T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BURHAN \u00d6ZM\u00dc\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/25022)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Burhan \u00d6ZM\u00dc\u015e<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Dilancan ATE\u015e TURGAL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumu g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sonucu meydana gelen yaralanma ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak \u0130zmir 3 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi sonras\u0131nda ko\u011fu\u015funa d\u00f6nerken telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi esnas\u0131nda sesini y\u00fckseltti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine u\u011fram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlilerin taraf\u0131ndan tutulan 1\/4\/2020 tarihli tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re saat 15.00-15.20 aras\u0131nda haftal\u0131k telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme odas\u0131na al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu, y\u00fcksek sesle konu\u015fmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00f6revli personel taraf\u0131ndan uyar\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u201cHay\u0131rd\u0131r siz kim oluyorsunuz da bana kar\u0131\u015f\u0131yorsunuz? Ben ailemle istedi\u011fim gibi konu\u015furum, siz bana kar\u0131\u015famazs\u0131n\u0131z.\u201d diyerek sald\u0131rgan bir tav\u0131rla tepki g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi bittikten sonra kendisini ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc esnada \u00fcst aramas\u0131 yapan g\u00f6revli personele \u201cBen size memur demek zorunda de\u011filim, beni uyaramazs\u0131n\u0131z.\u201d diyen ba\u015fvurucu, sakin olmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde uyar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlar\u0131na devam eden ve \u201cBen sizi tan\u0131yorum, hepinizle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fece\u011fim, bu i\u015fin d\u0131\u015far\u0131s\u0131 var.\u201d diyen ba\u015fvurucu; kendisine, \u00e7evresine ve kamu mal\u0131na zarar vermemesi i\u00e7in zor kullan\u0131larak k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli\u011fine g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130nfaz Kurumu Aile Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Merkezi doktoru taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 2\/4\/2020 tarihli adli muayene raporunda ba\u015fvurucunun sol kulak kep\u00e7esinin 2\/3\u2019l\u00fck k\u0131sm\u0131nda ekimoz (24 saat \u00f6ncesi ile uyumlu lezyon), sa\u011f diz alt\u0131nda 2×2 cm ebad\u0131nda y\u00fczeysel cilt laserasyonu oldu\u011fu, hayati tehlikesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, mevcut lezyonlar\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir d\u00fczeyde oldu\u011fu tespitleri yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Disiplin Kurulu) olay nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda bir disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015f ve 8\/4\/2020 tarihli kararla, ba\u015fvurucunun kurum g\u00f6revlilerine hakaret veya tehditte bulunma disiplin su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucuya 11 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma cezas\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Disiplin Kurulu, ba\u015fvurucunun kurallara kar\u015f\u0131 gelmek suretiyle g\u00f6revli personelin otoritesini sarsarak kurum g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmesini karar\u0131na gerek\u00e7e olarak g\u00f6stermi\u015f; kararda ayr\u0131ca kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerine g\u00f6re g\u00f6revli personelin ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 darp eylemi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun sakinle\u015fmesi i\u00e7in g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcrken direndi\u011fi, g\u00f6revli personelin m\u00fcdahalesinin zor kullanma \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda al\u0131nan adli muayene raporundaki belirlemelerin ba\u015fvurucunun etkisiz h\u00e2le getirilmesi i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale neticesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerine yer vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan karara y\u00f6nelikitiraz\u0131 kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun babas\u0131 6\/4\/2020 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucunun vekili ise 10\/4\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya \u0130nfaz Kurumunda fiziksel \u015fiddet uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla Alia\u011fa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015f ve yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir yaz\u0131yla kollu\u011fa ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve hastaneye sevkinin sa\u011flanarak rapor d\u00fczenlettirilmesi, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tespit edilmesi, olaya ili\u015fkin disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 evrak\u0131n\u0131n temin edilmesi, varsa tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun babas\u0131 ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile varsa g\u00fcvenlik kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin temin edilmesi konusunda talimat vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fteki s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesi al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu; olay g\u00fcn\u00fc telefonla konu\u015ftu\u011fu ki\u015finin babas\u0131 oldu\u011funu, babas\u0131yla konu\u015furken fark\u0131nda olmadan sesini y\u00fckseltti\u011fini, kendisini uyaran infaz koruma memuruna cevap verirken de sesinin biraz y\u00fcksek \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fini, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme sonland\u0131ktan sonra infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131rayla t\u00fcm mahpuslar\u0131 arayarak onlar\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015flar\u0131na g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini ancak kendisine \u201cSen \u015furada bekle bakal\u0131m.