T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BURAK AKBAY VE ESTET\u0130K YAYINCILIK A.\u015e. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/109219)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ekin \u00c7ANKAL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Burak AKBAY<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Estetik Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k A.\u015e.<\/p>\n
Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u0130smail YILMAZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, bir TV program\u0131nda haklar\u0131nda sarf edilen ifadelerin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu \u015firket S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin sahibi; ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ise S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin kurucusudur.<\/p>\n
3. 11\/1\/2019 tarihinde TGRT Haber TV’de “Medya Kritik” program\u0131nda gazeteci olan C.K. ile F.U.’nun ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131ndaki ifadeleri \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Fet\u00f6 a\u011fz\u0131. S\u00f6zc\u00fc’n\u00fcn Fet\u00f6 taktik ve y\u00f6ntemleriyle… Fet\u00f6 a\u011fz\u0131 bu, fethullah\u00e7\u0131 ter\u00f6ristlerin a\u011fz\u0131. S\u00f6zc\u00fc Gazetesi fethullah\u00e7\u0131 ter\u00f6ristlerin gazetesi. Zaten patronu da yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Burak Akbay firari. Kula\u011f\u0131ndan tutup, T\u00fcrkiye’ye getirilecek. [E.A.] sana s\u00f6yl\u00fcyorum. O o\u011flun, Fet\u00f6c\u00fc o\u011flun, kula\u011f\u0131ndan tutup T\u00fcrkiye’ye getirilecek. Cezaevinde \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fcyorlar. S\u00f6zc\u00fc sana da, Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131 Yasas\u0131 devreye girdi\u011finde gazetene kayyum atand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sen de biteceksin. O y\u00fczden gazeteniz gidecek yak\u0131nda … Kurtarma \u015fanslar\u0131 yok.” <\/p>\n
4. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na zarar verildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla 60.000 TL mebla\u011f\u0131nda manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“[…] daval\u0131lar\u0131n program esnas\u0131nda davac\u0131lara ve S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesine y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6ylemi\u015f olduklar\u0131 ifadelerin \u0130stanbul 37. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2017\/34 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131 ile aralar\u0131nda davac\u0131lardan Burak Akbay’\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesi imtiyaz sahipleri, yazarlar\u0131-yay\u0131n y\u00f6netmenleri vs. \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kovu\u015fturmaya dayal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, yine davac\u0131lar Burak Akbay i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lan ifadelerin yarg\u0131lama esnas\u0131nda yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ve dosyada beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131namayan Burak Akbay hakk\u0131nda yakalama ve k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 b\u00fclten kararlar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeni ile ifade edildi\u011fi, S\u00f6zc\u00fc Gazetesi’nin sahibi, yazarlar\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 aleyhine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalara dikkat \u00e7ekmek amac\u0131yla davac\u0131lar\u0131n ele\u015ftirildi\u011fi, bu ele\u015ftiri s\u0131ras\u0131nda kullan ifadelerin gazetenin s\u00fcregelen habercilik anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 ve yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu haberler ve y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kovu\u015fturmaya dayal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ithamlar\u0131n temelsiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir kovu\u015fturmaya dayal\u0131 olarak ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla daval\u0131lar\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadeler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olgusal bir temel bulundu\u011fu, daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan gazeteci kimlikleri ile ki\u015fisel de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 da katarak ele\u015ftiri yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerin ifade edildi\u011fi, yine daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan g\u00fcncel konularla ilgili d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerin a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunlar \u00fczerine yorum yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n ve daval\u0131lar\u0131n konumlar\u0131 ve sosyal stat\u00fcleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda davac\u0131lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ele\u015ftirel s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n daha geni\u015f kapsamda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, yap\u0131lan ele\u015ftiriler sert ve a\u011f\u0131r ele\u015ftiri olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnse de toplumca tan\u0131n\u0131p bilinen bir ki\u015fi olarak kendisine y\u00f6nelik rahats\u0131z edici, sert ve a\u011f\u0131r da olsa ele\u015ftirilere davac\u0131lar\u0131n katlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, yine davac\u0131lar\u0131n bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda sahip olduklar\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r ele\u015ftiri yapma hakk\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda kendileri aleyhine yap\u0131lan bu t\u00fcr a\u011f\u0131r ele\u015ftirilere de katlanma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin bulundu\u011fu, […]”<\/p>\n
5. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucular 21\/12\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucular; mezk\u00fbr TV program\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n (FET\u00d6\/PDY) ile ili\u015fkileri oldu\u011funun iddia edildi\u011fini oysa ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc i\u00e7indeki hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131ya d\u00e2hil olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fcte yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda haklar\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada, C.K.n\u0131n ifadesinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kendilerinin Fet\u00f6c\u00fc oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fini vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular, adil yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurunun bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile daval\u0131lar\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00e7at\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Devletin, bireylerin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ile ilgili pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile di\u011fer taraf\u0131n Anayasa\u2019da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yararlanma hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir denge kurmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00c7at\u0131\u015fan bu haklar aras\u0131nda dengeleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler genel olarak \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n
i. \u0130fadelerin kim taraf\u0131ndan dile getirildi\u011fi (Nihat Zeybekci, B. No: 2015\/5633, 8\/5\/2019, \u00a7 29; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, B. No: 2014\/1577, 25\/10\/2017, \u00a7 59),<\/p>\n
ii. Hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin kim oldu\u011fu, \u00fcnl\u00fcl\u00fck d\u00fczeyi ve \u00f6nceki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 yan\u0131nda katlanmas\u0131 gereken ele\u015ftirinin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n sade bir vatanda\u015fa g\u00f6re daha geni\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin kamusal yetki kullanan bir g\u00f6revli olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmelerin bulundu\u011fu kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Ali Suat Ertosun (7), B. No: 2014\/1416, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7 36; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2018\/17635, 26\/7\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 128, 129; Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, B. No: 2012\/1184, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7 45; \u0130lhan Cihaner (2), \u00a7 82; Kadir Sa\u011fd\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2013\/6617, 8\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 60-66; hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin siyaset\u00e7i olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmelerin bulundu\u011fu kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7\u00a7 66, 67; Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2) [GK], B. No: 2013\/8503, 27\/10\/2015, \u00a7 56; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 59- 61),<\/p>\n
iii. \u0130fadelerin genel yarara ili\u015fkin bir tart\u0131\u015fmaya katk\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kamuoyu ile di\u011fer ki\u015filerin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda sahip olduklar\u0131 haklar\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7 69; \u00c7etin Do\u011fan (2) [GK], B. No: 2014\/3494, 27\/2\/2019, \u00a7 62; Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2), \u00a7 56; Kadir Sa\u011fd\u0131\u00e7, \u00a7\u00a7 60-66; \u0130lhan Cihaner (2), \u00a7\u00a7 66-73; Nihat Zeybekci, \u00a7 32),<\/p>\n
iv. Kamuyu bilgilendirme de\u011feri, toplumsal ilginin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve konunun g\u00fcncel olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Seray \u015eahiner \u00d6zkan, B. No: 2016\/6439, 9\/6\/2021, \u00a7 44; \u0130brahim Okur (2), B. No: 2018\/12363, 26\/5\/2021, \u00a7 28),<\/p>\n
v. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7inin kendisine y\u00f6neltilen ifadelere cevap verme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Temel Co\u015fkun, B. No: 2017\/1632, 29\/1\/2020, \u00a7 33; \u015eaban Sevin\u00e7 (2), B. No: 2016\/36777, 26\/5\/2021, \u00a7 42; Nihat Zeybekci, \u00a7 39),<\/p>\n
vi. \u0130fadelerin hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin hayat\u0131 \u00fczerindeki etkisi (Ali Suat Ertosun (2), B. No: 2013\/1592, 20\/5\/2015, \u00a7 33; H\u00fcseyin Kocab\u0131y\u0131k, B. No: 2020\/15593, 22\/11\/2022, \u00a7 24),<\/p>\n
vii. Hukuki yapt\u0131r\u0131ma konu edilen ifadelerin kullan\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopart\u0131l\u0131p kopart\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, \u00a7 52; Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7\u00a7 62, 63; \u00d6nder Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, B. No: 2014\/6009, 15\/2\/2017, \u00a7 45, Nihat Zeybekci, \u00a7 36),<\/p>\n
viii. Ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131r\u0131ma maruz kalma endi\u015fesinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 etki yarat\u0131p yaratmayaca\u011f\u0131 (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2), \u00a7 79; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu ve Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, B. No: 2014\/12482, 8\/5\/2019, \u00a7 46),<\/p>\n
ix. Dava konusu s\u00f6ylemlerin maddi vak\u0131alar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 veya de\u011fer yarg\u0131s\u0131 olarak nitelendirilip nitelendirilemeyece\u011fi (Durmu\u015f Fikri Sa\u011flar (2) [GK], B. No: 2017\/29735, 17\/3\/2021, \u00a7 50; Deniz Karadeniz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/18001, 6\/2\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49).<\/p>\n
10. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015fi, daval\u0131 gazetecilerin TV program\u0131ndaki ifadeleriyle ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. \u0130htilafl\u0131 ifadelerin sarf edildi\u011fi d\u00f6nemde, ba\u015fvurucular ve daval\u0131lar aras\u0131nda polemik oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Daval\u0131 gazetecinin, bu polemik kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan ceza davas\u0131n\u0131 da dikkate alarak ba\u015fvurucu gazete ve mezk\u00fbr gazetenin sahibi hakk\u0131nda birtak\u0131m de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131 ortaya koydu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Daval\u0131ya g\u00f6re, ba\u015fvurucular \u00f6teden beri sergiledikleri gazetecilik anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye hizmet etmi\u015ftir. Bu noktada \u00f6nemle alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmelidir ki Anayasa Mahkemesinin daha \u00f6nce bir\u00e7ok kez ifade etti\u011fi \u00fczere somut unsurlarla desteklenmiyorsa de\u011fer yarg\u0131s\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz olabilir (di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndan bkz. Cem Mermut, B. No: 2013\/7861, 16\/4\/2015, \u00a7 48). Somut olayda ise daval\u0131n\u0131n kaleme ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131n\u0131n ana fikri, ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015finin ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen bir davada san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu olgular\u0131ndan yola \u00e7\u0131karak, b\u00f6ylesi bir ki\u015finin yay\u0131n organ\u0131 sahibi olmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fudur.<\/p>\n
11. Yaz\u0131da kullan\u0131lan dil ve \u00fcslup muhatab\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan rahats\u0131z edici olabilir. Ancak Anayasa Mahkemesinin benimsedi\u011fi gibi demokratik bir toplumun zorunlu temellerinden olan, toplumun ilerlemesi ve bireyin \u00f6zg\u00fcveni i\u00e7in gerekli temel \u015fartlardan birini te\u015fkil eden ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, sadece kabul g\u00f6ren veya zarars\u0131z yahut kay\u0131ts\u0131zl\u0131k i\u00e7eren bilgiler ya da fikirler i\u00e7in de\u011fil ayn\u0131 zamanda k\u0131r\u0131c\u0131, \u015fok edici veya rahats\u0131z edici olanlar i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir (Emin Ayd\u0131n (2), B. No: 2013\/3178, 25\/6\/2015, \u00a7 35; Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7 52). Nitekim bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131n\u0131n demokrasi ile yak\u0131n ili\u015fkisinin do\u011fal sonucu olarak bir dereceye kadar abart\u0131ya ve provoke etmeye izin verecek \u015fekilde geni\u015f yorumlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir (Ali Suat Ertosun, B. No: 2013\/1047, 15\/4\/2015, \u00a7 66; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 102).<\/p>\n
