T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
MAH\u0130R RASOOL HAM\u0130D HAMAD BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/53794)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 26\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
H\u00fcseyin \u00d6zg\u00fcr SEV\u0130ML\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mahir Rasool Hamid HAMAD<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u015eeref AK\u00c7AY<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, karar\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130stanbul’un Fatih il\u00e7esinde 21\/7\/2018 tarihinde Irak uyruklu B.N.T.T.nin \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131yla ilgili \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olaya ili\u015fkin kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen yakalama ve muhafaza alt\u0131na alma ile ara\u015ft\u0131rma tutanaklar\u0131nda \u015fu a\u00e7\u0131klamalara yer verilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
i. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri 21\/7\/2018 tarihinde saat 03.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda devriye g\u00f6revi yapmaktayken yedi sekiz el silah sesi duymu\u015f, sesin geldi\u011fi y\u00f6ne bakt\u0131klar\u0131nda iki erke\u011fin Hac\u0131 Bayram Mektebi Sokak i\u00e7erisine do\u011fru yaya olarak ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ekip otomobili ile takip etmeye ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131 bu ki\u015filerin dikkat \u00e7ekmemek i\u00e7in sokak \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan itibaren ko\u015fmay\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131p taksiye bindikleri s\u0131rada taksi durdurulmu\u015ftur. Taksinin arka koltu\u011funda oturan ki\u015fi \u00fcst aramas\u0131 yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ko\u015farak ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f, arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015fmaya ba\u015flayan emniyet bek\u00e7isi O.P. havaya ate\u015f a\u00e7m\u0131\u015fsa da o anda bu ki\u015fiyi yakalayamam\u0131\u015f, taksideki di\u011fer ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda ise yakalama i\u015flemi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. Yakalanan ki\u015finin Irak uyruklu A.J.M.M. oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; bu ki\u015finin k\u0131yafetlerinde, kol ve bacaklar\u0131nda kan lekeleri oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu s\u0131rada haber merkezi taraf\u0131ndan minib\u00fcs duraklar\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde b\u0131\u00e7ak ve ate\u015fli silahla yaralanm\u0131\u015f h\u00e2lde bir ki\u015fi oldu\u011funun anons edilmesi \u00fczerine olay yerine gidildi\u011finde yerde yatar h\u00e2lde bir erke\u011fin oldu\u011fu ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131nda \u00e7ok say\u0131da kovan tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. Irak uyruklu B.N.T.T. oldu\u011fu belirlenen yaral\u0131 hastaneye kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ktan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f, olay yerinden ka\u00e7an ki\u015filerin girdikleri sokakta yap\u0131lan kontrolde kanl\u0131 h\u00e2lde bir adet b\u0131\u00e7ak ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. A.J.M.M.den soruldu\u011funda yan\u0131ndaki ki\u015finin ad\u0131n\u0131 H.M. olarak bildi\u011fini ve ikamet etti\u011fi yeri g\u00f6sterebilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rmada ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en ki\u015fi bulunamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ki\u015fiyle ilgili yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rmada ger\u00e7ek isminin H.M.W.L. oldu\u011fu belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Olay yeri inceleme raporunda; Turgut \u00d6zal Millet Caddesindeki tramvay dura\u011f\u0131nda bulunan trafik \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131nda, kald\u0131r\u0131m \u00fczerinde ve kald\u0131r\u0131m dibindeki yol \u00fczerinde 10 adet kovan ile 1 adet deforme mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi oldu\u011fu, olay yerine yakla\u015f\u0131k elli metre uzakl\u0131ktaki d\u00fckkan \u00f6n\u00fcnde kan lekeli b\u0131\u00e7ak, y\u00fcz elli metre uzakl\u0131ktaki cadde \u00fczerinde de 1 adet kovan bulundu\u011fu, hastane morgunda bulunan maktul\u00fcn v\u00fccudunda kesi yaralar\u0131 ile \u00e7e\u015fitli yerlerinde 11 adet mermi isabet deli\u011fi oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Olay yerinde bulunan i\u015fyerlerine ait kameralar\u0131n incelenmesi sonucunda kolluk \u015fu tespitlere ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n
i. Millet Caddesindeki i\u015f han\u0131nda faaliyet g\u00f6steren T. Eczanesine ait kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinde; olay tarihinde saat 02.57.21’de maktul\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na girip yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, A.J.M.M.nin maktule b\u0131\u00e7akla sald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, H.M.W.L.nin de tabanca ile ate\u015f etti\u011fi belirlenmi\u015ftir. Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta bu i\u015fyerine ait kameran\u0131n g\u00fcncel saate g\u00f6re 1 dakika ileride oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. Ayn\u0131 mahallede bulunan Turgut \u00d6zal Caddesindeki Y. Ecza Deposuna ait kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinde; olay tarihinde saat 02.48.53’te kameran\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na sakall\u0131, spor ayakkab\u0131l\u0131, k\u0131sa kollu renkli ti\u015f\u00f6rtl\u00fc bir erke\u011fin girerek eliyle bel k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 tutup muhtemelen elinde bulunan silah\u0131 beline koymaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ko\u015far vaziyette ka\u00e7arak uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, ka\u00e7an ki\u015finin a\u00e7\u0131k kimli\u011fi belirlenemeyen Mahir M. oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. A.J.M.M. soru\u015fturma evresinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadelerinde;<\/p>\n