\u201d diyerek kenara \u00e7ektiklerini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu ifadesinin devam\u0131nda telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yaparken onu uyaran g\u00f6revli ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7evresini sard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir memurun \u201cNeden memura caz yap\u0131yorsun?\u201d diyerek \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, durumu a\u00e7\u0131klamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kendisini yere yat\u0131rarak ellerini arkadan kelep\u00e7elediklerini, tekme ve yumruk att\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bir infaz koruma memurunun bo\u011faz\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir di\u011ferinin k\u00fcfrederek elmac\u0131k kemi\u011fine yumruk att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k be\u015f on dakika kadar fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131ktan sonra kendisini s\u00fcr\u00fckleyek s\u00fcngerli odaya g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fcklerini, elleri arkadan kelep\u00e7eli olarak bu odada b\u0131rakt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, elleri \u00e7ok ac\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in be\u015f on dakika arayla \u00fc\u00e7 kez g\u00f6revlileri \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rarak kelep\u00e7elerini a\u00e7malar\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini, en sonunda g\u00f6revlilerin kelep\u00e7eleri a\u00e7arak kendisini ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fcklerini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu \u015fekilde kelep\u00e7eli olarak ne kadar s\u00fcreyle odada tutuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin net bir bilgi vermemi\u015f; ifadesinde u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 fiziksel \u015fiddetin emarelerini ko\u011fu\u015fta bulunan di\u011fer mahpuslar\u0131n g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ertesi g\u00fcn kendisini bir doktorun muayene etti\u011fini ancak v\u00fccudundaki izleri g\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen bunu rapora yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u0130nfaz Kurumu m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn kendisine uygulanan fiziksel \u015fiddete bizzat kat\u0131lmamakla beraber denetim ve g\u00f6zetim g\u00f6revini yerine getirmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. \u0130nfaz koruma memurlar\u0131 A.E. ve B.\u00c7.nin \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadeleri kolluk taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ancak olaya kar\u0131\u015fan di\u011fer infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi tan\u0131klar\u0131n pandemi ko\u015fullar\u0131 nedeniyle ifadesine ba\u015fvurulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kolluk\u00e7a tutanak tutulmu\u015ftur. A.E. ve B.\u00c7. yukar\u0131da belirtilen (bkz. \u00a7 3) tutanak do\u011frultusunda olay\u0131 anlatm\u0131\u015f; ba\u015fvurucunun sakinle\u015ftirme \u00e7abalar\u0131na direnerek sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlar sergilemeye devam etmesi \u00fczerine yere yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcrken kendisini duvarlara vurdu\u011funu, kesinlikle vurma, darp ya da benzeri bir \u015fiddet uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131nda on dakika kadar kalan ba\u015fvurucunun bir s\u00fcre sonra butona basarak sakinle\u015fti\u011fini ve \u00f6z\u00fcr diledi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeri g\u00f6steren kameralar\u0131n kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen 10\/4\/2020 tarihli G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc \u0130nceleme Tutana\u011f\u0131\u2019nda; dedekt\u00f6rle aramas\u0131 yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun konu\u015fmak i\u00e7in bekletildi\u011fi, sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlar sergilemesi \u00fczerine \u00fc\u00e7 infaz koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan zor kullan\u0131larak g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131 koridoruna g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, burada g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na girmemek i\u00e7in direnen ba\u015fvurucunun infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan odaya al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilen ve \u0130nfaz Kurumunda g\u00f6revli olan iki dijital kay\u0131t sorumlusu taraf\u0131ndan tutulan 9\/4\/2020 tarihli telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme kayd\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutanakta; ba\u015fvurucunun, babas\u0131 \u00c7.\u00d6. ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan abone ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 haftal\u0131k ankes\u00f6rl\u00fc telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda y\u00fcksek sesli konu\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle konu\u015fman\u0131n 04.27\u2019inci dakikas\u0131nda uyar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun ise g\u00f6revli memura sesini y\u00fckselterek “Sen ne diyorsun abi, ben burada ailemle konu\u015faca\u011f\u0131m sen kar\u0131\u015famazs\u0131n. Anlad\u0131n m\u0131 sen kar\u0131\u015famazs\u0131n. Kar\u0131\u015famazs\u0131n.” dedi\u011fi, sonras\u0131nda da konu\u015fmas\u0131na devam etti\u011fi tespiti yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 5\/6\/2020 tarihinde soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ve kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201c… 10\/04\/2020 tarihli g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunan g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin incelenmesi neticesinde koridorda bulunan m\u00fc\u015fteki ile memurlar\u0131n aralar\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131, ard\u0131ndan bir memurun m\u00fc\u015ftekinin boynundan tutarak bast\u0131rmak suretiyle yere yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerinde bulunan di\u011fer memurlar\u0131n da m\u00fc\u015ftekinin ayaklar\u0131n\u0131 ve ellerini kontrol alt\u0131na ald\u0131klar\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin yerde memurlardan kurtulmak i\u00e7in hareket halinde bulundu\u011fu, ard\u0131ndan memurlarca m\u00fc\u015ftekinin kollar\u0131ndan tutulmak ve kafas\u0131ndan bast\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle yar\u0131 ayakta vaziyette k\u0131smen s\u00fcr\u00fcklenerek s\u00fcngerli odaya