ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/107<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/109<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 30\/5\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 23. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 3\/7\/1940 tarihli ve 3890 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 1. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 206. maddesinin 28\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7101 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan \u201c\u2026muayyen e\u015fya ve akardan al\u0131nmas\u0131 laz\u0131m gelen resim ve vergi, rehinli alacaklardan sonra gelir.\u201d ibaresinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 5., 10., 35. ve 73. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: S\u0131ra cetveline y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131nda ilk derece mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n istinaf incelemesinde itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un 206. maddesinin itiraz konusu kural\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201c(De\u011fi\u015fik birinci f\u0131kra: 28\/2\/2018-7101\/5 md.) Alacaklar\u0131 rehinli olan alacakl\u0131lar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f tutar\u0131 \u00fczerinde r\u00fc\u00e7han haklar\u0131 vard\u0131r. G\u00fcmr\u00fck resmi ve akar vergisi gibi Devlet tekliflerinden muayyen e\u015fya ve akardan al\u0131nmas\u0131 laz\u0131m gelen resim ve vergi, rehinli alacaklardan sonra gelir.\u201d <\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r \u00d6mer GED\u0130K taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
2. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un \u201cAnayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemelerce ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinde Anayasa Mahkemesine itiraz yoluyla yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda izlenecek y\u00f6ntem belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. S\u00f6z konusu maddenin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda bir davaya bakmakta olan mahkemenin bu davada uygulanacak bir kanun veya Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi h\u00e2linde veya taraflardan birinin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131n\u0131n ciddi oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varmas\u0131 durumunda bu f\u0131krada say\u0131lan belgeleri dizi listesine ba\u011flayarak Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f; an\u0131lan f\u0131kran\u0131n (a) bendinde \u201c\u0130ptali istenen kurallar\u0131n Anayasan\u0131n hangi maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131\u201d ve (b) bendinde \u201cBa\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi\u201d Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilecek belgeler aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Maddenin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde dayanaktan yoksun veya y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmayan itiraz ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin gerek\u00e7eleriyle reddedilece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. An\u0131lan \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 46. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin her birinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n hangi maddelerine hangi nedenlerle ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eleriyle birlikte a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6stermesi gerekti\u011fi, (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda da itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 49. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendinde de Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan ilk incelemede ba\u015fvuruda eksikliklerin bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde itiraz yoluna ili\u015fkin i\u015flerde esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin ba\u015fvurunun reddine karar verilece\u011fi, (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise an\u0131lan (b) bendi uyar\u0131nca verilen karar\u0131n itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemenin eksiklikleri tamamlayarak yeniden ba\u015fvurmas\u0131na engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. An\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutanak ile gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
7. Yap\u0131lan incelemede dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunan 24\/4\/2024 tarihli \u201cTutanak ve Ara Karar\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belgenin ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutanak niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu ve bu belge d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ayr\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi ile \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 46. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 3\/7\/1940 tarihli ve 3890 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 1. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 206. maddesinin 28\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7101 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan \u201c\u2026muayyen e\u015fya ve akardan al\u0131nmas\u0131 laz\u0131m gelen resim ve vergi, rehinli alacaklardan sonra gelir.\u201d ibaresinin iptaline karar verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunun 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan REDD\u0130NE 30\/5\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 30\/5\/2024 tarihli, 2024\/107 esas – 2024\/109 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI \u00a0 Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/107 Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/109 Karar Tarihi : 30\/5\/2024 R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi. \u00a0 \u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 23. Hukuk Dairesi \u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 3\/7\/1940 tarihli ve 3890 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 1. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 206. maddesinin 28\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7101 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan \u201c\u2026muayyen e\u015fya ve akardan al\u0131nmas\u0131 laz\u0131m gelen resim ve vergi, rehinli alacaklardan sonra gelir.\u201d ibaresinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 5., 10., 35. ve 73. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir. OLAY: S\u0131ra cetveline y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131nda ilk derece mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n istinaf incelemesinde itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc Kanun\u2019un 206. maddesinin itiraz konusu kural\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir: \u201c(De\u011fi\u015fik birinci f\u0131kra: 28\/2\/2018-7101\/5 md.) Alacaklar\u0131 rehinli olan alacakl\u0131lar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f tutar\u0131 \u00fczerinde r\u00fc\u00e7han haklar\u0131 vard\u0131r. G\u00fcmr\u00fck resmi ve akar vergisi gibi Devlet tekliflerinden muayyen e\u015fya ve akardan al\u0131nmas\u0131 laz\u0131m gelen resim ve vergi, rehinli alacaklardan sonra gelir.\u201d II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME 1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r \u00d6mer GED\u0130K …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n