{"id":111914,"date":"2025-06-09T23:43:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-09T20:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-06-09T23:43:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-09T20:43:00","slug":"izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<br \/>\n\u0130ZM\u0130R<br \/>\nB\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130<br \/>\n11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/p>\n<p>DOSYA NO : 2021\/637<br \/>\nKARAR NO : 2023\/1934<\/p>\n<p>T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A<br \/>\nB \u00d6 L G E A D L \u0130 Y E M A H K E M E S \u0130 K A R A R I<\/p>\n<p>\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN<br \/>\nMAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130ZM\u0130R 3. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130<br \/>\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 03.12.2020<br \/>\nNUMARASI : 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K.<br \/>\nDAVANIN KONUSU : Tazminat<br \/>\nKARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023<br \/>\nKARAR YAZIM TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023<\/p>\n<p>\u0130zmir 3.Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinin 03.12.2020 tarih 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Dairemizce incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve istinaf dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, \u00fcye &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenip ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup, incelendi.<\/p>\n<p>GERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc :<\/p>\n<p>DAVA : Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar\u0131n, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc maliki ve ZMM sigortac\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu arac\u0131n kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 trafik kazas\u0131nda davac\u0131ya ait ara\u00e7ta maddi hasar meydana geldi\u011fini, kusurun kar\u015f\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcnde oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fan zarar\u0131ndan sorumlu oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin zarar\u0131 kar\u0131\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek; fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde 34.220,00-TL hasar 10.000,00-TL de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm daval\u0131lardan, 18.000,00-TL kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n ise daval\u0131 i\u015fletenlerden olay tarihinden i\u015fleyecek ticari faizi ile birlikte tahsiline, karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015f, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131na ili\u015fkin dava de\u011ferini 23.000,00-TL olacak \u015fekilde art\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>CEVAP : Daval\u0131 &#8230; Sigorta A.\u015e. vekili, kazaya kar\u0131\u015fan arac\u0131n daval\u0131 nezdinde ZMMS poli\u00e7esi ile sigortal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funun poli\u00e7e limit olan 33.000,00-TL oldu\u011funu, de\u011fer kayb\u0131 tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131nda ZMMS genel \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti ac\u0131s\u0131ndan da daval\u0131n\u0131n poli\u00e7e limiti oran\u0131nda sorumlu tutulabilece\u011fini, olay tarihinden faiz talep edilemeyece\u011fini, belirterek; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 &#8230; \u015eti. vekili, talep edilen tamir i\u015f\u00e7ilik ve par\u00e7a bedelinin sigortan\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funda olup sigorta \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu hasar\u0131n \u00f6denmesinin kabul edildi\u011fini, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n eksik evrak ibraz etmesi nedeniyle \u00f6demenin gecikti\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n kazan\u00e7 kay\u0131p bedelinden sorumlu tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, belirterek; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARININ \u00d6ZET\u0130 : Mahkemece iddia, savunma, benimsenen bilirki\u015fi raporu ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 &#8230; Sigorta nezdinde sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc daval\u0131 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc &#8230;&#8217;in % 40 oran\u0131nda tali, daval\u0131 &#8230; Ltd. \u015eirketi&#8217;nin % 60 oran\u0131nda asli kusurlu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ise kusursuz oldu\u011fu, dava konusu ara\u00e7ta kaza nedeniyle toplam 34.220.00-TL hasar meydana geldi\u011fi, rayi\u00e7 de\u011ferinin kaza nedeniyle ara\u00e7 olu\u015fan de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n 5.000,00-TL oldu\u011fu, bu zarardan daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden poli\u00e7e limit olan 31.000,00-TL ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmak kayd\u0131 ile daval\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlu oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131ya ait arac\u0131n 30 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde tamir edilebilece\u011fi, g\u00fcnl\u00fck net ticari kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n 284,35-TL oldu\u011fu, buna g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n 8.530,05-TL ticari kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, bu zarardan daval\u0131 i\u015fletenlerin sorumlu oldu\u011fu, belirtilerek; dav\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabulune, fazlaya ili\u015fkin talebin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Karara kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130ST\u0130NAF NEDENLER\u0130 : Davac\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n kaza tarihi olan 11.01.2017 ile fiilen arac\u0131 teslim alabildi\u011fi 08.05.2017 tarihi aras\u0131nda arac\u0131n\u0131 kullanamay\u0131p kazan\u00e7 elde edemedi\u011fi yaz\u0131l\u0131 delillerle ispatland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu d\u00f6nemde 117 g\u00fcn arac\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak kazan\u00e7 elde edemedi\u011fini, dava konusu ara\u00e7 ile ayn\u0131 nitelikte bir ba\u015fka arac\u0131 yerine ikame etmesi i\u00e7in gereken s\u00fcrenin tespit edilmedi\u011fini, bu nedenle raporun h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu s\u00fcrede orataya \u00e7\u0131kan zarara katlanmaya mahkum edilmesinin haks\u0131zl\u0131k oldu\u011funu, karar\u0131n adalet idesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, de\u011fer kayb\u0131 hesab\u0131 yap\u0131larken arac\u0131n rayi\u00e7 de\u011ferinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini, de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n eksik hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, raporun h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, belirterek; karar\u0131n kald\u0131rlmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>GEREK\u00c7E : Dava, trafik kazas\u0131 nedeni ile davac\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131nda olu\u015fan hasar, de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ve mahrumiyet zarar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fletenin hukuki sorumlulu\u011fu ve ZMMS kapsam\u0131nda tahsili istemine ili\u015fkin olup, ilk derece mahkemesince yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, fazlaya ili\u015fkin talebin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>1.Dairemizce HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 355. maddesi uyar\u0131nca istinaf nedenleriyle ve resen kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin sebeplerle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak istinaf incelemesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>2.2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu&#8217;nun 91\/1. 85\/1. ve 85\/son maddeleri ile Karayollar\u0131 Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortas\u0131 Genel \u015eartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re trafik kazas\u0131 nedeni ile davac\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131nda olu\u015fan zarardan daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi ile i\u015fleten s\u0131fat\u0131na haiz ara\u00e7 maliki ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn, sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kusuru oran\u0131nda sorumlu oldu\u011fu amirdir.(Yarg\u0131tay HGK&#8217;nun 15.6.2011 tarih ve 2011\/17-142 E. &#8211; 2011\/411 K., 17. HD&#8217; n\u0131n 20\/05\/2013 tarih ve 2012\/8984 E. &#8211; 2013\/7276 K. )<\/p>\n<p>3.Trafik kazas\u0131nda zarar g\u00f6ren arac\u0131n hasar\u0131 onar\u0131lsa dahi onar\u0131mdan sonra arac\u0131n piyasa rayi\u00e7 sat\u0131\u015f fiyat\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fckl\u00fck olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, kaza nedeniyle ara\u00e7ta meydana gelen de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ger\u00e7ek zarar i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirilir ve bu zarardan hem zarar veren i\u015fletenler hem de ZMSS \u015firketi sorumludur. Ancak, ZMMS genel \u015fartlar\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi ger\u00e7ek zarar kapsam\u0131nda olmayan dolayl\u0131 zararlardan say\u0131lan ikame ara\u00e7 bedelinden sorumlu de\u011fildir. Davac\u0131ya ait arac\u0131n tamir s\u00fcresince kullan\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle talep edilen mahrum kal\u0131nan kazan\u00e7 bedeli zorunlu mali sorumluluk sigortas\u0131 teminat\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi mahrumiyet bedeline ili\u015fkin zarardan sorumlu tutulamaz. Bu zarardan, i\u015fleten s\u0131fat\u0131na haiz ara\u00e7 maliki ile ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc m\u00fc\u015fterek ve m\u00fcteselsilen sorumludur.( Yarg\u0131tay 17. HD&#8217;nin 04.12.2019 tarih ve 2016\/3933 E. &#8211; 2019\/796 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131)<\/p>\n<p>4.De\u011fer kayb\u0131, arac\u0131n trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu hasarlan\u0131p, onar\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonraki de\u011feri ile hi\u00e7 hasarlanmam\u0131\u015f haldeki de\u011feri aras\u0131ndaki farka ili\u015fkin olup ara\u00e7taki de\u011fer kayb\u0131 belirlenirken, arac\u0131n markas\u0131, ya\u015f\u0131, modeli ve hasar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak arac\u0131n kaza tarihinden \u00f6nceki 2. el sat\u0131\u015f de\u011ferinin tespiti ile arac\u0131n tamir edildikten sonra ikinci el sat\u0131\u015f de\u011ferinin tespiti ve aras\u0131ndaki fark g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak belirlenmelidir.(Yarg\u0131tay 17. HD&#8217;n\u0131n 07.03.2016 tarih ve 2015\/15003 E.- 2016\/2856 K.)