T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
1. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2014\/16171 E., 2016\/4820 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ve ecrimisil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …’\u0131n raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n
-KARAR-<\/p>\n
Dava, payda\u015flar aras\u0131nda elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ve ecrimisil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kullanabilece\u011fi bir alan bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile paya vaki elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesine, intifadan men ko\u015fulunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile de ecrimisil isteminin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u00c7eki\u015fmeli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 ad\u0131na payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyet \u00fczere kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu sabittir.<\/p>\n
Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyette ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan yararlanamayan payda\u015f, engel olan \u00f6teki payda\u015f veya payda\u015flardan pay\u0131na vaki elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesini her zaman isteyebilir. Hatta elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinde dahi payda\u015flardan biri \u00f6teki payda\u015flar\u0131n olurlar\u0131n\u0131 almadan veya miras \u015firketine temsilci atanmadan tek ba\u015f\u0131na ortak ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan yararlanmas\u0131na engel olan ortaklar aleyhine elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir. Ancak, o payda\u015f\u0131n, pay\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz olarak kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir k\u0131s\u0131m yer varsa a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n dinlenme olana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. Yerle\u015fmi\u015f Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na ve ayn\u0131 do\u011frultudaki bilimsel g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere g\u00f6re, pay\u0131ndan az yer kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren payda\u015f\u0131n sorununu elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davas\u0131 ile de\u011fil, kesin sonu\u00e7 getiren taksim veya ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla giderilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7mak suretiyle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlemesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun (TMK) 706., T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun (TBK) 237., Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun (BK) 213., Tapu Kanunu’nun 26. maddeleri hilaf\u0131na tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda harici veya fiili taksim ile paylar\u0131n m\u00fclkiyeti ana ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan ayr\u0131lamaz. Ne var ki, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kullanma bi\u00e7imi t\u00fcm payda\u015flar aras\u0131nda var\u0131lan bir anla\u015fma ile belirlenmi\u015f yada fiili bir kullanma bi\u00e7imi olu\u015fmu\u015f, uzun s\u00fcre payda\u015flar bu durumu benimsemi\u015flerse kay\u0131tta payl\u0131, eylemsel olarak (fiilen) ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bu olu\u015fumun tapuda yap\u0131lacak resmi taksime veya ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle giderilmesine yahut o yerde bir imar uygulamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131na kadar korunmas\u0131, “ahde vefa” kural\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda TMK’nin 2. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen iyi niyet kural\u0131n\u0131n da bir gere\u011fidir. Aksi halde, pek \u00e7ok kimse zarar g\u00f6recek toplum d\u00fczeni ve bar\u0131\u015f\u0131 bozulacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
O h\u00e2lde, payda\u015flar aras\u0131ndaki elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davalar\u0131nda \u00f6ncelikle t\u00fcm payda\u015flar\u0131 ba\u011flayan harici bir taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve \u00f6zel bir parselasyon plan\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya fiili kullanma bi\u00e7iminin olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde \u00f6zenle durulmal\u0131, varsa \u00e7eki\u015fmeli yerin kimin kullan\u0131m\u0131na terk edildi\u011fi saptan\u0131lmal\u0131, harici veya fiili taksim yoksa uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yukar\u0131da de\u011finildi\u011fi gibi, TMK’nin m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmelidir.<\/p>\n
Somut olaya gelince, payda\u015flar aras\u0131nda fiili kullan\u0131m bi\u00e7iminin olu\u015ftu\u011fu, krokide C harfiyle g\u00f6sterilen (2850 m2) b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn daval\u0131, D (5600 m2) harfiyle g\u00f6sterilen b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn davac\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Taraf vekilleri 21\/03\/2014 tarihli ke\u015fifte davac\u0131 kullan\u0131m\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131lan D b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn 2010 y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00f6nce Saray Hal\u0131, 2010-2013 Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131 aras\u0131nda daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131 Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131ndan itibaren de dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 Berrin\u2019in kiraya verdi\u011fi ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
