{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","provider_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en","author_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","author_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en","title":"AYM'nin 2020\/38677 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fiGQufq6K1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-38677-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\">AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/38677 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-38677-basvuru-numarali-karari\/embed\/#?secret=fiGQufq6K1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/38677 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131&#8221; &#8212; Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" data-secret=\"fiGQufq6K1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>","description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130DR\u0130S \u00c7AMUR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/38677) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Saliha AKSOY Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130dris \u00c7AMUR Vekili : Av. Engin YILMAZEL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; i\u015f kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan tazminat davas\u0131nda, \u0131slah talebinin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015fof\u00f6r olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015firkette, misafirlerin \u015fantiyeye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesi esnas\u0131nda 13\/08\/2002 tarihinde trafik kazas\u0131 ge\u00e7irmi\u015f ve kaza sonucu yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu 24\/9\/2004 tarihinde \u0130stanbul Anadolu 6. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi nezdinde i\u015f kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f; fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere 40.000 TL manevi, 1.000 TL maddi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. 4. Mahkemece esas incelemesi yap\u0131lan dosyada 27\/5\/2013 tarihinde al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda daval\u0131 \u015firketin \u00f6demesi gereken tazminat miktar\u0131 75.059,05 TL olarak tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 17\/7\/2013 tarihinde verdi\u011fi \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esiyle talep etti\u011fi maddi tazminat\u0131 75.000 TL&#8217;ye y\u00fckseltmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 5. Mahkeme 10\/9\/2013 tarihli karar\u0131yla daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defini reddetmi\u015f &hellip;"}