T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2007\/17.HD-16 E., 2007\/28 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
\u0130\u0130Y.n\u0131n 331. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara u\u011fratmak kast\u0131yla mevcudunu eksiltmek su\u00e7unun takibinin \u0130\u0130Y.n\u0131n 346. ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvuru ile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 11.11.2005 g\u00fcn ve 2005\/21150 say\u0131 ile verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara, \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilince yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n Tarsus A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca, 30.12.2005 g\u00fcn ve 1028\/1295 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fcteferrik karar ile kabul\u00fc ile kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesine ili\u015fkin karara kar\u015f\u0131,<\/p>\n
Adalet Bakan\u0131nca yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminde bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesince 21.03.2006 g\u00fcn ve 12336 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
01 Haziran 2005 tarihinde kabul edilip ayn\u0131 g\u00fcnl\u00fc m\u00fckerrer Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu’nda De\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair 5358 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 1. maddesi ile \u0130\u0130K’nun 331. maddesindeki eylemin m\u00fceyyidesi, hapis ve adli para cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de su\u00e7un tabi oldu\u011fu yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin 349. maddede herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, an\u0131lan su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131laman\u0131n \u015fikayet prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu oldu\u011fundan, Tarsus A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.12.2005 tarihli ve 2005\/1028-1295 m\u00fcteferrik say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bozulmas\u0131na, sonraki i\u015flemlerin mahallinde yerine getirilmesine, karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 10.01.2007 g\u00fcn ve 60772 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
“Bor\u00e7lunun alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara sokmak kastiyle mevcudunu eksiltme su\u00e7u, \u0130\u0130Y’n\u0131n 331. maddesinin 5. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u015fikayete tabi ise de, an\u0131lan su\u00e7 alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131nca soru\u015fturularak, iddianame ile a\u00e7\u0131lacak davada kovu\u015fturma CMY’n\u0131n genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla, kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n Tarsus A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi yasaya uygun olup, yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine karar verilmesi yerine kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r” gerek\u00e7eleriyle itiraz yasayoluna ba\u015fvurularak, \u00d6zel Dairenin yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, Adalet Bakan\u0131n\u0131n yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin reddine karar verilmesi isteminde bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Dosya Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunca okundu, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n
CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu somut olaydaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar; \u0130\u0130Y’n\u0131n 331. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunan, alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara sokmak kasdiyle mevcudunu eksiltmek su\u00e7undan,<\/p>\n
a- \u015eikayetin C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u0131 yoksa \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesine mi yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
b- Bu su\u00e7la ilgili soru\u015fturman\u0131n C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca m\u0131 yoksa yetkili \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesince mi yerine getirilece\u011fi,<\/p>\n
c- Yetkili \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesine verilen dilek\u00e7enin dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yeterli say\u0131l\u0131p say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMY’n\u0131n 170 vd. maddelerine uygun olarak iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u0130Y’n\u0131n uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmleri;<\/p>\n
Alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara sokmak kasdiyle mevcudunu eksilten bor\u00e7lular\u0131n cezas\u0131:<\/p>\n
Madde 331- (De\u011fi\u015fik: 17\/7\/2003-4949\/89 md.; 31.5.2005-5358\/1 md.)<\/p>\n
Haciz yolu ile takip talebinden sonra veya bu talepten \u00f6nceki iki y\u0131l i\u00e7inde bor\u00e7lu; alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara sokmak maksad\u0131yla, mallar\u0131n\u0131 veya bunlardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fclk\u00fcnden \u00e7\u0131kararak, telef ederek veya k\u0131ymetten d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrerek hakiki surette yahut gizleyerek muvazaa yoluyla ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n uhdesine ge\u00e7irerek veya as\u0131l olmayan bor\u00e7lar ikrar ederek mevcudunu suni surette eksiltirse, aleyhine aciz belgesi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya alacakl\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispat etti\u011fi takdirde, alt\u0131 aydan \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131la kadar hapis ve bin g\u00fcne kadar adl\u00ee para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u2026\u2026..<\/p>\n
Bu su\u00e7lar alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine takip olunur.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6rev ve birle\u015ftirme yasa\u011f\u0131 :<\/p>\n
Madde 346 – (De\u011fi\u015fik: 3\/7\/1940-3890\/1 md. ;31.5.2005-5358\/18 md.)<\/p>\n
Bu Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re disiplin veya tazyik hapsine icra mahkemesi karar verir.<\/p>\n
\u2026..<\/p>\n
Bu Bapta yer alan su\u00e7larla ilgili davalara, icra mahkemesinde bak\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u015eikayet s\u00fcresi :<\/p>\n
Madde 347 – (De\u011fi\u015fik: 18\/2\/1965-538\/138 md. ;31.5.2005-5358\/19 md.)<\/p>\n
