T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
Hukuk Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2010\/2-648 E., 2010\/684 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
\u00a0MAHKEMES\u0130 : Antalya 4. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 20\/11\/2009
\nNUMARASI : 2009\/343-2009\/441<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cTapu iptali ve tescil\/ tenkis\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Antalya Asliye 4. Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen 16.10.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2001\/1039-2007\/363 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 2.Hukuk Dairesinin 16.6.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/4503-2009\/11622 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;
\n(\u201c…Miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve miras\u0131n ge\u00e7i\u015fi, miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re belirlenir. (4722 S.K. md.17)
\nDava tenkis istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece delillerin bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede de\u011ferlendirilip gerekti\u011finde uzman bilirki\u015fiden de rapor al\u0131nmak suretiyle sonucu uyar\u0131nca bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yanl\u0131\u015f nitelendirme ve de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r…\u201d)
\ngerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
TEMY\u0130Z \u00a0EDEN \u00a0: Davac\u0131lar vekili<\/p>\n
HUKUK GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n
Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:
\nYerel Mahkemece, bozma sonras\u0131nda verilen ara karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a \u201c\u2026Bozma ilam\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnilmesine\u2026\u201d karar verilmi\u015fken; gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finde \u00a0\u201c\u2026Usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan bozma ilam\u0131na uyulmas\u0131na\u2026\u201d ifadesi kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu nedenledir ki, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesine ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu(HUMK)’ nun 388 ve 389.maddelerine uygun olarak kurulup kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Aslolan k\u0131sa karar ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda direnme olgusu belirgindir. Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda da, gerek\u00e7ede yer alan bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn gerek\u00e7enin di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmleriyle uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, maddi hataya dayal\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00a0Bu nedenle gerek\u00e7ede sehven yer alan bu ifade \u00e7eli\u015fki ya da ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olarak kabul edilmemi\u015f; karar bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda i\u00e7erik itibariyle bozma \u00f6ncesindeki h\u00fckm\u00fcn aynen tekrarland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenmekle HUMK\u2019nun 381-388 maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve \u00f6n sorunun reddi ile \u201c\u2026Usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan bozma ilam\u0131na uyulmas\u0131na\u2026\u201d \u015feklindeki bu k\u0131sm\u0131n gerek\u00e7eden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmak suretiyle temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na oybirli\u011fi ile karar verilerek i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na gelince;<\/p>\n
Dava, dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u201ctapu iptali suretiyle tenkis\u201d olarak belirtilmi\u015f; mahkemece \u201cmuris muvazaas\u0131na dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil\u201d olarak nitelendirilmi\u015f; \u00d6zel daire ise davay\u0131 \u201ctenkis\u201d olarak vas\u0131fland\u0131rarak bozmaya konu etmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi \u00fczerine, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131lar vekilince temyize getirilmi\u015ftir.
\nBu haliyle Yerel Mahkeme ile \u00d6zel Daire aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, davac\u0131lar\u0131n isteminin, muris muvazaas\u0131 hukuksal nedenine mi yoksa tenkise mi ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu niteli\u011fine itibariyle, \u00f6ncelikle tenkis ile muris muvazaas\u0131 kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131nda yarar g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir:
\nBilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; muvazaa, taraflar\u0131n yapmak istedikleri as\u0131l akdi gizlemek i\u00e7in g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fte yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fka bir akittir. \u00d6rne\u011fin, taraflar\u0131n asl\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 yapmay\u0131 kastetmelerine ra\u011fmen, \u015fu veya bu nedenle bunu saklamak i\u00e7in hibe g\u00f6stermeleri veya hibe akdini gizlemek i\u00e7in sat\u0131\u015f g\u00f6stermeleri gibi hallerde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilecek iddialard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu durumda Hakim, akitteki as\u0131l kast\u0131n ne oldu\u011funu yorumlayarak, taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekte hangi t\u00fcr s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi yapmak istediklerini ve ancak bunu gizlemek i\u00e7in neden ba\u015fka t\u00fcr bir akit yapmak zorunlulu\u011funu duyduklar\u0131n\u0131, ger\u00e7ekte yapt\u0131klar\u0131 akdin yasal unsurlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve resmi \u015fekil y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de ge\u00e7erli olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 saptamak durumundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Muvazaa iddias\u0131 ancak s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin taraf\u0131 olan kimse ya da k\u00fclli halefi taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir. Bu ilkenin istisnalar\u0131 kanunda s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir (\u00d6rne\u011fin;\u0130\u0130K md.277 ve md.MK 690).<\/p>\n
Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra , bir kimsenin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 miras hakk\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rakmak amac\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekte ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamak istedi\u011fi tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tapu sicil memuru \u00f6n\u00fcnde iradesini sat\u0131\u015f do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde sakl\u0131 pay sahibi olsun ya da olmas\u0131n, miras hakk\u0131 \u00e7i\u011fnenen t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar; g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrdeki sat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve gizli ba\u011f\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin de bi\u00e7im ko\u015fulundan yoksun bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek dava a\u00e7abilirler.<\/p>\n
Uygulamada bu dava muris muvazaas\u0131 olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer taraftan, Doktrinde sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferini alamayan miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n miras b\u0131rakanlar\u0131n\u0131n, mirastan tasarruf edebilece\u011fi k\u0131sm\u0131 a\u015fan yani sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tecav\u00fcz\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmak ve geri al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalar ise tenkis(\u0130ndirim) davalar\u0131 olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r(4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 TMK madde 569). Miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n, sakl\u0131 paya tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti davan\u0131n tespit k\u0131sm\u0131d\u0131r. Bu i\u015flem tespit edildikten sonra da ne miktar pay\u0131n tecav\u00fcze u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu k\u0131sm\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131ya iadesi hususu da davan\u0131n eda k\u0131sm\u0131d\u0131r. Tenkis davas\u0131nda; miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n, miras\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay\u0131na tecav\u00fcz ederek vasiyetle veya \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 di\u011fer bir tasarrufla ba\u015fka bir miras\u00e7\u0131ya veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye ba\u011f\u0131\u015fta bulunmu\u015f olmas\u0131, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ko\u015fuludur. Miras Hukukundaki tenkis davalar\u0131, \u00f6z\u00fcnde ge\u00e7erli olan i\u015flemler i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131labilir. \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan 4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 565.maddesinde (Eski 743 Say\u0131l\u0131 Medeni Kanun\u2019un \u00a0507.md.) yer alan:\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cA\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z kazand\u0131rmalar, \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 tasarruflar gibi tenkise tabidir:<\/p>\n
1.Mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n, miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden yasal miras\u00e7\u0131ya miras pay\u0131na mahsuben yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu sa\u011flararas\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalar, geri verilmemek kayd\u0131yla altsoyuna malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 devri veya bor\u00e7tan kurtarma yoluyla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalar ya da al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda verilen \u00e7eyiz ve kurulu\u015f sermayesi,<\/p>\n
2 .Miras haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcmden \u00f6nce tasfiyesi maksad\u0131yla yap\u0131lan kazand\u0131rmalar,<\/p>\n
3.Mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n serbest\u00e7e d\u00f6nme hakk\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamalar ve \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden \u00f6nceki bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde adet \u00fczere verilen hediyeler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamalar,<\/p>\n
4.Mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay kurallar\u0131n\u0131 etkisiz k\u0131lmak amac\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k olan kazand\u0131rmalar.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u015eeklindeki h\u00fck\u00fcm ile tenkise tabi di\u011fer tasarruflar say\u0131lmak suretiyle miras b\u0131rakan taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ba\u015fkaca hangi i\u015flemlerin tenkise tabi olaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.
\n\u00d6nemle belirtilmelidir ki, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 74. maddesi gere\u011fince hakim taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 olup; ayn\u0131 Kanunun 76.maddesi gere\u011fince bir davada dava nedenini yani dayan\u0131lan olaylar\u0131 bildirmek taraflara, bunlar\u0131n hukuki nitelemesini yapmak, uygulanacak yasa maddelerini bulmak ve uygulamak ise Hakime aittir (HUMK.76).<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay irdelendi\u011finde:<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131lar vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinin ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda davay\u0131 \u201ctapu iptali suretiyle tenkis\u201d olarak g\u00f6sterip; dilek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011finde de; m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisi Emine Ceylan\u2019\u0131n daval\u0131 ile gayriresmi evlilik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu evlili\u011fin devam\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda murisin \u00a012.06.1991 tarih ve 19355 yevmiye nolu gayrimenkul sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile m\u00fclkiyeti Y… Z… E… \u2019a ait 2460 ada 1 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerine 4 katl\u0131 bina yapt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gayrimenkul sat\u0131\u015f vaadi tarihinde, sat\u0131\u015f vaadinde bulunan Y… Z… E… isimli \u015fahs\u0131n ayn\u0131 noterde daval\u0131ya \u00a0vekaletname verdi\u011fini, murisin kanser hastas\u0131 olmas\u0131 sebebiyle tapuyu \u00fczerine alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 M… \u2019ten olan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapusunun daval\u0131 M… A… Ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131na muvafakat etti\u011fini, bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda davac\u0131lar\u0131n ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc yap\u0131lan bu i\u015flemin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak mirastan mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma i\u015flemi oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n, murislerini manevi y\u00f6nden etkileyerek ve \u00f6lmeden k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce de tapunun \u00fczerine ge\u00e7irilmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n mahfuz hisseli miras\u00e7\u0131lar olarak ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek davaya konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapusunun iptali ile mahfuz hisseleri oran\u0131nda davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescilini istemi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