12. Taraflar aras\u0131nda mevcut polemik de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda daval\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcyle keyf\u00ee bir ki\u015fisel sald\u0131r\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez. \u00dcstelik ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n toplumsal konumlar\u0131 gere\u011fi, kendilerini hedef ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ettikleri yaz\u0131ya cevap verme ve bu cevab\u0131 geni\u015f kitlelere ula\u015ft\u0131rma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olduklar\u0131 da g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilmemelidir. Kald\u0131 ki ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 te\u015fkil etti\u011fi \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen ifadelerin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde kayda de\u011fer somut bir etki yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir iddia da bulunmamaktad\u0131r (H\u00fcseyin Kocab\u0131y\u0131k, B. No: 2020\/15593, 22\/11\/2022, \u00a7 24).<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesinin pek \u00e7ok karar\u0131nda vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, yarg\u0131 mercilerinin bir k\u0131s\u0131tlaman\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ba\u011fda\u015f\u0131p ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda karar verirken kullan\u0131lan ifadeleri ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopartmaks\u0131z\u0131n olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnselli\u011fi i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirmeleri gerekmektedir (Cem Atmaca, B. No: 2018\/6030, 8\/9\/2021, \u00a7 37; Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, \u00a7 52; \u00d6nder Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, \u00a7 45). Somut olayda, yarg\u0131 mercilerinin Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda dengeleme \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerini olaya uygulayarak adil bir denge kurduklar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Yukar\u0131daki de\u011ferlendirmelerin tamam\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 mercilerinin farkl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 dengelerken sahip olduklar\u0131 takdir paylar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, somut olayda devletin ba\u015fvurucunun \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Zira daval\u0131n\u0131n bir gazeteci olarak TV program\u0131nda yine gazeteci olan ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda sarf etti\u011fi s\u00f6zlerin, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmemesini gerektiren herhangi bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131n mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Aksi y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirme bir temel hak olan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6z\u00fcne dokunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesince kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda bir ihlal bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k olan ba\u015fvurular a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun kabul edilebilir (Hikmet Balabano\u011flu, B. No: 2012\/1334, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 24).<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u015eeref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/109219 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BURAK AKBAY VE ESTET\u0130K YAYINCILIK A.\u015e. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/109219) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Ekin \u00c7ANKAL Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Burak AKBAY \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Estetik Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k A.\u015e. Vekilleri : Av. \u0130smail YILMAZ \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, bir TV program\u0131nda haklar\u0131nda sarf edilen ifadelerin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu \u015firket S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin sahibi; ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ise S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin kurucusudur. 3. 11\/1\/2019 tarihinde TGRT Haber TV’de “Medya Kritik” program\u0131nda gazeteci olan C.K. ile F.U.’nun ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131ndaki ifadeleri \u015f\u00f6yledir: “Fet\u00f6 a\u011fz\u0131. S\u00f6zc\u00fc’n\u00fcn Fet\u00f6 taktik ve y\u00f6ntemleriyle… Fet\u00f6 a\u011fz\u0131 bu, fethullah\u00e7\u0131 ter\u00f6ristlerin a\u011fz\u0131. S\u00f6zc\u00fc Gazetesi fethullah\u00e7\u0131 ter\u00f6ristlerin gazetesi. Zaten patronu da yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Burak Akbay firari. Kula\u011f\u0131ndan tutup, T\u00fcrkiye’ye getirilecek. [E.A.] sana s\u00f6yl\u00fcyorum. O o\u011flun, Fet\u00f6c\u00fc o\u011flun, kula\u011f\u0131ndan tutup T\u00fcrkiye’ye getirilecek. Cezaevinde \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fcyorlar. S\u00f6zc\u00fc sana da, Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131 Yasas\u0131 devreye girdi\u011finde gazetene kayyum atand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sen de biteceksin. O y\u00fczden gazeteniz gidecek yak\u0131nda … Kurtarma \u015fanslar\u0131 yok.” 4. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na zarar verildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla 60.000 …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n