Dava tarihi itibari ile, fiili payla\u015f\u0131ma g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131lan yerin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sabit oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7makta hakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ancak, dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra krokide E ile g\u00f6sterilen ve a\u011fa\u00e7 dikmek sureti ile halen daval\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131nda bulunan b\u00f6l\u00fcm haricindeki yerler dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re bu b\u00f6l\u00fcme ili\u015fkin elatman\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan, 2010 ve 2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131lan b\u00f6l\u00fcmde daval\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 alana ili\u015fkin ecrimisile h\u00fckmedilmesi de kural olarak do\u011frudur.<\/p>\n
Ne var ki, 2010 y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00f6nce D ile g\u00f6sterilen b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan m\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan m\u0131 …\u2019ya kiraya verildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
\nH\u00e2l b\u00f6yle olunca, bilirki\u015fi krokisinde E ile g\u00f6sterilen yere ili\u015fkin elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi isteminin kabul\u00fcne, D ile g\u00f6sterilen b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden konusu kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesine, davac\u0131n\u0131n 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k ecrimisil istedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise, 2008-2010 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan m\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan m\u0131 kiraya verildi\u011finin saptanmas\u0131, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kiraya verilmi\u015fse 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k ecrimisile karar verilmesi, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kiraya verildi\u011fi belirlenirse 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 ile dava tarihi aras\u0131ndaki d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin ecrimisile h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekirken de\u011finilen hususlar\u0131 i\u00e7ermeyen bi\u00e7imde yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00fczere karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itiraz\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc yerindedir. Kabul\u00fcyle, h\u00fckm\u00fcn (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3.maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile) 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK.’n\u0131n 428.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, al\u0131nan pe\u015fin harc\u0131n temyiz edene geri verilmesine, 19.04.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bPayda\u015flar aras\u0131ndaki elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davalar\u0131nda \u00f6ncelikle t\u00fcm payda\u015flar\u0131 ba\u011flayan harici bir taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve \u00f6zel bir parselasyon plan\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya fiili kullanma bi\u00e7iminin olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde \u00f6zenle durulmal\u0131, varsa \u00e7eki\u015fmeli yerin kimin kullan\u0131m\u0131na terk edildi\u011fi saptan\u0131lmal\u0131, harici veya fiili taksim yoksa uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yukar\u0131da de\u011finildi\u011fi gibi, TMK’nin m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmelidir.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/16171 E., 2016\/4820 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ve ecrimisil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …’\u0131n raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc; -KARAR- Dava, payda\u015flar aras\u0131nda elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi ve ecrimisil istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kullanabilece\u011fi bir alan bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile paya vaki elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesine, intifadan men ko\u015fulunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile de ecrimisil isteminin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u00c7eki\u015fmeli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 ad\u0131na payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyet \u00fczere kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu sabittir. Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyette ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan yararlanamayan payda\u015f, engel olan \u00f6teki payda\u015f veya payda\u015flardan pay\u0131na vaki elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesini her zaman isteyebilir. Hatta elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinde dahi payda\u015flardan biri \u00f6teki payda\u015flar\u0131n olurlar\u0131n\u0131 almadan veya miras \u015firketine temsilci atanmadan tek ba\u015f\u0131na ortak ta\u015f\u0131nmazdan yararlanmas\u0131na engel olan ortaklar aleyhine elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir. Ancak, o payda\u015f\u0131n, pay\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz olarak kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir k\u0131s\u0131m yer varsa a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n dinlenme olana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. Yerle\u015fmi\u015f Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na ve ayn\u0131 do\u011frultudaki bilimsel g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere g\u00f6re, pay\u0131ndan az yer kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren payda\u015f\u0131n sorununu elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenilmesi davas\u0131 ile de\u011fil, kesin sonu\u00e7 getiren taksim veya ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla giderilmesi davas\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n