Bu Bapta yer alan fiillerden dolay\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131, fiilin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay ve her halde fiilin i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren bir y\u0131l ge\u00e7mekle d\u00fc\u015fer.<\/p>\n
Yetki :<\/p>\n
Madde 348 – (De\u011fi\u015fik: 31.5.2005-5358\/20 md.) Bu Bapta yer alan fiillerden dolay\u0131 yetkili icra mahkemesi, icra takibinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerdeki mahkemedir.<\/p>\n
Muhakeme usul\u00fc :<\/p>\n
Madde 349 – \u015eikayet dilek\u00e7e ile veya \u015fifahi beyanla yap\u0131l\u0131r. Dilek\u00e7eyi veya dava beyan\u0131n\u0131 alan icra mahkemesi duru\u015fma i\u00e7in hemen bir g\u00fcn tayin edip \u015fikayet\u00e7inin imzas\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131r ve maznuna celpname g\u00f6nderir. \u015eahit g\u00f6sterilmi\u015fse o da celbolunur.<\/p>\n
\u0130ki taraf tayin olunan g\u00fcn ve saatte icra mahkemesinin huzuruna gelme\u011fe veya vekil g\u00f6nderme\u011fe mecburdurlar.<\/p>\n
\u0130cab\u0131nda merci, taraflar\u0131n bizzat haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 emredebilir.<\/p>\n
Maznun ba\u015fka yerde ikamet ediyorsa istinabe yoliyle sorguya \u00e7ekilir.<\/p>\n
Maznun, \u015fikayeti alan veya istinabe edilen icra mahkemesinin huzuruna gelmez veya m\u00fcdafi g\u00f6ndermezse yahut bizzat bulunmas\u0131na l\u00fczum g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcrse zab\u0131ta marifetiyle getirilir. Bu suretle de bulundurulamazsa muhakeme g\u0131yab\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
\u015eikayet\u00e7i muayyen zamanda gelmez ve vekil de g\u00f6ndermezse \u015fikayet hakk\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fer.<\/p>\n
Gelmeyen \u015fahitlere yap\u0131lacak muamele ile bor\u00e7lunun g\u0131yab\u0131nda verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 eski hale getirme talebi hakk\u0131nda Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanununda yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmler tatbik olunur.<\/p>\n
Duru\u015fma :<\/p>\n
Madde 350 – \u0130cra mahkemesi iki taraf\u0131 ve delillerini dinler ve gerek taraflar\u0131n gerek \u015fahitlerin ifadelerini duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131na ge\u00e7irir.<\/p>\n
Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 haz\u0131r bulundurulmaz.<\/p>\n
Tahkikat:<\/p>\n
Madde 351 – \u015eikayet\u00e7i dilek\u00e7e veya beyan\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu delillerle ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Maznun m\u00fcdafas\u0131 i\u00e7in tahkikat\u0131n tevsiini ancak bir kere istiyebilir.<\/p>\n
Entscheidung:<\/p>\n
Madde 352 – \u0130cra mahkemesi iki taraf\u0131n ifadelerini ve b\u00fct\u00fcn delillerini ve iddia ve m\u00fcdafaalar\u0131n\u0131 dinledikten sonra nihayet be\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar\u0131n\u0131 verir ve hulasas\u0131n\u0131 Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131na bildirir.<\/p>\n
(Ek f\u0131kra: 17\/7\/2003-4949\/99 md.)Takibi \u015fik\u00e2yete ba\u011fl\u0131 su\u00e7larda dava ve cezan\u0131n 354 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddede yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebeplerle d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi kararda belirtilir.<\/p>\n
\u015eeklindedir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u0130Y’da 5358 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikler ve yeni yapt\u0131r\u0131m sistemi:<\/p>\n
5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY’s\u0131nda, c\u00fcr\u00fcm-kabahat ayr\u0131m\u0131 ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da yapt\u0131r\u0131m sisteminde yer alan a\u011f\u0131r-hafif hapis ayr\u0131m\u0131na son verilmesi \u00fczerine, yasada kabahat olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen bir k\u0131s\u0131m eylemler 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Yasas\u0131 ile idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 gerektiren eylemler olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f, bir k\u0131s\u0131m eylemler ise su\u00e7 haline getirilmi\u015f, bu sistem ve yapt\u0131r\u0131m de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin zorunlu sonucu olarak, \u00f6zel Yasalardaki yapt\u0131r\u0131m sisteminin de 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya uyarlanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla 01.06.2005 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulan 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Yasas\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131ndaki Yasan\u0131n 7. maddesi ile yasalarda, yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 hafif hapis ve hafif para cezas\u0131 olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen eylemler ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak, \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Yasas\u0131’nda, yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 hafif hapis olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen eylemler idari para cezas\u0131 gerektiren kabahatlere d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Ancak bu genel uyarlama h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yetersiz oldu\u011funu g\u00f6ren yasa koyucu, 01.06.2005 g\u00fcn ve 25832 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fckerrer Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, 31.5.2005 g\u00fcn ve 5358 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 16. bab kapsam\u0131ndaki fiilleri ikili bir ayr\u0131ma tabi tutarak, bir k\u0131s\u0131m eylemleri su\u00e7 olarak, di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m eylemleri ise, kabahat olarak d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda 337, 338\/2, 339, 340, 341, 343 ve 344. maddelerdeki eylemler kabahat olarak d\u00fczenlenip, disiplin hapsi veya tazyik hapsi \u015feklinde yapt\u0131r\u0131mlara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f, 331, 332, 333, 333\/a, 334, 335, 336, 337\/a, 338\/1, 342, 345\/a, 345\/b, maddelerindeki eylemler ise su\u00e7 kapsam\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, hapis cezas\u0131 veya adli para cezas\u0131 bi\u00e7iminde yapt\u0131r\u0131mlara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bir k\u0131s\u0131m su\u00e7lar\u0131n re’sen takibi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de, di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m su\u00e7lar\u0131n takibi \u015fikayet ko\u015fuluna ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f, bu husus su\u00e7 tan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddelerde, “Bu su\u00e7lar alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine takip olunur”, “alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine”, “ilgilinin \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine”, “zarar g\u00f6ren alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine” ibareleriyle a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekilde belirtmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr;<\/p>\n