i. Olaydan 7 ay \u00f6nce T\u00fcrkiye’ye giri\u015f yap\u0131p \u0130stanbul’a geldi\u011fini, 20\/7\/2018 tarihinde saat 20.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda evinden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p Aksaray’da deniz kenar\u0131na gitti\u011fini, burada ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 biray\u0131 i\u00e7erken yan\u0131na \u00f6nceden tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, Irak uyruklu ve ad\u0131n\u0131n Mahir oldu\u011funu bildi\u011fi arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n geldi\u011fini, Mahir’in de bira i\u00e7tikten sonra yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tek ba\u015f\u0131na eve giderken olay yerine geldi\u011finde \u00f6nceden tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 H.M.W.L. ile maktul\u00fc tart\u0131\u015f\u0131rken g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, yanlar\u0131na geldi\u011fi anda H.M.W.L.nin elindeki tabancayla maktule ate\u015f etti\u011fini, orada bulunan di\u011fer ki\u015filerin ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
ii. Silah sesini duyunca kendisinin de ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yol kenar\u0131nda duran taksiye bindi\u011fi anda H.M.W.L.nin de arkadan gelip taksinin arka koltu\u011funa oturdu\u011funu, yolda k\u0131sa mesafe gittikten sonra polislerin taksiyi durdurdu\u011funu, taksiden inen H.M.W.L.nin polisten ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maktul ile H.M.W.L.nin neden kavga etti\u011fini bilmedi\u011fini, kendisinin olaya kar\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerde maktule b\u0131\u00e7akla sald\u0131ran ki\u015finin kendisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130stanbul 10. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 23\/7\/2018 tarihinde A.J.M.M. ile H.M.W.L.nin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatlar\u0131n\u0131n 29\/5\/2018 il\u00e2 23\/7\/2018 tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki ileti\u015fimlerinin tespitine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130leti\u015fimin tespitine dair kay\u0131tlarda, F.A.R.R. adl\u0131 ki\u015fi ile H.M.W.L. aras\u0131nda 21\/7\/2018 tarihinde saat 03.14.25’te 21 saniyelik g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerine dair incelemeler ile olaya ili\u015fkin istihbar\u00ee ve sokak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sonucunda olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ile F.A.R.R.nin de oldu\u011fu belirlenmi\u015f, bu iki ki\u015fi 2\/8\/2018 tarihinde Habur Kara S\u0131n\u0131r Kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak T\u00fcrkiye’den \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapmakta olduklar\u0131 s\u0131rada yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer yandan H.M.W.L. de 9\/8\/2018 tarihinde Fatih’te yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. F.A.R.R. soru\u015fturma evresinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadelerinde; maktul\u00fc ve di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcphelileri tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maktul\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131yla ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye’ye gezmek i\u00e7in geldikten sonra annesinin rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle Irak’a d\u00f6nmek \u00fczereyken yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. H.M.W.L. soru\u015fturma evresinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadelerinde; T\u00fcrkiye’ye ka\u00e7ak yollarla girdi\u011fini, maktul\u00fc ve A.J.M.M.yi tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu olaya kar\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndaki ki\u015finin de kendisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu soru\u015fturma evresinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadelerinde; 2011 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri T\u00fcrkiye’de oldu\u011funu, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en ki\u015filerden sadece A.J.M.M.yi tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sedef hastas\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in tedavi olmak amac\u0131yla \u0130stanbul’a geldi\u011fini, A.J.M.M.nin arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n kendisine sadece bir kavga olay\u0131ndan bahsetti\u011fini, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerindeki ki\u015filerden birinin kendisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tedavi paras\u0131n\u0131 tedarik edemedi\u011fi i\u00e7in Irak’a d\u00f6nmeye karar verdi\u011fini, s\u00f6z konusu olaya kar\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Ka\u00e7an ki\u015fiyi kovalayan kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinden al\u0131nan iki tabanca ile olay yerinde bulunan kovanlar \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme \u00fczerine \u0130stanbul Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131 M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck) taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 30\/7\/2018 tarihli uzmanl\u0131k raporunda; 11 kovan\u0131n farkl\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7 tabancadan at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Cerrahpa\u015fa Caddesi \u00fczerinde bulunan bir kovan\u0131n kolluk g\u00f6revlisi O.P.den al\u0131nan tabancalar\u0131n birinden at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer 10 kovan\u0131n ise bu tabancalardan at\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ayn\u0131 tarihli di\u011fer uzmanl\u0131k raporuna g\u00f6re maktul ile A.J.M.M.nin el svap numunelerinde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Maktul\u00fcn annesi olan R.J.K. kollukta 5\/9\/2018 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde; maktul\u00fcn olaydan 1 y\u0131l \u00f6nce ticaret yapmak i\u00e7in T\u00fcrkiye’ye gitti\u011fini, o\u011flunun Fatih’te A.J.M.M. ile ayn\u0131 evde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 5 y\u0131ld\u0131r tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, A.J.M.M.nin Irak’taki evlerine o\u011fluyla birlikte ara s\u0131ra geldi\u011fini, o\u011flunun 2018 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Nisan ay\u0131nda bu evden ayr\u0131l\u0131p H. adl\u0131 arkada\u015f\u0131yla kalmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, o\u011fluna evden neden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011funda A.J.M.M.nin uyu\u015fturucu madde kullan\u0131p satt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu y\u00fczden aralar\u0131nda sorun oldu\u011funu anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olaydan 3 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce o\u011fluyla telefonla konu\u015ftu\u011funda A.J.M.M. ile H.M. adl\u0131 ki\u015filerin kendisini \u00f6ld\u00fcrmekle tehdit ettiklerini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini ancak nedenini anlatmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ard\u0131ndan o\u011flunun arkada\u015flar\u0131 olan A.J.M.M., H.M., F.M. ve Mahir Rasool taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, olaydan sonra \u0130stanbul’daki akrabas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131na geldi\u011finde onu N.M. adl\u0131 bir ki\u015finin telefonla aray\u0131p bu olaya polisi kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmamalar\u0131 konusunda kendisini tehdit etti\u011fini, bu ki\u015fiyi ara\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130stanbul’da insan ticareti ve uyu\u015fturucu ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, o\u011flunu \u00f6ld\u00fcren ki\u015filerin ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00e7etenin lideri oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 25\/9\/2018 tarihli otopsi raporunda; maktul \u00fczerinde 9 adet ate\u015fli silah mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi giri\u015f yaras\u0131 olup bunlardan d\u00f6rd\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc nitelik ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fcm at\u0131\u015flar\u0131n biti\u015fik at\u0131\u015f mesafesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, kesici aletten kaynaklanan yaralar\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc mahiyette olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, maktul\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ate\u015fli silah mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 \u00e7e\u015fitli k\u0131r\u0131klar ile birlikte i\u00e7 organ ve b\u00fcy\u00fck damar yaralanmas\u0131ndan geli\u015fen i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f kanama sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturma sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra A.J.M.M., H.M.W.L. ve F.A.R.R. hakk\u0131nda maktul\u00fc i\u015ftirak h\u00e2linde kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fckleri iddias\u0131yla 2\/10\/2018 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclen yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda Mahkeme, i\u015fyerine ait kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerle san\u0131klara ait foto\u011fraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu hususta d\u00fczenlenen 20\/11\/2018 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; Y. Ecza Deposuna ait g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin a\u00e7\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, T. Eczanesine ait g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerde maktul\u00fcn kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na girdi\u011fi s\u0131rada iki ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan darp edildi\u011fi, maktul\u00fcn yere d\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine bir ki\u015finin darp etmeye devam etti\u011fi, di\u011ferinin bu s\u0131rada maktule ate\u015f etti\u011fi, bir s\u00fcre bo\u011fu\u015ftuktan sonra iki ki\u015finin de ka\u00e7\u0131p uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin zay\u0131f olmas\u0131, olay\u0131n kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan uzak bir yerde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi, ka\u00e7an ki\u015finin kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na z\u0131t y\u00f6nde gitmeleri nedeniyle olay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ki\u015filerin san\u0131klardan hangileri oldu\u011fu konusunda net bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 22\/1\/2019 tarihli celsesinde al\u0131nan ifadeleri \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. San\u0131k A.J.M.M.;<\/p>\n
