T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
11. Hukuk Dairesi <\/p>\n
2021\/1534 E., 2021\/6811 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMELER\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RELER\u0130\u2019N\u0130N KES\u0130N N\u0130TEL\u0130KTEK\u0130 KARARLARI ARASINDAK\u0130 UYU\u015eMAZLI\u011eIN G\u0130DER\u0130LMES\u0130NE Y\u00d6NEL\u0130K KARAR<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURU<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul 2. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi\u2019nin 11\/01\/2021 tarih ve 2020\/185 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fvurusu ile, i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f akdinin feshinden sonraki d\u00f6nemi kapsayan rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan cezai \u015fart istemine ili\u015fkin davalarda \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 12. Hukuk ve \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 14. Hukuk Dairelerinin Asliye Ticaret Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk ve \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 43. Hukuk Dairelerinin ise \u0130\u015f Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011funa dair kararlar verdi\u011finden bahisle Daireler aras\u0131nda g\u00f6revli mahkemenin tespiti hususunda olu\u015fan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f fark\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesinin talep edilmesi \u00fczerine, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanlar Kurulu 29\/01\/2021 tarihinde toplanarak konuyla ilgili olarak verilen kesin kararlar nedeniyle g\u00f6revli mahkemenin tespitine ili\u015fkin olu\u015fan ve saptanan \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n ilgili dairesinden karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, konuyla ilgili olarak d\u00fczenlenen evrak\u0131 i\u00e7eren dosya Dairemiz Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. \u0130STANBUL B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RELER\u0130 BA\u015eKANLAR KURULU\u2019NUN KARARI<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan konu, 29.01.2021 tarihinde \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Hukuk Daireleri Ba\u015fkanlar Kurulu\u2019nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemeleri Hukuk Daireleri\u2019nce verilen kesin nitelikteki kararlar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulundu\u011fu tespit edildikten sonra, yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler sonucunda 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n, 6102 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK’dan sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi ve TTK’n\u0131n 4\/1-c maddesindeki d\u00fczenlemeyi z\u0131mnen ilga etti\u011fi, 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019da, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin devam\u0131 veya sona ermesinden sonra a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar ay\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmadan, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f mahkemelerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011finin belirtilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f akdinin feshinden sonraki d\u00f6nemi kapsayan rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerden kaynaklanan davalar\u0131n i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan dava oldu\u011fu, bu durumda 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden sonra rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131ndan kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara bakma g\u00f6revinin, 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanununun 5\/1-a maddesine g\u00f6re, i\u015f mahkemelerine ait bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ile i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f akdinin feshinden sonraki d\u00f6nemi kapsayan rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan cezai \u015fart istemine ili\u015fkin davalarda B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Hukuk Daireleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6revli mahkemenin tespiti konusunda olu\u015fan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f fark\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi i\u00e7in 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 35\/3 maddesi gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019ne ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131na oybirli\u011fi ile karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. UYU\u015eMAZLI\u011eIN G\u0130DER\u0130LMES\u0130 \u0130STEM\u0130NE KONU KES\u0130N N\u0130TEL\u0130KTEK\u0130 KARARLAR VE GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130<\/p>\n
A- \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2019\/6 E-2019\/715 K., ve \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 43. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/1715 E-2020\/387 K say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda, davan\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK’n\u0131n 444-447. maddeleri aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, 25.10.2017 tarihinde Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 5\/1-a maddesinde, “…6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun \u0130kinci K\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Alt\u0131nc\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine tabi i\u015f\u00e7iler ile i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekilleri aras\u0131nda, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na i\u015f mahkemelerinde bak\u0131l\u0131r…\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n, 6102 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK’ dan sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi ve TTK’n\u0131n 4\/1-c maddesindeki d\u00fczenlemeyi de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fi, \u00f6zel nitelikte olan ve daha sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019da, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin devam\u0131 veya sona ermesinden sonra a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar ay\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, aksine i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f mahkemelerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, i\u015f akdinin sona ermesinden sonra olu\u015facak rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin davalarda ticaret mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yitirdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc benimsenerek karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B- \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 14. Hukuk Dairesi 2020\/300 E-2020\/877 K, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/2377 E-2020\/966 K. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda, 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu’nun 5. maddesinde i\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ve m\u00fclga 5521 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 1. maddesinden farkl\u0131 olarak, \u0130\u015f Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda kalmayan ve sadece TBK’n\u0131n hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine tabi hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n da i\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, yani, m\u00fclga 5521 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 1. maddesi, “\u0130\u015f Kanununa g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7i say\u0131lan kimselerle (o kanunun de\u011fi\u015ftirilen ikinci maddesinin \u00c7, D ve E f\u0131kralar\u0131nda istisna edilen i\u015flerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar hari\u00e7) i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekilleri aras\u0131nda i\u015f akdinden veya \u0130\u015f Kanununa dayanan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hak iddialar\u0131ndan do\u011fan hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi ile g\u00f6revli olarak l\u00fczum g\u00f6r\u00fclen yerlerde i\u015f mahkemeleri kurulur….” \u015feklinde bir d\u00fczenleme getirmi\u015f iken 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu’nun 5. maddesinde, “(1) \u0130\u015f mahkemeleri; a) 5953 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna tabi gazeteciler, 854 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna tabi gemiadamlar\u0131, 22\/5\/2003 tarihli ve 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanununa veya 11\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun \u0130kinci K\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Alt\u0131nc\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine tabi i\u015f\u00e7iler ile i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekilleri aras\u0131nda, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na, b) \u0130dari para cezalar\u0131na itirazlar ile 5510 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi kapsam\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar hari\u00e7 olmak \u00fczere Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumu veya T\u00fcrkiye \u0130\u015f Kurumunun taraf oldu\u011fu i\u015f ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik mevzuat\u0131ndan kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara, c) Di\u011fer kanunlarda i\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu belirtilen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara, ili\u015fkin dava ve i\u015flere bakar.” d\u00fczenlemesi getirildi\u011fi, (Bas\u0131n \u0130\u015f Kanunu ve Deniz \u0130\u015f Kanunu kapsam\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n, eski Kanun d\u00f6neminde de i\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131), i\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen her iki kanunun da i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na bakma g\u00f6revini i\u015f mahkemelerine verdi\u011fi, aralar\u0131ndaki fark\u0131n, \u0130\u015f Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda kalmay\u0131p sadece TBK’n\u0131n hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine tabi olan s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerden kaynaklanan hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n da i\u015f mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev kapsam\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan ibaret oldu\u011fu, nitekim 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5. maddesinin gerek\u00e7esinde bunun ifade edildi\u011fi, 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un genel gerek\u00e7esi ve 5. maddesinin gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda, bu d\u00fczenleme ile kanun koyucunun TTK’n\u0131n 4\/1-c ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 5. maddesindeki d\u00fczenlemeyi bertaraf etmek gibi bir arzu ve iradesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, aksine TTK\u2019n\u0131n an\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin 1956 tarihli 6762 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK\u2019dan bu yana hi\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fmeden gelmesinin kanun koyucunun bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n asliye ticaret mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iradesinin ne derece g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, sonu\u00e7ta 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu ile TTK aras\u0131nda \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn TTK\u2019ya tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ve TBK’n\u0131n 444 vd. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 anla\u015fmas\u0131ndan do\u011fan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda g\u00f6revli mahkemenin asliye ticaret mahkemesi oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc benimsenerek karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. UYU\u015eMAZLIK<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan ve birbirinden ayr\u0131\u015fan \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Hukuk Daireleri\u2019nin kesin nitelikteki kararlar\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, konuyla ilgili g\u00f6revli mahkemenin tayini bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, 25\/10\/2017 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 5\/1-a maddesindeki \u201ci\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f mahkemelerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi\u201d \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemenin rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan cezai \u015fart istemine ili\u015fkin davalar\u0131 da kapsam\u0131na al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir di\u011fer s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle konuyla ilgili uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara bakmakla g\u00f6revli mahkemenin tayininde 7306 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 6102 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK aras\u0131nda bir h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc halinde ise 7306 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme ile 6102 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK’n\u0131n 4\/1-c maddesindeki d\u00fczenlemenin ilga edilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131p say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131nda bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
V. UYU\u015eMAZLIKLA \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 YASAL D\u00dcZENLEMELER<\/p>\n
6102 SAYILI TTK
\n6102 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK\u2019n\u0131n 4\/1-c bendi: Taraflar\u0131n tacir olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n 11\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin 444 ila 447. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hususlardan do\u011fan hukuk davalar\u0131 ve \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz yarg\u0131 i\u015fleri ticari dava ve ticari nitelikte \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz yarg\u0131 i\u015fi say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6102 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK\u2019n\u0131n 5\/1.f\u0131kras\u0131: Aksine h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, dava olunan \u015feyin de\u011ferine veya tutar\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n asliye ticaret mahkemesi t\u00fcm ticari davalar ile ticari nitelikteki \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz yarg\u0131 i\u015flerine bakmakla g\u00f6revlidir.<\/p>\n
6098 SAYILI TBK
\nVII. Rekabet Yasa\u011f\u0131<\/p>\n
1. Ko\u015fullar\u0131
\nMADDE 444- Fiil ehliyetine sahip olan i\u015f\u00e7i, i\u015fverene kar\u015f\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona ermesinden sonra herhangi bir bi\u00e7imde onunla rekabet etmekten, \u00f6zellikle kendi hesab\u0131na rakip bir i\u015fletme a\u00e7maktan, ba\u015fka bir rakip i\u015fletmede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktan veya bunlar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, rakip i\u015fletmeyle ba\u015fka t\u00fcrden bir menfaat ili\u015fkisine giri\u015fmekten ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak \u00fcstlenebilir.
\nRekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 kayd\u0131, ancak hizmet ili\u015fkisi i\u015f\u00e7iye m\u00fc\u015fteri \u00e7evresi veya \u00fcretim s\u0131rlar\u0131 ya da i\u015fverenin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fler hakk\u0131nda bilgi edinme imk\u00e2n\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131yorsa ve ayn\u0131 zamanda bu bilgilerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, i\u015fverenin \u00f6nemli bir zarar\u0131na sebep olacak nitelikteyse ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n
2. S\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131
\nMADDE 445- Rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7inin ekonomik gelece\u011fini hakkaniyete ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrecek bi\u00e7imde yer, zaman ve i\u015flerin t\u00fcr\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygun olmayan s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar i\u00e7eremez ve s\u00fcresi, \u00f6zel durum ve ko\u015fullar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda iki y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015famaz.
\nH\u00e2kim, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 nitelikteki rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131, b\u00fct\u00fcn durum ve ko\u015fullar\u0131 serbest\u00e7e de\u011ferlendirmek ve i\u015fverenin \u00fcstlenmi\u015f olabilece\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131 edimi de hakkaniyete uygun bi\u00e7imde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutmak suretiyle, kapsam\u0131 veya s\u00fcresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan s\u0131n\u0131rlayabilir.<\/p>\n
3. Ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131
\nMADDE 446- Rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranan i\u015f\u00e7i, bunun sonucu olarak i\u015fverenin u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn zararlar\u0131 gidermekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.
\nYasa\u011fa ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f bir ceza ko\u015fuluna ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015fsa ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmede aksine bir h\u00fck\u00fcm de yoksa, i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen miktar\u0131 \u00f6deyerek rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin borcundan kurtulabilir; ancak, i\u015f\u00e7i bu miktar\u0131 a\u015fan zarar\u0131 gidermek zorundad\u0131r.
\n\u0130\u015fveren, ceza ko\u015fulu ve do\u011fabilecek ek zararlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a sakl\u0131 tutmas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla, kendisinin ihlal veya tehdit edilen menfaatlerinin \u00f6nemi ile i\u015f\u00e7inin davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 hakl\u0131 g\u00f6steriyorsa, yasa\u011fa ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015fa son verilmesini de isteyebilir.<\/p>\n
4. Sona ermesi
\nMADDE 447- Rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131, i\u015fverenin bu yasa\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesinde ger\u00e7ek bir yarar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenmi\u015fse sona erer.
