T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
L.C.E. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/42369)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 26\/2\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
L.C.E.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ey\u00fcp Murat DURAN<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecindeki taleplerin dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilen tarihte \u00e7ocuk olan (16 ya\u015f\u0131nda) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. 23\/2\/2022 tarihinde \u00c7ocuk \u0130zlem Merkezinde su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia edilen tarihte 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olan ma\u011fdur \u00e7ocuk N.nin ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. N. ifadesinde; ba\u015fvurucu ile sevgili olduklar\u0131n\u0131, 6\/2\/2022 tarihinde il\u00e7e merkezinde bulu\u015ftuktan sonra (hakk\u0131nda ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen \u015f\u00fcpheli) V.K.n\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki ara\u00e7la gezmeye ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ile arac\u0131n arka koltu\u011funa oturduklar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ve V.K.n\u0131n bir ara, yol \u00fczerindeki marketten alkol al\u0131p araca d\u00f6nd\u00fcklerini, hareket h\u00e2lindeki ara\u00e7ta bulunduklar\u0131 s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucu ve V.K.n\u0131n zorlamas\u0131yla biralardan i\u00e7ti\u011fini, \u00f6nce piknik alan\u0131nda tan\u0131d\u0131k ara\u00e7 bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle burada durmayarak Ku\u015fadas\u0131’na gitmeyi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fcklerini ancak itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine \u2026 Mahallesi’ne gitmeye karar verdiklerini, kimsenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarlal\u0131k alanda durduklar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ara\u00e7tan indi\u011finde V.K.n\u0131n kendisine cinsel nitelikte eylemlerde bulundu\u011funu, bir s\u00fcre sonra ba\u015fvurucunun araca d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve bulunduklar\u0131 yerden ara\u00e7la hareket ettikleri s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine “Yalar m\u0131s\u0131n?” dedi\u011fini, “Hay\u0131r” demesine ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel organ\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kararak a\u011fz\u0131na soktu\u011funu ve bu ama\u00e7la kafas\u0131n\u0131 tutup bast\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, istememesine ra\u011fmen kafas\u0131n\u0131 eliyle bast\u0131rmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucuya engel olamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun pantolonunun \u00fczerinden \u00f6n \u00f6zel b\u00f6lgesini ok\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, susmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131da bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada V.K.dan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefonla eylemi videoya \u00e7ekti\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun eylemi sona erdikten sonra ba\u015fka bir yerde durduklar\u0131n\u0131 ve V.K.n\u0131n yeniden yan\u0131na gelmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak ona engel oldu\u011funu, \u0131srar\u0131 \u00fczerine kendisini eve b\u0131rakt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu olay\u0131n duyulmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kendisini arayarak “Senin bende videolar\u0131n var, bug\u00fcn ya\u015fananlar\u0131 birine anlat\u0131rsan videolar\u0131 herkese yayar\u0131m.” diyerek tehdit etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. 23\/2\/2022 tarihinde kolluk taraf\u0131ndan ifadesi al\u0131nan ma\u011fdur \u00e7ocu\u011fun annesi de ba\u015fvurucudan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 24\/2\/2022 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuyu \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan tutuklanmas\u0131 istemiyle Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sevk etmi\u015ftir. Tutuklama sevk yaz\u0131s\u0131nda; ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fdurun k\u0131z arkada\u015f\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi kolayl\u0131k ve ara\u00e7ta bulunmalar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortama ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak cinsel istismar eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, savunmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fkilerle dolu ve hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren olgular\u0131n ve tutuklama nedeninin bulundu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu; sorgusunda N. ile sevgili oldu\u011funu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc V.K. arabay\u0131 s\u00fcrerken kendisinin arka koltukta N. ile oturdu\u011funu ve \u00f6p\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, cinsel organ\u0131n\u0131 N.nin d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p a\u011fz\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, onu herhangi bir \u015fekilde zorlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu eylemi N.nin kendi r\u0131zas\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hatta N.nin bu an\u0131 telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclemesini istedi\u011fini, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri N.ye kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fantaj ya da tehdit unsuru olarak kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Sorgusunun ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu 24\/2\/2022 