(1) Maktul ile yak\u0131n arkada\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131, maktul\u00fcn olaydan \u00f6nce Irak’a d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde bir \u00f6ld\u00fcrme olay\u0131na kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu olay\u0131 kendisine maktul\u00fcn anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maktul ile ayn\u0131 evde kal\u0131rken maktul\u00fcn uyu\u015fturucu kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle onunla tart\u0131\u015f\u0131p evden gitmesini istedi\u011fini, bu nedenle maktulle aras\u0131nda husumet ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olaydan \u00f6nceki tarihlerde maktul\u00fcn kendisini \u00f6ld\u00fcrmekle tehdit etti\u011fini ve eve gelip b\u0131\u00e7akla yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
(2) Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc H.M.W.L.yi telefonla arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, onun da kendisine ba\u015fvurucuyla beraber oldu\u011funu ve ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine gelen paray\u0131 teslim alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, paray\u0131 ald\u0131ktan sonra sahilde beraber i\u00e7ki i\u00e7meyi teklif etti\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucu ve H.M.W.L ile birlikte sahilde i\u00e7ki i\u00e7ip d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yoluna ge\u00e7tiklerini, o s\u0131rada yanlar\u0131nda F.A.R.R.nin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
(3) Yusufpa\u015fa’ya geldiklerinde ba\u015fvurucunun midesinin bulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle kustu\u011funu, onu hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrmeyi teklif ettiklerini, kendisinin o esnada tuvalete gitti\u011fini, bu s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucu ile H.M.W.L.nin yava\u015f ad\u0131mlarla gitmeye devam ettiklerini, yanlar\u0131na geldi\u011finde onlar\u0131n minib\u00fcs dura\u011f\u0131na geldiklerini, ikisini ileride maktul ile beraberlerken g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, kendisini g\u00f6ren maktul\u00fcn do\u011frudan b\u0131\u00e7ak \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131p kendisine sald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, savunma amac\u0131yla maktule vurup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, sonra da maktul\u00fc b\u0131\u00e7aklay\u0131p d\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,<\/p>\n
(4) Kendisine soruldu\u011funda; olay an\u0131nda F.A.R.R.nin orada olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay yerinde ba\u015fvurucu da d\u00e2hil \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fi olduklar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun hi\u00e7bir \u015fey yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay an\u0131nda maktul kendisine sald\u0131r\u0131nca di\u011fer ikisinin oray\u0131 terk ettiklerini, ancak H.M.W.L.nin de maktule tabanca ile ate\u015f etti\u011fini, olaydan sonra kendisinin de ka\u00e7\u0131p taksiye bindi\u011fini, arkas\u0131ndan da H.M.W.L.nin geldi\u011fini, polis durdurunca da H.M.W.L.nin ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun da sonradan olay yerinden ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soru\u015fturma evresindeki ifadelerinin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. H.M.W.L.;<\/p>\n
(1) San\u0131k A.J.M.M. ile ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maktul ile de Irak’ta tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve 2012 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri arkada\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131, aralar\u0131nda sorun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fvurucuyla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine Irak’tan havale yoluyla para geldi\u011fini s\u00f6yleyip birlikte para \u00e7ekmeyi teklif etti\u011fini, yoldayken A.J.M.M.nin telefonla aray\u0131p i\u00e7ki i\u00e7meye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, paray\u0131 ald\u0131ktan sonra yanlar\u0131na A.J.M.M.nin gelmesi \u00fczerine birlikte sahile gidip \u00fc\u00e7\u00fc birlikte i\u00e7ki i\u00e7tiklerini,<\/p>\n
(2) \u0130\u00e7ki i\u00e7tikten sonra yemek yemeye giderken ba\u015fvurucunun midesinin bulan\u0131p kustu\u011funu, A.J.M.M.nin de onu hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrmek istedi\u011fini, o s\u0131rada da A.J.M.M.nin tuvalete gitti\u011fini, kendisinin de ba\u015fvurucuyla birlikte y\u00fcr\u00fcmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, o esnada maktul\u00fcn kendilerini yolda g\u00f6r\u00fcp \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tokala\u015fmak i\u00e7in elini uzatt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda maktul\u00fcn “Sen adam de\u011filsin” diyip elini itti\u011fini ve k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fini, yanlar\u0131na A.J.M.M.nin gelmesi \u00fczerine maktul\u00fcn onun \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve ikisinin kavga etti\u011fini, o anda birinin elini g\u00f6be\u011fine g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ancak aradaki mesafeden dolay\u0131 elini uzatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde ne oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