g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, s\u00fcngerli odada \u00fcst\u00fcndeki ceketin ve \u00e7oraplar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak kelep\u00e7eli vaziyette duvara yasland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve memurlar\u0131n oday\u0131 terk etti\u011fi, koridorda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen m\u00fcdahale olay\u0131n\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k 2 dakika kadar s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve ilk m\u00fcdahale ve s\u00fcngerli odadan memurlar\u0131n ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131na kadar ge\u00e7en zaman diliminde a\u00e7\u0131k ve kay\u0131tta olan kameralarda m\u00fc\u015ftekiye y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir tekme yahut yumruk atma eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131… m\u00fc\u015ftekinin kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve doktor raporuyla \u00e7eli\u015fen \u2018yakla\u015f\u0131k 5-10 dakika kadar darp edildim, elmac\u0131k kemi\u011fine yumruk at\u0131ld\u0131\u2019 \u015feklindeki beyanlar\u0131na itibar edilmeksizin kula\u011f\u0131ndaki ve dizindeki BTM ile giderilebilir yaralanmalar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revli memurlar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi etkisiz hale getirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 esnada zor kullanma yetkisi kapsam\u0131ndaki fiilleri neticesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi… [anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.]\u201d<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucunun kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 2. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 25\/6\/2020 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 26\/6\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmesinin ard\u0131ndan 22\/7\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
14. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
15. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu 1\/4\/2020 tarihinde infaz koruma memurlar\u0131nca darbedildi\u011fini ve hakaretlere u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u0130nfaz Kurumu doktorunun muayenede fark etmesine ra\u011fmen v\u00fccudundaki iz ve emareleri rapora yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u0130nfaz Kurumu m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn fiziksel \u015fiddete bizzat kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmakla beraber gerekli denetim ve g\u00f6zetim g\u00f6revini yerine getirmedi\u011fini, gerekmedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde elleri arkadan kelep\u00e7eli olarak bir s\u00fcre s\u00fcngerli odada tutuldu\u011funu ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkisiz bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131ndan netice al\u0131namad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde adli makamlar\u0131n tespitinden ve ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
19. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi, yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75).<\/p>\n
20. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131, ki\u015fi \u00fczerindeki etkisi ne olursa olsun ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde de g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bzk. Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 81).<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla yasaklanan muamelelerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddialar, uygun delillerle desteklenmelidir. Bu delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde ise s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen delillerin iddiay\u0131 makul \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6tesinde ispat edip etmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir. Bununla birlikte yeterince ciddi, a\u00e7\u0131k ve tutarl\u0131 emareler ya da aksi ispat edilemeyen birtak\u0131m karineler de iddian\u0131n ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli kan\u0131t te\u015fkil edebilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 95; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 83).<\/p>\n
22. Ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada yaralanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde yetkili makamlar, bu olaya ili\u015fkin tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95) zira bu t\u00fcr olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgiler \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fimindedir (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerince fiziki m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011fu ve bunun neticesinde ba\u015fvurucunun yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda teredd\u00fct yoktur. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, verdi\u011fi kararda ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n zor kullanma yetkilerini yerine getirmeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana geldi\u011fini ifade ederek yaralanma olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gereken husus, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn kesin olarak gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u015fayet gerekli ise g\u00fcc\u00fcn a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan, ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla da orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7elendirilip gerek\u00e7elendirilemedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
24. 29\/3\/2020 tarihli ve 310831 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6netimi ile Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik\u2019in (Y\u00f6netmelik) 10. maddesinin (8) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re infaz ve koruma ba\u015fmemuru ile infaz ve koruma memuru, kurumun g\u00fcvenli\u011fini bozan firara te\u015febb\u00fcs, isyan, rehin alma, sald\u0131r\u0131, kanuna veya d\u00fczenlemelere dayal\u0131 bir emre kar\u015f\u0131 aktif veya pasif direnme gibi olaylar ile 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 25. maddesindeki me\u015fru savunma ve zorunluluk h\u00e2li ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kurum en \u00fcst amirinin izni ile zor kullanabilir. Acil h\u00e2llerde tehlikenin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla izin al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n da zor kullan\u0131labilir. Durum derh\u00e2l en \u00fcst amire iletilir. Zor kullanan personel gerekenden fazla kuvvet kullanamaz.<\/p>\n
