T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MUHAMMED POLAT BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/29116)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammed POLAT<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Devrim \u00d6zg\u00fcr AKYOL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 m\u00fc\u015favir kadrosunda g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken milletvekili aday\u0131 olmak i\u00e7in istifa eden ba\u015fvurucunun tekrar ayn\u0131 kadroya atanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Elektrik ve elektronik m\u00fchendisi olan ba\u015fvurucu, bakanl\u0131k m\u00fc\u015faviri unvan\u0131 ile genel idare hizmetleri s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 7\/6\/2015 tarihinde yap\u0131lan 25. D\u00f6nem Milletvekili Genel Se\u00e7imi’nde milletvekili aday\u0131 olabilmek i\u00e7in istifa etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu se\u00e7imde aday g\u00f6sterilmemesi \u00fczerine Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvurarak eski g\u00f6revine iadesini talep etmi\u015f ancak farkl\u0131 bir kadro olan m\u00fchendis kadrosuna atanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan i\u015flemin iptali ve bu i\u015flem nedeniyle yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zl\u00fck haklar\u0131n\u0131n iadesi talebiyle Ankara 12. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130dare; Mahkemeye sundu\u011fu cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 m\u00fc\u015favirlik kadrolar\u0131n\u0131n 635 say\u0131l\u0131 Bilim Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fkilat ve G\u00f6revleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca istifa ile son buldu\u011funu, bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6reve geri d\u00f6nme talebinde bulundu\u011fu tarihte eski kadrosuna atanabilmesinin hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u0130dare Mahkemesi 26\/4\/1961 tarihli ve 298 say\u0131l\u0131 Se\u00e7imlerin Temel H\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve Se\u00e7men K\u00fct\u00fckleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un ek 7. maddesinin \u00f6zel ve istisnai bir d\u00fczenleme oldu\u011funu, 635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesindeki h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta uygulanma kabiliyeti bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmdeki kadronun bo\u015falmas\u0131ndan kast\u0131n devlet memurlar\u0131n\u0131n memurluktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131, memurluk niteliklerini kaybetmesi, emekliye ayr\u0131lmas\u0131, \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, ba\u015fka bir g\u00f6reve atanmas\u0131 gibi durumlar oldu\u011funu, kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin genel se\u00e7imlerde yahut mahall\u00ee idareler se\u00e7imlerinde aday aday\u0131 veya aday olmalar\u0131 amac\u0131yla g\u00f6revlerinden ayr\u0131lmalar\u0131 durumunda eski g\u00f6revleri ile ba\u011flar\u0131n\u0131n mutlak \u015fekilde kopmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, aksi bir yorumun 298 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ek 7. maddesindeki istisnai ve \u00f6zel olarak getirilmi\u015f d\u00fczenlemeyi bertaraf edece\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun atand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kadronun \u00f6nceki kadrosuna e\u015f de\u011fer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek dava konusu i\u015flemi iptal etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flem nedeniyle yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zl\u00fck ve mali haklar\u0131n\u0131n da \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 idarece yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130kinci Dairesi, se\u00e7imler nedeniyle istifa edip se\u00e7ilemeyen ba\u015fvurucunun eski g\u00f6revine d\u00f6nme talebinde bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu talebini yerine getirme konusunda daval\u0131 idarenin ba\u011fl\u0131 yetki i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funu ancak bu yetkisini kullan\u0131rken eski g\u00f6revine ili\u015fkin kadronun bo\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, 635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ilgili maddesi gere\u011fince ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bakanl\u0131k m\u00fc\u015faviri kadrosunun istifayla bo\u015fald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve iptal edildi\u011fini, bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucunun eski kadrosuna atanmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek \u0130dare Mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131 bozmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun karara y\u00f6nelik karar d\u00fczeltme istemi reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Bahsi ge\u00e7en bozma karar\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0130dare Mahkemesi, bozma karar\u0131na uyarak kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elerle davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 bu kez ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130kinci Dairesi karar\u0131 onam\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun karar d\u00fczeltme istemini de reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 3\/6\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 5\/7\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilmek i\u00e7in istifa etti\u011fi h\u00e2lde eski kadrosuna yeniden atanmamas\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma ve se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun kadrosunun istifa ile iptal oldu\u011fu, bu sebeple eski kadrosuna atanamayaca\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fahs\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ba\u015fvurucunun anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru, Anayasa’n\u0131n 67. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Kurulu, benzer nitelikteki bir \u015fik\u00e2yeti Mehmet Demircio\u011flu ([GK], B. No: 2020\/35797, 14\/9\/2023) karar\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. Kararda, idare mahkemesinin milletvekili se\u00e7imlerine kat\u0131lmak i\u00e7in istifa eden \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 kadrodaki bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin kadrosunun istifayla birlikte ask\u0131ya al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7 tart\u0131\u015fmadan kadronun do\u011frudan iptal edildi\u011fi sonucuna vard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 oysa s\u00f6z konusu kadronun -normal bir istifa bi\u00e7imi olmayan milletvekilli\u011fi i\u00e7in istifa h\u00e2linde- do\u011frudan iptal edildi\u011finin de\u011fil ge\u00e7ici s\u00fcreyle ask\u0131ya al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc h\u00e2linde bu kadronun bo\u015fald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla iptal oldu\u011fundan bahsedilemeyece\u011fini, s\u00f6z konusu kadronun bo\u015falmas\u0131n\u0131n ancak bu ki\u015finin kanuni s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yeniden g\u00f6reve ba\u015flamamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca mahkemenin \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 kadronun iptal edildi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revine d\u00f6nmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde kanuni engel bulundu\u011fu \u015feklindeki yorumunun kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorunlu oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir (Mehmet Demircio\u011flu \u00a7 34). Anayasa Mahkemesi kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tespit edilen sorunlar\u0131n yan\u0131nda se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n demokratik bir toplumda ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nem nedeniyle s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahalenin me\u015fru ama\u00e7 ve demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerini kar\u015f\u0131lay\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir (Mehmet Demircio\u011flu, \u00a7 35). Bu ba\u011flamda idarenin milletvekili olabilmek i\u00e7in istifa eden kamu g\u00f6revlilerini mutlak \u015fekilde eski kadrolar\u0131na atama zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131n kamu hizmetlerinde s\u00fcreklili\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 me\u015fru amac\u0131na hizmet etti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir (Mehmet Demircio\u011flu, \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirirken ba\u015fvurucunun memuriyet hayat\u0131n\u0131n milletvekili olabilmek i\u00e7in istifa etti\u011fi anda stat\u00fcsel anlamda kesintiye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun istifa \u00f6ncesi ve sonras\u0131 \u00f6zl\u00fck haklar\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131rf se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n durumunda beklemedi\u011fi bir k\u00f6t\u00fcle\u015fmeye yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011finin mahkemelerce ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7eyle ortaya konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun istifa \u00f6ncesindeki ve sonras\u0131ndaki stat\u00fcs\u00fc k\u0131yasland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda m\u00fcdahalenin orant\u0131l\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin yeterli gerek\u00e7eler sunulmadan eski g\u00f6revinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 imk\u00e2nlardan faydalanamamas\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131nda cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir etki olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahalenin kanunilik ve demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mamas\u0131 nedeniyle Anayasa’n\u0131n 67. maddesinde korunan se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Mehmet Demircio\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 45-51).<\/p>\n
14. Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda mahkemeler, m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan bakanl\u0131k m\u00fc\u015favirli\u011fi kadrosunun herhangi bir sebeple bo\u015falmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde hi\u00e7bir i\u015fleme gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n iptal edilece\u011fine dair h\u00fckm\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revine d\u00f6nmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde kanuni engel olu\u015fturdu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Mahkemelerin bu yorumu kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden baz\u0131 sorunlara neden olabilir (ayn\u0131 d\u00fczenlemeyi i\u00e7eren 663 say\u0131l\u0131 Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Ba\u011fl\u0131 Kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fkilat ve G\u00f6revleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin ge\u00e7ici 4. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131yla ilgili de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u00a7 12). Benzer bi\u00e7imde eldeki ba\u015fvuruda m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunlu\u011funun incelenmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da Anayasa Mahkemesinin an\u0131lan karar\u0131ndaki de\u011ferlendirmelerin (bkz. \u00a7 13) ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir. T\u00fcm bu de\u011ferlendirmelerden hareketle somut ba\u015fvuruda Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan Mehmet Demircio\u011flu karar\u0131nda var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle mahkemelerin hatal\u0131 yorumu nedeniyle kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamayan ve demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olmayan s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahale nedeniyle Anayasa’n\u0131n 67. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN ve Muhterem \u0130NCE bu sonuca kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi ve miktar belirtmeksizin maddi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi ve belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 67. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN ve Muhterem \u0130NCE’nin kar\u015f\u0131oylar\u0131 ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 12. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2019\/2455, K.2020\/362) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan 19.287,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130kinci Dairesi (E.2021\/14989) ile Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/7\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 m\u00fc\u015favir kadrosunda g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken milletvekili aday\u0131 olmak i\u00e7in istifa etti\u011fini tekrar ayn\u0131 kadroya atanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. Benzer ihlal iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak Mehmet Demircio\u011flu ([GK], B. No: 2020\/35797, 14\/9\/2023) karar\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011funluk taraf\u0131ndan Anayasa’n\u0131n 67. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015f ancak az\u0131nl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda Mehmet Demircio\u011flu karar\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131oyda belirtilen ilkelerden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda, se\u00e7ime kat\u0131lmak i\u00e7in istifa eden \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 kadrodaki bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin kadrosunun istifayla birlikte ask\u0131ya al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvuru konusu kararda yer alan \u201c\u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 kadronun iptal oldu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revine d\u00f6nmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde kanuni engel bulundu\u011fu\u201d \u015feklindeki yorumun kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorunlu oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Kararda, buradan bir ihlal karar\u0131 verilip bununla yetinilmeden, se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n demokratik bir toplumda ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6neme vurgu yap\u0131larak s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahalenin me\u015fru ama\u00e7 ve demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerini kar\u015f\u0131lay\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, bakanl\u0131k m\u00fc\u015faviri unvan\u0131 ile genel idare hizmetleri s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 7\/6\/2015 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 25. D\u00f6nem Milletvekili Genel Se\u00e7iminde milletvekili aday\u0131 olabilmek i\u00e7in istifa etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu se\u00e7imde aday olarak g\u00f6sterilmemesi \u00fczerine Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvurarak eski g\u00f6revine iadesini talep etmi\u015f ancak farkl\u0131 bir kadro olan m\u00fchendis kadrosuna atanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucunun, an\u0131lan i\u015flemin iptali ve bu i\u015flem nedeniyle yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zl\u00fck haklar\u0131n\u0131n iadesi istemiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada \u0130dare Mahkemesince dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali ile ba\u015fvurucunun yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 mali ve \u00f6zl\u00fck haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dan\u0131\u015ftay bozma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 ise davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Milletvekili aday\u0131 olmak i\u00e7in istifa eden bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin tekrar eski kadrosuna atanmamas\u0131 olgusu, kabul edilmelidir ki onun se\u00e7imlerde aday olma ya da olmama y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iradesinin olu\u015fumunda \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde etkilidir. Bu nedenle somut olayda, istifadan \u00f6nceki g\u00f6revine geri d\u00f6nme talebinde bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun eski kadrosuna atanmamas\u0131 \u015feklinde tesis edilen i\u015flem se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahaledir.<\/p>\n
9. Temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin nas\u0131l s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel bir d\u00fczenleme olan Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesine g\u00f6re; temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, sadece Anayasa’n\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplerle ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. Ayn\u0131 zamanda bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut olaydaki m\u00fcdahalenin de Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. ve 67. maddelerine g\u00f6re hakl\u0131 olabilmesi i\u00e7in kanuni bir temelinin olmas\u0131, me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