\nS\u00f6zle\u015fme, hakl\u0131 bir sebep olmaks\u0131z\u0131n i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan veya i\u015fverene y\u00fcklenebilen bir nedenle i\u015f\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan feshedilirse, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 sona erer.<\/p>\n
M\u00dcLGA 5521 SAYILI \u0130\u015e MAHKEMELER\u0130 KANUNU
\nMADDE 1- \u0130\u015f Kanununa g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7i say\u0131lan kimselerle (o Kanunun de\u011fi\u015ftirilen ikinci maddesinin \u00c7, D ve E f\u0131kralar\u0131nda istisna edilen i\u015flerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar hari\u00e7) i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekilleri aras\u0131nda i\u015f akdinden veya \u0130\u015f Kanununa dayanan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hak iddialar\u0131ndan do\u011fan hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi ile g\u00f6revli olarak l\u00fczum g\u00f6r\u00fclen yerlerde i\u015f mahkemeleri kurulur.<\/p>\n
7036 SAYILI \u0130\u015e MAHKEMELER\u0130 KANUNU
\nG\u00f6rev
\nMADDE 5- (1) \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri;
\na) 5953 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna tabi gazeteciler, 854 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna tabi gemiadamlar\u0131, 22\/5\/2003 tarihli ve 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanununa veya 11\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun \u0130kinci K\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Alt\u0131nc\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine tabi i\u015f\u00e7iler ile i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekilleri aras\u0131nda, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na,
\nb) \u0130dari para cezalar\u0131na itirazlar ile 5510 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi kapsam\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar hari\u00e7 olmak \u00fczere Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumu veya T\u00fcrkiye \u0130\u015f Kurumunun taraf oldu\u011fu i\u015f ve sosyal g\u00fcvenlik mevzuat\u0131ndan kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara,
\nc) Di\u011fer kanunlarda i\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu belirtilen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin dava ve i\u015flere bakar.<\/p>\n
VI. GEREK\u00c7E
\n\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi ilgili hukuk daireleri aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili de\u011ferlendirmelere ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, bir hususa daha i\u015faret etmek gerekir ki, TTK\u2019n\u0131n 1. maddesi bu Kanunun 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun ayr\u0131lmaz bir par\u00e7as\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmekte olup 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 646. maddesi uyar\u0131nca TBK\u2019n\u0131n T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 5. kitab\u0131 ve onun tamamlay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olarak addedilmesi nedeniyle TBK\u2019da d\u00fczenlenen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin di\u011fer kanunlarla ili\u015fkilendirilmesine ili\u015fkin yorum faaliyetinde, y\u00f6ntemsel olarak, s\u00f6z konusu \u00fc\u00e7 temel kanuna yans\u0131yan bu b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.
\nKonuya bu ba\u011flamda yakla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; 25.10.2017 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun \u201cG\u00f6rev\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesi, madde gerek\u00e7esinde de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri\u2019nin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n\u0131 5521 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne nazaran geni\u015fletmi\u015f, 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK\u2019da hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine tabi i\u015f\u00e7ilerin, i\u015fverenleri ile \u201ci\u015f ili\u015fkisi\u201d nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve kanundan do\u011fan hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 da i\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revi kapsam\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
\nAncak, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBK\u2019n\u0131n 444 vd. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen h\u00fck\u00fcmler, do\u011frudan hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bir unsuru olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi gibi rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7i-i\u015fveren aras\u0131ndaki hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin sona ermesinden sonra h\u00fck\u00fcm ifade edecek mahiyette olmas\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7inin tek tarafl\u0131 bir taahh\u00fcd\u00fc suretiyle de olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmakla, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali halinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n i\u015f ili\u015fkisinden yahut hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilemez.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin bizatihi hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak olu\u015fan i\u015f (hizmet) ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklanan rekabet etmeme ve i\u015fverene ait s\u0131rlar\u0131 saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, TBK\u2019n\u0131n 396. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan ve kanundan kaynaklanan i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00f6zen ve sadakat borcu ile ili\u015fkili olup TBK\u2019n\u0131n 444. maddesinde tan\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lan ve taraf iradesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan rekabet etmeme taahh\u00fcd\u00fc (rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131) ise, a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu karakteri nedeniyle, i\u015f\u00e7inin kanundan kaynaklanan \u00f6zen ve sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bir devam\u0131 yahut i\u015f\u00e7inin bu borcunun, s\u00f6zle\u015fme sona erdikten sonra da devam\u0131na olanak sa\u011flayan bir d\u00fczenleme niteli\u011finde de\u011fildir. Nitekim, i\u015f\u00e7inin hizmet ili\u015fkisinin sona ermesinden sonraya ili\u015fkin s\u0131r saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, TBK\u2019n\u0131n 396. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde \u00f6zel olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup do\u011frudan kanundan kaynaklanan bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck niteli\u011finde bulunmakla, bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn, serbest iradeye dayal\u0131 rekabet etmeme taahh\u00fcd\u00fcnden hukuki karakteri itibariyle ayr\u0131\u015fmakta oldu\u011fu, kanunda birbirinden farkl\u0131 nitelikteki bu iki kavrama ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, a\u00e7\u0131klanan ayr\u0131\u015fmaya uygun olarak farkl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u015eu halde, TBK\u2019n\u0131n 444 vd. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak bu yasa\u011f\u0131n ihlali halinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n, 7306 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k olarak tan\u0131mlanmas\u0131 ve giderek \u0130\u015f Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revi kapsam\u0131nda addedilmesi yerinde bir yakla\u015f\u0131m de\u011fildir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri ile Ticaret Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev alanlar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bir h\u00fck\u00fcm uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilemeyece\u011fi gibi 7306 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi ile TBK\u2019daki rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin mutlak ticari dava olarak tan\u0131mlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TTK\u2019n\u0131n 4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn z\u0131mnen ilga edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu da ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemez.<\/p>\n
Hal b\u00f6yle olmakla, kanun koyucunun, mutlak ticari dava niteli\u011findeki bir davay\u0131, TTK\u2019n\u0131n 5. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u201caksine h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayal\u0131 olarak, ihtisas alan\u0131 ve yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc t\u00fcm\u00fcyle farkl\u0131 bir mahkemenin g\u00f6revi kapsam\u0131na almas\u0131 gibi kabul edilemez nitelikteki bir yakla\u015f\u0131mda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olamayaca\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lmakla, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde karar verilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
VII. SONU\u00c7<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, TBK\u2019n\u0131n 444-447 maddelerinden do\u011fan rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline dair uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara bakma g\u00f6revinin TTK\u2019n\u0131n 4\/1\u2013c maddesi gere\u011fince ayn\u0131 Kanunun 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Ticaret Mahkemelerine ait olaca\u011f\u0131na, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019nin 13 ve 43. Hukuk Daireleri ile 12 ve 14. Hukuk Daireleri aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu \u015fekilde giderilmesine, 03\/12\/2021 tarihinde 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 35\/4 maddesi gere\u011fince (gerek\u00e7e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00e7o\u011funlukla) sonu\u00e7 itibar\u0131yla oybirli\u011fiyle kesin olarak karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u0130LAVE GEREK\u00c7E \u015eERH\u0130<\/p>\n
Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, 25.10.2017 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanununun G\u00f6rev ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesinin, 01.07.2012 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6102 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK\u2019n\u0131n 4\/1 \u2013 c maddesini fiili olarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131p kald\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015f mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev kapsam\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanununun 5. maddesi ile \u201c\u202611\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun \u0130kinci K\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Alt\u0131nc\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine tabi i\u015f\u00e7iler ile i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekilleri aras\u0131nda, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na\u201d i\u015f mahkemelerince bak\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
TTK\u2019n\u0131n 4\/1- c maddesinde ise \u201c\u2026rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin T.B.K 444 ve 447\u2026\u201d maddelerinden kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n Ticaret Mahkemeleri g\u00f6rev alan\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Birbirleriyle \u00e7eli\u015fen her iki d\u00fczenleme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, hizmet akdinden kaynaklanan rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin davalar\u0131n hangi mahkemelerin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131nda kalaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda hakl\u0131 teredd\u00fctler ya\u015fanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Kanunlar \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 halinde, bunlardan hangisine itibar edilmesi gerekti\u011fiyle ilgili \u00f6nceki kanun-sonraki kanun, genel kanun-\u00f6zel kanun gibi bir tak\u0131m k\u0131staslar mevcuttur.<\/p>\n
