T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130LYAS BA\u015eAK BA\u015eVURUSU (3)<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/24411)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130lyas BA\u015eAK<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Meral HALAT<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulan \u015f\u00fcphelinin fiziksel sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011framas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle 28\/3\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplam yedi g\u00fcn g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalan ba\u015fvurucu 3\/4\/2019 tarihinde adli kontrol karar\u0131 ile serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, 28\/3\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015eanl\u0131urfa Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131nca duvara bakt\u0131r\u0131larak uzun bir s\u00fcre ayakta bekletildikten sonra ba\u015f\u0131na siyah bir maske ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f, g\u00f6zleri ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f, elleri arkadan iple ba\u011flanarak yere diz \u00e7\u00f6kt\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015f\u0131 yere vurulmu\u015f, ayaklar\u0131 ile v\u00fccuduna basan polis memurlar\u0131 arkadan ba\u011fl\u0131 olan ellerini ters \u015fekilde yukar\u0131 \u00e7ekip fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu eylemler esnas\u0131nda hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve tehdit edildi\u011fini de ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 29\/3\/2019 tarihinde \u015eanl\u0131urfa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) iletti\u011fi dilek\u00e7e ile i\u015fkenceye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek kamu g\u00f6revlilerinden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatarak ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015f, \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f ve di\u011fer t\u00fcm adli raporlar\u0131n g\u00f6nderilmesini m\u00fczekkere yoluyla talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 28\/3\/2019 ile 3\/4\/2019 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam dokuz adli muayene raporu d\u00fczelenmi\u015f olup bu raporlardan 29\/3\/2019 tarihinde saat 17.15’te d\u00fczenlenen rapor d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki raporlarda darp ve cebir izi tarif edilmemi\u015ftir. 29\/3\/2019 tarihli adli muayene raporunda “Kuyruk sokumu ve sol k\u00fcrek kemi\u011fi k\u0131sm\u0131nda muayeneyle hassasiyeti mevcut. Akut darp izine rastlanmad\u0131.” tespitine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda \u015eanl\u0131urfa Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden al\u0131nan 29\/3\/2019 tarihli raporda “Fizik muayenesinde; T\u00fcm v\u00fccut muayenesi yap\u0131ld\u0131. Alt i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011finden genital b\u00f6lge ve gluteal b\u00f6lge de\u011ferlendirilemedi. T\u00fcm v\u00fccutta ekimoz, s\u0131yr\u0131k vb herhangi bir cilt lezyonu izlenmedi. T\u00fcm eklem hareketleri do\u011fal olarak saptand\u0131. Sol k\u00fcrek kemi\u011fi d\u0131\u015f kenar\u0131n\u0131n hizas\u0131nda koltuk alt\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131nda (arka aksiller hat \u00fczerinde) ve bel b\u00f6lgesinin alt ucunda (lumbosakral seviyede)elle muayenede lokal hassasiyet izlendi. Bu b\u00f6lgelerde de herhangi bir d\u0131\u015f bulgu saptanmad\u0131.” tespiti yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, “Ki\u015finin yap\u0131lan muayenesinde herhangi bir cilt lezyonu saptanmamakla birlikte elle muayenede sol koltuk alt\u0131 arka k\u0131s\u0131mda ve bel b\u00f6lgesi alt – orta k\u0131s\u0131m\u0131nda saptanan hassasiyet bulgular\u0131n\u0131n v\u00fccudun o b\u00f6lgesinin maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00fcnt bir travma (vurma, vurulma, d\u00fc\u015fme, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclme veya ki\u015finin iddia etti\u011fi \u00fczere lokal bask\u0131, eklemin pasif a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 gerilmesi veya harekete kar\u015f\u0131 a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 diren\u00e7 vb.) sonucunda olu\u015fabilece\u011fi” rapor edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 11\/11\/2019 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, gerek\u00e7esinde; i\u015fkence su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in sistematik ve s\u00fcreklilik arz eden eylemlerin bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesinin i\u015fkence alt\u0131nda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair soyut beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olaya ili\u015fkin kamera kayd\u0131 veya tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u015fkence yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir iz ve emarenin mevcut adli raporlarda tespit edilemedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucunun karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fince reddedilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu karar\u0131 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenip 8\/7\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu; g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc emniyet binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde polislerin fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ya\u015fananlar nedeniyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetin etkili \u015fekilde soru\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde \u00f6ncelikle olaya ili\u015fkin s\u00fcrece ve konuya ili\u015fkin insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131na yer verilmi\u015f, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ay\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren maddi ya da hukuki bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvuru k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. \u0130spat k\u00fclfetinin devlete ge\u00e7ti\u011fi durumlar\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011framalar\u0131 