25. \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen 1\/4\/2020 tarihli tutanakta ba\u015fvurucu sald\u0131rgan tav\u0131rlar sergiledi\u011finden ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine, \u00e7evresine ve kamu mal\u0131na zarar vermemesi amac\u0131yla zor kullan\u0131larak k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli\u011fine g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte tutanakta ba\u015fvurucunun sergiledi\u011fi iddia edilen sald\u0131rgan tavr\u0131n ne oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucuya kanuna veya d\u00fczenlemelere dayal\u0131 bir emir verildi\u011fi ancak ba\u015fvurucunun bu emre kar\u015f\u0131 aktif veya pasif direni\u015f sergiledi\u011fi ya da me\u015fru savunma ve zorunluluk h\u00e2li kapsam\u0131nda kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 zor kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret eden bir husustan da bahsedilmemi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 2). Bu husus 10\/4\/2020 tarihli G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc \u0130nceleme Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de ge\u00e7erlidir. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Disiplin Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan kurum g\u00f6revlilerine hakaret veya tehditte bulunma disiplin su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 11 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi ve infaz koruma g\u00f6revlilerine direndi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7undan ba\u015flat\u0131lan bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruya konu soru\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 fiziki g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fini ortaya koydu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez. Var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 dikkate al\u0131narak kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn orant\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu; v\u00fccudundaki izleri g\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen doktorun bunu rapora yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u0130nfaz Kurumu m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn kendisine uygulanan fiziksel \u015fiddete bizzat kat\u0131lmamakla beraber denetim ve g\u00f6zetim g\u00f6revini yerine getirmedi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ne var ki ba\u015fvurucuda meydana gelen yaralanman\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir (bkz. \u00a7 4). Ayr\u0131caba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131nda infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n eylemlerini kurum m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn talimat\u0131yla yapt\u0131klar\u0131na ya da kurum m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn olaydan \u00f6nceden haberdar olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucunun korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli ve makul tedbirleri almad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair hi\u00e7bir veri bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucu, elleri ile ayaklar\u0131 kelep\u00e7eli \u015fekilde s\u00fcngerli odada tutulmas\u0131ndan da yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi Cihan Ko\u00e7ak (B. No: 2014\/12302, 21\/9\/2017) ve Ahmet \u015eenol ve di\u011ferleri (B. No: 2014\/16947, 22\/2\/2018) kararlar\u0131nda ellerin ve ayaklar\u0131n kelep\u00e7eli \u015fekilde uzun bir s\u00fcre (yakla\u015f\u0131k alt\u0131 saat) tutulmaya y\u00f6nelik iddiay\u0131 incelemi\u015f ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bununla beraber ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun elleri ve ayaklar\u0131 kelep\u00e7eli \u015fekilde g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir bilgi ve belge bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki tutulma s\u00fcresi kesin olarak tespit edilemese de nispeten k\u0131sad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131na neden olan g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunu ihlal etti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yasaklanan muamelelerle ilgili \u00f6nceki de\u011ferlendirmeleri g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 muamele, insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele olarak nitelenmelidir (bahsi ge\u00e7en muamelelerle ilgili ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. S.D., \u00a7\u00a7 84-88; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, \u00a7\u00a7 90-94).<\/p>\n
29. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddedeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bireyin bir devlet g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten ki\u015filer olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmal\u0131, soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli ve soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 111, 112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103). Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma sonunda verilen karar, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereklili\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermelidir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cebrail Bekta\u015f ve Y\u00fcksel \u015eahin, B. No: 2015\/4787, 25\/9\/2019, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, su\u00e7 duyurular\u0131 \u00fczerine derh\u00e2l soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015f; kolluk g\u00f6revlilerine kollu\u011fa ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve hastaneye sevkinin sa\u011flanarak rapor d\u00fczenlettirilmesi, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tespit edilmesi, olaya ili\u015fkin disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 evrak\u0131n\u0131n temin edilmesi, varsa tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun babas\u0131 ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile varsa g\u00fcvenlik kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin temin edilmesi konusunda talimat vermi\u015ftir. Bu talimat \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucunun ve iki infaz koruma memurunun ifadesi ile