T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
A. \u00d6. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/56372)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 26\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ayd\u0131n DEM\u0130REL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kal\u0131nan s\u00fcrenin h\u00fckmedilen ceza s\u00fcresinden mahsup edilmesi talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Isparta Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu 25\/5\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, Mersin 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin (Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) 27\/5\/2016 tarihinde ba\u015flayan sorgusu sonras\u0131 31\/5\/2016 tarihinde verilen adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na dair kararla serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ayn\u0131 soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 29\/5\/2018 tarihinde yeniden g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve 5\/6\/2018 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, Isparta 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) taraf\u0131ndan 26\/2\/2019 tarihli kararla m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7tan 8 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan onanarak 29\/9\/2020 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Tarsus Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 15\/6\/2021 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnamede ba\u015fvurucunun bihakk\u0131n tahliye tarihi 21\/2\/2027, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi ise 15\/12\/2024 olarak tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u nedeniyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 7 g\u00fcn ile tutuklu kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 925 g\u00fcn (toplamda 932 g\u00fcn) ceza s\u00fcresinden mahsup edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu 12\/7\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle, m\u00fcddetnamede g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrenin ceza s\u00fcresinden eksik mahsup edildi\u011fini, 25\/5\/2016-31\/5\/2016 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrenin mahsup edilmedi\u011fini belirterek bu s\u00fcrenin de mahsup edilmesini infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011finden talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Burdur \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi), A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinden ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcrelerin, bu s\u00fcrelerin daha \u00f6nce mahsup edilip edilmedi\u011finin bildirilmesini ve mahkeme dosyas\u0131na ait iddianame, tutuklama ve tahliye m\u00fczekkereleri ile kesinle\u015fme \u015ferhli gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n iletilmesini istemi\u015ftir. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun 29\/5\/2018-5\/6\/2018 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin ba\u015fka bir h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde infaz edildi\u011fine dair herhangi bir bilgi ve belge bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgilerini iletmi\u015ftir. Cevap yaz\u0131s\u0131nda, 25\/5\/2016-31\/5\/2016 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir bilgiye yer verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 22\/10\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun talebini reddetmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7enin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“… H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc talebinde 2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda Isparta 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2018\/445 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda 7 g\u00fcn g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrelerin mahsubunu talep etmi\u015f, bu konuda Isparta 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere cevab\u0131nda; 29\/5\/2018-5\/6\/2018 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015f, bu g\u00fcnlerin ise Burdur CBS taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnameyle mahsubunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcddetnamesinden anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn talebin reddine karar verilerek….”<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131 22\/11\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 15\/12\/2023 tarihinde denetimli serbestli\u011fe ayr\u0131larak ceza infaz kurumundan tahliye olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Nihai karar ba\u015fvurucuya 25\/11\/2021 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olup ba\u015fvurucu 6\/12\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne ve ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131nda uygulanan ilk g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirinin mahsup edilmesi talebinin haks\u0131z olarak reddedilmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve di\u011fer baz\u0131 anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun 25\/5\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, 25\/5\/2016 tarihinde adliyeye sevk edildi\u011fi, 27\/5\/2016 tarihinde ba\u015flayan sorguda Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 31\/5\/2016 tarihinde adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi sonras\u0131 serbest b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvuru, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesi, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda kalaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreyi do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 olarak etkileyen durumlar\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (Burhan Yaz (3) [GK], B. No: 2021\/7919, 29\/5\/2024, \u00a7 43; \u0130brahim Uysal [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/1711, 23\/7\/2014, \u00a7 26; G\u00fcnay Okan [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/8114, 17\/9\/2014, \u00a7 13). Mahsup, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme s\u00fcresinin belirlenmesiyle ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ceza infaz kurumunda kal\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken s\u00fcreyle do\u011frudan ilgilidir (Ercan Bucak (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/11651, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7 41).<\/p>\n
16. Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilen bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve bu ba\u011flamda ceza infaz kurumunda tutulma s\u00fcresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, ceza mahkemesinin karar\u0131na uygun hareket edilmesi ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan zorunludur. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin ceza infaz kurumunda kalacaklar\u0131 s\u00fcrenin, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na ve ilgili mevzuata uygun olmas\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesi kapsam\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u0130brahim Uysal, \u00a7 32). Bununla birlikte Anayasa’da yer alan hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler ihlal edilmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece mahkemelerin kararlar\u0131ndaki kanunun yorumuna ya da maddi veya hukuki hatalara dair hususlar bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesinde ele al\u0131namaz (Abdullah \u00dcnal [2. B.], B. No: 2012\/1094, 7\/3\/2014, \u00a7 39).<\/p>\n
17. Mahsuba ili\u015fkin 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 63. maddesinde yer alan h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden \u00f6nce ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ve ki\u015finin h\u00fcrriyetini k\u0131s\u0131tlayan b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2ller nedeniyle ge\u00e7irilen s\u00fcrelerin h\u00fckmolunan hapis cezas\u0131ndan indirilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenleme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131na mahsuba ili\u015fkin bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130lgili yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131 mahsuba ili\u015fkin incelemelerinde mahsup \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemekle ve \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmu\u015fsa mahsup karar\u0131 vermekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcrler (Ercan Bucak (2),\u00a7 49).<\/p>\n
18. 25\/5\/2016-31\/5\/2016 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen ba\u015fvurucunun bu s\u00fcrenin ceza s\u00fcresinden mahsup talebi A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine eksik bilgi iletilmesi nedeniyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bu durum ba\u015fvurucunun mahsup talep etti\u011fi ceza ba\u011flam\u0131nda hapiste kalma s\u00fcresinin uzamas\u0131na neden olacakt\u0131r. Hukuk sistemimizde mahsubun mecburili\u011fi s\u00f6z konusudur. Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun belirlenenden daha fazla bir s\u00fcre h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun kalmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda hukuka uygun bir tutma niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ve miktar belirtmeksizin maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla ihlalin mahkeme karar\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, ceza infaz kurumundan tahliye olmu\u015ftur. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Di\u011fer taraftan yaln\u0131zca ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin tespitiyle giderilemeyecek olan manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya -s\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcrelerin daha sonra mahsup talebine konu edilebilece\u011fi de g\u00f6zetilerek- net 24.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucunun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi zararla ilgili bilgi ve belge sunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 24.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Burdur \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2021\/2123, K.2021\/2741) ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 26\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 26\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/56372 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR A. \u00d6. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/56372) Karar Tarihi: 26\/3\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Ayd\u0131n DEM\u0130REL Ba\u015fvurucu : I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kal\u0131nan s\u00fcrenin h\u00fckmedilen ceza s\u00fcresinden mahsup edilmesi talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Isparta Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu 25\/5\/2016 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, Mersin 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin (Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) 27\/5\/2016 tarihinde ba\u015flayan sorgusu sonras\u0131 31\/5\/2016 tarihinde verilen adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na dair kararla serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ayn\u0131 soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 29\/5\/2018 tarihinde yeniden g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve 5\/6\/2018 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, Isparta 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) taraf\u0131ndan 26\/2\/2019 tarihli kararla m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7tan 8 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan onanarak 29\/9\/2020 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Tarsus Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 15\/6\/2021 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnamede ba\u015fvurucunun bihakk\u0131n tahliye tarihi 21\/2\/2027, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi ise 15\/12\/2024 olarak tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u nedeniyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 7 g\u00fcn ile tutuklu kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 925 g\u00fcn (toplamda 932 g\u00fcn) …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n