1-\u0130cra \u0130flas Yasas\u0131nda yer alan \u015fikayete tabii k\u0131l\u0131nan su\u00e7lar dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ve bu kapsamda an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 331. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunup da, kovu\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fikayete tabii oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ku\u015fku bulunmayan alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara sokmak kasdiyle mevcudunu eksiltmek su\u00e7undan, yap\u0131lan \u015fikayet \u0130\u0130Y’n\u0131n 347. maddede belirtilen s\u00fcreler i\u00e7inde, ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 348 ve 349. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca yetkili \u0130cra Mahkemesine yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2-Bu su\u00e7larla ilgili dava a\u00e7ma y\u00f6ntemi, \u0130\u0130Y’n\u0131n 349. maddesinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015f bulundu\u011fundan, \u015fikayet Yasan\u0131n 346. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nan \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesine yap\u0131lmal\u0131 ve bu su\u00e7larla ilgili soru\u015fturmalarda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de\u011fil, \u0130\u0130Y h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3- \u015eikayete tabi oldu\u011fu belirtilen bu su\u00e7larla ilgili olarak, \u015fikayetin do\u011frudan \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 170. maddesi uyar\u0131nca iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesine gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 170. ve devam\u0131 madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin de bu su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanmas\u0131na olanak bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4-Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ve bu su\u00e7a ait soru\u015fturman\u0131n C.Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin olan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe yasal dayanak olarak g\u00f6sterilen, 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 9. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 344 vd. maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen \u015fahsi dava t\u00fcrleriyle ilgili olup, bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u0130\u0130Y’nda yer alan su\u00e7larda uygulama alan\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
An\u0131lan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ve \u00f6zellikle \u0130\u0130Y’n\u0131n 5358 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile de\u011fi\u015fik 346 ve 349. maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmleri g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, an\u0131lan su\u00e7 t\u00fcrleriyle ilgili soru\u015fturman\u0131n C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yasal olanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, su\u00e7lar\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve adalet d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle de olsa, yasakoyucu taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen bir y\u00f6ntemin uygulanmas\u0131 veya verilmeyen bir yetkinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuk devleti ilkesiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmakla, yasal bir d\u00fczenleme konusu yap\u0131labilecek bu hususta, \u00d6zel Dairece verilen kararda bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n
1- Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2- Dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 13.02.2007 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.
\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 13.02.2007 tarihli, 2007\/17.HD-16 E. ve 2007\/28 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu 2007\/17.HD-16 E., 2007\/28 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” \u0130\u0130Y.n\u0131n 331. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zarara u\u011fratmak kast\u0131yla mevcudunu eksiltmek su\u00e7unun takibinin \u0130\u0130Y.n\u0131n 346. ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca icra mahkemesine ba\u015fvuru ile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 11.11.2005 g\u00fcn ve 2005\/21150 say\u0131 ile verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara, \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilince yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n Tarsus A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca, 30.12.2005 g\u00fcn ve 1028\/1295 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fcteferrik karar ile kabul\u00fc ile kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesine ili\u015fkin karara kar\u015f\u0131, Adalet Bakan\u0131nca yasa yarar\u0131na bozma isteminde bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesince 21.03.2006 g\u00fcn ve 12336 say\u0131 ile; 01 Haziran 2005 tarihinde kabul edilip ayn\u0131 g\u00fcnl\u00fc m\u00fckerrer Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu’nda De\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair 5358 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 1. maddesi ile \u0130\u0130K’nun 331. maddesindeki eylemin m\u00fceyyidesi, hapis ve adli para cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de su\u00e7un tabi oldu\u011fu yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin 349. maddede herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, an\u0131lan su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131laman\u0131n \u015fikayet prosed\u00fcr\u00fcne uygun olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu oldu\u011fundan, Tarsus A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.12.2005 tarihli ve 2005\/1028-1295 m\u00fcteferrik say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bozulmas\u0131na, sonraki i\u015flemlerin mahallinde yerine getirilmesine, karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n