T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
YA\u011eMUR D\u00d6NMEZ VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/26124)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ali Erdem \u015eAH\u0130N<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Ya\u011fmur D\u00d6NMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Ali H\u0131d\u0131r TEK\u0130N<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. Enerji, Sanayi ve Maden Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Candan DUMRUL KADIYORANO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin sendika karar\u0131na istinaden kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 protesto eyleminden dolay\u0131 disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 nedeniyle sendika haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular, ba\u015fvuruya konu olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte Devlet Su \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde (DS\u0130) m\u00fctercim veya veri haz\u0131rlama kontrol i\u015fletmeni (VHK\u0130) olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular ayr\u0131ca Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikalar\u0131 Konfederasyonuna (KESK) ba\u011fl\u0131 Enerji, Sanayi ve Maden Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 (ESM) \u00fcyesidir.<\/p>\n
3. T\u00fcrkiye, 15 Temmuz 2016 gecesi silahl\u0131 bir darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn savu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ise \u00fclke genelinde ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) ilan edilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. OHAL s\u00fcresince yirmi d\u00f6rt kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname (KHK)(667-690 say\u0131l\u0131) \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu KHK’larla genel ve soyut normlar ihdas edilerek al\u0131nan tedbirlerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda do\u011frudan etki do\u011furucu nitelikte i\u015flemler de yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (15 Temmuz darbe giri\u015fimine ili\u015fkin geni\u015f arka plan bilgisi i\u00e7in bkz. Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017).<\/p>\n
4. Somut olay ise ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine veya devletin mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011funa Mill\u00ee G\u00fcvenlik Kurulunca karar verilen yap\u0131, olu\u015fum veya gruplara \u00fcyeli\u011fi, mensubiyeti veya iltisak\u0131 yahut bunlarla irtibat\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilenlerine y\u00f6nelik kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131karma tedbirini de i\u00e7eren, 29\/10\/2016 tarihli ve 29872 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 675 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (675 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) etraf\u0131nda \u015fekillenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan KHK kapsam\u0131nda Yenilenebilir Enerji Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde (YEGM) g\u00f6rev yapan baz\u0131 sendika \u00fcyelerinin de kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine kurum yemekhanesinde uygulamay\u0131 protesto eden konu\u015fmalar yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve an\u0131lan ki\u015filerin u\u011furlanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla bir sendika karar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular, s\u00f6z konusu karara istinaden YEGM yemekhanesinde \u00f6\u011fle aras\u0131nda personelin yemek yedi\u011fi esnada yap\u0131lan toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yakla\u015f\u0131k on ki\u015finin kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemde Sendika Ba\u015fkan\u0131 M.\u015e. ve g\u00f6revlerine son verilen ki\u015filerden M.E.A. ve \u00d6.F.K. a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015ftur. Bunun yan\u0131nda kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7e\u015fitli sloganlar att\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n ise “Geri D\u00f6nece\u011fiz” yaz\u0131l\u0131 k\u00e2\u011f\u0131t d\u00f6vizler ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ve tutanaklara yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda an\u0131lan eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular; ifadelerinde i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 toplamak i\u00e7in g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlileri nezaretinde arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n odalar\u0131na gittiklerini, oradan da veda konu\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 dinlemek i\u00e7in YEGM yemekhanesine ge\u00e7tiklerini, konu\u015fmalar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan grubun olays\u0131z bir \u015fekilde da\u011f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bir kamu kurumunda izinsiz olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen protesto g\u00f6sterisine kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 ve g\u00f6steriyi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren grupla beraber hareket ettikleri, Ya\u011fmur D\u00f6nmez’in g\u00f6steride kullan\u0131lan d\u00f6vizleri da\u011f\u0131tman\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra slogan atarak, Ali H\u0131d\u0131r Tekin’in ise ayn\u0131 g\u00f6steride d\u00f6viz kald\u0131rarak g\u00f6steriye katk\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Nihayetinde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (B) bendinin (d) alt bendi olan “Hizmet d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda devlet memurunun itibar ve g\u00fcven duygusunu sarsacak nitelikte davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmak” uyar\u0131nca k\u0131nama cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucular, disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemiyle idare mahkemelerine ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130lk derece mahkemeleri, ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda eylemin toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 ile ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilerek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini ve eylemin sendikal faaliyet kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek dava konusu i\u015flemlerin iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Daval\u0131 idare, iptal kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge idare mahkemeleri, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ba\u015fka bir kurumun yemekhanesinde di\u011fer insanlar\u0131n ve kurumun huzurunu bozacak davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011funu, sendika karar\u0131n\u0131n KHK ile g\u00f6revlerine son verilen sendika \u00fcyelerine destek amac\u0131yla al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle sendikal faaliyet niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Nihayetinde b\u00f6lge idare mahkemeleri, eylemlerin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve meslekleri ile herhangi bir \u015fekilde ili\u015fkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve protesto g\u00f6sterisinin sendikalar\u0131n \u00e7ekirdek faaliyet alanlar\u0131na d\u00e2hil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle ilk derece mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davalar\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurular s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyon taraf\u0131ndan 2020\/28031 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun 2020\/26124 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvuru ile birle\u015ftirilmesine, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Ger\u00e7ek Ki\u015fi Ba\u015fvurucular Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular, sendika karar\u0131 \u00fczerine kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 protesto g\u00f6sterisi nedeniyle disiplin cezas\u0131 ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek bu m\u00fcdahalelerin sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; somut olayda toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131na bir m\u00fcdahalenin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bulundu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde m\u00fcdahalelerin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131 haiz olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fik\u00e2yete konu edilen disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n me\u015fru ama\u00e7 ile orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kararlar\u0131n demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerinden olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu anlamda ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7eler i\u00e7erip i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi hususu de\u011ferlendirilirken ilgili ulusal ve uluslararas\u0131 mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile yarg\u0131 i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi, \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda kamu g\u00f6revlileri sendikalar\u0131n\u0131n faaliyet alanlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olduk\u00e7a geni\u015f a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015ftur (Ahmet Parmaks\u0131z [GK], B. No: 2017\/29263, 22\/5\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 50,62; Ayfer Altunta\u015f ve \u0130kbal \u00dcnzile G\u00fcrsoy, B. No: 2018\/24874, 31\/3\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 26,36). An\u0131lan kararlarda sendika \u00fcyelerinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131, y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri, i\u015f g\u00fcvenlikleri ve sa\u011fl\u0131k ko\u015fullar\u0131 gibi konular\u0131n sendikalar\u0131n \u00e7ekirdek faaliyet alanlar\u0131ndan oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re somut olaya konu protesto g\u00f6sterisinin (bkz. \u00a7 4) kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan sendika \u00fcyesi kamu g\u00f6revlilerine destek verme amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yani \u00e7ekirdek alana ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan g\u00f6steriye kat\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruculara yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalelerin sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (\u00e7ekirdek alan \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Nigar H\u00fcrel ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2017\/16800, 22\/11\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 13,15; Hasan Ta\u015f ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2020\/21790, 10\/7\/2024, \u00a7 11)<\/p>\n
13. \u00d6te yandan s\u00f6z konusu belirlemenin eylemin ama\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak (\u00e7ekirdek hak, bask\u0131 grubu ayr\u0131m\u0131) incelenmesinin bir sonucu oldu\u011fu, kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin sendikalarla kurduklar\u0131 \u00fcyelik veya y\u00f6neticilik gibi ba\u011flar\u0131n meseleleri otomatik olarak sendika hakk\u0131 ile ili\u015fkilendirmeyece\u011fi gibi bu kimselere tabi olduklar\u0131 stat\u00fc hukukunun getirdi\u011fi sorumluluk ve s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z, alternatif veya ikame bir kimlik kazand\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131 da hat\u0131rlanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle meselenin sendikal hak ba\u011flam\u0131nda incelenmesinin ki\u015filerin eylemlerini otomatik olarak me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (\u0130dris G\u00fcrkan, B. No: 2018\/24432, 7\/6\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 17-24; Hasan Ta\u015f ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2020\/21790, 10\/7\/2024, \u00a7 12).<\/p>\n
14. Ancak uygulamada yarg\u0131 mercileri, sendika kaynakl\u0131 eylemleri salt sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak incelemekte ve e\u011fer eylemler sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011filse davalar\u0131 reddetmektedirler. Oysa yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken e\u011fer bir fiil sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fcyorsa hangi temel hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funun tespit edilerek ilgili menfaatler aras\u0131nda bir dengeleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. E\u011fer sendikal bir eylem ise bu durumda da sendika hakk\u0131 ile kamu hizmetinin gere\u011fi gibi- s\u00fcrekli ve d\u00fczenli- y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruculara stat\u00fc hukuku \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde y\u00fcklenen \u00f6devler aras\u0131nda bir dengeleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Zira yukar\u0131da da zikredildi\u011fi gibi meselenin sendikal hak ba\u011flam\u0131nda incelenmesi ki\u015filerin eylemlerini otomatik olarak me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rmamaktad\u0131r (sendika karar\u0131ndan kaynaklanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden incelenen kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Elif \u00d6zkan, B. No: 2018\/7757, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 18-21; Ayfer Altunta\u015f ve \u0130kbal \u00dcnzile G\u00fcrsoy, \u00a7 36); toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131ndan incelenen kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. G\u00fcven \u00c7elik ve Kadri Dursun, B. No: 2018\/5060, 8\/6\/2023, \u00a7 10; Kamuran K\u0131l\u0131n\u00e7, B. No: 2018\/5549, 18\/10\/2023, \u00a7 9; Hasan Ta\u015f ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2020\/21790, 10\/7\/2024, \u00a7 13)<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Sendika hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 125. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n B bendinin (d) alt bendinin kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlama \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. M\u00fcdahalenin devlet memurunun itibar ve g\u00fcveninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u00f6nlemlerin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 51. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131 me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Sendika hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 gerekir (Tayfun Cengiz, B. No: 2013\/8463, 18\/9\/2014, \u00a7 55; Abidin Ayd\u0131n T\u00fcfek\u00e7i, B. No: 2013\/1315, 15\/4\/2015, \u00a7 52; Hikmet Aslan, B. No: 2014\/11036, 16\/6\/2016, \u00a7 50). Bu itibarla m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunlu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucular, \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu sendikan\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 \u00fczerine bir kamu kurumunda izinsiz olarak d\u00fczenlenen protesto g\u00f6sterisine kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruculardan biri ta\u015f\u0131nan d\u00f6vizleri da\u011f\u0131tmakla birlikte slogan atm\u0131\u015f, di\u011feri ise d\u00f6viz ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130dare, an\u0131lan eylemlerin hizmet d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda devlet memuruna duyulan g\u00fcven ve itibar\u0131 sarst\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirerek ba\u015fvurucular\u0131 disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 5-7). Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ilk derece mahkemelerince verilen disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin kararlar, istinaf kanun yolunda eylemlerin sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kurumun huzurunu bozdu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle kald\u0131r\u0131larak davalar reddedilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a78, 9).<\/p>\n