(3) Bir s\u00fcre sonra maktul\u00fcn yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve g\u00f6be\u011finden bir \u015fey \u00e7\u0131karmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnce kendisini korumak i\u00e7in \u00fczerinde ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 tabancayla maktule ate\u015f etti\u011fini, olay sonras\u0131nda kendisinin korkup ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tabancay\u0131 da yolda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun uzakta durdu\u011funu ve maktule “Ay\u0131pt\u0131r k\u00fcf\u00fcr etme” dedi\u011fini, onun ne yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
iii. Ba\u015fvurucu;<\/p>\n
(1) Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc kendisine Irak’tan havale geldi\u011fini, Aksaray’da H.M.W.L.yi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, paray\u0131 \u00e7ekmek i\u00e7in birlikte giderken yolda A.J.M.M.nin H.M.W.L.yi arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, para \u00e7ektikten sonra \u00fc\u00e7\u00fc birlikte sahilde oturup i\u00e7ki i\u00e7tiklerini, di\u011fer san\u0131klarda b\u0131\u00e7ak ya da tabanca bulundu\u011fundan haberinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yolunda midesinin bulan\u0131p kustu\u011funu, A.J.M.M.nin de tuvalete gitmek i\u00e7in yanlar\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin de H.M.W.L. ile beraber cadde \u00fczerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fckleri s\u0131rada maktul\u00fcn H.M.W.L.yi g\u00f6r\u00fcp \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, H.M.W.L.nin de tokala\u015fmak i\u00e7in ona yana\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131nda maktul\u00fcn eliyle itti\u011fini, bu s\u0131rada A.J.M.M.nin de geldi\u011fini, maktul\u00fcn ikisine de k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmesi \u00fczerine aralar\u0131nda kavga \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle kendisinin oradan uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
(2) Korktu\u011fu i\u00e7in taraflar\u0131 ay\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve soru\u015fturma evresinde olaya ili\u015fkin farkl\u0131 beyanda bulundu\u011funu, olay yerinden ayr\u0131l\u0131rken bir taksiye binip sahil taraf\u0131na gitti\u011fini,<\/p>\n
(3) F.A.R.R.nin telefon hatt\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 zaman bu hatta ait SIM kart\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kendisine verdi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. San\u0131k F.A.R.R.;<\/p>\n
Olaydan sonra H.M.W.L. ile yap\u0131lan telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesine konu hatt\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay gecesi di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n yan\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Irak’a gitmek \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucuyla s\u0131n\u0131ra geldiklerinde yakaland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kendisinin olayla ilgili bilgi verdi\u011fini ancak kendisinin olaya kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir \u015fey s\u00f6ylemedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Mahkeme, ilk bilirki\u015fi raporunda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclenemeyen kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fyerinden kolluk arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla temin ettikten sonra g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri yeniden bilirki\u015fiye teslim etmi\u015ftir. Bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 7\/2\/2019 tarihli ek raporda, Y. Ecza Deposuna ait kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re \u00e7evredeki insanlar\u0131n hareketlili\u011finden dolay\u0131 olay\u0131n saat 02.51 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, T. Eczanesine ait kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla Y. Ecza Deposuna ait kay\u0131tlar aras\u0131nda 6 dakikal\u0131k fark oldu\u011fu, olay yerinin her iki kamera a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olmas\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n kamera a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na hi\u00e7 girmemi\u015f olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla san\u0131klara ait foto\u011fraflar aras\u0131nda mukayese yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 4\/4\/2019 tarihli celsesinde sundu\u011fu esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaada;san\u0131k A.J.M.M.nin maktule b\u0131\u00e7akla vurdu\u011funu, H.M.W.L.nin de tabancayla ate\u015f etti\u011fini, kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve uzmanl\u0131k raporuna g\u00f6re olayda kullan\u0131lan ve ele ge\u00e7irilemeyen di\u011fer tabancay\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, b\u00f6ylelikle ba\u015fvurucu ile san\u0131klar A.J.M.M. ile H.M.W.L.nin kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu i\u015ftirak h\u00e2linde i\u015fledi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirerek bu san\u0131klar\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131k F.A.R.R. hakk\u0131nda ise beraat karar\u0131 verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Yarg\u0131lama sonucunda Mahkeme; san\u0131k F.A.R.R.nin at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan beraatine, san\u0131klar A.J.M.M. ve H.M.W.L. ile ba\u015fvurucunun kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan 25 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Mahk\u00fbmiyet gerek\u00e7esinde;<\/p>\n