<\/p>\n<p>5.Trafik kazalar\u0131nda ara\u00e7 mahrumiyeti nedeniyle zarar belirlenirken arac\u0131n hasar durumuna g\u00f6re onar\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in gereken makul s\u00fcrenin belirlenmesi ve belirlenen s\u00fcredeki kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 hesab\u0131nda esas al\u0131nacak maliyet bedellerinin, davac\u0131n\u0131n ticari defter ve kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile muhasebe kay\u0131tlar\u0131 incelenmek suretiyle net olarak saptanmas\u0131, belirlenen bu maliyet bedelinin tamir s\u00fcresimde arac\u0131n elde edece\u011fi gelir olarak saptanan bedelden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi suretiyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n talep edebilece\u011fi net kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131 hesab\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle zarar\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir. ( Yarg\u0131tay 4. HD&#8217;nin 29.09.2021 tarih ve 2021\/16438 E. &#8211; 2021\/5771K. 17. HD&#8217;nin 18\/04\/2016 tarih ve 2015\/17177 E. &#8211; 2016\/4901 K. )<\/p>\n<p>6.A\u00e7\u0131klanan t\u00fcm bu hukuki ve maddi vak\u0131alar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; ilk derece mahkemesince h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya ve denetime elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131na, arac\u0131n hasar nedeniyle de\u011fer kayb\u0131na ve tamir s\u00fcresi boyunca kullan\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in k\u00e2r mahrumiyetine u\u011framas\u0131 nedeniyle davac\u0131n\u0131n hasar, de\u011fer kayb\u0131 ve mahrumiyet zarar\u0131na hak kazanmas\u0131n\u0131na, zarar kalemlerinin an\u0131lan ilke ve esaslar ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fecek \u015fekilde olay\u0131n olu\u015f \u015fekli ve dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun olarak tespit edilmesine, arac\u0131n hasarl\u0131 ve hasars\u0131z ikinci el bedelinin piyasa rayi\u00e7lerine uygun \u015fekilde belirlenmesine, kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131na esas s\u00fcrenin ara\u00e7ta olu\u015fan hasar ile uyumlu ve makul olarak tespit edilmesine, kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n makul tamir s\u00fcresi \u00fczerinden g\u00fcnl\u00fck net kazan\u00e7 esas al\u0131narak belirlenmesine, taraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131 ile dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131 ile hukuki ili\u015fkinin do\u011fru nitelendirilmesine, h\u00fckm\u00fcn dairemizce de benimsenmi\u015f bulunan yasal ve hukuksal gerek\u00e7eleriyle dayana\u011f\u0131 madd\u00ee delillere ve \u00f6zellikle bu delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, ilk derece mahkemesince verilen kararda bir hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmamakla, daval\u0131n\u0131n istinaf itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>Bu durumda, istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuran\u0131n dilek\u00e7esinde yer verdi\u011fi itirazlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7e \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yerinde olmamas\u0131na, kararda kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin bir ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmamas\u0131na, karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka uygun olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyerek Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 353\/1-b-1 maddesi gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>H \u00dc K \u00dc M : Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n<p>1-Davac\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 353\/1-b-1 maddesi uyar\u0131nca ESASTAN REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>2-Davac\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf karar harc\u0131 olan 269,85-TL&#8217;den pe\u015fin al\u0131nan 59,30-TL&#8217;nin mahsubu ile eksik kalan 210,55\u202c-TL&#8217;nin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak hazineye gelir kayd\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p>3-\u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu nedeniyle davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 giderlerin kendi \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p>Dosya \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde, HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 362\/1-a maddesi uyar\u0131nca miktar itibariyle kesin olmak \u00fczere 28.12.2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200b\u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 28.12.2023 tarihli 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. \u0130ZM\u0130R B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 DOSYA NO : 2021\/637 KARAR NO : 2023\/1934 T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A B \u00d6 L G E A D L \u0130 Y E M A H K E M E S \u0130 K A R A R I \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130ZM\u0130R 3. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130 TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 03.12.2020 NUMARASI : 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K. DAVANIN KONUSU : Tazminat KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023 KARAR YAZIM TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023 \u0130zmir 3.Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinin 03.12.2020 tarih 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Dairemizce incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve istinaf dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, \u00fcye &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenip ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup, incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc : DAVA : Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar\u0131n, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc maliki ve ZMM sigortac\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu arac\u0131n kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 trafik kazas\u0131nda davac\u0131ya ait ara\u00e7ta maddi hasar meydana geldi\u011fini, kusurun kar\u015f\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcnde oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fan zarar\u0131ndan sorumlu oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin zarar\u0131 kar\u0131\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek; fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde 34.220,00-TL hasar 10.000,00-TL de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm daval\u0131lardan, 18.000,00-TL kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n ise daval\u0131 i\u015fletenlerden olay &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. \u0130ZM\u0130R B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 DOSYA NO : 2021\/637 KARAR NO : 2023\/1934 T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A B \u00d6 L G E A D L \u0130 Y E M A H K E M E S \u0130 K A R A R I \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130ZM\u0130R 3. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130 TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 03.12.2020 NUMARASI : 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K. DAVANIN KONUSU : Tazminat KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023 KARAR YAZIM TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023 \u0130zmir 3.Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinin 03.12.2020 tarih 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Dairemizce incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve istinaf dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, \u00fcye &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenip ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup, incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc : DAVA : Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar\u0131n, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc maliki ve ZMM sigortac\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu arac\u0131n kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 trafik kazas\u0131nda davac\u0131ya ait ara\u00e7ta maddi hasar meydana geldi\u011fini, kusurun kar\u015f\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcnde oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fan zarar\u0131ndan sorumlu oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin zarar\u0131 kar\u0131\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek; fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde 34.220,00-TL hasar 10.000,00-TL de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm daval\u0131lardan, 18.000,00-TL kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n ise daval\u0131 i\u015fletenlerden olay &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-09T20:43:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-09T20:43:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1689,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-09T20:43:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. \u0130ZM\u0130R B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 DOSYA NO : 2021\/637 KARAR NO : 2023\/1934 T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A B \u00d6 L G E A D L \u0130 Y E M A H K E M E S \u0130 K A R A R I \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130ZM\u0130R 3. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130 TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 03.12.2020 NUMARASI : 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K. DAVANIN KONUSU : Tazminat KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023 KARAR YAZIM TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28.12.2023 \u0130zmir 3.Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinin 03.12.2020 tarih 2017\/337 E. 2020\/754 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Dairemizce incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve istinaf dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, \u00fcye &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenip ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup, incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc : DAVA : Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar\u0131n, s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc maliki ve ZMM sigortac\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu arac\u0131n kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 trafik kazas\u0131nda davac\u0131ya ait ara\u00e7ta maddi hasar meydana geldi\u011fini, kusurun kar\u015f\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcnde oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fan zarar\u0131ndan sorumlu oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin zarar\u0131 kar\u0131\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek; fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 \u015feklinde 34.220,00-TL hasar 10.000,00-TL de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm daval\u0131lardan, 18.000,00-TL kazan\u00e7 kayb\u0131n\u0131n ise daval\u0131 i\u015fletenlerden olay &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-06-09T20:43:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hukuki Haber.net","Estimated reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-06-09T20:43:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1689,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-09T20:43:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/izmir-bam-11-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-637-e-2023-1934-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u0130zmir BAM 11. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2021\/637 E., 2023\/1934 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111914"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111914\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}