19. Anayasa Mahkemesi Hasan Ta\u015f ve di\u011ferleri karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru konusu protesto g\u00f6sterisine kat\u0131lan ba\u015fka kamu g\u00f6revlilerine yap\u0131lan disiplin cezas\u0131 \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahaleleri sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu kararda; \u00f6\u011fle yeme\u011fi servisinde ve g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlileri nezaretinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen eylemin olays\u0131z bir \u015fekilde sona erdi\u011fi ve idarenin kamu hizmetinin gere\u011fi gibi y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli tedbirleri alacak zamana sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bunun yan\u0131nda eylem esnas\u0131nda yemek servisinin devam etmesinin, eylemin idarenin i\u015fleyi\u015fine bir tehdit olarak alg\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Son olarak ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n eylemdeki rollerinin ne \u015fekilde kamu g\u00f6revlisine duyulan g\u00fcven ve itibar duygusunu sarst\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya kamu hizmetini etkiledi\u011fine dair idarece herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmi\u015ftir. Nihayetinde de\u011ferlendirmelerinde Anayasa Mahkemesinin kabul etti\u011fi standartlar\u0131 uygulamayan idarenin ve b\u00f6lge idare mahkemelerinin, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile ortaya koyamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuyla sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Bu itibarla somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n Hasan Ta\u015f ve di\u011ferleri karar\u0131nda s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ko\u015fullarla (protesto g\u00f6sterisi, disiplin cezalar\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n iddialar\u0131, soru\u015fturma raporu, b\u00f6lge idare mahkemelerinin gerek\u00e7eleri) ayn\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahse konu kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvuruya konu demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olmayan m\u00fcdahaleler nedeniyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 51. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. T\u00fczel Ki\u015fi Ba\u015fvurucu Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvuru, m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 disiplin cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvurucu t\u00fczel ki\u015fi, ba\u015fvuru formunda temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ili\u015fkin olarak herhangi bir iddia ileri s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir. Bu anlamda t\u00fczel ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucunun ihlale konu edilen i\u015flem nedeniyle g\u00fcncel ve ki\u015fisel bir hakk\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan etkilendi\u011fi s\u00f6ylenemez. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurunun t\u00fczel ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir (Onur Do\u011fanay, B. No: 2013\/1977, 9\/1\/2014, \u00a7 \u00a7 39-47).<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucular ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 50.000 TL tazminat istemlerinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi mahkemece yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan ([GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100). \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 net 34.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. T\u00fczel ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 51. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 2. \u0130dari Dava Dairesine (E.2019\/2069, K.2020\/377, E.2019\/2400, K.2020\/749)iletilmek \u00fczere Ankara 11. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2018\/1729, K.2019\/915) ve Ankara 12. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2018\/1843, K.2019\/1483) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvuruculara net 34.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n AYRI AYRI \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 893,80 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.893,80 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 22\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 22\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/26124 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 YA\u011eMUR D\u00d6NMEZ VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/26124) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Ali Erdem \u015eAH\u0130N Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Ya\u011fmur D\u00d6NMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Ali H\u0131d\u0131r TEK\u0130N \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Enerji, Sanayi ve Maden Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 Vekili : Av. Candan DUMRUL KADIYORANO\u011eLU \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin sendika karar\u0131na istinaden kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 protesto eyleminden dolay\u0131 disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 nedeniyle sendika haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular, ba\u015fvuruya konu olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte Devlet Su \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde (DS\u0130) m\u00fctercim veya veri haz\u0131rlama kontrol i\u015fletmeni (VHK\u0130) olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular ayr\u0131ca Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikalar\u0131 Konfederasyonuna (KESK) ba\u011fl\u0131 Enerji, Sanayi ve Maden Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 (ESM) \u00fcyesidir. 3. T\u00fcrkiye, 15 Temmuz 2016 gecesi silahl\u0131 bir darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn savu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ise \u00fclke genelinde ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) ilan edilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. OHAL s\u00fcresince yirmi d\u00f6rt kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname (KHK)(667-690 say\u0131l\u0131) \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu KHK’larla genel ve soyut normlar ihdas edilerek al\u0131nan tedbirlerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda do\u011frudan etki …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n