da insan haklar\u0131na sayg\u0131n\u0131n gerekli k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir h\u00e2lin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Kadriye Encu’nun bireysel ba\u015fvurusunun \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeniyle Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 80. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer Ba\u015fvurucular Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
1. Ya\u015fam Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucular; soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde g\u00f6rev alan yarg\u0131 mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6 mensubiyeti nedeniyle kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu hususun yeni bir durum te\u015fkil etti\u011fini, \u00e7e\u015fitli devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin bas\u0131na yans\u0131yan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131n bu hususu tevsik etti\u011fini, yeniden soru\u015fturma \u00f6devinin canland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini, hata kavram\u0131na ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmenin savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, can kay\u0131plar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak titizlikle inceleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, somut s\u00fcre\u00e7 ve insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 aktar\u0131larak somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zellikleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi beyan edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan dilek\u00e7elerinde yeniden soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n ba\u015fvuruya konu edildi\u011fini ifade ederek ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 49. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n incelenmesinde bu Kanun ve \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’te h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan h\u00e2llerde ilgili usul kanunlar\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fine uygun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 114. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda da dava \u015fartlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ayn\u0131 davan\u0131n daha \u00f6nceden kesin h\u00fckme ba\u011flanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 yer almaktad\u0131r. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 115. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise mahkemenin dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmesi h\u00e2linde davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n incelenmesinde 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan h\u00e2llerde ilgili usul kanunlar\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fine uygun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanacakt\u0131r. Bireysel ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin an\u0131lan mevzuatta m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ayn\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 nedenle birden fazla bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvurunun 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un dava \u015fartlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin yukar\u0131da belirtilen h\u00fck\u00fcmleri k\u0131yasen uygulanmak suretiyle reddedilmesi gerekir .<\/p>\n
12. Somut s\u00fcrece bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hava harek\u00e2t\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmaya ili\u015fkin olarak 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi ve karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi ve A\u0130HM nezdinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ihlaline y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurular\u0131n da reddedildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Konuya ili\u015fkin verilmi\u015f bir hak ihlali karar\u0131 veya yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir karar s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n kendi talepleri \u00fczerine yeni somut vakaya ili\u015fkin yeni delil ileri s\u00fcrmeden yapt\u0131klar\u0131 yeniden soru\u015fturma talebi Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda sonu\u00e7lanan soru\u015fturmaya at\u0131fla m\u00fckerrer kay\u0131t olmas\u0131 nedeniyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ba\u015fvurucular, somut vakaya ili\u015fkin \u00f6ncekinden farkl\u0131 bir husus ortaya koyamam\u0131\u015f yeniden soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerekli k\u0131lacak somut olaya ili\u015fkin yeni bir delil ileri s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucular, her ne kadar soru\u015fturman\u0131n yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinin reddine ili\u015fkin s\u00fcreci konu ederek bu s\u00fcrecin ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015f ise de mevcut ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ihlali iddias\u0131na konu as\u0131l vaka hava harek\u00e2t\u0131 sonucu ya\u015fanan can kay\u0131plar\u0131 ve bu harek\u00e2t sonras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ve 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda sonu\u00e7lanan soru\u015fturma olup s\u00f6z konusu son s\u00fcre\u00e7 sona ermi\u015f bir soru\u015fturmay\u0131 yeniden canland\u0131rma \u00e7abas\u0131na y\u00f6neliktir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da formda dile getirdikleri (hatan\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f yorumlanmas\u0131, titizlikle ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 vs.) iddialar bu durumu tevsik eder niteliktedir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n daha \u00f6nce ayn\u0131 olaya ili\u015fkin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ihlali iddias\u0131yla ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurunun reddedildi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden m\u00fckerrer oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru olmas\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
2. Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucular; somut yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri hususlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gerek\u00e7enin doyurucu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, somut s\u00fcre\u00e7 ve insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 aktar\u0131larak somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zellikleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi beyan edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan dilek\u00e7elerinde yeniden soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n ba\u015fvuruya konu edildi\u011fini ifade ederek ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 45. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ihlal edildi\u011fi iddia edilen hakk\u0131n Anayasa\u2019da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) ve T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin taraf oldu\u011fu S\u00f6zle\u015fme’ye ek protokoller kapsam\u0131na da girmesi gerekir. Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin ortak koruma alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan hak ihlali iddias\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren ba\u015fvurular bireysel ba\u015fvurunun kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fildir. S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinde adil yarg\u0131lanmaya ili\u015fkin hak ve ilkelerin medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler ile ilgili uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n ve bir su\u00e7 isnad\u0131n\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 esnas\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu belirtilerek hakk\u0131n kapsam\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bahsedilen h\u00e2ller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddias\u0131na dayanan ba\u015fvurular, Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalaca\u011f\u0131ndan bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu olamaz. Bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep eden ma\u011fdur, su\u00e7tan zarar g\u00f6ren, \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i veya kat\u0131lan s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan ki\u015filer S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinin koruma alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalmaktad\u0131r (Onurhan Solmaz, B. No: 2012\/1049, 26\/3\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 18-24).<\/p>\n
19. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucular m\u00fc\u015fteki s\u0131fat\u0131yla yer ald\u0131klar\u0131 ve yeniden soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 taleplerinin reddi ile sonu\u00e7lanan yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcreci adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na konu ettiklerinden \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemine y\u00f6nelik s\u00fcrecin ba\u015fvurucular a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kadiye Encu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun D\u00dc\u015eMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru olmas\u0131 nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 12\/6\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 12\/6\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/15347 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR ABDULAZ\u0130Z ENCU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/15347) Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Volkan \u00c7AKMAK Ba\u015fvurucular : 1.Abdulaziz ENCU 2. Abdullah ENCU 3. Abdurrahman ENCU 4. Aysel \u00c7ET\u0130N 5. Azime \u00dcREK 6. Ceylan ENCU 7. Dervi\u015f ENCU 8. Fadile TOSUN 9. Fatma ENCU 10. Felek ENCU 11. Halime ENCU 12. Halime ENCU 13. Halime ENCU 14. Hamdiye ENCU 15. Heybet ENCU 16. Hikmet ENCU 17. \u0130rfan ENCU 18. \u0130slam ENCU 19. Kadriye ENCU 20. Leyla ENCU 21. Mehmet ENCU 22. Mehmet KAPLAN 23. Mes\u00fct ENCU 24. Nahide ENCU 25. Pakize KAPLAN 26. Rihan ENCU 27. Sad\u0131k ALMA 28. Servet ENCU 29. \u015eahra ENCU 30. \u015eemsettin ENCU 31. Tahir ENCU 32. T\u00fcrkan UYSAL 33. \u00dcbeydullah ENCU 34. Yahya ENCU 35. Zeki TOSUN Vekili : Av. Kerem ALTIPARMAK 36. \u011eazal ENCU 37. S\u00fcleyman ENCU Vekili : Av. Habibe DANI\u015eMAN, Av. Sedat BENEK I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, asker\u00ee operasyon sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen can kay\u0131plar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik sona ermi\u015f bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinin reddi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri, \u015e\u0131rnak ili Uludere …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-135836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n