Ne var ki, davac\u0131 vekilinin gerek 4.2.2002 tarihli ilk celsede dava dilek\u00e7esini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak tutana\u011fa aynen ge\u00e7en \u201c\u2026Ger\u00e7ek istemimiz muris E… C… \u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 tasarrufu nedeniyle tasarruf nisab\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan miktar\u0131n tenkis edilmesidir.\u201d \u015feklindeki beyanlar\u0131; gerek 14.2.2006 tarihli celsedeki \u201c\u2026A\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z dava muris muvazaas\u0131na dayanan iptal davas\u0131 olmay\u0131p tenkis davas\u0131d\u0131r. Muris uzun y\u0131llar yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak para kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla tek mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan davaya konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131n alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u2026\u201d bi\u00e7imindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,davac\u0131lar\u0131n \u00a0a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 \u00a0davan\u0131n tenkise ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 taraf dilek\u00e7esine a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirdi\u011fi her iki beyan\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a tenkis istediklerini bildirmekle hakim bu talep d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kamaz ve bu iste\u011fe g\u00f6re hangi kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit edip uygulamak zorundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Eldeki davada yerel mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n tenkise y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelemede dava muris muvazaas\u0131 olarak kabul edilmi\u015f; ara\u015ft\u0131rma da bu niteleme \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f; sonu\u00e7ta 01.04.1974 tarih ve 1\/2 Say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u0130BK \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131larak davan\u0131n reddi yoluna gidilmi\u015ftir.
\nDosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, davac\u0131lar\u0131n miras b\u0131rakan\u0131 12.06.1991 tarihinde, Y… Z… E… ‘dan 2460 ada 1 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile sat\u0131n alm\u0131\u015f; 22.05.2001 tarihinde ise ayn\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Y… Z… E… taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 M… A…\u2019e sat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131lar asl\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n miras b\u0131rakanlar\u0131 ad\u0131na tapuda tescilinin yap\u0131lacakken, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na tescil edildi\u011fini, oysa ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n miras b\u0131rakanlar\u0131n\u0131n yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 sonucunda kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 para ile sat\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n zedelendi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, tenkis istemi\u015fler; duru\u015fmalarda da bu taleplerini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dile getirmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6yleyse Yerel Mahkemece, davac\u0131lar\u0131n talebinin tenkise y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek, tenkis ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, ayn\u0131 hususlara i\u015faret eden ve Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019nca da benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmak gerekirken, \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.
\nBu nedenle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
S O N U \u00c7 : 1-Yerel mahkeme karar\u0131nda ge\u00e7en (usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan bozma ilam\u0131na uyulmas\u0131na) ibaresinin karardan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n
2- Davac\u0131lar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda ve yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 H.U.M.K.nun 429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n geri verilmesine, 22.12.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde, oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun 22.12.2010 tarihli, 2010\/2-648 E., 2010\/684 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2010\/2-648 E., 2010\/684 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” \u00a0MAHKEMES\u0130 : Antalya 4. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 20\/11\/2009 NUMARASI : 2009\/343-2009\/441 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cTapu iptali ve tescil\/ tenkis\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Antalya Asliye 4. Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen 16.10.2007 g\u00fcn ve 2001\/1039-2007\/363 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 2.Hukuk Dairesinin 16.6.2009 g\u00fcn ve 2008\/4503-2009\/11622 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile; (\u201c…Miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve miras\u0131n ge\u00e7i\u015fi, miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re belirlenir. (4722 S.K. md.17) Dava tenkis istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece delillerin bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede de\u011ferlendirilip gerekti\u011finde uzman bilirki\u015fiden de rapor al\u0131nmak suretiyle sonucu uyar\u0131nca bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yanl\u0131\u015f nitelendirme ve de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r…\u201d) gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir. TEMY\u0130Z \u00a0EDEN \u00a0: Davac\u0131lar vekili HUKUK GENEL KURULU KARARI Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Yerel Mahkemece, bozma sonras\u0131nda verilen ara karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a \u201c\u2026Bozma ilam\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnilmesine\u2026\u201d karar verilmi\u015fken; gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finde \u00a0\u201c\u2026Usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan bozma ilam\u0131na uyulmas\u0131na\u2026\u201d ifadesi kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenledir ki, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesine ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76919","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n