nedeniyle ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren ki\u015filer, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131na giren a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta bir muamele g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olabileceklerini g\u00f6steren emare ve delilleri -hakl\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7eleri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece- zaman\u0131nda yetkili makamlara sunma konusunda \u00f6zenli davranmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Olgulara dayanmayan yetersiz a\u00e7\u0131klamalar, iddialar\u0131n deliller ile desteklenmemesi hatta kimi zaman delillerin uyumsuzlu\u011fu veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yer, zaman ve di\u011fer konulardaki \u00e7eli\u015fkili ifadeler gibi hususlar k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin ger\u00e7ekli\u011fini \u015f\u00fcpheye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr. Bu durumda iddian\u0131n savunabilir oldu\u011fundan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu iddialara ili\u015fkin derh\u00e2l resm\u00ee bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklili\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemez. Kald\u0131 ki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir dayanakla birlikte yetkili merciler nezdinde dile getirmemeleri h\u00e2linde ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren ki\u015filerin etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine ili\u015fkin me\u015fru (hakl\u0131) bir beklentiye girebileceklerinin s\u00f6ylenebilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Beyza Metin, B. No: 2014\/19426, 12\/12\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 45-47).<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu; g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015f\u0131na siyah bir maske ge\u00e7irildi\u011fini, g\u00f6zlerinin ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, elleri arkadan iple ba\u011flanarak yere diz \u00e7\u00f6kt\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fckten sonra ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yere vuruldu\u011funu, ayaklar\u0131 ile v\u00fccuduna basan polis memurlar\u0131nca arkadan ba\u011fl\u0131 olan ellerinin ters \u015fekilde yukar\u0131 \u00e7ekilerek fiziksel \u015fiddet uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu eylemler s\u0131ras\u0131nda hakaret ve tehdide maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 3).<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015f\u0131n yere vurulmas\u0131, ki\u015fide fiziki bulgu olu\u015fturmas\u0131 beklenen bir eylemdir. Ne var ki g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresinde al\u0131nan toplam dokuz adli muayene raporunun hi\u00e7birinde fiziki bir bulgudan s\u00f6z edilmemi\u015f, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015eanl\u0131urfa Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 29\/3\/2019 tarihli raporda ba\u015fvurucunun t\u00fcm eklem hareketlerinin do\u011fal oldu\u011funun saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hassasiyetin bulundu\u011fu iddia edilen b\u00f6lgelerde herhangi bir d\u0131\u015f bulgu tespit edilemedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 6). Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu, mevcut olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen fiziki bulgular\u0131n adli raporlara yaz\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir iddiada bulunmam\u0131\u015f; serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan adli rapor alma \u00e7abas\u0131na girmemi\u015ftir. 29\/3\/2019 tarihinde saat 17.15\u2019te yap\u0131lan adli muayene ile \u015eanl\u0131urfa Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn yap\u0131lan muayenede tespit edilen hassasiyet, ba\u015fvurucunun fiziki \u015fiddete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n nesnel bir g\u00f6stergesi de\u011fildir. Ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131nda hakaret ve tehdit iddias\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulayan bir veri de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle somut olayda ispat k\u00fclfetinin devlete ge\u00e7medi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik iddialar\u0131n\u0131n savunulabilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131na resm\u00ee bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklili\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN ve Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN ile Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ’in kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 31\/10\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucu, 28\/3\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015eanl\u0131urfa Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131nca duvara bakt\u0131r\u0131larak uzun bir s\u00fcre ayakta bekletildikten sonra ba\u015f\u0131na siyah bir maske ge\u00e7irilip g\u00f6zlerinin ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ellerinin arkadan iple ba\u011flanarak yere diz \u00e7\u00f6kt\u00fcr\u00fclerek ba\u015f\u0131 yere vurulmu\u015f \u015fekilde ayaklar\u0131 ile v\u00fccuduna basan polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n arkadan ba\u011fl\u0131 olan ellerini ters \u015fekilde yukar\u0131 \u00e7ekip fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmak suretiyle i\u015fkence edildi\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca bu uygulamalar esnas\u0131nda hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve tehdit edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. Bir g\u00fcn sonra C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7eyle \u015fikayet\u00e7i olan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 29\/3\/2019 tarihinde saat 17.15’te d\u00fczenlenen adli muayene raporunda “Kuyruk sokumu ve sol k\u00fcrek kemi\u011fi k\u0131sm\u0131nda muayeneyle hassasiyeti mevcut. Akut darb izine rastlanmad\u0131.” tespitine yer verilmi\u015ftir. \u015eanl\u0131urfa Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden al\u0131nan 29\/3\/2019 tarihli rapordaki de\u011ferlendirmeler ise \u015f\u00f6yledir: “Fizik muayenesinde; T\u00fcm v\u00fccut muayenesi yap\u0131ld\u0131. Alt i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011finden genital b\u00f6lge ve gluteal b\u00f6lge de\u011ferlendirilemedi. T\u00fcm v\u00fccutta ekimoz, s\u0131yr\u0131k vb herhangi bir cilt lezyonu izlenmedi. T\u00fcm eklem hareketleri do\u011fal olarak saptand\u0131. Sol k\u00fcrek kemi\u011fi d\u0131\u015f kenar\u0131n\u0131n hizas\u0131nda koltuk alt\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131nda (arka aksiller hat \u00fczerinde) ve bel b\u00f6lgesinin alt ucunda (lumbosakral seviyede)elle muayenede lokal hassasiyet izlendi. Bu b\u00f6lgelerde de herhangi bir d\u0131\u015f bulgu saptanmad\u0131. Ki\u015finin yap\u0131lan muayenesinde herhangi bir cilt lezyonu saptanmamakla birlikte elle muayenede sol koltuk alt\u0131 arka k\u0131s\u0131mda ve bel b\u00f6lgesi alt – orta k\u0131s\u0131m\u0131nda saptanan hassasiyet bulgular\u0131n\u0131n v\u00fccudun o b\u00f6lgesinin maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00fcnt bir travma (vurma, vurulma, d\u00fc\u015fme, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclme veya ki\u015finin iddia etti\u011fi \u00fczere lokal bask\u0131, eklemin pasif a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 gerilmesi veya harekete kar\u015f\u0131 a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 diren\u00e7 vb.) sonucunda olu\u015fabilece\u011fi\u2026” <\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n 11\/11\/2019 tarihli kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131nda gerek\u00e7e olarak; i\u015fkence su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in sistematik ve s\u00fcreklilik arz eden eylemlerin bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesinin i\u015fkence alt\u0131nda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair soyut beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olaya ili\u015fkin kamera kayd\u0131 veya tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgusu yap\u0131lmak suretiyle i\u015fkence yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir iz ve emarenin mevcut adli raporlarda tespit edilememesi g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuran hakk\u0131nda yukarda s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen muayene raporu ile adli t\u0131p \u015fubesi raporunda \u015fikayetle uyumlu bulgulardan s\u00f6z edilmi\u015ftir. Bir g\u00fcn sonraki \u015fikayetiyle birlikte al\u0131nan adli raporlarda tespit edilen fiziksel g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bulgular kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n savunulabilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi makul bir yakla\u015f\u0131m olmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Mahkememizin ilkesel kararlar\u0131nda vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; fiziksel ve ruhsal bir sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frand\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair savunulabilir bir iddia varsa, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17\/3. maddesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki b\u00f6yle bir iddia hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmelidir. Etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sonuca ili\u015fkin olmay\u0131p s\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc niteli\u011findedir. Eylemin g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin g\u00f6revi sebebiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde devletin negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlaline y\u00f6nelik savunulabilir bir iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle ve olaya kar\u0131\u015fanlardan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir \u015fekilde ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131, soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k tutulmal\u0131, soru\u015fturma sonunda \u00e7abuk ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayan\u0131lmamal\u0131, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn ilgilinin davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle mutlak surette gerekli olan bir g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelip gelmedi\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturma makam\u0131nca de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Yine soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir (s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ilkelerin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rnek kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S\u00fcleyman Deveci,\u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2), B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
6. Yine g\u00f6zalt\u0131, tutukluluk, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck gibi bir nedenle ki\u015filerin devletin kontrol ve denetimi alt\u0131nda oldu\u011fu s\u0131radaki yaralanmalar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan devlet merciinin yaralanman\u0131n nedenine ili\u015fkin inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7e sunma ve a\u00e7\u0131klama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r (AYM S\u00fcleyman Deveci, B. No: 2013\/2017, 16.12.2015, p. 89-90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20.4.2016, p. 95). Kolluk ve savc\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemlerinde ikna edici bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 durumunda s\u00f6z konusu yaralanma dolay\u0131s\u0131yla devletin negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir (bkz. AYM Ya\u015far Cesur Kelkit, B. No: 2020\/442, 24\/5\/2023, p. 42; AYM Ali Ocak ve Saime Sebla Arcan Tatlav, B. No: 2019\/18583). Ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle a\u00e7\u0131klama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yerine getirilmedi\u011fi durumda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. De\u011ferlendirme ba\u011flam\u0131nda ilk olarak, olaydan bir g\u00fcn sonra al\u0131nan adli raporlarla uyumlu g\u00f6r\u00fcnen g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda \u015fiddet uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair savunulabilir iddiaya kar\u015f\u0131 kamu makamlar\u0131ndan g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanman\u0131n gereklili\u011fine ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca savc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131nda bu de\u011ferlendirme, i\u015fkence su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in sistematik ve belirli bir s\u00fcre devam eden eylemlerin olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden olayda i\u015fkence su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bi\u00e7iminde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu gerek\u00e7esi ba\u015fvurana bir kez \u015fiddet kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n z\u0131mnen kabul edilmesi, ancak i\u015fkence su\u00e7u unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvuran\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131yla uyumlu g\u00f6r\u00fcnen adli raporlardaki \u015fiddet bulgular\u0131na ili\u015fkin makul bir gerek\u00e7e ve a\u00e7\u0131klama sunmayan savc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kriterini kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131n\u0131n mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan rapor bulgular\u0131na yans\u0131yan eylemin di\u011fer bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi de gerekirdi. \u00d6rne\u011fin zor kullanma yetkisine ili\u015fkin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 su\u00e7u (TCK m.256) y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de bir inceleme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda Mahkememizin benzer olaylara dair verdi\u011fi kararlarda belirtildi\u011fi gibi \u015fiddet uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yerine getirilmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutuyla ihlal edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcndeyim.<\/p>\n
8. \u0130kinci olarak, bu t\u00fcr iddialarda uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilen etkili soru\u015fturma ilkelerine kar\u015f\u0131n ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k dosyada mevcut rapor bulgular\u0131n\u0131 dikkate almam\u0131\u015f, tan\u0131k ya da \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla kurum personelinin ifadesine ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi olaya ili\u015fkin bir kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair de bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015eanl\u0131urfa Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde kay\u0131t yapan kameralar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve olaya ili\u015fkin bilgi sahibi olma ihtimali olan g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131n maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 ad\u0131na kritik \u00f6nemde oldu\u011fu izahtan varestedir. Bu eksiklikler, soru\u015fturma makam\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6stermesi gereken \u00f6zen y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olumsuz bir izlenime neden olmakta ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 bir \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere fiziksel m\u00fcdahaleye ili\u015fkin ikna edici mahiyette olan genel adli muayene raporu ve adli t\u0131p raporu soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na girmi\u015fken Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a olaya ili\u015fkin kamera kayd\u0131 ya da olaya dair bilgi sahibi bir tan\u0131k olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n i\u015fkence yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir iz ve emarenin ve tan\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bi\u00e7imindeki soyut gerek\u00e7eyle karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karardaki bu \u00f6zensiz yakla\u015f\u0131m savunulabilir k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturulmamas\u0131na ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin usul boyutuyla ihlal edilmesine yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
\u00a0Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. G\u00f6zalt\u0131ndayken k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kal\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetin etkili \u015fekilde soru\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda Mahkeme \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine dair iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk nedeniyle kabul edilemez bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u015feklindeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
2. Karardaki olay ve olgular k\u0131sm\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru ile ilgili yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda da g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi \u00fczere 28\/3\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015eanl\u0131urfa Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131nca i\u015fkenceye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ba\u015fvurucu 29\/3\/2019 tarihinde \u015eanl\u0131urfa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) iletti\u011fi dilek\u00e7e ile kamu g\u00f6revlilerinden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Hakk\u0131nda 28\/3\/2019 ile 3\/4\/2019 tarihleri aras\u0131nda toplam dokuz adli muayene raporu d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup bu raporlardan 29\/3\/2019 tarihinde saat 17.15’te d\u00fczenlenen rapor d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda di\u011fer raporlarda darp ve cebir izi tarif edilmemi\u015ftir. Cebir izi tarifine yer verilen bahse konu adli muayene raporunda “Kuyruk sokumu ve sol k\u00fcrek kemi\u011fi k\u0131sm\u0131nda muayeneyle hassasiyeti mevcut. Akut darb izine rastlanmad\u0131.” tespiti yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Yine y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan \u015eanl\u0131urfa Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden al\u0131nan 29\/3\/2019 tarihli raporda “Fizik muayenesinde; T\u00fcm v\u00fccut muayenesi yap\u0131ld\u0131. Alt i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011finden genital b\u00f6lge ve gluteal b\u00f6lge de\u011ferlendirilemedi. T\u00fcm v\u00fccutta ekimoz, s\u0131yr\u0131k vb herhangi bir cilt lezyonu izlenmedi. T\u00fcm eklem hareketleri do\u011fal olarak saptand\u0131. Sol k\u00fcrek kemi\u011fi d\u0131\u015f kenar\u0131n\u0131n hizas\u0131nda koltuk alt\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131nda (arka aksiller hat \u00fczerinde) ve bel b\u00f6lgesinin alt ucunda (lumbosakral seviyede)elle muayenede lokal hassasiyet izlendi. Bu b\u00f6lgelerde de herhangi bir d\u0131\u015f bulgu saptanmad\u0131.” tespiti yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, “Ki\u015finin yap\u0131lan muayenesinde herhangi bir cilt lezyonu saptanmamakla birlikte elle muayenede sol koltuk alt\u0131 arka k\u0131s\u0131mda ve bel b\u00f6lgesi alt – orta k\u0131s\u0131m\u0131nda saptanan hassasiyet bulgular\u0131n\u0131n v\u00fccudun o b\u00f6lgesinin maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00fcnt bir travma (vurma, vurulma, d\u00fc\u015fme, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclme veya ki\u015finin iddia etti\u011fi \u00fczere lokal bask\u0131, eklemin pasif a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 gerilmesi veya harekete kar\u015f\u0131 a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 diren\u00e7 vb.) sonucunda olu\u015fabilece\u011fi” de\u011ferlendirmesine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Bununla birlikte Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturmay\u0131 i\u015fkence su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in sistematik ve s\u00fcreklilik arz eden eylemlerin bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesinin i\u015fkence alt\u0131nda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair soyut beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olaya ili\u015fkin kamera kayd\u0131 veya tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgusu yap\u0131lmak suretiyle i\u015fkence yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir iz ve emarenin mevcut adli raporlarda tespit edilememesi gerek\u00e7esiyle 11\/11\/2019 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar\u0131 ile sonu\u00e7land\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc emniyet binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde polislerin fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ya\u015fananlar nedeniyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetin etkili \u015fekilde soru\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ba\u015fvurusunda Anayasa Mahkemesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda savunulabilir nitelikteki ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n etkili bi\u00e7imde soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine y\u00f6nelik yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 \u00f6nemli bir g\u00fcvence niteli\u011findedir. Anayasa Mahkemesi k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele ile ilgili ihlal iddialar\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda bunlar\u0131 etkili bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalarla inceleyip sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmaya y\u00f6nelik yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 bug\u00fcne kadarki i\u00e7tihad\u0131nda uygulamaya \u00f6zen g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n
7. Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6re bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te bireyin, bir devlet g\u00f6revlisi taraf\u0131ndan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesini ihlal eder bi\u00e7imde bir muameleye tabi tutuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddias\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 halinde, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi, \u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddedeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda etkili resmi bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir. Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bu soru\u015fturma, sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini ve cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamaya elveri\u015fli olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda bazen tek ba\u015f\u0131na soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 yahut da yeterli soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 da k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele te\u015fkil edebilmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, \u015fartlar ne olursa olsun, yetkililer resmi \u015fik\u00e2yet yap\u0131l\u0131r yap\u0131lmaz harekete ge\u00e7melidirler. \u015eik\u00e2yet yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile i\u015fkence veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren yeterli kesin belirtiler oldu\u011funda soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 sa\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda soru\u015fturman\u0131n derhal ba\u015flamas\u0131, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bi\u00e7imde, kamu denetimine tabi olarak \u00f6zenli ve s\u00fcratli y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi ve bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak etkili olmas\u0131 gerekir. Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmalar\u0131, sorumlular\u0131n tespitine ve cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na imk\u00e2n verecek \u015fekilde etkili ve yeterli olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili ve yeterli oldu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edebilmek i\u00e7in soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n resen harekete ge\u00e7erek olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n tespitine yarayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri toplamalar\u0131 gerekir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddialar\u0131n\u0131n gerektirdi\u011fi soru\u015fturma ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir \u015fekilde, h\u0131zl\u0131 ve derinlikli y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmelidir. Yetkililer, olay ve olgular\u0131 ciddiyetle \u00f6\u011frenmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ve soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak ya da kararlar\u0131n\u0131 temellendirmek i\u00e7in \u00e7abuk ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131rlar. (Bkz.: Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103).<\/p>\n