i. San\u0131klar H.M.W.L. ve A.J.M.M. ile ba\u015fvurucunun sahilde bulu\u015fup i\u00e7ki i\u00e7tikten sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrken maktul ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131p aralar\u0131nda konu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131n, aniden ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan kas\u0131tla san\u0131k A.J.M.M.nin b\u0131\u00e7akla san\u0131k H.M.W.L.nin tabanca ile ate\u015f ettikten sonra san\u0131klar\u0131n her birinin olay yerinden ka\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinden ve san\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
ii. San\u0131klar A.J.M.M. ile H.M.W.L.nin eylemlerini kabul etti\u011fi, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinde olay yerinden ka\u00e7an \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin kimli\u011fi tespit edilememi\u015f olsa da beraat eden san\u0131k F.A.R.R.nin kendi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya vermesi, bu hat kullan\u0131larak olaydan sonra saat 03.14.25’te san\u0131k H.M.W.L. ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda bu ki\u015finin ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri di\u011fer iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131nda bulunan ba\u015fvurucu oldu\u011funun kabul edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
iii. Maktul\u00fcn san\u0131klarca darbedildi\u011fi, san\u0131k A.J.M.M.nin maktule b\u0131\u00e7akla vurup maktul\u00fcn yere d\u00fc\u015fmesinden sonra eylemlerini sonland\u0131rmayarak devam etti\u011fi, maktul yerde yatarken san\u0131k H.M.W.L.nin tabancayla hayati b\u00f6lgelerine olacak \u015fekilde be\u015f el ate\u015f etti\u011fi,<\/p>\n
iv. \u00dc\u00e7 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay yerinden ka\u00e7arak uzakla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 esnada maktul\u00fcn yerde yatar vaziyette kalmas\u0131, su\u00e7ta kullan\u0131lan aletlerin niteli\u011fi, silahlar\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131, at\u0131\u015f ve kesici\/delici alet yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n fazlal\u0131\u011f\u0131, darbe ve at\u0131\u015flar\u0131n isabet yerleri, san\u0131klar\u0131n eyleme son verme \u015fekli dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n kastlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
v. Meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm neticesi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n birlikte su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131na g\u00f6re hareket ederek fiil \u00fczerinde ortak h\u00e2kimiyet kurarak eylemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, bu itibarla 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 37. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda her \u00fc\u00e7 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da fail olarak maktul\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi su\u00e7undan sorumlu oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu;<\/p>\n
i. T\u00fcrkiye’den gitmek istemesinin olaydan dolay\u0131 ka\u00e7ma amac\u0131ndan kaynaklanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerine i\u015ftirak etmi\u015f olsa Irak’a ka\u00e7ak yollardan gitmesi gerekti\u011fini, yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihe kadar hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
ii. Kamera kayd\u0131nda elini beline g\u00f6t\u00fcren ki\u015finin kendisi oldu\u011funun tespit edilemedi\u011fini, aksinin kabul\u00fc h\u00e2linde de alkoll\u00fc olmas\u0131 nedeniyle elini beline g\u00f6t\u00fcrmesinin do\u011fal oldu\u011funu, olay an\u0131nda kendisinde tabanca bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde bu y\u00f6nde yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmenin dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
iii. Olay an\u0131nda san\u0131k H.M.W.L.nin havaya ate\u015f a\u00e7mas\u0131 nedeniyle korkup ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilirki\u015fi raporunda da tespit edilen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcye dair saatin 02.48 oldu\u011funu, olay\u0131n ise saat 02.57’de ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini, bu durumda \u00f6ld\u00fcrme olay\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k 9 dakika \u00f6nce olay yerini terk etti\u011finin belli oldu\u011funu, olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinden \u00f6nce olay yerinden ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in sonras\u0131nda di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n yapt\u0131klar\u0131 eylemlerden de haberdar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
iv. Maktulden ve san\u0131k A.J.M.M.den al\u0131nan el svaplar\u0131nda da at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 rastland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle olayda kullan\u0131lan di\u011fer silah\u0131n maktule ya da san\u0131k A.J.M.M.ye ait olabilece\u011fini,<\/p>\n
v. Maktul\u00fcn v\u00fccudunda bulunan mermi \u00e7ekirdeklerinin olayda kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen iki tabancadan hangisine ait oldu\u011fu konusunda bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, bu inceleme yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n olayda ikinci tabancan\u0131n kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa da \u00f6l\u00fcm neticesine etkisi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenemeyece\u011fini,<\/p>\n
