<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Av. Deniz Can K&#x131;z&#x131;l</provider_name><provider_url>https://denizcankizil.tr/en</provider_url><author_name>Av. Deniz Can K&#x131;z&#x131;l</author_name><author_url>https://denizcankizil.tr/en</author_url><title>AYM'nin 2020/4296 ba&#x15F;vuru numaral&#x131; karar&#x131;</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="2LwzhpDmKR"&gt;&lt;a href="https://denizcankizil.tr/en/hukukihaber/aymnin-2020-4296-basvuru-numarali-karari/"&gt;AYM&#x2019;nin 2020/4296 ba&#x15F;vuru numaral&#x131; karar&#x131;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://denizcankizil.tr/en/hukukihaber/aymnin-2020-4296-basvuru-numarali-karari/embed/#?secret=2LwzhpDmKR" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;AYM&#x2019;nin 2020/4296 ba&#x15F;vuru numaral&#x131; karar&#x131;&#x201D; &#x2014; Av. Deniz Can K&#x131;z&#x131;l" data-secret="2LwzhpDmKR" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://denizcankizil.tr/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;</html><description>T&#xDC;RK&#x130;YE CUMHUR&#x130;YET&#x130; ANAYASA MAHKEMES&#x130; &#xA0; &#xA0; B&#x130;R&#x130;NC&#x130; B&#xD6;L&#xDC;M &#xA0; KARAR &#xA0; MUSTAFA T&#xDC;LEK BA&#x15E;VURUSU (Ba&#x15F;vuru Numaras&#x131;: 2020/4296) &#xA0; Karar Tarihi: 13/2/2024 B&#x130;R&#x130;NC&#x130; B&#xD6;L&#xDC;M &#xA0; KARAR &#xA0; Ba&#x15F;kan : Hasan Tahsin G&#xD6;KCAN &#xDC;yeler : Yusuf &#x15E;evki HAKYEMEZ &#xA0; &#xA0; Selahaddin MENTE&#x15E; &#xA0; &#xA0; &#x130;rfan F&#x130;DAN &#xA0; &#xA0; Muhterem &#x130;NCE Raport&#xF6;r : &#xC7;a&#x11F;lar &#xD6;NCEL Ba&#x15F;vurucu : Mustafa T&#xDC;LEK Vekili : Av. G&#xF6;khan A&#x11E;IRBA&#x15E; &#xA0; I. BA&#x15E;VURUNUN &#xD6;ZET&#x130; 1. Ba&#x15F;vuru, haks&#x131;z tutuklama tedbiri dolay&#x131;s&#x131;yla &#xF6;denen tazminat&#x131;n yetersiz olmas&#x131; nedeniyle ki&#x15F;i h&#xFC;rriyeti ve g&#xFC;venli&#x11F;i hakk&#x131;n&#x131;n ihlal edildi&#x11F;i iddias&#x131;na ili&#x15F;kindir. 2. Ba&#x15F;vurucu 28/3/2002 tarihinde silahla ya&#x11F;ma su&#xE7;lamas&#x131;yla tutuklanm&#x131;&#x15F;, 21/5/2004 tarihinde 36 y&#x131;l hapis cezas&#x131; ile cezaland&#x131;r&#x131;lmas&#x131;na karar verilmi&#x15F;tir. Yarg&#x131;tay 6. Ceza Dairesi 13/7/2005 tarihinde h&#xFC;km&#xFC;n bozulmas&#x131;na ve ba&#x15F;vurucunun tahliyesine karar vermi&#x15F;tir. 3. Bozma karar&#x131; &#xFC;zerine yap&#x131;lan yarg&#x131;lama sonucunda beraatine karar verilen ba&#x15F;vurucu 11/9/2014 tarihinde &#x130;stanbul 17. A&#x11F;&#x131;r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a&#xE7;arak 10.311,76 TL maddi, 22.000 TL manevi tazminat&#x131;n &#xF6;denmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi&#x15F;tir. 4. Mahkeme, davan&#x131;n s&#xFC;re y&#xF6;n&#xFC;nden reddine karar vermi&#x15F;; an&#x131;lan karar Yarg&#x131;tay 12. Ceza Dairesince (Daire) bozulmu&#x15F;tur. Ba&#x15F;vurucu, bozma karar&#x131;ndan sonra Mahkemeye sundu&#x11F;u &#x131;slah dilek&#xE7;esi ile maddi tazminat talebini 11.741,91 TL, manevi tazminat talebini ise 200.000 TL olarak art&#x131;rd&#x131;&#x11F;&#x131;n&#x131; belirtmi&#x15F;; ayr&#x131;ca h&#xFC;kmedilecek manevi tazminata tutuklama tarihinden itibaren faiz i&#x15F;letilmesine karar verilmesini talep &hellip;</description></oembed>