ba\u015fvurucunun adli raporu al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 evrak\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun babas\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin kayd\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenlik kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri temin edilmi\u015ftir. Bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a da incelenmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte pandemi ko\u015fullar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ba\u015fka infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadesi al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu eksikli\u011fe ra\u011fmen \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlilerince haz\u0131rlanan G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc \u0130nceleme Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme kayd\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011fa dayan\u0131larak sonuca gidilmesi soru\u015fturman\u0131n fiil\u00ee ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde \u015f\u00fcphe uyand\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n zor kullanma yetkilerini yerine getirmeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana geldi\u011fini kabul etse de g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n neden gerekli oldu\u011fu ve kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuna nazaran orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
31. An\u0131lan hususlar insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterlidir.<\/p>\n
32. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE ve Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespitini, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve lehine 30.000 TL manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan ([GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
35. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda talebine ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Muhterem \u0130NCE ve Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L\u2019in kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Alia\u011fa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2020\/1836) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/9\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucu, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc s\u0131fat\u0131yla tutuldu\u011fu ceza infaz kurumu g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine u\u011framas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkememiz \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun tutumunun kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kesin olarak zorunlu k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yetkililerce yeterince ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve olay\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi esnada orada bulunan di\u011fer infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi tan\u0131klar\u0131n bilgisine ba\u015fvurulmadan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00c7o\u011funlu\u011fun bu y\u00f6ndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z gerek\u00e7eler do\u011frultusunda kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun cezaevinde telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rken y\u00fcksek sesle konu\u015fmamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde uyar\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine infaz koruma memurlar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu tart\u0131\u015fma esnas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu y\u00fcksek sesle konu\u015fmaya ve sald\u0131rgan davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunmaya devam etmi\u015ftir. Olaya ili\u015fkin kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri ve tutulmu\u015f olan tutanaktan kendi davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmek istenen ba\u015fvurucunun buna direnmesi nedeniyle infaz koruma g\u00f6revlilerince zor kullan\u0131lma zorunda kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, kollar\u0131ndan tutulmak ve kafas\u0131ndan bast\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle k\u0131smen yar\u0131 ayakta, k\u0131smen s\u00fcr\u00fcklenerek g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bu s\u0131rada hafif \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruya yans\u0131yan olgular ve Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k karar gerek\u00e7esinden anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130nfaz koruma memurlar\u0131yla s\u00f6zl\u00fc tart\u0131\u015fmaya giren ba\u015fvurucu; Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131nda bulunan mahpuslar\u0131n kendilerine ve \u00e7evrelerine zarar vermelerinin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lan ve bu amaca uygun olarak t\u00fcm duvar ve zemini yumu\u015fak malzeme kullan\u0131larak dekore edilmi\u015f s\u00fcngerli oda olarak tabir edilen bir b\u00f6lmeye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesine diren\u00e7 g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda infaz g\u00f6revlilerince zor kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir. Kurum i\u00e7inde kendine ve ba\u015fkalar\u0131na zarar verilmemesi ve disiplinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik her t\u00fcrl\u00fc tedbirin al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi konusunda \u015f\u00fcphe yoktur. Ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi diren\u00e7 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131larak ge\u00e7ici s\u00fcreli\u011fine m\u00fc\u015fahede odas\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u015feklinde uygulanan tedbir bu ba\u011flamda hakl\u0131 ve makul g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir ve zor kullanman\u0131n gerekli ve ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi kamu makamlar\u0131nca ortaya konulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. M\u00fcdahalenin gerekli ve ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz oldu\u011fu ortaya konulduktan sonra ikinci a\u015famada olay\u0131n niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re m\u00fcdahalenin orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ele al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r.