vi. Alkoll\u00fc olmas\u0131 nedeniyle olaydan sonra san\u0131k H.M.W.L.nin kendisini hangi nedenle arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonu\u00e7 olarak olay\u0131n di\u011fer iki san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi ve bu san\u0131klar\u0131n kendisini su\u00e7lay\u0131c\u0131 beyanda bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 sabit oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde, kendisinin i\u015flemedi\u011fi eylemden sorumlu tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
21. \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi (Daire) aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu san\u0131klar\u0131n istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru taleplerini 22\/1\/2020 tarihinde esastan reddetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunda dile getirdi\u011fi itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar ederek Daire karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi 7\/6\/2021 tarihli ilam\u0131yla Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na, bir \u00fcyenin ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fine dair kar\u015f\u0131oyuyla karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 2\/7\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 8\/7\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Gerek\u00e7eli Karar Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu; istinaf ve temyiz kanun yolunda dile getirdi\u011fi itirazlar do\u011frultusunda, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n muhakeme s\u00fcrecinde kendi lehine verdikleri ifadelerle olay an\u0131na ili\u015fkin kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda yer alan veriler uyar\u0131nca kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una i\u015ftirak etmedi\u011fine dair davan\u0131n esas\u0131na etkili itirazlar\u0131 konusunda de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmadan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
25. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihatlara de\u011finildikten sonra an\u0131lan hakk\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine dair iddian\u0131n incelenmesinde ilgili mevzuat\u0131n, yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda dile getirdi\u011fi itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvuru, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
27. Anayasa Mahkemesi, \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen bir\u00e7ok ba\u015fvuruda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini belirlemi\u015ftir. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, Anayasa’n\u0131n 141. maddesi de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ki\u015filerin adil bir \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamay\u0131 ve denetlemeyi ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, yarg\u0131lamada ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen t\u00fcm iddialara ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde yan\u0131t verilmesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lamaz. Bu nedenle gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterme zorunlulu\u011funun kapsam\u0131 karar\u0131n niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015febilir. Taraflar\u0131n uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonucuna etkili nitelikteki iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n mahkemesince ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekir. Di\u011fer taraftan kanun yolu incelemesi yapan merciin yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan mahkemeyle ayn\u0131 sonuca ula\u015fmas\u0131 ve bunu ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyi kullanarak veya ayn\u0131 at\u0131fla karar\u0131na yans\u0131tmas\u0131, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterlidir. Bununla birlikte ilk derece mahkemesince kar\u015f\u0131lanmayan iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n bu defa kanun yolu merciince de de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline yol a\u00e7ar (Muhittin Kaya ve Muhittin Kaya \u0130n\u015faat Taahh\u00fct Madencilik G\u0131da Turizm Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. \u015eti. [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/1213, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 25, 26; Vesim Parlak [2. B.], B. No: 2012\/1034, 20\/3\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 33, 34; Yasemin Ek\u015fi [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 56, 57; Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31-39; M\u00fcn\u00fcr Ata [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/4958, 22\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 37-43; Hikmet \u00c7elik ve di\u011ferleri [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/4894, 15\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 54-59; \u015eah Tar\u0131m \u0130n\u015faat Turizm Seyahat Yat\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/7847, 9\/3\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 36-48; Mehmet Yavuz [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/2995, 20\/2\/2014, \u00a7 51).<\/p>\n