8. Somut ba\u015fvuruya konu olaya ili\u015fkin al\u0131nan adli muayene raporundaki tespitlere ra\u011fmen \u00e7o\u011funluk karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik b\u00fct\u00fcn iddialar\u0131n\u0131n savunulabilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131na resm\u00ee bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklili\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi \u015feklindeki de\u011ferlendirmesinin (\u00a7 14) Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu ile ilgili yukar\u0131da s\u0131ralanan g\u00fcvenceleri tamamen anlams\u0131z k\u0131lacak bir yakla\u015f\u0131m oldu\u011funu ifade etmek gerekir.<\/p>\n
9. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ihlal iddialar\u0131 ile ilgili ba\u015fvurularda Mahkememizin arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu standard\u0131 ortaya koymayan ba\u015fvurularda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlaline karar verilmesi gerekmektedir. Mahkememizin bu yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ortada iken \u00e7o\u011funluk karar\u0131 bununla a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a \u00e7eli\u015fmektedir.<\/p>\n
10. Zira somut ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesinin i\u015fkence alt\u0131nda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair soyut beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olaya ili\u015fkin kamera kayd\u0131 veya tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgusu yap\u0131lmak suretiyle i\u015fkence yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir iz ve emarenin mevcut adli raporlarda tespit edilememesinden hareketle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermesine ra\u011fmen tan\u0131k ya da \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla herhangi bir kurum personelinin ifadesine ba\u015fvurmam\u0131\u015f ve olaya ili\u015fkin bir kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daha da \u00f6nemlisi s\u00fcre\u00e7te al\u0131nan ve soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na girmi\u015f olan iki raporda lokal hassasiyete yer verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu minvalde Savc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131nda bu konuya ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme yer almamaktad\u0131r. Oysa bu bi\u00e7imdeki iki adli raporun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumunda soru\u015fturman\u0131n daha titiz bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclerek bu iddialar\u0131n Savc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 \u00f6nem arz etmektedir.<\/p>\n
11. \u00d6te yandan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, i\u015fkence su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in sistematik ve s\u00fcreklilik arz eden eylemlerin olmas\u0131 gerekirken olayda bu su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu g\u00f6sterilemedi\u011fini belirterek sadece i\u015fkence su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir inceleme yapm\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda yer alan sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun olaya ili\u015fkin anlat\u0131m\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015fkence seviyesine ula\u015fmasa da ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7un olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu da etkili soru\u015fturma bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli bir eksiklik olarak g\u00f6ze \u00e7arpmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Sonu\u00e7 olarak yukar\u0131da s\u0131ralanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk nedeniyle kabul edilemez bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u015feklindeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00a0Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 31\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/24411 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130LYAS BA\u015eAK BA\u015eVURUSU (3) (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/24411) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130lyas BA\u015eAK Vekili : Av. Meral HALAT \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulan \u015f\u00fcphelinin fiziksel sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011framas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle 28\/3\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplam yedi g\u00fcn g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalan ba\u015fvurucu 3\/4\/2019 tarihinde adli kontrol karar\u0131 ile serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, 28\/3\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015eanl\u0131urfa Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131nca duvara bakt\u0131r\u0131larak uzun bir s\u00fcre ayakta bekletildikten sonra ba\u015f\u0131na siyah bir maske ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f, g\u00f6zleri ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f, elleri arkadan iple ba\u011flanarak yere diz \u00e7\u00f6kt\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015f\u0131 yere vurulmu\u015f, ayaklar\u0131 ile v\u00fccuduna basan polis memurlar\u0131 arkadan ba\u011fl\u0131 olan ellerini ters \u015fekilde yukar\u0131 \u00e7ekip fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu eylemler esnas\u0131nda hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve tehdit edildi\u011fini de ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n