\u0130nfaz koruma memurlar\u0131nca kontrol alt\u0131na al\u0131narak g\u00f6zlem odas\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesine direnen ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanma \u015fekli ve hafifli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda direncinin k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn orant\u0131s\u0131z oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu iddias\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Her ne kadar ba\u015fvurucu v\u00fccudunun bir\u00e7ok yerinden a\u011f\u0131r yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015f ise de, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda al\u0131nan sa\u011fl\u0131k raporundaki bulgular\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra incelenen kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinde de ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen m\u00fcdahalenin tamam\u0131n\u0131n iki dakika kadar s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve a\u011f\u0131r derecede olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k kanaatinden farkl\u0131 bir sonuca ula\u015fmay\u0131 gerektirecek herhangi bir delilin ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131na yans\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve infaz g\u00f6revlilerinin gereken \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcy\u00fc a\u015facak \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucuya fiziksel m\u00fcdahalelerini g\u00f6steren bir olgunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet ve delilleri tespit edilmi\u015f, \u015f\u00fcpheli infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kimli\u011fi belirlenerek savunmalar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, olayla ilgili kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri incelenmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 dosya i\u00e7ine konulmu\u015fur. Toplanan t\u00fcm deliller neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k izlenen kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinden yola \u00e7\u0131karak ba\u015fvurucunun tart\u0131\u015fma ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 infaz koruma memurlar\u0131na direndi\u011fi, bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucuya orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131larak sakinle\u015fmesi ve ba\u015fkalar\u0131na zarar vermesinin \u00f6nlenmesi i\u00e7in m\u00fc\u015fahede odas\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Bu noktada Anayasa Mahkemesinin ilgili soru\u015fturma ve yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131n\u0131n yerine ge\u00e7ecek \u015fekilde delillerin do\u011frudan de\u011ferlendirmesini yapmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olamayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmelidir. Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi, bu makamlar\u0131n maddi olaylara ili\u015fkin yapt\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmenin yerine kendi de\u011ferlendirmesini koymak de\u011fildir (H\u0131d\u0131r \u00d6zt\u00fcrk ve Dilif \u00d6zt\u00fcrk, B. No: 2013\/7832, 21\/4\/2016, \u00a7 185). Bu konuda as\u0131l sorumlu ve yetkili olanlar, ilk elden olaylar\u0131 inceleyen yetkili adli ve idari mercilerdir. Bunun aksine bir durum, ancak olaya ili\u015fkin kesin, ikna edici nitelikte bulgular\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde s\u00f6z konusu olabilir (Cemil Dan\u0131\u015fman, B. No: 2013\/6319, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7 58).<\/p>\n
8. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda meydana gelen olaya ili\u015fkin olarak soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla delillerin topland\u0131\u011f\u0131, toplanmayan herhangi bir delilden s\u00f6z edilmedi\u011fi, toplanan delillerin ilgili soru\u015fturma makam\u0131nca de\u011ferlendirmesinin yap\u0131larak bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinin etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini g\u00f6steren herhangi bir bulguya rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda korunan hakk\u0131 zedeleyecek mahiyette soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir herhangi bir bulguya rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan karara itiraz\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun bularak itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, somut ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan etkili bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahsedilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi kanaatini ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zdan, \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun aksi y\u00f6ndeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/25022 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BURHAN \u00d6ZM\u00dc\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/25022) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Burhan \u00d6ZM\u00dc\u015e Vekili : Av. Dilancan ATE\u015e TURGAL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumu g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sonucu meydana gelen yaralanma ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak \u0130zmir 3 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi sonras\u0131nda ko\u011fu\u015funa d\u00f6nerken telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi esnas\u0131nda sesini y\u00fckseltti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine u\u011fram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlilerin taraf\u0131ndan tutulan 1\/4\/2020 tarihli tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re saat 15.00-15.20 aras\u0131nda haftal\u0131k telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme odas\u0131na al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu, y\u00fcksek sesle konu\u015fmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00f6revli personel taraf\u0131ndan uyar\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u201cHay\u0131rd\u0131r siz kim oluyorsunuz da bana kar\u0131\u015f\u0131yorsunuz? Ben ailemle istedi\u011fim gibi konu\u015furum, siz bana kar\u0131\u015famazs\u0131n\u0131z.\u201d diyerek sald\u0131rgan bir tav\u0131rla tepki g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi bittikten sonra kendisini ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc esnada \u00fcst …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n