28. Somut olayda Mahkeme; maktule y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen b\u0131\u00e7ak ve tabancayla sald\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerinin ba\u015flay\u0131p sonland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ana kadar ba\u015fvurucunun, haklar\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kesinle\u015fen di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n yanlar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu, eylemi onlarla birlikte ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve sald\u0131r\u0131dan sonra bu san\u0131klarla birlikte olay yerinden ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; iki kamera kayd\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki zaman fark\u0131 itibar\u0131yla olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinden \u00f6nce oradan ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair savunmas\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015fse de (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 16, 20) bu y\u00f6ndeki beyan\u0131nda dahi tabancayla ate\u015f edilmesinden sonra ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmesi, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n da ba\u015fvurucunun olay an\u0131nda yanlar\u0131nda oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemeleri ve uzmanl\u0131k raporlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re de maktule sald\u0131r\u0131 ile olay yerinden ka\u00e7ma eylemlerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi s\u00fcre dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermedi\u011finden s\u00f6z etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonucuna etkili nitelikteki iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131, kanun yolu incelemesi sonucunda verilen kararda de\u011ferlendirme konusu h\u00fck\u00fcm ve gerek\u00e7esinin uygun bulundu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir ihlal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
29. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucunun;<\/p>\n
i. Su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuldu\u011fu muhakeme s\u00fcreci itibar\u0131yla ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Mehmet Emin K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 ([2. B.], B. No: 2013\/5267, 7\/3\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 19-32) ve Mehmet \u015eim\u015fek ([1. B.], B. No: 2018\/10953, 22\/7\/2020) kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131; mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuldu\u011fu s\u00fcre\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n \u00c7.\u00d6. ([GK], B. No: 2014\/5927, 19\/7\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 36-39) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131, <\/p>\n
ii. Delillerin toplanmamas\u0131 ve bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00fcksel Han\u00e7er ([1. B.], B. No: 2013\/2116, 23\/1\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 14-21) karar\u0131, yeterli delil elde edilmeden mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n da Ahmet Sa\u011flam ([2. B.], B. No: 2013\/3351, 18\/9\/2013) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik kriterlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerine BIRAKILMASINA 26\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 26\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/53794 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR MAH\u0130R RASOOL HAM\u0130D HAMAD BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/53794) Karar Tarihi: 26\/3\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : H\u00fcseyin \u00d6zg\u00fcr SEV\u0130ML\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Mahir Rasool Hamid HAMAD Vekili : Av. \u015eeref AK\u00c7AY I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, karar\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u0130stanbul’un Fatih il\u00e7esinde 21\/7\/2018 tarihinde Irak uyruklu B.N.T.T.nin \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131yla ilgili \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olaya ili\u015fkin kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen yakalama ve muhafaza alt\u0131na alma ile ara\u015ft\u0131rma tutanaklar\u0131nda \u015fu a\u00e7\u0131klamalara yer verilmi\u015ftir: i. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri 21\/7\/2018 tarihinde saat 03.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda devriye g\u00f6revi yapmaktayken yedi sekiz el silah sesi duymu\u015f, sesin geldi\u011fi y\u00f6ne bakt\u0131klar\u0131nda iki erke\u011fin Hac\u0131 Bayram Mektebi Sokak i\u00e7erisine do\u011fru yaya olarak ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ekip otomobili ile takip etmeye ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131 bu ki\u015filerin dikkat \u00e7ekmemek i\u00e7in sokak \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan itibaren ko\u015fmay\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131p taksiye bindikleri s\u0131rada taksi durdurulmu\u015ftur. Taksinin arka koltu\u011funda oturan ki\u015fi \u00fcst aramas\u0131 yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ko\u015farak ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f, arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015fmaya ba\u015flayan emniyet bek\u00e7isi O.P. havaya ate\u015f a\u00e7m\u0131\u015fsa da o anda bu ki\u015fiyi yakalayamam\u0131\u015f, taksideki di\u011fer ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda ise yakalama i\u015flemi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. ii. Yakalanan ki\u015finin Irak …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n