10. Olaydaki m\u00fcdahalenin, 635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan bakanl\u0131k m\u00fc\u015favirli\u011fi kadrosunun herhangi bir sebeple bo\u015falmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde hi\u00e7bir i\u015fleme gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n iptal edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm ile 298 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ek 7. maddesinde yer alan milletvekili se\u00e7ilmek i\u00e7in istifa eden kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin s\u00fcre\u00e7 sonunda g\u00f6reve geri d\u00f6nme talebinde bulunmalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde eski g\u00f6revlerine veya kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak ayl\u0131k derecelerindeki ba\u015fka bir g\u00f6reve d\u00f6nebileceklerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckme dayan\u0131larak tesis edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
11. Bu ba\u011flamda \u00f6ncelikle \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn dayanaklar\u0131ndan birisi olan \u201ckanunilik\u201d sorununun de\u011ferlendirilmesi uygun olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda tesis edilen i\u015flemin dayanaklar\u0131ndan birisini olu\u015fturan 635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131, idareye veya Mahkemelere, \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 bir kadroda g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken se\u00e7ime kat\u0131lmak i\u00e7in istifa eden \u015fahs\u0131n i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu bu kadronun, ilgili ki\u015finin se\u00e7im s\u00fcreci neticelenene kadar ask\u0131ya al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir de\u011ferlendirme yapma yetkisi vermemekte, kadronun herhangi bir sebeple bo\u015falmas\u0131 halinde hi\u00e7bir i\u015fleme gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n iptal edilmi\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla se\u00e7ime kat\u0131lmak i\u00e7in istifa eden \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 kadrodaki bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin kadrosunun istifayla birlikte ask\u0131ya al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorunlu oldu\u011funun s\u00f6ylenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
13. Me\u015fru ama\u00e7 konusuna gelince; ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda uygulanan 298 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ek 7. maddesi ve 635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, idarenin, milletvekili olabilmek i\u00e7in istifa eden kamu g\u00f6revlilerini mutlak bir \u015fekilde eski kadrolar\u0131na atama zorunlulu\u011funun bulunmamas\u0131, kamu hizmetlerinde s\u00fcreklili\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fi hususu birlikte g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde m\u00fcdahalenin me\u015fru bir amaca hizmet etti\u011fi sonucu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken mesele m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131nda uygulanan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve mahkeme kararlar\u0131 birlikte g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak ayl\u0131k derecesinin korunarak ba\u015fka bir kadroya atanmas\u0131 suretiyle se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin, onun siyasal hayata kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 engelleyici veya se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zorla\u015ft\u0131rarak etkisini ortadan kald\u0131racak mahiyette oldu\u011fu kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir.<\/p>\n
15. Sonu\u00e7 olarak zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcdahalenin se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 derecede s\u0131n\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kamu hizmetlerinin s\u00fcrekli\u011fini sa\u011flamaya y\u00f6nelik me\u015fru ama\u00e7 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda orant\u0131s\u0131z da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finden, m\u00fcdahalenin bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun oldu\u011fu ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 67. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun aksi y\u00f6ndeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/29116 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MUHAMMED POLAT BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/29116) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/7\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Muhammed POLAT Vekili : Av. Devrim \u00d6zg\u00fcr AKYOL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 m\u00fc\u015favir kadrosunda g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken milletvekili aday\u0131 olmak i\u00e7in istifa eden ba\u015fvurucunun tekrar ayn\u0131 kadroya atanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle se\u00e7ilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Elektrik ve elektronik m\u00fchendisi olan ba\u015fvurucu, bakanl\u0131k m\u00fc\u015faviri unvan\u0131 ile genel idare hizmetleri s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 7\/6\/2015 tarihinde yap\u0131lan 25. D\u00f6nem Milletvekili Genel Se\u00e7imi’nde milletvekili aday\u0131 olabilmek i\u00e7in istifa etmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu se\u00e7imde aday g\u00f6sterilmemesi \u00fczerine Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvurarak eski g\u00f6revine iadesini talep etmi\u015f ancak farkl\u0131 bir kadro olan m\u00fchendis kadrosuna atanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan i\u015flemin iptali ve bu i\u015flem nedeniyle yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zl\u00fck haklar\u0131n\u0131n iadesi talebiyle Ankara 12. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130dare; Mahkemeye sundu\u011fu cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 m\u00fc\u015favirlik kadrolar\u0131n\u0131n 635 say\u0131l\u0131 Bilim Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fkilat ve G\u00f6revleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (635 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) ge\u00e7ici …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n