T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
C\u0130HAN YILMAZ BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/8031)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Cihan YILMAZ<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Batuhan ULUERG\u00dcVEN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 6\/7\/2019 tarihinde saat 01.00 civar\u0131nda Yenimahalle \u015eehit B\u00fclent Bostano\u011flu Polis Merkezi Amirli\u011fine (Polis Merkezi) \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmak i\u00e7in gitmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Polis Merkezinde g\u00f6revli polislerin el yaz\u0131s\u0131yla yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ile ablas\u0131n\u0131n da imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u011f\u0131rarak talebinin gereklerinin yerine getirilmesini istemi\u015f; yerine getirilmedi\u011fi takdirde gere\u011fini yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine polisler taraf\u0131ndan, ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen ba\u015fvurucu (Tutana\u011f\u0131n belli bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine zarar vermemesi amac\u0131yla oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir) kademeli olarak zor kullanma yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmak suretiyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve akabinde doktor raporu al\u0131nmak \u00fczere hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. Olaylar \u00fczerine g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme, kamu g\u00f6revlisine hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun, olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 Polis Merkezinde \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucudan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olan kamu g\u00f6revlileri; \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olarak verdikleri ifadelerde ve benzer \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucunun alkoll\u00fc olarak Polis Merkezine geldi\u011fini, ba\u011f\u0131rarak ablas\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131n\u0131 gasbetti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, cep telefonunu masaya sert \u015fekilde f\u0131rlat\u0131p “Gere\u011fini yap\u0131n yoksa ben gere\u011fini yapaca\u011f\u0131m.” diyerek g\u00f6revli memurlara hitap etti\u011fini ve ayn\u0131 zamanda hakarette bulundu\u011funu, kendisine zarar vermeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Polis Merkezinden ka\u00e7mas\u0131 \u00fczerine g\u00f6revliler taraf\u0131ndan yakalanarak yere yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, orant\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde zor kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle kendisine kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve muhafaza odas\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun buradayken kafas\u0131n\u0131 duvarlara vurmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu ald\u0131r\u0131lmak \u00fczere Gazi Mustafa Kemal Devlet Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ba\u015fvurucudan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olduklar\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu 6\/7\/2019 tarihinde saat 10.43 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak al\u0131nan ifadesinde; \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmak i\u00e7in geldi\u011fi Polis Merkezinden ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011finde kamu g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan darbedildi\u011fini, ilgili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu, kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n temin edilmesi h\u00e2linde darbedildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamu g\u00f6revlilerine direnmedi\u011fini, yard\u0131m alamay\u0131nca sinirlenerek nezarethanenin duvar\u0131na tekme att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. \u0130ki polis memuru taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 tarihte d\u00fczenlenen G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc \u0130nceleme Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda “ba\u015fvurucunun polis merkezine iki kere girip \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ikinci giri\u015finden \u00f6nce bah\u00e7ede bekleme alan\u0131nda bekledi\u011fi, cep telefonu ile m\u00fcracaat masas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131nda telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi bittikten sonra memurlar ile konu\u015furken aniden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kap\u0131s\u0131na do\u011fru ko\u015ftu\u011fu, durmay\u0131nca pe\u015finden giden memurlar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyu zor kullanarak etkisiz h\u00e2le getirip kelep\u00e7eledi\u011fi, akabinde ara bekleme b\u00f6lgesi, sonras\u0131nda da nezarethaneye koyduklar\u0131, bekleme b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ve nezarethane i\u00e7erisinde darp olay\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Hastanede g\u00f6revli bir doktor taraf\u0131ndan 6\/7\/2019 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 03.20’de d\u00fczenlenen raporda ba\u015fvurucunun v\u00fccudunda “sol g\u00f6z \u00e7evresinde \u00f6dem ve ekimoz, sa\u011f temporal b\u00f6lgede 4×6 cm’lik k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k ve \u00f6dem, al\u0131n sa\u011f k\u0131s\u0131mda 3 adet 8-10cm’lik \u00e7izik tarz\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131klar, burun sa\u011f yanda 4-5 adet y\u00fczeyel \u00e7izikler, sol zigomatik kemik \u00fczerinde \u00f6dem ve ekimoz, oksipital b\u00f6lge sa\u00e7l\u0131 deride 3x3cm’lik k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, boyun sol yanda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k ve \u00e7izikler, sa\u011f kulak aurikulas\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k ve hafif \u00f6dem, sa\u011f kulak arkas\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k ve y\u00fczeyel \u00e7izikler” oldu\u011fu, kesin rapor d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucunun kulak burun bo\u011faz uzman\u0131nca muayene edilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Hastanede g\u00f6revli bir ba\u015fka doktor taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 13.46’da d\u00fczenlenen raporda ise sol g\u00f6z \u00e7evresinde 4×5 cm ebad\u0131nda hematom, sa\u011f g\u00f6z \u00e7evresinde t\u0131rnak izine benzeyen muhtelif s\u0131yr\u0131klar oldu\u011fu ifade edilerek yaralanman\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 13\/7\/2019 tarihinde Ankara Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce d\u00fczenlenen raporda yaralanman\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucudan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olan kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 adli raporlarda da kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin el ve kollar\u0131nda \u00e7izikler tarif edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Olaya ili\u015fkin olarak Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme ve hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerine ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015f, 12\/7\/2019 tarihli iddianame ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Ankara 42. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili, Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi’ne (UYAP) 5\/11\/2019 tarihinde kaydedilen dilek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesine ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetine konu etti\u011fi kamu g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma i\u015flemi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, delillerin bir an \u00f6nce toplanmas\u0131na ve kamu g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik taleplerini Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa iletmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, bu ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine konuyla ilgili derh\u00e2l soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131p ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin evrak\u0131n celbi i\u00e7in yaz\u0131\u015fma yapm\u0131\u015f; 13\/1\/2020 tarihinde Polis Merkezine m\u00fczekkere yazarak ba\u015fvurucunun kesin adli raporu ile ba\u015fvurucunun annesi ve ablas\u0131n\u0131n bilgi sahibi olarak ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. M\u00fczekkereye cevap verildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir bilgi Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k dosyas\u0131nda bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 12\/2\/2020 tarihinde \u015f\u00fcpheli polis memurlar\u0131 A.K., \u00d6.L.K., S.E. ve S.Y. hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda \u015f\u00fcpheli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ifadelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir ancak polislerin \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak ifadelerinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir bilgi UYAP’ta bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“… [\u015e]\u00fcphelilerin ifadelerinde m\u00fc\u015ftekinin karakola ba\u011f\u0131rarak giri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ailesi ile telefonda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrken k\u00fcf\u00fcrler edip ailesini tehdit etti\u011fini, bunun \u00fczerine g\u00f6revli memurlar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015fahs\u0131 sakinle\u015ftirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p kendisine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olacaklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemelerine ra\u011fmen m\u00fc\u015ftekinin agresif hareketler sergileyerek karakolda bulunan duvarlar\u0131 tekmeleyip yumruklad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kendilerine hitaben ‘a.\u0131na koyaca\u011f\u0131m, g\u00f6revinizi yap\u0131n’ \u015feklinde hakaret etti\u011fini ve buna benzer nitelikte g\u00f6revlerini yapmalar\u0131na engel oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kulland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan ettikleri, 06\/07\/2019 tarihi saat 02:30’da tutulan tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re m\u00fc\u015ftekinin polis merkezi amirli\u011fine alkoll\u00fc ve ba\u011f\u0131rarak girdi\u011fi, g\u00f6revlilere hitaben ‘orospu \u00e7ocu\u011fusunuz, anan\u0131z\u0131 s.keyim’ \u015feklinde ba\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kendisine zarar vermeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ard\u0131ndan m\u00fc\u015ftekinin muhafaza odas\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada m\u00fc\u015ftekinin kafas\u0131n\u0131 duvara vurmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair tutanak tutuldu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca m\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u015f\u00fcphelilere y\u00f6nelik eylemleri hakk\u0131nda 12\/07\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme ve hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan iddianame d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, bahse konu iddianamenin Ankara 42. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi 2019\/716 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden kovu\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin al\u0131nan raporunda; BTM ile giderilebilir nitelikte yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131, v\u00fccudunun \u00e7e\u015fitli yerlerinde k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k ve \u00e7iziklerin bulundu\u011fu, mevcut yaralanman\u0131n polise mukavemet ve ta\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131k sonucunda g\u00f6revli memurlar\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 ile olu\u015fmu\u015f olabilece\u011finin de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin yaralama kast\u0131 ile hareket ettiklerine y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir delilin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na… [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu karara itiraz etmi\u015f; itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde dosyaya kazand\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken deliller hakk\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yaralanman\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir olmas\u0131n\u0131n zor kullanma yetkisinin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fkil etmeyece\u011fini belirterek Polis Merkezinde \u00e7ekilmi\u015f foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131 dilek\u00e7esine eklemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131 Ankara 5. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 20\/8\/2020 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 11\/2\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 4\/3\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
17. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar veren Komisyon, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu; kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddet niteli\u011findeki fiillerine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit eden sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ra\u011fmen eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n yeterli gerek\u00e7e a\u00e7\u0131klanmadan reddedildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
21. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131, ki\u015fi \u00fczerindeki etkisi ne olursa olsun ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde de g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7 81).<\/p>\n
22. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla yasaklanan muamelelerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddialar, uygun delillerle desteklenmelidir. Bu delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde ise s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen delillerin iddiay\u0131 makul \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6tesinde ispat edip etmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir. Bununla birlikte yeterince ciddi, a\u00e7\u0131k ve tutarl\u0131 emareler ya da aksi ispat edilemeyen birtak\u0131m karineler de iddian\u0131n ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli kan\u0131t te\u015fkil edebilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7 95; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 83).<\/p>\n
23. Ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada yaralanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde yetkili makamlar, bu olaya ili\u015fkin tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95) zira bu t\u00fcr olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgiler \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fimindedir (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
24. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddedeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bireyin bir devlet g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten ki\u015filer olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmal\u0131, soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli ve soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 111, 112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103). Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma sonunda verilen karar, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereklili\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermelidir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fiklikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cebrail Bekta\u015f ve Y\u00fcksel \u015eahin, B. No: 2015\/4787, 25\/9\/2019, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
25. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlarda birtak\u0131m bulgulara yer verildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun da \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesinde kamu g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan darbedildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Buna ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131 olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucunun ayr\u0131 bir ba\u015fvuru yapmas\u0131n\u0131 beklemi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 6, 8, 10, 11). Soru\u015fturmada ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin evrak incelense de olay\u0131n potansiyel tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ile ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. 13\/1\/2020 tarihinde Polis Merkezine yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere ile ba\u015fvurucunun annesi ve ablas\u0131n\u0131n bilgi sahibi olarak ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 istenmi\u015f ancak bu ifadelerin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ayr\u0131ca -kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda \u015f\u00fcpheli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ifadelerinden s\u00f6z edilse de- polislerin \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak ifadelerinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir bilgi UYAP kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Son olarak kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda yaralanman\u0131n polise mukavemet ve ta\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131k sonucunda g\u00f6revli memurlar\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 ile olu\u015fabilece\u011finin de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi ifade edilse de ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan bir tutumunun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6yle bir tutumu varsa g\u00fcc\u00fcn bu tutuma nazaran orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in olay\u0131 \u00e7evreleyen maddi ko\u015fullar, inceleme yapmaya olanak verecek \u015fekilde ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 ise ihlal iddialar\u0131 ile ilgili etkili bir soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda olay\u0131 \u00e7evreleyen ko\u015fullar yeterinceayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu a\u015famada k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespit edilmesi, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve hakkaniyete uygun manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi ve belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor.No:2019\/175855) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/8031 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 C\u0130HAN YILMAZ BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/8031) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucu : Cihan YILMAZ Vekili : Av. Batuhan ULUERG\u00dcVEN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 6\/7\/2019 tarihinde saat 01.00 civar\u0131nda Yenimahalle \u015eehit B\u00fclent Bostano\u011flu Polis Merkezi Amirli\u011fine (Polis Merkezi) \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmak i\u00e7in gitmi\u015ftir. 3. Polis Merkezinde g\u00f6revli polislerin el yaz\u0131s\u0131yla yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ile ablas\u0131n\u0131n da imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u011f\u0131rarak talebinin gereklerinin yerine getirilmesini istemi\u015f; yerine getirilmedi\u011fi takdirde gere\u011fini yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine polisler taraf\u0131ndan, ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen ba\u015fvurucu (Tutana\u011f\u0131n belli bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine zarar vermemesi amac\u0131yla oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir) kademeli olarak zor kullanma yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmak suretiyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve akabinde doktor raporu al\u0131nmak \u00fczere hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 4. Olaylar \u00fczerine g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme, kamu g\u00f6revlisine hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun, olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 Polis Merkezinde \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n