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“SS\u00c7’nin [su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk] \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7unun niteli\u011fine, kan\u0131t durumuna, kanun maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ceza miktar\u0131na, SS\u00c7’nin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un CMK.nun 100\/3-a maddesinde say\u0131l\u0131 katalog su\u00e7lardan olmas\u0131, SS\u00c7 savunmas\u0131, \u015fikayet\u00e7i ifade tutana\u011f\u0131, bilgi alma tutanaklar\u0131, yakalama tutana\u011f\u0131, kendili\u011finden gelme ve \u00fcst arama tutana\u011f\u0131, teslim tesell\u00fcm tutana\u011f\u0131, adli muayene raporlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda SS\u00c7’nin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren somut delillerin bulunmas\u0131hususlar\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu, adli kontrol uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm delillerden anla\u015f\u0131lmakla CMK.100\/3 maddeleri gere\u011fince belirtilen tutuklama ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan SS\u00c7’ nin \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan tutuklanmas\u0131na \u2026 [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklama karar\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince 4\/3\/2022 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme itiraz\u0131n reddi karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren somut delillerin bulundu\u011funu, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un katalog su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun delilleri karartabilece\u011fi ve yarg\u0131lamadan ka\u00e7abilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde somut olgular\u0131n da mevcut oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve adli kontrol uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 23\/3\/2022 tarihinde soru\u015fturman\u0131n devam etti\u011fini, delillerin toplanma a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011funu, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un vas\u0131f ve mahiyetini, mevcut delil durumunu, su\u00e7a dair kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 cezan\u0131n \u00fcst haddini ve tahliye edilmesini gerektiren bir sebep olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu bu karara itiraz etmi\u015ftir. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi 24\/3\/2022 tarihinde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un katalog su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011funu, tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011funu, adli kontrol uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm delillerden anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek itiraz\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu 30\/3\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131, \u00f6zel hayata ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve sesleri if\u015fa etme, \u00e7ocu\u011fu h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma, \u015fantaj su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 1\/6\/2022 tarihli iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. \u0130ddianamede; ma\u011fdurun cinsel i\u00e7erikteki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinden birinin \u015f\u00fcpheli V.K. hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada telefonundan elde edilen video ile ayn\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bu videoda arac\u0131n arka koltu\u011funda y\u00fczleri g\u00f6r\u00fcnmeyen iki \u015fahs\u0131n oral seks yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ve arac\u0131 kullanan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir \u015fahs\u0131n bulundu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. \u0130ddianamede, ba\u015fvurucuyla ayn\u0131 okulda e\u011fitim g\u00f6ren arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu ifadelerde tan\u0131klar, ma\u011fdura ait m\u00fcstehcen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyduklar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
13. \u0130ddianamede; ba\u015fvurucunun ve ma\u011fdurun ayn\u0131 okulda \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren ortak arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu, bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fdurun 17 ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011funa dair savunmas\u0131na itibar edilemeyece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Sonu\u00e7 olarak iddianamede, ba\u015fvurucunun yan\u0131nda bulunan \u015f\u00fcpheli V.K. ile birlikte ma\u011fduru araca alarak ma\u011fdurun h\u00fcrriyetini cinsel ama\u00e7la k\u0131s\u0131tlad\u0131klar\u0131, ara\u00e7ta bulunduklar\u0131 s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel organ\u0131n\u0131 r\u0131zas\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ma\u011fdurun a\u011fz\u0131na soktu\u011fu, s\u00f6z konusu olay\u0131n akabinde su\u00e7un ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ma\u011fdura “Senin bende videolar\u0131n var, bug\u00fcn ya\u015fananlar\u0131 birisine anlat\u0131rsan bu videolar\u0131 herkese yayar\u0131m.” diyerek \u015fantajda bulundu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca ma\u011fdurla aralar\u0131ndaki cinsel ili\u015fkiye dair videoyu ba\u015fkalar\u0131na g\u00f6stererek veya g\u00f6ndererek ma\u011fdurun \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal etti\u011fi ve bu \u015fekilde \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131, birden fazla ki\u015fi ile cinsel ama\u00e7la \u00e7ocu\u011fun h\u00fcrriyetinin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131, \u015fantaj ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
15. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. V.K. hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan dava ile birle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 30\/9\/2022 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun tahliyesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 16\/12\/2022 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan 8 y\u0131l 10 ay 20 g\u00fcnhapis cezas\u0131, ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7undan 2 y\u0131l 1 ay hapis cezas\u0131, m\u00fcstehcenlik su\u00e7undan 2 y\u0131l 9 ay 10 g\u00fcn hapis ve 40 TL adli para cezas\u0131, \u015fantaj su\u00e7undan 6 ay 20 g\u00fcn hapis ve 80 TL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma ve m\u00fcstehcenlik su\u00e7undan verilen hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesine, \u015fantaj su\u00e7undan verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 20. Ceza Dairesi 13\/3\/2024 tarihinde \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7undan verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmleri bozmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi; ma\u011fdurenin arkada\u015flar\u0131 olan tan\u0131klar\u0131n, ma\u011fdurenin sosyal medyada ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck g\u00f6sterme e\u011filiminde oldu\u011funa dair beyanlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak hata savunmas\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurenin fiziki g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc ile ilgili g\u00f6zlem yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fdurun ya\u015f\u0131 konusunda hataya d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kabul edilmesi h\u00e2linde, ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Bozma karar\u0131 \u00fczerine davaya A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde devam edilmi\u015ftir. Dava, bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla derdesttir.<\/p>\n
21. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu; su\u00e7 tarihinde \u00e7ocuk oldu\u011funu, bu durumunun tutuklama karar\u0131nda hi\u00e7 dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ocuk koruma kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tutuklaman\u0131n son \u00e7are olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, ka\u00e7ma ve delilleri karartma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulundu\u011funa hi\u00e7 de\u011finilmedi\u011fini ve di\u011fer koruma tedbirlerinin de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini belirterek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, tutuklulu\u011fun hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
24. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahale temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin belirlendi\u011fi Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcddet\u00e7e Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ihlalini te\u015fkil edecektir. Bu sebeple m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclme, Anayasa’n\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen hakl\u0131 sebeplerden bir veya daha fazlas\u0131na dayanma ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmama ko\u015fullar\u0131na uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir (Halas Aslan, B. No: 2014\/4994, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 53, 54).<\/p>\n
25. Somut olayda \u00f6ncelikle ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 100. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. Kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc incelenmeden \u00f6nce tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu olan su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirti bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
27. Tutuklama karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131na, \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i ifade tutana\u011f\u0131na, bilgi alma tutanaklar\u0131na, yakalama tutana\u011f\u0131na ve adli muayene raporlar\u0131na at\u0131f yap\u0131larak at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren somut delillerin bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Somut olayda ma\u011fdur \u00e7ocu\u011fun ifadesinde cinsel istismar eyleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcpheli V.K.n\u0131n telefonundan ele ge\u00e7irilen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler de s\u00f6z konusu cinsel istismar eyleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fine ili\u015fkin kuvvetli belirti te\u015fkil etmektedir. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu, ma\u011fdurun r\u0131zas\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 17 olarak bildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ise de s\u00f6z konusu eylemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 okulda \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren ortak arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n da bulundu\u011funa at\u0131fla ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fdurun 17 ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011funa dair savunmas\u0131na itibar etmemesi makul bir de\u011ferlendirme olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca ma\u011fdurun 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck oldu\u011fu durumlarda r\u0131zan\u0131n eylemin su\u00e7 olma \u00f6zelli\u011fini etkilemedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle yarg\u0131 mercilerinin tutuklama tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131nda su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirti bulundu\u011funu kabul etmesinin temelsiz ve keyf\u00ee oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
28. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan ve kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki \u00f6n ko\u015fulu yerine gelmi\u015f olan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na karar verilen \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7u, T\u00fcrk hukuk sistemi i\u00e7inde a\u011f\u0131r cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen su\u00e7 tipleri aras\u0131nda olup isnat edilen su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin olarak kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezan\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesine i\u015faret eden durumlardan biridir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Devran Duran [GK], B. No: 2014\/10405, 25\/5\/2017, \u00a7 66). Ayr\u0131ca \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7u 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 100. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan ve kanun gere\u011fi tutuklama nedeni varsay\u0131labilen su\u00e7lar aras\u0131ndad\u0131r. Somut olayda \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin ba\u015fvurucunun ka\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi me\u015fru amac\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden i\u015flevsel bir niteli\u011fi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde aleyhine ifade veren ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131klar \u00fczerinde bask\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 giri\u015fiminde bulunma ihtimali de s\u00f6z konusudur.<\/p>\n
30. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut olay\u0131n yukar\u0131da belirtilen \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131 ile Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden -su\u00e7un a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na atfen- ka\u00e7ma ve ba\u015fta ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ma\u011fdur veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131 \u00fczerinde bask\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 giri\u015fiminde bulunma \u015f\u00fcphesine y\u00f6nelen tutuklama nedenlerinin olgusal temellerinin oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir.<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da tespiti gerekir. Bir tutuklama tedbirinin Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. ve 19. maddeleri kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn belirlenmesinde somut olay\u0131n t\u00fcm \u00f6zellikleri dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017, \u00a7 268; Sel\u00e7uk \u00d6zdemir [GK], B. No: 2016\/49158, 26\/7\/2017, \u00a7 76; G\u00fclser Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m (2) [GK], B. No: 2016\/40170, 16\/11\/2017, \u00a7 151).<\/p>\n
32. \u00c7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda tutuklama tedbirinin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda tutuklaman\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurulacak en son yol oldu\u011fu, e\u011fer tutukluluk bir zorunluluksa bunun m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan en k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak bu husus, \u00e7ocuklar hakk\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir durumda tutuklama tedbirinin uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesinin de belirtti\u011fi gibi \u00e7ocuklar taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenmi\u015f olan \u00e7ok ciddi su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin istisnai olaylarda tutuklama tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Furkan Omurtag, B. No: 2014\/18179, 25\/10\/2017, \u00a7 82).<\/p>\n
33. Somut olayda tutuklama tarihi itibar\u0131yla 18 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 tamamlamam\u0131\u015f olan (16 ya\u015f\u0131nda) ba\u015fvurucu, \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 gibi a\u011f\u0131r bir su\u00e7tan tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 24\/2\/2022 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, 30\/9\/2022 tarihinde ise tutuklamadan beklenen faydan\u0131n has\u0131l oldu\u011fu ve delillerin topland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi; tahliye karar\u0131 verdi\u011fi tarihe kadar san\u0131klar\u0131 ve tan\u0131klar\u0131 dinlemi\u015f, delilleri toplam\u0131\u015f, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca haz\u0131rlanan m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 savunma haz\u0131rlamak \u00fczere san\u0131klara s\u00fcre vermi\u015f, sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te tutukluluk s\u00fcresini de dikkate alarak tahliye karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Bir sonraki celsede ise h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmu\u015ftur. Bu nedenle yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci, tutukluluk s\u00fcresi, su\u00e7un niteli\u011fi, su\u00e7un konusunu olu\u015fturan eylemlerin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda H\u00e2kimli\u011fin ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu ve tutuklama koruma tedbirinden beklenen menfaatlerin adli kontrol tedbiriyle sa\u011flanamayaca\u011f\u0131 kanaatine varmas\u0131n\u0131n keyf\u00ee ve temelsiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u00e7ocuklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan isnat edilen su\u00e7un a\u011f\u0131r niteli\u011fi de dikkate al\u0131narak tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 di\u011fer kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. C.Y., B. No: 2021\/51397, 7\/2\/2024; Ahmet Naml\u0131, B. No: 2022\/34086, 6\/6\/2024; Z.N.\u00c7. ve F.\u0130., B. No: 2021\/307, 24\/11\/2021; Enver Oktay Babat\u00fcrk, B. No: 2016\/15355, 9\/10\/2019; Mehmet Eren Ovayolu, B. No: 2017\/36232, 10\/12\/2019).<\/p>\n
34. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bir ihlalin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
35. Ba\u015fvurucu; ma\u011fdurun ya\u015f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik hata h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ma\u011fdurun kemik ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesine y\u00f6nelik taleplerinin Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
36. Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuru, iddia edilen hak ihlallerinin derece mahkemelerince d\u00fczeltilmemesi h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurulabilecek ikincil nitelikte bir hak arama yoludur. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunun ikincil niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi, Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunulabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle ola\u011fan kanun yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi zorunludur (Ay\u015fe Z\u0131raman ve Cennet Ye\u015filyurt, B. No: 2012\/403, 26\/3\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 16, 17).<\/p>\n
37. Somut olayda Anayasa Mahkemesince inceleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki dava A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde devam etmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucunun, hakk\u0131ndaki soru\u015fturma ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde yap\u0131lan uygulamalar nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerini A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama, istinaf vetemyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde ileri s\u00fcrebilme ve ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ise bu \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin bu a\u015famalarda incelenme imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesindeki yarg\u0131laman\u0131n, istinaf ve temyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 beklenmeden adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
38. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
39. Ba\u015fvurucu, tutuklama karar\u0131nda hangi makamlara itiraz edece\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klama ve bildirimde bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ile etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
40. Somut olayda tutuklama karar\u0131 itiraz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, itiraz mercii belirtilmemi\u015ftir. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 268. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendinde sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finin tutuklama kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itirazlar\u0131n incelenmesinin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresinde bulundu\u011fu asliye ceza mahkemesi h\u00e2kimine ait oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Nitekim ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklama karar\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz da bu h\u00fck\u00fcm uyar\u0131nca Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince incelenmi\u015f ve reddedilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 6). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tutuklama karar\u0131nda itiraz merciinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmemesinin ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklulu\u011fa etkili itiraz etme hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir ihlal olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
41. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 26\/2\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 26\/2\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/42369 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR L.C.E. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/42369) Karar Tarihi: 26\/2\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : L.C.E. Vekili : Av. Ey\u00fcp Murat DURAN I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecindeki taleplerin dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilen tarihte \u00e7ocuk olan (16 ya\u015f\u0131nda) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. 23\/2\/2022 tarihinde \u00c7ocuk \u0130zlem Merkezinde su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia edilen tarihte 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olan ma\u011fdur \u00e7ocuk N.nin ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. N. ifadesinde; ba\u015fvurucu ile sevgili olduklar\u0131n\u0131, 6\/2\/2022 tarihinde il\u00e7e merkezinde bulu\u015ftuktan sonra (hakk\u0131nda ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen \u015f\u00fcpheli) V.K.n\u0131n sevk ve idaresindeki ara\u00e7la gezmeye ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ile arac\u0131n arka koltu\u011funa oturduklar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ve V.K.n\u0131n bir ara, yol \u00fczerindeki marketten alkol al\u0131p araca d\u00f6nd\u00fcklerini, hareket h\u00e2lindeki ara\u00e7ta bulunduklar\u0131 s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucu ve V.K.n\u0131n zorlamas\u0131yla biralardan i\u00e7ti\u011fini, \u00f6nce piknik alan\u0131nda tan\u0131d\u0131k ara\u00e7 bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle burada durmayarak Ku\u015fadas\u0131’na gitmeyi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fcklerini ancak itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine \u2026 Mahallesi’ne gitmeye karar verdiklerini, kimsenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarlal\u0131k …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n