T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MUAZZEZ ERDO\u011eAN VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (2)<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/32990)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi:31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Volkan \u00c7AKMAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Muazzez ERDO\u011eAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Ruken ERDO\u011eAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. Yunus ERDO\u011eAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
4. Yusuf ERDO\u011eAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Abdulhekim G\u0130DER<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, 6-7 Ekim olaylar\u0131nda g\u00f6stericiler aras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmada meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 temelinde a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ve ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n murisi M.E. 7\/10\/2014 tarihinde Siirt’in Kurtalan il\u00e7esinde meydana gelen, DAE\u015e ve PYD mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n\/sempatizanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin de m\u00fcdahale etti\u011fi olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131t grupta yer alan ki\u015filerin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ate\u015f sonucu hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 temelinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 Siirt \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 9\/12\/2015 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, ki\u015filerin kendi kusuru ile sebebiyet verdi\u011fi zararlar\u0131n idarece tazmininin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olayda M.E.nin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131 ve g\u00f6stericiler ile beraber hareket etti\u011fi, kamu mal\u0131na zarar verdi\u011fi, ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n can g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, bu sebeple idari eylem ile zarar aras\u0131nda illiyet ba\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tazminat sorumlulu\u011fu olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ret h\u00fckm\u00fc gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ret h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik istinaf talebi 27\/12\/2018 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015f, istinaf talebinin reddi karar\u0131 Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onuncu Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan 9\/6\/2020 tarihinde onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular nihai karar\u0131 10\/9\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmelerinin ard\u0131ndan 8\/10\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemelerinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
A. Ya\u015fam Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucular, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilkeleri soyut olarak k\u0131saca belirtmek suretiyle herhangi bir sebep, somut olay ba\u011flam\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir husus belirtmeden, koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn neden ihlal edildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klamadan ya\u015fam\u0131 koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; somut s\u00fcre\u00e7, ilgili mevzuat ve insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 aktar\u0131larak adli makamlar\u0131n ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken bu hususlar\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi beyan edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda karma\u015f\u0131k veya zorlama \u015fik\u00e2yetler, kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011findeki \u015fik\u00e2yetler, ba\u015fvurucunun ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 temellendiremedi\u011fi \u015fik\u00e2yetler ile temel haklara y\u00f6nelik bir ihlalin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k olan \u015fik\u00e2yetler a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun kabul edilebilir. Anayasa Mahkemesi ancak temellendirilmi\u015f bir bireysel ba\u015fvuruyu inceler. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetlerini hem maddi hem de hukuki olarak temellendirme zorunlulu\u011fu vard\u0131r. Maddi dayanaklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fik\u00e2yetlerine konu temel olay ve olgular\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamak, bunlara ili\u015fkin delilleri Anayasa Mahkemesine sunmak, hukuki dayanak y\u00f6n\u00fcnden y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ise bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerden hangisinin hangi nedenle ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00f6z\u00fc itibar\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klamakt\u0131r. Nitekim 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na ilave olarak Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 59. maddesinde de ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda \u015fik\u00e2yetin maddi ve hukuki temellerine ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde yer vermesi gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015f, b\u00f6ylece ba\u015fvuru ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirli\u011fi kuvvetlendirilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesinde Anayasa Mahkemesi, kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc eylem ve i\u015flemleri ile mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’ya uygunlu\u011funun ve m\u00fcdahale gerek\u00e7elerinin denetimini kendili\u011finden yapmaz. Anayasa Mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yerine ge\u00e7erek ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7elendirme, olay ve olgular\u0131 ortaya koyma, delil toplama g\u00f6rev ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yoktur. S\u00f6z konusu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler ba\u015fvuruculara aittir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n an\u0131lan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklere uymamalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde \u015fik\u00e2yetlerini temellendiremedikleri i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurular\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun bulunabilir(Sabah Y\u0131ld\u0131z\u0131 Radyo ve Televizyon Yay\u0131n \u0130leti\u015fim Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi [GK], B. No: 2014\/12727, 25\/5\/2017; Aynur T\u00fcley ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/14338, 3\/3\/2022).<\/p>\n
9. Anayasa Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7elendirme, olay ve olgular\u0131 ortaya koyma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ili\u015fkin temellendirme olgusuna dair incelemeyi her ba\u015fvurunun kendi somut ko\u015fullar\u0131nda yapar. Somut s\u00fcrece bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131 6-7 Ekim olaylar\u0131nda soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kan kar\u015f\u0131t gruplar\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 esnas\u0131nda ate\u015fli silah yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn kamu g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yani kollu\u011fun g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir iddias\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi somut olayda bu y\u00f6nde (\u00f6ld\u00fcrme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde) bir veri de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ya\u015fam\u0131 koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise ba\u015fvurucular soyut olarak koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair ilkeleri k\u0131saca belirtmi\u015f; somut olayla ilgili herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klama, gerek\u00e7elendirme, \u00f6zelle\u015ftirme yapmadan ihlal iddias\u0131nda bulunmu\u015ftur. H\u00e2lbuki somut vakan\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 (kar\u015f\u0131t g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler, sivil vatanda\u015f ve kollu\u011fun d\u00e2hil oldu\u011fu vaka) d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi gereken M.E.nin ya\u015fam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik riske ve risk olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen kamunun ihmal g\u00f6sterdi\u011fine ili\u015fkin arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n nas\u0131l form\u00fcle edildi\u011fi (husumetli birisi oldu\u011fu, bu husumetin kamu makamlar\u0131nca bilindi\u011fi, bilinmesi gerekti\u011fi, kollu\u011fun yetersiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 vs.) kritik \u00f6nemdedir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucular koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn neden, nas\u0131l ihlal edildi\u011fine dair bilgi (\u00f6rne\u011fin g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma\/g\u00f6steri i\u00e7in tedbir almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yeterli g\u00fcvenlik personeli ile olaya m\u00fcdahale edilmedi\u011fi, \u00e7at\u0131\u015fman\u0131n \u00f6nceden bilinmesine kar\u015f\u0131n hareketsiz kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya asl\u0131nda M.E.nin \u00e7at\u0131\u015fan gruplarla ilintisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin sivil halk\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fman\u0131n etkilerinden korumak i\u00e7in yeterli organizasyonu sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da M.E.nin daha \u00f6nceden ideoloji vs. sebeplerle husumetli oldu\u011fu birinin bulunmas\u0131na ve bunun kamu makamlar\u0131nca bilinmesine kar\u015f\u0131n durumun dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vb.) vermemi\u015f olup \u015fik\u00e2yetlerini somutla\u015ft\u0131rmam\u0131\u015f, gerek\u00e7elendirmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi kendili\u011finden inceleme yapamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in yukar\u0131da aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, gerek\u00e7elendirilmesi, olgusal olarak koruma y\u00fck\u00fcm\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn neden, nas\u0131l ihlal edildi\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131, bu hususlar\u0131n somut olay ve olgular ile desteklenmesi gerekir. Fakat ba\u015fvuru formunda s\u00f6z konusu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fck yerine getirilmemi\u015f, sonu\u00e7 itibar\u0131yla ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ihlal iddias\u0131 temellendirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131 Kapsam\u0131nda Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucular tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k be\u015f y\u0131lda kesin sonuca ba\u011flanmas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde somut s\u00fcre\u00e7, ilgili mevzuat ve insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 aktar\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken bu hususlar\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi beyan edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Veysi Ado ([GK] B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede Anayasa Mahkemesi 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe g\u00f6re 9\/3\/2023 tarihi (bu tarih d\u00e2hil) itibar\u0131yla derdest olan, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 neticesine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Somut ba\u015fvuruda an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik nedenleri incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucular tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesi temelinde anayasal haklar\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; somut s\u00fcre\u00e7, ilgili mevzuat ve insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 aktar\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken bu hususlar\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi beyan edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 148. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda kanun yolunda g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken hususlara ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin bireysel ba\u015fvuruda incelenemeyece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda ilke olarak mahkemeler \u00f6n\u00fcnde dava konusu yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f maddi olay ve olgular\u0131n kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131, delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi, hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131 ve uygulanmas\u0131 ile uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kla ilgili var\u0131lan sonucun adil olup olmamas\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru konusu olamaz. Ancak bireysel ba\u015fvuru kapsam\u0131ndaki hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil eden, bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyf\u00eelik i\u00e7eren tespit ve sonu\u00e7lar bu kapsamda de\u011fildir (Ahmet Sa\u011flam, B. No: 2013\/3351, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 42).<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup kararda bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyf\u00eelik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir..<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA, <\/p>\n
3. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA, <\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 31\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 31\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/32990 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MUAZZEZ ERDO\u011eAN VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (2) (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/32990) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi:31\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Volkan \u00c7AKMAK Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Muazzez ERDO\u011eAN \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Ruken ERDO\u011eAN \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Yunus ERDO\u011eAN \u00a0 \u00a0 4. Yusuf ERDO\u011eAN Ba\u015fvurucular Vekili : Av. Abdulhekim G\u0130DER \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, 6-7 Ekim olaylar\u0131nda g\u00f6stericiler aras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmada meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 temelinde a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ve ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n murisi M.E. 7\/10\/2014 tarihinde Siirt’in Kurtalan il\u00e7esinde meydana gelen, DAE\u015e ve PYD mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n\/sempatizanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin de m\u00fcdahale etti\u011fi olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131t grupta yer alan ki\u015filerin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ate\u015f sonucu hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 temelinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 Siirt \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 9\/12\/2015 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, ki\u015filerin kendi kusuru ile sebebiyet verdi\u011fi zararlar\u0131n idarece tazmininin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olayda M.E.nin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131 ve g\u00f6stericiler ile beraber hareket etti\u011fi, kamu mal\u0131na zarar verdi\u011fi, ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n can g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, bu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n