T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
A.B. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23463)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Tolga BA\u015eBOZKURT<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
A.B.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumuna hediye olarak getirilen baz\u0131 s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ceza infaz kurumu idaresi taraf\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulunarak teslim edilmemesi nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru tarihinde silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak su\u00e7undan Silivri 3 No.lu L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucunun ziyaret\u00e7ileri taraf\u0131ndan “Uygulamal\u0131 Siber G\u00fcvenlik ve Hacking” ve “CCNP and CCIE Security Core (Scor 350-701)” isimli s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar ile bir k\u0131s\u0131m yay\u0131n hediye kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya teslim edilmek \u00fczere Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. S\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu E\u011fitim Kurulu (E\u011fitim Kurulu) taraf\u0131ndan incelenmi\u015ftir. E\u011fitim Kurulu, inceleme sonucunda 2\/2\/2021 tarihinde hediye kapsam\u0131nda gelen bir k\u0131s\u0131m s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya teslimine karar verilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n yukar\u0131da isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan iki s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya verilmemesine ve ziyaret\u00e7isine iade edilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu yay\u0131nlar\u0131n; bilimsel \u015fifreleme y\u00f6ntemleri i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, herhangi bir bilgisayarda bilgi toplama zararl\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fcretilmesinde kullan\u0131labilece\u011fi, baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm veya sayfalar\u0131n\u0131n ay\u0131klanarak verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun birlikte kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 di\u011fer ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyelerinin de \u00f6rg\u00fctsel haberle\u015fmelerinde kullan\u0131labilece\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde hem kurum g\u00fcvenli\u011finin hem de kamusal g\u00fcvenli\u011fin tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi \u015feklindeki temel gerek\u00e7elere dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, E\u011fitim Kurulunun karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Silivri 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (Hakimlik) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu dilek\u00e7esinde, g\u00fcvenlik m\u00fchendisi olarak \u00e7e\u015fitli projelerde g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131 belirli aral\u0131klarla yenilenen sertifika yeterlilik s\u0131navlar\u0131na \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak i\u00e7in talep etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. H\u00e2kimlik 18\/2\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7elere benzer tespitler yaparak ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetini reddetmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca H\u00e2kimlik gerek\u00e7esinde, s\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun’un 62. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda ders kitab\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, H\u00e2kimlik karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130tiraz\u0131 inceleyen Silivri A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 9\/3\/2021 tarihinde H\u00e2kimlik karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011funu belirterek itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 23\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 21\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; kriptoloji alan\u0131nda ihtisas yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7e\u015fitli projelerde g\u00fcvenlik m\u00fchendisi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ceza infaz kurumunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde bu bilgilerini unutmamak i\u00e7in ziyaret\u00e7isinden (ailesinden) istedi\u011fi “Uygulamal\u0131 Siber G\u00fcvenlik ve Hacking” ve “CCNP and CCIE Security Core (Scor 350-701)” isimli s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan kendisine verilmemesinin bilim ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, ayr\u0131ca baz\u0131 \u00fcniversitelerde s\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n konular\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren e\u011fitim ve \u00f6\u011fretim yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu do\u011frultuda e\u011fitim ve \u00f6\u011frenim hakk\u0131n\u0131n da ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 71. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurunun i\u00e7tihad\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu alana ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilerek Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc beklenmeden ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 16). Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nce verdi\u011fi bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklulara kargo yoluyla gelen ya da ziyaret\u00e7ileri arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla getirilen veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n kendi sat\u0131n ald\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00fcreli ya da s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131na kabul edilmemesini ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir (ilgili kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. \u0130brahim Kaptan (2), B. No: 2017\/30723, 12\/9\/2018, \u00a7 23; Recep Bekik ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/12936, 27\/3\/2019, \u00a7 24; Ahmet Sil ve Taner Yay, B. No: 2017\/35227, 30\/9\/2020, \u00a7 31). Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda an\u0131lan kararlardaki de\u011ferlendirmelerden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvuru, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir nedeni de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Ceza infaz kurumunda bulunan ba\u015fvurucuya hediye olarak gelen s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n teslim edilmemesinin haber veya fikir alma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahale oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullar\u0131 yerine getirmedi\u011fi m\u00fcddet\u00e7e Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinin ihlalini te\u015fkil edecektir. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cTemel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, … yaln\u0131zca Anayasan\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, … demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin … gereklerine ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.\u201d<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesi Recep Bekik ve di\u011ferleri karar\u0131nda, benzer m\u00fcdahalelerin hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 62. maddesinin kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlama \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvuruya konu yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeninin ve g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, su\u00e7un \u00f6nlemesi ve mahk\u00fbmun \u0131slah\u0131 ama\u00e7lar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruculara verilmemesi \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalelerin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi kapsam\u0131nda me\u015fru bir ama\u00e7 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Recep Bekik ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 32, 33). Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda da an\u0131lan tespitten ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu belirlemenin ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunlu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131 bir m\u00fcdahale olmas\u0131 gerekir (Bekir Co\u015fkun [GK], B. No: 2014\/12151, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 53-55; Mehmet Ali Ayd\u0131n [GK], B. No: 2013\/9343, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 70-72; Murat Karayel (5), B. No: 2013\/6223, 7\/1\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 38-41; Ferhat \u00dcst\u00fcnda\u011f, B. No: 2014\/15428, 17\/7\/2018, \u00a7 45; Cihat \u00d6zdemir, B. No: 2015\/214, 9\/5\/2018, \u00a7 21; E\u015fref Arslan, B. No: 2014\/14655, 18\/7\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 39-43).<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa Mahkemesi, ceza infaz kurumunda bulunan tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin s\u00fcreli ve s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlardan yararlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel ilke ve esaslar\u0131 Serdar G\u00fczel\u00e7ay ve di\u011ferleri ([GK], B. No: 2022\/66987, 21\/12\/2023) karar\u0131nda ortaya koymu\u015ftur. Yine s\u00fcreli veya s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken denetime ili\u015fkin ilkeler de Anayasa Mahkemesinin Halil Bay\u0131k karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu itibarla, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne gerek\u00e7esiz olarak veya Anayasa Mahkemesince ortaya konulan kriterleri (Halil Bay\u0131k, \u00a7\u00a7 28-43) kar\u015f\u0131lamayan bir gerek\u00e7e ile yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleler Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesini ihlal edecektir (Halil Bay\u0131k, \u00a7 43).<\/p>\n
19. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucunun ziyaret\u00e7isi taraf\u0131ndan getirilen “Uygulamal\u0131 Siber G\u00fcvenlik ve Hacking” ve “CCNP and CCIE Security Core (Scor 350-701)” isimli s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar E\u011fitim Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda bilimsel \u015fifreleme y\u00f6ntemleri i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, herhangi bir bilgisayar i\u00e7in bilgi toplama zararl\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fcretilmede kullan\u0131labilece\u011fi ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel haberle\u015fmede kullan\u0131labilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7eleriyle ba\u015fvurucuya verilmemi\u015f ve ziyaret\u00e7isine iade edilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Bu karara yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yeti de\u011ferlendiren \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, E\u011fitim Kurulunun gerek\u00e7elerine ek olarak s\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 62. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda ders kitab\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da belirterek itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi de karar\u0131 usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu idaresi ve yarg\u0131 mercilerinin kararlar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, s\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n kurum g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrece\u011fi ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel \u015fifreli haberle\u015fmeye neden olabilece\u011fi \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7elere dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bununla birlikte idare ve yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131, -kural olarak- bilgisayara eri\u015fimi olmayan ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yete konu yay\u0131nlar\u0131n; ceza infaz kurumunun g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrecek \u015fekilde nas\u0131l kullan\u0131labilece\u011fini, herhangi bir bilgisayar i\u00e7in bilgi toplama zararl\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcretmede nas\u0131l kullan\u0131labilece\u011fini ya da \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7i \u015fifreli haberle\u015fmede ne \u015fekilde bir kolayl\u0131k sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Nitekim ba\u015fvurucunun d\u00fczenli ya da d\u00fczensiz \u015fekilde ceza infaz kurumunda herhangi bir bilgisayara eri\u015fiminin bulundu\u011fu hem idare hem de h\u00e2kimlik karar\u0131nda belirtilmemi\u015ftir. \u00d6te yandan yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ders kitab\u0131 vasf\u0131na sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e olu\u015fturulmu\u015f olsa da ba\u015fvurucunun mesle\u011fi gere\u011fi bu yay\u0131nlara eri\u015fiminde menfaati oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddias\u0131 da \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fince yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede yeterli bir gerek\u00e7eyle kar\u015f\u0131lanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, ba\u015fvuruya konu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya verilmemesinin demokratik bir toplumda gerekli oldu\u011fu ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile g\u00f6sterilebilmi\u015f de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu ihlalin tespiti ile maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucunun ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ihlal karar\u0131 -ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e eksikli\u011fine dayal\u0131 olarak verildi\u011finden- ba\u015fvuruya konu yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya verilmesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde yorumlanamaz.<\/p>\n
26. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulundu\u011fundan karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin -Anayasa Mahkemesince ortaya konulan kriterler ve g\u00f6sterilen y\u00f6ntemle- yeniden yarg\u0131lama yapmak ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucuna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131 hakk\u0131nda yeni bir karar vermek \u00fczere Silivri 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
27. Ayr\u0131ca ihlalin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurucuya net 10.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
C. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
D. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Silivri 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2021\/423 ve K. 2021\/479) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Net 10.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 27\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 27\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/23463 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 A.B. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23463) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Tolga BA\u015eBOZKURT Ba\u015fvurucu : A.B. \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumuna hediye olarak getirilen baz\u0131 s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ceza infaz kurumu idaresi taraf\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bulunarak teslim edilmemesi nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru tarihinde silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak su\u00e7undan Silivri 3 No.lu L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucunun ziyaret\u00e7ileri taraf\u0131ndan “Uygulamal\u0131 Siber G\u00fcvenlik ve Hacking” ve “CCNP and CCIE Security Core (Scor 350-701)” isimli s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar ile bir k\u0131s\u0131m yay\u0131n hediye kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya teslim edilmek \u00fczere Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. S\u00f6z konusu s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlar Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu E\u011fitim Kurulu (E\u011fitim Kurulu) taraf\u0131ndan incelenmi\u015ftir. E\u011fitim Kurulu, inceleme sonucunda 2\/2\/2021 tarihinde hediye kapsam\u0131nda gelen bir k\u0131s\u0131m s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya teslimine karar verilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n yukar\u0131da isimleri yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan iki s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya verilmemesine ve ziyaret\u00e7isine iade edilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu yay\u0131nlar\u0131n; bilimsel …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n