Mahkemelerin genel olarak g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununa k\u0131yasla, T\u00fcrk Ticaret Kanunu ve \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu aras\u0131nda; \u00f6zel kanun – genel kanun ayr\u0131m\u0131na gidilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fka k\u0131staslara ba\u015fvurmak gerekir.<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihi k\u0131stas\u0131na g\u00f6re; sonraki kanun olan \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanununa \u00f6ncelik verilmesi gerekli ise de, her iki kanun metni b\u00fcy\u00fcte\u00e7 alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; birinin \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcm, di\u011ferinin ise ona k\u0131yasla genel h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde kaleme al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fc\u015fahede edilmekle konunun bu kapsamda ele al\u0131n\u0131p tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 daha isabetli g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
\u015e\u00f6yle ki, \u0130\u015f Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanununun 5. maddesi \u201c\u2026T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun \u0130kinci K\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Alt\u0131nc\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine tabi i\u015fveren veya i\u015fveren vekilleri aras\u0131nda, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden veya kanundan do\u011fan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na..\u201d \u015feklinde genel bir at\u0131fta bulunulmu\u015ftur. Kanununun g\u00f6ndermede bulundu\u011fu TBK \u0130kinci K\u0131s\u0131m, Alt\u0131nc\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmde hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine dair muhtelif konular\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 55 madde bulunmaktad\u0131r. TBK 393 ila 447 maddeleri aras\u0131nda s\u0131ralanan bu maddelerde rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ise yaln\u0131zca 4 madde mevcuttur.<\/p>\n
TTK\u2019n\u0131n 4\/C \u2013 1 maddesinde ise TBK\u2019n\u0131n 444-447 maddeleri a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a zikredilmek suretiyle adeta nokta at\u0131\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131larak hi\u00e7bir teredd\u00fcte yer b\u0131rakmadan i\u015fin mutlak ticari dava mahiyetinde oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda TTK\u2019daki h\u00fckm\u00fcn, \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunundaki d\u00fczenlemeye nazaran \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 apa\u00e7\u0131k ortadad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki \u201cticari s\u0131r\u201d kavram\u0131, konusunda ihtisas sahibi mahkemelerce, mevcut piyasa \u015fartlar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken ticari bir kavram oldu\u011fundan, i\u015fin Ticaret Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi, hakkaniyet ilkesine de uygun d\u00fc\u015fecektir.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak, TBK\u2019n\u0131n 444 – 447 maddelerinden do\u011fan rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline dair uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara bakma g\u00f6revinin TTK\u2019n\u0131n 4\/1 \u2013 c maddesi gere\u011fince, Ticaret Mahkemelerine ait olaca\u011f\u0131 BAM Daireleri aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu \u015fekilde giderilmesi gerekti\u011fi hususundaki say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne i\u015ftirak etmekle birlikte yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn de gerek\u00e7eye eklenmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaatindeyim.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 03\/12\/2021 tarihli, 2021\/1534 E., 2021\/6811 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/1534 E., 2021\/6811 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMELER\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RELER\u0130\u2019N\u0130N KES\u0130N N\u0130TEL\u0130KTEK\u0130 KARARLARI ARASINDAK\u0130 UYU\u015eMAZLI\u011eIN G\u0130DER\u0130LMES\u0130NE Y\u00d6NEL\u0130K KARAR I. BA\u015eVURU \u0130stanbul 2. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi\u2019nin 11\/01\/2021 tarih ve 2020\/185 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fvurusu ile, i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f akdinin feshinden sonraki d\u00f6nemi kapsayan rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan cezai \u015fart istemine ili\u015fkin davalarda \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 12. Hukuk ve \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 14. Hukuk Dairelerinin Asliye Ticaret Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk ve \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 43. Hukuk Dairelerinin ise \u0130\u015f Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011funa dair kararlar verdi\u011finden bahisle Daireler aras\u0131nda g\u00f6revli mahkemenin tespiti hususunda olu\u015fan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f fark\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesinin talep edilmesi \u00fczerine, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanlar Kurulu 29\/01\/2021 tarihinde toplanarak konuyla ilgili olarak verilen kesin kararlar nedeniyle g\u00f6revli mahkemenin tespitine ili\u015fkin olu\u015fan ve saptanan \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n ilgili dairesinden karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, konuyla ilgili olarak d\u00fczenlenen evrak\u0131 i\u00e7eren dosya Dairemiz Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. II. \u0130STANBUL B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 HUKUK DA\u0130RELER\u0130 BA\u015eKANLAR KURULU\u2019NUN KARARI Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan konu, 29.01.2021 tarihinde \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Hukuk Daireleri Ba\u015fkanlar Kurulu\u2019nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemeleri Hukuk Daireleri\u2019nce verilen kesin nitelikteki kararlar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulundu\u011fu tespit edildikten sonra, yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler sonucunda 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n