T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
HAS\u0130NE AKY\u00dcZ VE MEHMET AR\u0130F AKY\u00dcZ BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23361)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 14\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015eehadet \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Hasine AKY\u00dcZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Mehmet Arif AKY\u00dcZ<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ali BOZAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n makul s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu Hasine Aky\u00fcz’\u00fcn o\u011flu, di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Arif Aky\u00fcz’\u00fcn ise karde\u015fi olan Y.A. uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde ticareti yapma veya sa\u011flama su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda Mersin 7. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 5\/6\/2009 tarihli karar\u0131 ile tutuklanarak Mersin E Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna konulmu\u015ftur. 9\/6\/2009 tarihinde 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Y.A.n\u0131n Pozant\u0131 M Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) nakli yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn al\u0131nan kararla B-10 No.lu odaya yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda 16\/8\/2009 tarihinde saat 08.00’de yap\u0131lan sabah say\u0131m\u0131nda B-10 No.lu ko\u011fu\u015fta bir ki\u015finin eksik oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fta tutuklu olarak bulunan M.E.Y., ak\u015fam say\u0131m\u0131ndan sonra Y.A.y\u0131 kavga ederken \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc beyan etmi\u015ftir. Y.A. yetkililerce yukar\u0131 kattaki yatakhane b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00f6l\u00fc h\u00e2lde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Pozant\u0131 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) 17\/8\/2009 tarihinde bilirki\u015fi e\u015fli\u011finde otopsi i\u015flemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f ve Adana Adli T\u0131p Grup Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Morg \u0130htisas Dairesinden 9\/12\/2009 tarihli otopsi raporu al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Otopsi raporunun sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde Y.A.n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn “k\u00fcnt toraks travmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 seri kot k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131 ile birlikte akci\u011fer yaralanmas\u0131, hemotoraks, ba\u011fla bo\u011fmaya ba\u011fl\u0131 mekanik asfiksi” sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi m\u00fctalaa edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Y.A. ile ayn\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fta kalan su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen 13 \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tefrik karar\u0131 verip ayr\u0131 soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fcten Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, Y.A.n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc olay\u0131nda kusurlar\u0131 bulundu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fi infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan 11\/9\/2009 tarihli iddianameyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Pozant\u0131 Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi iddianameyi kabul ederek infaz kurumu memurlar\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olayda kas\u0131t veya taksirlerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle beraatlerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Pozant\u0131 Sulh Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 28\/11\/2011 tarihli karara kar\u015f\u0131 kat\u0131lanlar vekili ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 devam ederken ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ba\u015fka yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla birlikte olaydan do\u011fan maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini talebiyle Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) aleyhine a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 k\u0131smen kabul edilerek sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu Hasine Aky\u00fcz lehine 24.269,22 TL maddi, 15.000 TL manevi tazminat, ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Arif Aky\u00fcz ile di\u011fer alt\u0131 davac\u0131ya ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 1.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6denmesine karar verilen toplam manevi tazminat miktar\u0131 22.000 TL’dir. Kararda davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 21\/9\/2010 tarihinden itibaren hesaplanacak yasal faiziyle birlikte davac\u0131lara \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Adana 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi 14\/12\/2012 tarihli karar gerek\u00e7esinde; Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda personel yetersizli\u011fi bulundu\u011funun bizzat kurum m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131lan yaz\u0131lardan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131lar murisinin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 B-10 ko\u011fu\u015funda \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131ndan k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre \u00f6ncesinde de tutuklular aras\u0131nda iki kez kavga ve dayak olay\u0131 oldu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi, sorumlular\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen gerekli \u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu belirtilerek dava konusu \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n meydana gelmesinde ki\u015filerin can ve mal g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flamakla sorumlu idarenin hizmet kusurunun bulundu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan karar Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onuncu Dairesince 15\/4\/2016 tarihinde onanm\u0131\u015f, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n karar d\u00fczeltme talebi de 26\/10\/2020 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Temyiz incelemesi sonucunda Yarg\u0131tay 5. Ceza Dairesi (Ceza Dairesi) 26\/5\/2014 tarihinde san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin bozulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bozma karar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esinde olaya ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 ayr\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7u dosyas\u0131n\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi dosya aras\u0131na getirilmeden ve ifadesine ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 gereken tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nmadan eksik inceleme ile karar verilmesi \u00fczerinde durulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Bozma sonras\u0131 Pozant\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada bozma ilam\u0131 do\u011frultusunda deliller dosya aras\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucu verilen kararda; olay\u0131n oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n tutulmas\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fcn\u00fcn fazla oldu\u011fu, maktul\u00fcn i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu odadan \u00e7\u0131kan seslerin idareye ula\u015fmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n \u00f6nlem ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve maktul\u00fcn bo\u011fulma sesinin san\u0131klar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yer itibar\u0131yla duyulma ihtimali olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle Kurum personelinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olayda kas\u0131t veya taksirinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilip \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan beraatlerine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Mahkemece verilen 13\/11\/2015 tarihli beraat karar\u0131 kat\u0131lanlar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. Dosya, Ceza Dairesinde olup temyiz incelemesi hen\u00fcz sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular 25\/3\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucular; yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n devletin g\u00f6zetimi ve denetimi alt\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 korumakla g\u00f6revlilerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131n ne oldu\u011funun yarg\u0131 mercilerince dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131lamaya konu ihmalin kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmenin ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla i\u015flenmesi su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eksik inceleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 (Sebebi a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.) ve delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde hata yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru formunun bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Bakanl\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n iddialar\u0131 dile getirme \u015fekli (makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret eden iddialarda bulunmalar\u0131) ve infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revlerine yap\u0131lan vurgu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu nedenlerle ba\u015fvuru, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda devlet, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in olu\u015fturulan yasal ve idari \u00e7er\u00e7evenin gere\u011fi gibi uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hakka y\u00f6nelik ihlallerin durdurulup cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak etkili bir yarg\u0131sal sistem kurmakla da y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheli her \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2012\/752, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a752, 54; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 97).<\/p>\n
17. \u00d6l\u00fcme kasten neden olunmas\u0131 veya \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu meydana gelmesi h\u00e2linde etkili yarg\u0131sal sistem kurma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 55). Bu t\u00fcr bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131 resen harekete ge\u00e7erek \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri tespit etmeli, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fctmeli, soru\u015fturma veya sonu\u00e7lar\u0131, gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131 ve me\u015fru menfaatlerini korumak i\u00e7in \u00f6len ki\u015finin yak\u0131nlar\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine gerekli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kat\u0131labilmelidir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 57, 58; Salih Akku\u015f, B. No: 2012\/1017, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 30;Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 99). Bununla birlikte etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir sonu\u00e7 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de\u011fil uygun ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi ba\u015fvuruculara \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle yarg\u0131latma ya da cezaland\u0131rma hakk\u0131 vermedi\u011fi gibi devlete t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyetle sonu\u00e7land\u0131rma \u00f6devi de y\u00fcklemez (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 56; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 98).<\/p>\n
18. Olas\u0131 cezai sorumlulu\u011fun tespiti ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonras\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f ise bu a\u015fama da Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gereklerine cevap verebilecek nitelikte olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Filiz Aka, B. No: 2013\/8365, 10\/6\/2015, \u00a7 30; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 100).<\/p>\n
19. Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler ve ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n iddialar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvuruda incelenmesi gereken mesele, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrat ve \u00f6zenle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fidir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yarg\u0131lamaya konu ihmalin kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmenin ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla i\u015flenmesi su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu iddias\u0131 bulunmaktaysa da bireylerin cezai sorumlulu\u011funa ili\u015fkin hukuki sorunlar\u0131 incelemek, bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u015f\u00fcpheli ya da san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan ki\u015filerin su\u00e7lu veya su\u00e7suz oldu\u011funakarar vermek ya da s\u00f6z konusu yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te san\u0131klara verilen cezalar\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir (Umut Tama\u00e7, B. No: 2014\/13514, 18\/7\/2018, \u00a7 98). Anayasa Mahkemesinin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131yla ilgili bir ba\u015fvuruda inceledi\u011fi husus, devletin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi kapsam\u0131ndaki sorumlulu\u011fudur (Aysel Gezer ve di\u011ferleri, 2021\/9961, 2\/11\/2023, \u00a7 147). Bu nedenle Anayasa Mahkemesinden san\u0131klara isnat edilen eylemlerin vas\u0131fland\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 yapmas\u0131 beklenmemelidir.<\/p>\n
20. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tespit ba\u015fvuruya konu olay\u0131n kendi ko\u015fullar\u0131na, soru\u015fturmadaki \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131na, su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n niteli\u011fine, olay\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k derecesine ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n ilerlemesine engel olan unsurlar ya da g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcklerin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re farkl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6sterebilecektir (Fahriye Erkek ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/4668, 16\/9\/2015, \u00a7 91).<\/p>\n
21. Somut s\u00fcre\u00e7te ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda meydana gelmi\u015f olup bu olay hakk\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma bir aydan daha k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcrede tamamlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Pozant\u0131 Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda, yakla\u015f\u0131k iki y\u0131l i\u00e7inde karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ceza Dairesinin ilk bozma karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin temyiz s\u00fcreci yakla\u015f\u0131k iki bu\u00e7uk y\u0131l s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkemece bozma sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama bir bu\u00e7uk y\u0131la yak\u0131n bir s\u00fcrede tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olup bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 kat\u0131lanlarca 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 son ay\u0131nda ikinci kez kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. Dosya, dokuz y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcredir temyiz incelemesinde olup hen\u00fcz sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvuru konusu yarg\u0131lamada ikinci kez yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesinin dokuz y\u0131ldan fazla s\u00fcrmesinin ve h\u00e2len sonu\u00e7lanmamas\u0131n\u0131n Ceza Dairesinin i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcnden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla birlikte yarg\u0131lamadaki hi\u00e7bir unsur yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bu denli uzamas\u0131n\u0131 ve hen\u00fcz sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lamamas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lmamaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle ilgili soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. Yap\u0131lan bu tespitler bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde somut olayda, soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n resen harekete ge\u00e7mesi ve gerekli t\u00fcm delilleri elde etmesi sonucu makul bir s\u00fcrede kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi\u011fi, savc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve ilk derece yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 a\u015famas\u0131nda \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm y\u00f6nlerinin ortaya konulmas\u0131na, sorumlu ki\u015filerin belirlenmesine ve cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n tan\u0131yan bir s\u00fcrecin i\u015fledi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Fakat ikinci temyiz incelemesi a\u015famas\u0131nda ya\u015fanan gecikmeler nedeniyle on be\u015f y\u0131ldan uzun s\u00fcren ve devam eden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n -yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n davan\u0131n h\u0131zla sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndaki menfaatinin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- \u00f6zelde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n, genel olarak da toplumdaki di\u011fer bireylerin hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne olan ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlere ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi ya da kay\u0131ts\u0131z kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc verilmesinin engellenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucular, ihlalin tespiti ve her biri i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 250.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
26. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara m\u00fc\u015ftereken net 225.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM <\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. 225.000 TL net manevi tazminat\u0131n ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Pozant\u0131 Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi (E.2014\/372, K.2015\/533) ile Yarg\u0131tay 5. Ceza Dairesine (E.2021\/6608) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 14\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 14\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/23361 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 HAS\u0130NE AKY\u00dcZ VE MEHMET AR\u0130F AKY\u00dcZ BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23361) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 14\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : \u015eehadet \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Hasine AKY\u00dcZ \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Mehmet Arif AKY\u00dcZ Vekili : Av. Ali BOZAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n makul s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu Hasine Aky\u00fcz’\u00fcn o\u011flu, di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Arif Aky\u00fcz’\u00fcn ise karde\u015fi olan Y.A. uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde ticareti yapma veya sa\u011flama su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda Mersin 7. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 5\/6\/2009 tarihli karar\u0131 ile tutuklanarak Mersin E Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna konulmu\u015ftur. 9\/6\/2009 tarihinde 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Y.A.n\u0131n Pozant\u0131 M Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) nakli yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn al\u0131nan kararla B-10 No.lu odaya yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda 16\/8\/2009 tarihinde saat 08.00’de yap\u0131lan sabah say\u0131m\u0131nda B-10 No.lu ko\u011fu\u015fta bir ki\u015finin eksik oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fta tutuklu olarak bulunan M.E.Y., ak\u015fam say\u0131m\u0131ndan sonra Y.A.y\u0131 kavga ederken \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc beyan …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n